Welcome to: Internationalisation Change Programme Final meeting 19 February 2013

 Fire procedure.  Cloakrooms.  Refreshments.  Catering.  Work spaces.  Administration and staffing. Housekeeping

 To meet with other participating institutions to reflect on and share progress and experiences of undertaking change.  To reflect on cross cutting approaches and processes of implementing change.  To consider what further work needs to be undertaken to ensure changes are embedded and sustainable.  To be better equipped to prepare your case study.  To review lessons learned and identify key messages for the HE sector. 3 Objectives of the day

Looking back 10:40Team updates Break 12:00Approaches to implementing change Looking forward 13:30Sustaining and embedding change 14:30Writing for dissemination 15:30 Final remarks and next steps 4 Programme

 Mutual respect, trust, support and encouragement  Confidentiality  Consent Ground rules …

Team updates 6

Approaches to implementing change

 How did you promote change?  How did you achieve success?  What worked?  Why were the methods effective?  Which approaches were the most effective (i.e. made the biggest impact)?  How did you know you’d been successful? Implementing change

10 Engaging senior managers Member of change programme team Chair working or advisory group Link to other institutional priorities Report to strategic committees Define financial implications of retention Tailored pitch, presentation, and/or workshop Briefing or update meetings Based on Thomas and May (2011) Inclusive Learning and Teaching, HEA

11 Staff engagement Staff consultation or research Champions in schools/ faculties Working groups or committees PSF: CPD and PG Cert Induction for new staff Conference, workshops Use the student voice and other data Resources / guidance Performance management processes Mentoring, shadowing Based on Thomas and May (2011) Inclusive Learning and Teaching, HEA

12 Student engagement Institutional research and evaluation Student- led research Events and campaigns Working groups Student representation system Employment Technology including social networks Peer mentoring Based on May, H. and Felsinger, A. (2010) Strategic approaches to disabled student engagement ECU

For you…For colleaguesFor studentsFor your institutionWider context Levels of impact/benefits

14 Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model of development (1979), image from Wikipedia

Student Staff Institution Sector Approaches to implementing change

How to sustain and embed the change? Simon Sweeney

Writing for Dissemination Viv Caruana

Next Steps 18

Things we need from you:  submit your case study by 31 March to  Let us have your reflections on the day and programme as a whole, open until 15 March.  Contact your supporter with queries or dates for a visit (if you have not done so already). Next Steps 19