Way forward on TBS determination in initial partial subframes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bit grouping for IEEE m CTC Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0670 Date Submitted: Source: Seunghyun Kang, Sukwoo Lee {sh_kang,
Advertisements

© NOKIAProduced as informative material for 3GPP RAN WG1 meeting No. 2 Downlink Shared Channel - DSCH DSCH associated with a dedicated channel (DCH) Downlink.
WF on design of physical downlink control channel for MTC CATT, Alcatel Lucent, Alcatel Lucent Shanghai Bell, Ericsson, ETRI, InterDigital, MediaTek, NTT.
WF on PBCH Coverage Enhancement
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
TF160 / SS VENDORS SESSION 3GPP RAN5#65 10 – 14 November 2014 Venice, Italy R5-14xxxx Presented by TF160 Leader © ETSI All rights reserved.
Way forward on eIMTA signaling to support up to 32 component carriers
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 # R1-15xxxx Fukuoka, Japan 25th – 29th May 2015
Weber’s Model Tutorial Start This is a cost map showing the total transport cost. End.
8Tx Dedicated Pilot Pattern Simulation Results IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0805 Date Submitted:
8Tx Pilot Pattern Performance for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0544 Date Submitted:
Proposed Solution for Device Binding 3GPP2 TSG-S WG4 S Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact(s): Anand Palanigounder,
Experiment 24 pH ranges and pH of Buffer Solutions CHE1181.
Title: Evaluation of DL MIMO Schemes: OL SU Spatial Multiplexing with 2-D MMSE channel estimation Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1043r2 Date Submitted:
WF on CQI Table for eMTC ZTE, Sony, Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung… R GPP TSG RAN WG1 #83 Anaheim, USA, 15th – 22nd November, 2015 Agenda item
WF on Support of EBF/FD-MIMO Features in TM9
WF on MCOT and CWS for LBT priority classes
WF on Regulation and MCOT
WF on SIB1bis Transmission
WF on LAA DL Multi-Channel LBT
Proposal for NB-IoT single-tone only UE
MCS Adaptation and Feedback Mechanism in m MBS IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-08/1151 Date Submitted:
CHAPTER 3-3: PAGE MAPPING MEMORY MANAGEMENT. VIRTUAL MEMORY Key Idea Disassociate addresses referenced in a running process from addresses available in.
Doc.:IEEE /0820r0 Submission July 13, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 MCS Selection and Padding Equations Date: Authors:
Design of the CDMA Allocation A-MAP IE Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/1420 Date Submitted: Source: Heejeong Cho
Doc.: IEEE c Submission Slide 1 July, 2008 Chang woo Pyo, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Multi-Level Codes Sequence for Simultaneous MCS Feedback IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-08/1152 Date.
WF on MCOT limit Signaling and Modifying LBT type Ericsson, … 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #85 R1-16xxxx Nanjing, China 23 rd – 27 th May 2016 Agenda item:
Overview of open issues in
WF on Bandwidth Part for DL common channel
WF on RA-RNTI design 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting NR#3 R1-171xxxx
3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting NR#3 Nagoya, Japan, 18 – 21 Sep, 2017
Offline Discussion on remaining details about RACH Procedure
Memory Management Virtual Memory.
Draft WF on single Tx switched UL
Single Tx switched UL DRAFT 3GPP RAN #77 September , 2017
WF on new NR CG sequences for PUCCH
Summary of proposals on CBG-based retransmission
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November, 2015
Proposals on remaining issues on PDCCH structure
3GPP RAN1 #90 meeting summary on LAA Enhancements
WF on Beam Indication for Beam Management
WF on NB-IoT Radio Link Monitoring Performance Test Procedure
Way forward on emissions scaling
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #90bis
WF on Beam failure recovery
WF on SS Block Index Reporting through RACH Procedure
Way forward on cell identification in NR
Discussion on TB-ack/CBG-Nack for initial transmissions
3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #67 Shanghai, China, 9 – 12 March, 2015
Samsung, KT Corp., NTT DOCOMO, Verizon, [ZTE], [CATT], [Intel]
WF on beam reporting CATT, Intel R1-17xxxxx
WF on Beam-Related Indication
WF on CSI timing offset for PUSCH
LTE-A Relays and Repeaters
WF on Radio Link Monitoring in NR
Summary on CA Aspects Samsung 3GPP TSG RAN WG1#91
WF on 4Tx UL Codebook For CP-OFDM
SC 64-QAM in clause 21 PHY Date: Authors: November 2015
WF on UL Beam Management
WF on UL Beam Management
Summary on CA Aspects Samsung 3GPP TSG RAN WG1#91
L-Header spoofing and bit reuse
Proposed response to 3GPP ED request
MCS signaling for reducing MAP overhead
WF on LTE-NR Coexistence
[Adaptive Spreading Scheme]
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
pH ranges and pH of Buffer Solutions
Additional SC MCSs in clause 20 (DMG PHY)
Presentation transcript:

Way forward on TBS determination in initial partial subframes 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #83 Anaheim, US, 15th - 22nd November 2015 Agenda Item: 6.2.3.3 R1-15xxxx Way forward on TBS determination in initial partial subframes Panasonic, ...

