“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Advertisements

We will lead the nation in improving student achievement. CLASS Keys SM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement Spring 2010 Teacher and.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys ™ Module 8: Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Spring 2010 Teacher and.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Educator Effectiveness and The Common Core State Standards October 20, 2013 Bend Oregon.
Welcome to CLASS Keys™ Study Session 1 February 22, 2010 Our session will begin at 4:00 p.m. While you are waiting, please do the following: Configure.
Thinking about assessment…
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
The levels of performance considered at the element level are not intended to be used to label teachers as Not Evident, Emerging, Proficient, and Exemplary.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 9: Annual Evaluation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Data/MTSS Team Training September, Learning Goals Data/MTSS Team members will be able to assist teachers in using data to write a SMARTer PDP goal.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Evaluate Davis Goal Requirements Comparison Last Year This Year Performance Goal Academic Goal.
Write on sticky note, how you implemented the exit slip strategy. What does this tell you about your students?
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
LEARNING GOALS AND PERFORMANCE SCALES PLC FOCUS FOR BVS
Strategic Plan Goals City Schools of Decatur seeks to challenge every student to succeed by providing a rigorous, engaging, and authentic learning experience.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
CLASS KeysSM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
CLASS KeysTM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010
State Board of Education Progress Update
Georgia Department of Education
CLASS KeysTM Module 10: Professional Development Plan For Improvement
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Presentation transcript:

“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement

Resources and Materials Teachers will need the following resources and materials for this module: CLASS Keys TM Notebook Module 4 PowerPoint Professional Growth Plan (PGP) form Handout 4A: Example of PGP Self-Assessment and Reflection Results (If teachers have completed this work.)

Module Objectives Emphasizes the teacher’s responsibility for writing and monitoring the PGP. Explains the evaluator’s responsibility to approve the elements targeted and the PGP. Describes the preparation that precedes the development of the PGP. Explains the step-by-step process for writing and monitoring the PGP.

Three Phases of the CLASS Keys TM Process

Professional Growth Plan Supports teacher ownership in professional learning. Links professional growth to action plans. Focuses on needs and strategies that result in individual and collective improvement. Identifies the CLASS Keys TM elements, Continuum of Improvement rubrics, evidence, and artifacts that meet identified needs.

Preparation for PGP Development Identify elements for growth as individuals or within a team setting, if appropriate. Prioritize one to three CLASS Keys™ elements that support the identified needs of the teacher and learner. Evaluators may assist with the selection or assignment of elements. Think of each selected element as a learning target. o How will teacher practices change? o How will student learning be impacted? o What evidence will prove students are learning?

Writing the PGP Step 1 - Record the Elements Record the information at the top of the PGP form. Professional Growth Plan (PGP) for CLASS Keys TM Teacher: John Rite Grade/Content: 4th Grade Reading School/District: Key Elementary, Piedmont Schools Evaluator: Sue Hamel School Year: Date:

CLASS Keys ™ Element 1: SBI 1.4 The teacher uses flexible grouping practices based on ongoing diagnostic and formative assessment. (p. 35) Teacher learning strategies: Expected impact on teacher practice and/or student learning or behavior: Checkpoints and actual results: List one to three elements to be targeted.

Step 2 - Identify Teacher Learning Strategies Examine the teacher evidence found under PROFICIENT and EXEMPLARY for the targeted elements in the CLASS Keys™ notebook. Determine the strategies needed for the teacher to reach that level of performance. Identify resources that will be needed to support these strategies.

CLASS Keys ™ Element 1: SBI 1.4 The teacher uses flexible grouping practices based on ongoing diagnostic and formative assessment. (p. 35) Teacher learning strategies: 1.Define flexible grouping through collaborative team discussion. 2.Observe peer teachers who use effective flexible grouping based on student need. Expected impact on teacher practice and/or student learning or behavior: Checkpoints and actual results:

Step 3 – Identify Expected Impact on Teacher Practice and/or Student Learning or Behavior Reflect on each selected element as a learning target. How will teacher practices change? How will student learning be impacted? What evidence will prove students are learning?

Step 3 – Identify Expected Impact on Teacher Practice and/or Student Learning or Behavior Examine the rubrics, evidence, and data sources found under the PROFICIENT and EXEMPLARY columns for the selected element. Select relevant evidence or artifacts that support improved student learning. Consider additional student evidence discussed in collaborative teams. Record the evidence as “Expected Impact” for each targeted element on the PGP form.

CLASS Keys ™ Element 1: SBI 1.4 The teacher uses flexible grouping practices based on ongoing diagnostic and formative assessment. (p. 35) Teacher learning strategies: 1.Define flexible grouping through collaborative team discussion. 2.Observe peer teachers who use effective flexible grouping based on student need. Expected impact on teacher practice and/or student learning or behavior: 1.The teacher will use diagnostic and formative assessments and other tools to determine student understanding and adapt grouping accordingly. 2.The students will participate in small group instruction based on academic need when appropriate. Checkpoints and actual results:

Step 4 – Checkpoints and Actual Results (completed by teacher) Select dates as checkpoints for monitoring progress. Record these dates on the PGP form. Record actual results of teacher practice and student learning and/or behavior. Prepare to discuss formative progress of plan with evaluator whenever requested. Present the summative results at the Annual Evaluation Conference.

CLASS Keys ™ Element 1: SBI 1.4 The teacher uses flexible grouping practices based on ongoing diagnostic and formative assessment. (p. 35) Teacher learning strategies: 1.Define flexible grouping through collaborative team discussion. 2.Observe peer teacher(s) who uses effective flexible grouping based on student need. Expected impact on teacher practice and/or student learning or behavior: 1.The teacher will use diagnostic and formative assessments and other tools to determine student understanding and adapt grouping accordingly. 2.The students will participate in small group instruction based on academic need when appropriate. Checkpoints and actual results: 9/30/10 1.Common definition of flexible grouping adopted at collaborative team meeting. (9-9-10). 2. Peer observations completed and discussed. ( , )

Step 5 - Planning for Next Year The teacher and evaluator: Review the actual results of the current PGP during the Annual Evaluation Conference. Consider the results of the Annual Evaluation in preparation for designing next year’s PGP. Discuss any school or district initiatives or requirements that may be in place next year that will impact the PGP. Begin the process of developing next year’s PGP.