Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Green Impacts of Public Transportation on our Communities Help Florida Turn the Corner with Transit.
Advertisements

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan February 2010 presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation and Cambridge.
KEEP MOVING TO KEEP AHEAD MAY MnDOT Vision and Mission Vision: Transportation leader, committed to upholding public needs and collaboration with.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Keep Moving to Keep Ahead / INVESTING IN TRANSPORTATION FOR THE NEXT 20 YEARS Recommendations from the Minnesota Transportation Finance Advisory Committee.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
First Statewide Comprehensive Rail Plan for MN Commissioned by 2008 Legislature Compliant with 2008 PRIIA Federal Rules 6 Months to prepare, 10 Months.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Current as of: Feb.06, New Economic Recovery Package: Not the Cure Federal government is working on a one-time economic recovery package Package.
The Way Forward – A 21 st –Century Transportation Plan Frank DePaola, P.E. Administrator, Highway Division April 2013 Massachusetts Department of Transportation.
Highway Improvement Program Funding Status With ARRA Rhode Island Department of Transportation April 8, 2010.
City Transportation Funding Overview House Transportation Committee January 13, 2004 Ashley Probart AWC Transportation Coordinator.
I-94 West Corridor Reference Map To Brainerd Lakes Region St. Cloud Urbanized Area 111, Census Twin Cities Urbanized Area 2.7 Million 2010 Census.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
Barbara Ivanov Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Freight Systems Division Director Washington State Freight Mobility Plan Truck Freight.
International Partnership Meeting Thursday, January 17, 2013 Washington D.C. 1.
The Impacts of Regional Transit Investment: Research, Results and Legislative Action Thursday, March 21, 2013 Charles A. Zelle, Transportation Commissioner.
Senate Transportation Committee Wednesday, February 6, 2013 Charles A. Zelle, Transportation Commissioner 1.
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014.
Juva Barber Executive Director. What is KBT? Kentuckians for Better Transportation educates and advocates for all modes of transportation to promote a.
The Looming Transportation Crisis May 2008 T he L ooming T ransportation C risis.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation February 18, 2014.
Patrick Weidemann Ryan Wilson, P.E., AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference March 5, 2013.
VTrans2040 VTrans Multimodal Transportation Plan (VMTP) Blueprint for Livable Communities - Citizen Advisory Group Henrico, VA July 17, 2015 Kelli Nash.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
The Transportation Funding Gap This is what you have heard.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Sue Mulvihill, Deputy Commissioner & Chief Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
OREGON ECONOMIC & BRIDGE OPTIONS STUDY The problem is not just the bridges, or the freight system, It is about Oregon’s economy and quality of life. FHWA.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
Authorization of a New Federal Transportation Program AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley Subcommittee on Design Albuquerque, New Mexico July 15, 2008.
Session 2 Introduction to Pavement Preventive Maintenance Concepts.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
AT THE CROSSROADS Building for the Next Generation Council of State Governments May 30, 2008 Lexington, Kentucky.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
1 Houston Economic Club May 18, 2009 Matthew K. Rose Chairman, President and CEO Transportation for Tomorrow.
Keeping Texas in Business. Texas has a long legacy of good roads Symbol of our economic prosperity, attracting jobs and people to the State In part, our.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
In Numbers Strength COLORADO TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009 Mn/DOT Performance Management - Setting our Direction.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Review and Comment on Draft 2009 Ten-Year State Highway Operation and Protection Plan Presented to California Transportation Commission February
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
Minnesota’s Municipal Transportation System
Southern California Transportation Outlook to the year 2040
Transportation Funding
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
Critical Commerce Corridors
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
Presentation transcript:

Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation

2

3 Moving goods ▪ Value of freight moved in MN $1 trillion ▪ Rail carries 240 million tons of freight ▪ MN handles 480,000 tons of air cargo annually Connecting us to recreation ▪ ~8 million people visit MN state parks annually ▪ 40 million annual visitors to MOA Getting us to work and school ▪ Average Minnesota drives 15,000 miles a year

 50% state highway pavements over 50 years old  35% of MnDOT bridges over 50 years old  Almost 9% of bridges structurally deficient  MN 9 th most extreme temperature variations in the nation  Overall, state highway pavements rank 38 th in the nation 4

5 Purchasing power declined 30% since 1988 (despite ’08 gas tax increase) Half the ‘08 gas tax increase was dedicated to debt service

6

7  Under MnSHIP, the 20-year spending plan, pavement will worsen by 55% through 2024 and then gets even worse  Interrupted service results in millions lost per day, to business  Congestion may increase 30% per person  Infrastructure repair dominates funding outlook – new projects less likely

8  Identified Minnesota’s transportation funding needs the next 20 years  Needs outpace revenue projections  Identified $50B in investments over the next 20 years, all modes, to create economically competitive system  For roads and bridges alone there is a $12B funding gap

 Status quo: No new funding or investments  Maintain performance: An additional $5B in funding to maintain system performance at current levels  Economically competitive: To serve a 21 st century economy, TFAC recommended an additional $12B over current levels 9

Metro Area Multimodal Vision 10

 What’s the ROI for maintaining the current performance?  What’s the ROI for spending more on improvements to help become more economically competitive?  Which kinds of projects offer the highest ROI? 11

 $5B invested over 20 years to maintain current performance delivers $10B - $23B in benefits (ROI 3.1)  Additional $7B over 20 years (achieve world-class system) gains $15B - $19B in benefits (ROI 2.1)  Projects with the highest ROI: ◦ Active Traffic Management, ◦ General Congestion Mitigation ◦ and Safety Spot Improvements 12

The team drew on MnDOT expertise as well as national best practices to establish ranges of typical returns for 10 investment categories 13 Source: Technical memo, project team analysis Ranges of ROI for each investment category Mapped TFAC investment categories (4) to MnSHIP investment categories (10) STEP 1 Drew on empirical evidence to establish ranges of returns STEP 2

 Vehicle operating costs  Travel time savings  Safety benefits  Lifecycle costs 14

15

 Maintain current performance ◦ Incremental investment $5B ◦ Average benefit $16B  Economically competitive and world class ◦ Incremental investment $7B ◦ Average benefit $14B  Total = $12B investment, $31B average benefit 16

 Active Traffic Management, 8.9  Congestion Mitigation-General, 5.5  Safety Spot Improvement, 4.1  MnPASS, 3.5  Pavement Preservation, 2.0  Bridge Repair, 1.5  Pavement Reconstruction (urban), 1.4  Capacity Development, 1.2  Bridge Replacement, 1.0  Pavement Reconstruction (corridor),

 Population expected to increase by almost 1 million to over 6.1 by 2030  Twin Cities area expected to grow twice as much as rest of the state  Truck freight will increase by 30%  Baby boomers will start turning 80 in 2025 (need for more transportation options)  Millennials demand a more multimodal system 18

 Enhancing, connecting communities  Supporting businesses, contributing to economic benefits of MN  Taking care of what we have  Careful management of limited state resources