2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA COMPUTER-ASSISTED TESTING PETYA GEORGIEVA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IRPS 2014 AUTHOR INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION Chance Findings and Ima Scientist Sandy Nation Labs Dry Gulch, NM USA Sample Title Slide Company Logo.
Advertisements

ABEERA ARIF THE CITY SCHOOL I.C.TECH., GRADE 5. Prepare students for 21 st Century skills.
HONG KONG EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED HKDSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
Developing an Assessment
DEEPENING ASSESSMENT LITERACY Fall Objective  Identify best practices for local assessment development  Provide a working knowledge of the WPSD.
PALS-PreK.
Action Plan Change always comes bearing gifts. Ms Sadaf Kanwar The City School Gulshan Junior E ICT, Level V Action Plan Change always comes bearing gifts.
Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development, Sofia, Bulgaria, March, 2006 LEARNING-BY-DOING APPROACHES FOR SKILL ACQUISITION Ivo Hristov.
Gender Issues in Systems Design and User Satisfaction for e- testing software Prepared by Sahel AL-Habashneh. Department of Business information systems.
Washington Group on Disability Statistics Pre-test implementation documents Catriona Bate September 2005.
BILC Standardization Initiatives and Conference Objectives
SELF TEST TUTORIAL Taking an Exam What you need to get started.
Weaving Pathways: Interculturalism and Language
GRE Test Preparation Workshop for Campus Educators GRE Test Prep Resources.
ANGELA SHORT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND HUMANITIES KEVIN STARRS, SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING(RETIRED!) Designing and Delivering an online module.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Human Computer Interaction & Usability Prototyping Design & Prototyping HCI Prototyping.
1 Restructure of the Developmental Mathematics Courses.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 6- Quality Assurance & Form Reviews.
Computer Assisted Learning (CAL) Tutorials Special needs pupils; Spelling programs which have an interactive component testing student with games, quizzes.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
1 Producing Your Assessment Question Mark “Software for creating and delivering assessments with powerful reports”  Copyright 2000 QuestionMark. All.
2016 National Curriculum Tests and Assessments KS1
Creating Polls within Wimba July Polling Options Wimba polling feature allows you to create the following types of polls: Multiple choice – a single.
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Action Plans for Test Development and Administration STANAG 6001 BILC Conference, Mons, SHAPE, Belgium, September 2013 Ludmila Ianovici-Pascal Head, Language.
OCR AS Applied ICT Business Documents. Big picture.
ALIGNING TEACHING AND TESTING IN BULGARIA IN SUPPORT OF INTEROPERABILITY.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Assessment Developing an Assessment. Assessment Planning Process Analyze the environment Agency, clients, TR program, staff & resources Define parameters.
DIT School of Computing Postgraduate Examinations Guide to tackling written examinations.
SD WriteToLearn Assessment Pilot TIE Conference April 20, 2010.
ENHANCING TRAINING AND TESTING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH LESSONS LEARNED Emilia Nesheva, Ministry of Defense, Bulgaria Greta Keremidchieva, Rakovski National.
Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.
1Personnel Policy Directorate Ministry of Defense The Bulgarian Strategy for Developing English Language Training and Testing ( ) IN ACTION (Standardizing.
IRPS 2016 AUTHOR INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION Chance Findings and Ima Scientist Sandy Nation Labs Dry Gulch, NM USA Sample Title Slide Company Logo.
MICHIGAN EXAMS Presentado por: Kelly Roa Roa
Year 10 Online Literacy and Numeracy Assessment Mark Downsborough Dean of Administration.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Training Modules Session B5 Michigan School Testing Conference February 23, 2011.
S4 Information Evening 2 nd September  Welcome  Structure of National Qualification  Tracking and monitoring progress  Support available  Advice.
 WIDA MODEL: Grades 1-12 Measure of Developing English Language.
New Bulgarian University ENGLISH B2 FINAL/EXAM TEST FORMAT, CONTENT and PROCEDURES © Angel Rundaliev, NBU, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Minnesota Assessment Conference Reading 2011 and Beyond Jennifer Dugan, Alice Golden, and Angie Norburg.
ICT IGCSE Theory – Revision Presentation The Systems Life Cycle Chapter 7: The Systems Life Cycle Analysis 7.2 Design 7.3 Development.
ASSESSMENT METHODS – Chapter 10 –.
ANSWER SHEET LISTENING (PartⅠ~ Ⅳ) READING (PartⅤ ~ Ⅶ) NO
Feedback.
Life and Work Listening
Literacy Assessment and Monitoring Programme (LAMP)
Data Analysis and Standard Setting
(Standardizing the Standards of Teaching and Testing in the Military)
Online Testing System Assessment Viewing Application (AVA)
IRPS 2018 AUTHOR INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
Writing Instruction System:
A GLIMPSE OF FAIR TESTING
IRPS 2018 AUTHOR INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
Performance Evaluations: Providing feedback in organizations
STANAG 6001 Testing Workshop
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Challenges of Piloting Test Items
Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Defense
IRPS 2019 AUTHOR INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
Guidelines for Selecting Computer Software
CI804 Wichita State University May 3, 2012
IRPS 2019 AUTHOR INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
IRPS 2016 AUTHOR INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
Module A: Review Setting Expectations for Student Success
Click to insert title - Arial 36pt
Quality management and Process improvement
Presentation transcript:

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA COMPUTER-ASSISTED TESTING PETYA GEORGIEVA BULGARIAN STANAG 6001 TESTING TEAM HEAD 2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium

 till 1 March, 2012 – approbation of the CAT “writing” module;  till 1 July, 2012 – analysis of the results;  since exam session Autumn 2012 – optional CAT “writing” module;  March, 2013 – approbation of CAT modules for “reading” and “listening”;  till 1 July, 2013 – analysis of the results;  since exam session Autumn 2013 – optional CAT “writing”, “reading”, and “listening” modules;  since exam session Autumn 2014 – all candidates are to be tested on computers for the modules “writing”, “reading”, and “listening”(Action Plan 1 iaw Ministerial Order № 857/ ).  since exam session Autumn 2013 – parallel pen-and-paper and CAT in the three skills.  As of Spring End of pen-and-paper STANAG 6001 tests (Action Plan 2 iaw Ministerial Order № 219/ ). 2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva * * BG CAT Background GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA Administrative Module main menus:  Lists  Protocols  Tasks  Tests  Evaluation and Analysis

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva Candidates’ module:  Reading Test  Listening Test  Writing Test GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva  follows the current Specifications for STANAG 6001 exam for the Bulgarian Armed Forces;  starts with items for L1, then L2, then L3 ;  a minimum of 12 and a maximum of 18 questions per level;  level is given for a minimum of 70% correct answers;  a candidate can terminate the exam when a level is achieved or decide to go up;  50%-69% correct answers of the next level → (+) level. GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva Paper-based withdrawals % Failed – Reading (1.5%) Listening (2.5%) Writing (1%) CAT withdrawals – 17.16% Failed – Reading (2.56%) Listening (16.21%) Writing (0%) GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva CAT – 33% of candidates improved their results (R, L, or both). Reading – 30.76% showed lower results; 33.33% confirmed the results; 35.91% scored higher. Listening – 27.92% showed lower results; 39.63% confirmed the results; 32.45% scored higher. Data refers to March 2013 CAT piloting session (R and L). GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva PROS:  candidates can manage their time;  decreased candidates’ frustration;  time saving (for both candidates and testers);  anonymity criteria unconditionally complied with;  immediate feedback;  highly objective feedback;  fewer items are compromised;  new items can be piloted and statistics is facilitated. GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva Cons:  interface problems for the test-takers (computer screen clarity, font, size, color of the letters)  due to test-takers’ characteristics (computer literacy, motor skills needed to respond to test items, danger of bad time-management);  no option for test administrators to troubleshoot during the test process. GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva RECOMMENDATIONS FUTURE ACTION PLANS (based on candidates retrospective written and oral feedback and test administrators’ impressions); Several groups:  technical (software perfection, interface layout);  methodological (revision of test components and test administration)  facility use and administrative support GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva  Instructions – reviewed;  Layout of the reading material – black font; screen allowing for parallel viewing of the text and answer sheet;  Increase time allotted for looking through the options for L1 and L2 candidates at the Listening;  Reducing number of items if more than 3 per text (R and L). GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA

2 – 6 September 2013 SHAPE (Mons) Belgium Petya Georgieva ? ? ? ? ? ? GEORGI RAKOVSKI NATIONAL DEFENSE ACADEMY - SOFIA BULGARIA