Exploring the Change of Frequency in the Jobseekers Signing Regime; Do Weekly Work Search Review Meetings Result In Improved Employment Outcomes? Mark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes to the welfare system: implications for people with a learning disability Tatu Delaney Regional Campaigns Officer September 2012.
Advertisements

CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR UK labour market policies - a recipe for success? Georgina Hill British Embassy, Paris.
Linda McCabe and Donna Davies South London District The Jobcentre Plus offer.
Challenges in evaluating social interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems? Lyndal Bond, Kathryn Skivington, Gerry McCartney,
Department for Work and Pensions 1 Name: Paul Williams Labour Market Operations Director Date: 1 st May 2013 Jobcentre Plus ‘Working Locally’
Estimating net impacts of the European Social Fund in England Paul Ainsworth Department for Work and Pensions July 2011
Conditionality Chris Hayes Labour Market Analysis and Strategy Division DWP.
High Level Overview for External Partners
An introduction to. Sickness absence costs: - employees £4 billion in lost earnings, - the Government £2 billion in sick pay and foregone taxes; and -
Welfare To Work Conference Jennifer Bradley Deputy Director Labour Market Interventions Strategy 26 November 2014.
HEALTH AND WEALTH – PRELIM REVISION Critically examine the success of recent government policies to reduce poverty.
‘The right support, in the right way, at the right time’ Responding to data analytics in order to better support our clients into sustainable work Luke.
Janet Sinclair, Devon Partnership Manager. An overview of Jobcentre Plus.
Heads you’re in; tails you’re out: How RCTs have evolved in DWP Jane Hall
Employment and Support Allowance Information Pack
Swings and Roundabouts Lone mothers and the Australian Welfare System R G Gregory Australian National University.
Universal Credit Overview- Wrexham Poverty Event
Support for the Long Term Unemployed Help to Work Support Supervised Jobsearch Pilots TSEF 28 November 2013.
1 Building services through partnership
Supported Employment Demonstration Sites 2010/2011.
Welfare Reforms Ursula Barrington. Welfare reforms On 16 February 2011 the Welfare Reform Bill was introduced to Parliament. The Bill legislates for the.
Slide 1 of 18 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 3: Developing effective work.
Nigel Purkis, Mervyna Thomas and Ben Jones Working with lone parents to meet Work Programme targets 30 th June 2011.
Increased support from Jobcentre Plus – Autumn 2009.
Registering and Filling Future Jobs Fund Jobs Rachel Ginnelly, Be Birmingham Gerry Lyng, Jobcentre Plus (JCP)
Islington Welfare Reform Event 16 th January 2013.
Jobcentre Plus Jobcentre Plus Support Department for Work and Pensions.
Mark Harris Senior Group Partnership Manager London and Home Counties London Employment and Skills Policy Network 28 th October 2011.
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
2026 Presentation 6 th May Purpose of Today To review Phase 1 Introduce 2 Phase 2 Priority Families Service Transformation.
Developing a Methodology for Costing the Impact of Digital Exclusion Dr Leandro Carrera and Chris Gilson LSE Public Policy Group.
The case for supporting people with long term conditions in the workplace Dr Bill Gunnyeon Chief Medical Adviser Department for Work and Pensions.
Government Responses to Wealth Inequalities Strategies Aimed at Targeting Wealth Inequalities.
UNITE and the benefit cap: building a new data platform Daniel Brown & William Baxter - DWP.
2 Mark Stamper Development Manager, A4e 3 Purpose Purpose of Today's session To give a brief introduction to A4e Overview of the Work programme, Context.
The Power of Data Analytics: Understanding our clients and understanding what works James Kelly and Vinny Pattison Tuesday 10 th July 2012.
1 Department for Work and Pensions Universal Credit & conditionality UNCLASSIFIED.
Matthew 10/07/13 Parking the hardest to help: short and long-term solutions.
1 Department for Work and Pensions Stephen Meredith Head of Social Justice Analysis, DWP 11 November 2013 Where do we go from here? Social Impact Bonds.
Focusing on the most vulnerable: modernization of social protection and supporting activation Mik Woolley & Simon Smith - UK.
Statement of Fitness to Work Dr. Chathley. Benefits Income support Aged years, on low income, working less than 16 hours per week and not receiving.
Support for the Very Long Term Unemployed Trailblazer Evaluation 10 th July 2013.
Universal Credit – Partner Presentation Updated 4 March 2015.
Mandating full New Deal participation for the over- 50s: an experimental analysis Richard Dorsett & Stefan Speckesser, Policy Studies Institute Commissioned.
1 Department for Work & Pensions Scottish Employability and Skills Conference 18 th September 2013 Jim McGonigle District Manager East and South East Scotland.
Jobcentre Plus Get Britain Working Measures Department for Work and Pensions Mariangela Hankinson Business Development Partner Merseyside District 23/11/11.
Work Choice Evaluation and the DWP Disability Employment Strategy. Sarah Foster - Inclusion Debi Bleines – DWP Specialist Disability Employment Programmes.
ONS Labour Market Statistics on Nomis by Bob Watson and Sinclair Sutherland.
Employment and Support Allowance National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers 6 th June 2008 Phil Bartlett Programme Director Jobcentre Plus.
Personal Independence Payment Rob O’Carroll, Nick Smith, Claire de Banke, Craig Isherwood Department for Work and Pensions nawra national association of.
Universal Credit Presentation 1 st September 2015.
Patrick Hughes Director for Jobcentre Plus London and Home Counties 23 May 2011 Getting Londoners into work LONDON EMPLOYMENT & SKILLS CONVENTION 2011.
Jobcentre Plus Get Britain Working Measures Jobcentre Plus.
1 Department for Work and Pensions Pat Russell 22 May 2012 Troubled Families.
State Pension changes Department for Work and Pensions December 2015
Aidan Quigley Disability Employment Adviser (DEA) Jobcentre Plus Carlisle June 2012 Work and Benefit Changes Learning Disability Partnership Board.
Department for Work and Pensions 1 Croydon Ward Report Benefit Data Comparison Report.
Welfare Reform Briefing. Jim Burns, Jobcentre Plus, West of Scotland District Welfare Reform Update.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
The United Kingdom experience in data collection and statistics on disability Ian Dale Head of Disability Analysis Department for Work and Pensions Steel.
Supporting Warwickshire’s Carers Claire Hall Carers and Care at Home Commissioner.
Operational Stakeholder Engagement Forum ESA Health and Work Conversation and Claimant Commitment 6 March 2017 Presented by: Ian Anderson and Matt.
Measuring Impact – what can we learn from recent DWP evaluations?
Welfare Reform and helping the claimant into work:
Personal Support Package External partners and small employers presentation Date: March 2017 Version: 1.0.
We offer our help and support with:
Personal Support Package Presentation to Synchronize group
Where next for Welfare Reform? Alistair Reid.
Universal Credit Full Service What to expect.
Estimating net impacts of the European Social Fund in England
Presentation transcript:

Exploring the Change of Frequency in the Jobseekers Signing Regime; Do Weekly Work Search Review Meetings Result In Improved Employment Outcomes? Mark Langdon and Simon Clay Department for Work and Pensions 10 September

2 What we aim to cover An evidence summary on the impact of the Fortnightly Work Search Reviews (WRS). An overview of a trial with JSA claimants comparing the impact of two JSA signing regimes and; An overview of the early analysis.

3 What does DWP do? “The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is responsible for welfare, pensions and child maintenance policy. As the UK’s biggest public service department it administers the State Pension and a range of working age, disability and ill health benefits to over 22 million claimants and customers” Our priorities are: helping to reduce poverty and improve social justice helping people to find and stay in work enabling disabled people to fulfil their potential helping people save more for their retirement through workplace pensions and making the State Pension simpler and fairer recognising the importance of family in providing the foundation of every child’s life improving services to the public by providing value for money and reducing fraud and error Working Age Benefits costs the Tax Payer £24.6bn Of which £5.3bn is JSA (Unemployment Benefit) 2013/4 financial statement

e=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRxqFQoTCJSo-Z2358cCFWmd2wodduAEWg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk &psig=AFQjCNFXwDptO2AtH1YXXa7ZxcrFEXc2Iw&ust= g The fortnightly WSR has been a core component of the UK Government Active Labour Market policy for many years… 4 But it has transformed from this… … to this…

The Jobcentre Plus support offer is effective, supporting many claimants into work. June The majority of claimants leave JSA within 13 weeks. The Fortnightly WSR is a key component of that support in those early weeks… 5

6 Different variations of the JSA signing regime were trialled. These trials and their finding are summarised as follows: Exemption of ‘signing’ for the first 13 weeks, with a random call-in for the first 11 weeks of the JSA claim. Participants spending an additional 6.1 days on JSA. Exemption of ‘signing’ for the first 7 weeks, with a random call-in for the first 5 weeks of the JSA claim. This led to participants spending an additional 5.8 days on JSA. Fortnightly telephone ‘signing’, with a random call-in for the first 13 weeks of the JSA claim. This led to participants spending an additional 6.6 days on JSA. A shortened WSR, but still at fortnightly frequency No significant impact was observed. Group signing, but still at fortnightly frequency No significant impact was observed but the sample sizes were small. Previous Research on the Work Search Review… a series of experiments (2005-6)

7 People will stay on JSA for longer if there is no ‘Signing’ Regime The impact was larger for men than it was for women The duration of the WSR did not matter Rather, it is the face to face element of the WSR that leads to more rapid benefit exit So what did this show…

