PHILOSOPHY 104 9.2 Notes. SOME DEFINITIONS:  Necessary: When A is a necessary condition for B, that means that condition A must be fulfilled before condition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy 148 Causes. Causal Reasoning Not all conditionals indicate causal relationships, but for those that do, we have a number of evaluative standards.
Advertisements

© LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Essential Question: How do you know when a system is ready to be solved using elimination?
Possible World Semantics for Modal Logic
Annoucements  Next labs 9 and 10 are paired for everyone. So don’t miss the lab.  There is a review session for the quiz on Monday, November 4, at 8:00.
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Functionalism and Qualia Critics of functionalist accounts of the mental often appeal to thought experiments in which.
Explanations. D1. The explanandum is that which is to be explained in an explanation. D2. The explanans is that which does the explaining in an explanation.
Deductive Validity Truth preserving: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the.
The Problem of Evil Basic premises There is evil in the world.
1 1 Slide MA4704Gerry Golding Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Hypothesis testing can be used to determine whether Hypothesis testing can be.
Logic 2 The conditional and biconditional
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Philosophy of Science Science is the study of alternative explanations. What is an explanation?
Alpha: Symbolization and Inference Bram van Heuveln Minds and Machines Lab RPI.
No new reading for Monday or Wednesday Exam #2 is next Friday, and we’ll review and work on proofs on Monday and Wed.
Chapter 4 Section 2 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil By David Kelsey.
5.2 Solving Systems of Equations by the Substitution Method.
I have NO IDEA at all about WHICH DIRECTION to pray and my NAMAAZ IS BECOMING QADHA! Help!! What should I do? Don’t panic! Just PRAY IN ANY DIRECTION.
Philosophical Problems Most philosophical problems are conceptual in nature One way for this to happen is for two beliefs to conflict conceptually with.
Section 2 Logic.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 9, Part A Hypothesis Tests Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses.
Propositions and Truth Tables
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications
1 Hypothesis testing can be used to determine whether Hypothesis testing can be used to determine whether a statement about the value of a population parameter.
Conditional Statements and Material Implication. The Conditional: The Fourth Connective Conditional statement: when two statements are combined by placing.
Chapter 10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs.
Ch 5.3 Elimination (addition)
FALSE PREMISE.
Ad Hoc Constraints Objectives of the Lecture : To consider Ad Hoc Constraints in principle; To consider Ad Hoc Constraints in SQL; To consider other aspects.
Existential Graphs Intermediate Logic. Existential Graphs A graphical logic system developed by C.S. Peirce almost 100 years ago. Peirce studied semiotics:
The Problem of Evil: McCabe, “The Statement of the Problem”
Thinking Mathematically Systems of Linear Equations.
Today’s Topics Review of Sample Test # 2 A Little Meta Logic.
Transposition (p > q) : : ( ~ q > ~ p) Negate both statements when switching order of antecedent and consequent If the car starts, there’s gas in the tank.
Intro to Scientific Research Methods in Geography Chapter 2: Fundamental Research Concepts.
Translating Conditionals Some more advanced issues: 1. ‘only if ’ 2. necessary and sufficient conditions 3. dealing with time.
2.1 Sets 2.2 Set Operations –Set Operations –Venn Diagrams –Set Identities –Union and Intersection of Indexed Collections 2.3 Functions 2.4 Sequences and.
Experimental Control Definition Is a predictable change in behavior (dependent variable) that can be reliably produced by the systematic manipulation.
1 Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4-1 Systems of Equations and Inequalities Chapter 4.
Mathematics for Comter I Lecture 2: Logic (1) Basic definitions Logical operators Translating English sentences.
Conditionality What does TFF mean?. The paradox of material implication p ⊨ q ⊃ p is valid (by the definition of the truth table of ⊃ ) but trivially.
Sum of Arithmetic Sequences. Definitions Sequence Series.
Intro to Limits Sections 1.2, 1.3, &1.4.
Thinking Mathematically Logic 3.4 Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional.
Constructing a Case for the Opposition International Debate Education Association.
Conditional statement or implication IF p then q is denoted p ⇒ q p is the antecedent or hypothesis q is the consequent or conclusion ⇒ means IF…THEN.
More Proofs. REVIEW The Rule of Assumption: A Assumption is the easiest rule to learn. It says at any stage in the derivation, we may write down any.
Induction versus deduction Deductive: P1,..., Pn; therefore Q Inductive: P1,..., Pn; therefore Q is very likely to be true.
March 23 rd. Four Additional Rules of Inference  Constructive Dilemma (CD): (p  q) (r  s) p v r q v s.
The Literature Review 3 edition
FALSE PREMISE.
A Crash Course in Logic : Introduction to Philosophy
Verificationism on religious language
Today’s Outline Discussion of Exercise VI on page 39.
Conditional Statement Geometry Ms. Olifer
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Conditions and Ifs BIS1523 – Lecture 8.
Searle, Minds, Brains and Science Chapter 6
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Systems of Equations and Inequalities
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications Kenneth H
Solving Systems of Equations by Elimination
Questions Parallel Programming Shared memory performance issues
Transposition (p > q) : : ( ~ q > ~ p) Negate both statements
7 x 7 Rule Presentation Tips.
THE LAWS OF LOGIC Let’s be reasonable!.
Chapter 2 Sets Active Learning Lecture Slides
True or False True or False
Presentation transcript:

PHILOSOPHY Notes

SOME DEFINITIONS:  Necessary: When A is a necessary condition for B, that means that condition A must be fulfilled before condition B can obtain, but that fulfilling condition A may not be by itself enough to fulfill condition B.  Sufficient: When A is sufficient for B, that means that all you need for B to obtain is for condition A to be fulfilled. However, condition B might still obtain without condition A being fulfilled.

THE CONDITIONAL  Conditional statements are called conditionals because they assert necessary and sufficient conditions.  In any given true conditional, the antecedent is a sufficient condition for the consequent, while the consequent is a necessary condition for the antecedent. S  N

TESTING NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS:  There are two tests for necessary and sufficient conditions: The conceptual test: formulate the conditions as a conditional statement in the appropriate way. True conditionals reveal what is a condition for what, while false conditionals reveal what isn’t a condition for what. The empirical test: The SCT and NCT of future slides.

THE NECESSARY CONDITION TEST (NCT)  Some feature F is a necessary condition for having feature G if and only if anything that lacks feature F also lacks feature G  Any feature F that is absent when G is present is eliminated as a possible necessary condition of G.

THE SUFFICIENT CONDITION TEST (SCT)  Some feature F is a sufficient condition for having feature G if and only if anything that has feature F also has feature G  So, any feature F that is present when G is absent is eliminated as a possible sufficient condition of G

THE JOINT TEST  A factor is necessary and sufficient in the case that it does not fail either NCT or SCT

RIGOROUS TESTING  If you’re looking for candidates for causal factors, make sure that you have enough examples of each feature’s presence and absence  This is to rule out coincidence