Background For the initial subframe, the MAC layer/scheduler needs to determine the Transport Block Size (TBS) and prepare PHY coding before knowing how long the initial subframe is This might cause the need to prepare the MAC/PHY chain assuming two different TBS sizes or starting positions for at least the first two subframes Depending whether the TBS for the first subframe is size 1 or size 2, the Transport Block for the second subframe would start at different positions of the Tx buffer even for the same TBS of the second Transport Block. In order to alleviate this burden to the eNB, it is desirable to determine only one TBS that is applicable to the first subframe, regardless of whether the first subframe is full or partial.

Potential solutions Option A) Option B) Re-use the DwPTS TBS determination approach with a scaling factor of 0.5, so that N_PRB = floor(N'_PRB * 0.5) for lookup in the TBS table Option B) Determine the TBS according to the N'_PRB as indicated in the DCI, but adapt the modulation order in case the coderate exceeds 0.931 E.g. if the I_MCS indicates QPSK but the coderate for the determined TBS exceeds 0.931, the modulation order is changed to 16-QAM

Analysis Option A The example assumes scheduling of 100 PRBs in a full or partial subframe For a full subframe, the TBS table allows the following TB sizes For a partial subframe according to Option A (PRB scaling), the following TBS sizes are allowed Yellow elements denote TBS that are identical for full subframe and PRB scaling partial subframes. "36696" is also identical, but exceeds code rate 0.931 in both cases Effect: Only 9 TB sizes are identical for a full subframe and a partial subframe with PRB scaling The modulation size and code rate for these 9 TB sizes 2792 3624 4584 5736 7224 8760 10296 12216 14112 15840 17568 19848 22920 25456 28336 30576 32856 36696 39232 43816 46888 51024 55056 57336 61664 63776 75376 1384 1800 2216 2856 3624 4392 5160 6200 6968 7992 8760 9912 11448 12960 14112 15264 16416 18336 19848 21384 22920 25456 27376 28336 30576 31704 36696 TBS 3624 8760 14112 19848 22920 25456 28336 30576 Full M 2 4 6 CR 0,151 0,365 0,588 0,4135 0,4775 0,53 0,59 0,637 0,425 Scaling 0,302 0,551 0,707 0,787 0,849

For partial subframe case Analysis Option A This example shows the unavailable MCS (red) for the case of 100 PRB and scaling factor of 0.5 TBS Scaling For full subframe case TBS Scaling For partial subframe case MCS Index Modulation Order TBS Index 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 reserved 30 31 MCS Index Modulation Order TBS Index 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 reserved 30 31

Analysis Option B The example assumes scheduling of 100 PRBs in a full or partial subframe For a full subframe, the TBS table allows the following TB sizes For a partial subframe according to Option B (Modulation order adaptation), the same TBS sizes are allowed that show a code rate <=0.931 Effect: 19 identical TB sizes are available for a full subframe and a partial subframe with Modulation adaptation The modulation size and code rate for these 19 TB sizes 2792 3624 4584 5736 7224 8760 10296 12216 14112 15840 17568 19848 22920 25456 28336 30576 32856 36696 39232 43816 46888 51024 55056 57336 61664 63776 75376 2792 3624 4584 5736 7224 8760 10296 12216 14112 15840 17568 19848 22920 25456 28336 30576 32856 36696 39232 43816 46888 51024 55056 57336 61664 63776 75376 TBS 2792 3624 4584 5736 7224 8760 10296 12216 14112 15840 17568 19848 22920 25456 28336 30576 32856 Full M 2 4 6 CR 0,116 0,151 0,191 0,239 0,301 0,365 0,429 0,509 0,588 0,66 0,33 0,366 0,414 0,478 0,53 0,59 0,637 0,425 0,456 Mod. Adapt. 0,233 0,302 0,382 0,602 0,73 0,858 0,732 0,827 0,707 0,787 0,849 0,913

Analysis Option B This example shows the unavailable MCS (red) for the partial subframe MCS 19 and above are not available because the code rate for the partial subframe would exceed 0.931 Entries in yellow show modulation order changes that are applicable for a starting partial subframe only The code rate is calculated assuming 60 PDSCH REs are available per PRB in a partial subframe MCS Index Modulation Order TBS Index Code rate 2 0.233 1 0.302 0.382 3 0.478 4 0.602 5 0.73 6 0.858 7 0.509 8 0.588 9 0.66 10 11 0.732 12 0.827 13 0.637 14 0.707 15 0.787 16 0.849 17 18 0.913 19 1.019 20 1.090 21 1.217 22 1.302 23 1.417 24 1.529 25 1.593 26 1.713 27 1.772 28 2.094 29 reserved 30 31

Observations With PRB Scaling, 9 identical TB sizes are available for full and partial subframes With Modulation Adaptation, 19 identical TB sizes are available for full and partial subframes Modulation used for TBS PRB Scaling QPSK for TBS 1384-7992 16-QAM for TBS 7992-15264 64-QAM for TBS 15264-31704 Modulation Adaptation QPSK for TBS 2792-10296 16-QAM for TBS 12216-19848 64-QAM for TBS 22920 -31704 This means that for the same TBS, Modulation Adaptation will choose the same or more robust modulation order compared to PRB scaling, resulting in a generally lower BLER for the same TB

Proposal For an initial full subframe For an initial partial subframe, No change compared to Release 12 procedures For an initial partial subframe, The TBS is determined according to the MCS and #PRB as indicated in the DCI (same as in Release 12) Modify the MCS-to-TBS mapping table for some entries as shown Yellow parts indicate changes compared to the Release-12 table If necessary, a 256-QAM capable table could be added MCS Index Modulation Order TBS Index 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 reserved 30 31