8 From April % of JSA Caseload will have Weekly WSRs Work Coach (WC) discretion will determine which Claimants undertake Weekly WSRs The number of the Weekly WSR is also at the discretion of the WC JCP Offices are funded and resourced to ensure the capacity to deliver Weekly WSRs for 50% of JSA Claimants An new trial to test the impact of the change A new policy… a new opportunity

Does increasing the frequency of the Work Search Review increase the JSA benefit off-flow rate? The Trial…Addressing two key questions What Works for Whom? Which claimants are most likely to be helped by weekly and fortnightly Work Search Review meetings? 9

The Trial… JCP OFFICES 27 across UK Eligible Population: Those individuals making a new Claim for Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) Target Sample Size 27,000 (Achieved 26,006) Recruitment between 22 nd September 14 and 19 th Feb 15. Refusal Rate For Survey Completion: 10% Excluded from the trial; Work Programme Returners Those with history of non-compliance with the JSA regime Those exempt from fortnightly signing Not considered to be capably of providing informed consent 10

The Trial Process… New JSA Claimant Interview with JCP Work Coach Interview Conducted as normal – about 2/3 through the Work Coach introduces the survey data collection tool (requests claimant to consent to complete the survey and allow data matching with DWP Administrative data Claimant Agrees - completes the survey Work Coach completes their questions in the survey Claimant Declines the survey Random Allocation Algorithm informs the Work Coach of the claimants Signing Regime Survey Tool automatically encrypts and s the record of Claimant consent, the survey data and the trial arm allocation. (All records are then automatically deleted from the Work Coaches IT system) Intervention Group Claimant undertakes weekly signing for a block of 13 weeks Control Group Claimant undertakes Fortnightly signing for a block of 13 weeks 11

An overview of the survey tool ExclusionsConsent Claimant questions Advisor questions Assignment In general, all new claimants to JSA were included. Where claimants must be excluded; Those escaping domestic violence Those who are not able to give informed consent, or; Those, who would be required to attend a JCP office on a more frequent basis – in line with Business As Usual practice. We collected informed consent from claimants to collect information from them for research purposes WC read the statement to the claimant and ask whether they agree to this. Those who do not consent are still part of the trial but won’t have data collected about them. A response must be given for all questions, but the claimant may opt for ‘prefer not to answer’ WC read out the question to the claimant, and then the claimant fill in their answer WC then turn their screens away from the claimant to answer their questions confidentially Once all questions answered, the tool assigns the claimant to Weekly or Fortnightly WSR for 13 weeks. It ed data to the analytical team. Advisers then inform the claimant of the frequency by which they will need to attend the JCP office. 12

13 The Trial Management… The Trial Team undertook the following… Developed the Guidance Notes for JCP Staff Identified a SPOC for each site – and set up an induction day for them. On site training for all 27 offices Performance Dashboard - weekly Weekly SPOC meetings to feedback on performance, deal with issues and questions and to share experiences Each site visited, at least once, during live running. Observed the process in action to ensure compliance with the trial design. Feedback to sites on individual Work Coach performance A trial Newsletter ed to all Work Coaches and Managers involved in the Trial Semi-formal interviews with staff

The Analysis 14

Achieved Sample Size 15 Weekly Signing Fortnightly signing Claims12,72413,282 Claimants12,19712,647 The total sample size was 26,006 claims to JSA made by 24,844 claimants (some of whom made two or more claims in the trial period). Claimants were put into the weekly signing or fortnightly signing groups depending on whether the last three digits of their National Insurance Number (NINO) were between 000 and 499 or between 500 and 999.

Analysis 16 The effects of weekly signing …To see whether weekly signing has an effect on the time spent on benefit, a straightforward technique is to plot the percentage of claimants still on benefit as a function of the number of days after their claim.

Does signing regime have an effect on time on benefit?

…yes – about four days less on benefit on average Does signing regime have an effect on time on benefit?

So what does this mean? 19 By around two weeks the percentage of the weekly signing group still on benefit is around 2 percentage points lower than those in the fortnightly signing group. This difference is statistically significant from around a week after claim, but there was no statistically significant difference before the claim. From this we can conclude that there was no significant difference between the benefit-related behaviour of the weekly and fortnightly signing groups before their claim, and that weekly signing has a significant effect on reducing the time spent on benefit compared to fortnightly signing.

Sub Group Analysis – which claimants respond most positively to weekly WSR’s 20 Variables that appear to have an effect % of time spent in employment % time spent on benefit living arrangements (particularly partners) Disability Early Analysis – treat with caution

Conclusion 21 At this point, results should only be considered preliminary because there has not been enough time for all claimants to flow off benefit. Weekly signing appears to produce a reduction in time on benefit of four days for the population at large. It is possible to choose a segment of around half the sample for whom the reduction in time on benefit is six days. We are continuing to work on the segmentation model.

22 Thanks for your attention