Fog Seals and Rejuvenating Seal Subtask Group Progress Report CO-Chairs John Fox - Caltrans Bob McCrea-Industry A PPTG Partnering Accomplishment April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 7 Fog and Rejuvenating Seals.
Advertisements

From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
2014 Chip Seal Training ODOT Specifications
Chapter 6 Chip Seals From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
Selecting the Right Maintenance Treatment Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman,
Eugene Cifers Sales Manager Asphalt Emulsion Industries, LLC.
Subcommittee On Pressure Relief Systems CRE Meeting Spring 2011 Meeting Clark Shepard.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 2 Surface Characteristics.
Pavement Preservation Update By Shakir Shatnawi Chief, Office of Pavement Preservation PPTG Caltrans Co-Chair Gary Hildebrand and Casey Holloway PPTG Industry.
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding Virginia Concrete Conference Richmond, VA March 6, 2014.
FHWA Life Cycle Costs Analysis and Pavement Type Selection Guidance Maryland Concrete 2014 Conference March 18, 2014.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
U.S. General Services Administration General Services Administration Policy, the Procurement Process, the Buy Accessible Wizard, and Purchasing Section.
Fog Seals, Sand Seals, Scrub Seals, and Rejuvenators.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David Rayburn.
Caltrans Specifications - Changes and Implementation Scott Dmytrow Telfer Oil Telfer Highway Technologies.
Green Light-Go Program Pennsylvania’s Municipal Signal Partnership Program April 7, 2015 Daniel Farley Chief, Traffic Signal and Arterial Management Section.
Chapter 5 Patching and Edge Repair
Acceptance Process for Manufactured Products by Certification: A users guide for implementation of Materials Bulletin No. MB 06-02, DCE Memorandum No.
Slide No. 1 IAEA Developed by NSNI Division, IAEA under the supervision of Mr. Marco Gasparini (PNRA supported in the development under TC-Project PAK/09/028)
 Materials – Highest & Best Use  Public Health  Safety  The Environment  Safety  Reliability  Performance  Flexibility  Productivity Improve Mobility.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT August 21, 2014.
Overview of the New Hot Mix Specifications Dale A. Rand, P.E. TxDOT Construction Division Flexible Pavements Branch TRB AFK10 Committee Meeting April 20-21,
Guidelines for the Development and Maintenance of RTF- Approved Measure Savings Estimates December 7, 2010 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
PPTG2005 FORUM Shakir Shatnawi – Caltrans Chair Gary Hildebrand- Industry Chair George Bradley – Local Agency Chair Pavement Preservation Task Group.
1 National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research for Improved Highway Operations and Maintenance National Cooperative Highway Research.
Matthew Udenenwu Waste Permits Division 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
Working Successfully With Property Managers: An Interactive Engagement
AAPA 2011 Study Tour – Surface Treatments #1 Surface Treatments #1.
April 19, 2005 PPTG Meeting Education Efforts for the PPTG How to share our knowledge and experience with others.
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT November 19, 2013.
February 10, 2015 Martin Lang, MPA Deputy Director of Field Operations.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Utility and Railroad Engineer, INDOT June 10, 2015.
NSF 61 - Purkiss December 1, Diluted Surface Area- Section 3 Current Requirements of Section 3.2 require 100% complete formulation information for.
HBP Warranties – The Cost Benefit Evaluation Begins By: Jay Goldbaum, P.E. Colorado Department of Transportation Pavement Management and Design Program.
REVISED May 2009STATE MATERIALS OFFICE Goals in this Session To understand:  The Sampling & Testing process  The Project Certification process  The.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Safety Concerns on Low Volume Roads Towns & Township Meeting December 2015 By Cliff Reuer Technical Assistance Provider SDLTAP.
REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED SIGNIFICENT REVISIONS TO THE 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL Fall 2014 Virginia ATSSA Chapter Meeting October 1, 2014.
Surface Treatments #2.
Multi-Layer Systems By Vadim Kravtsov Intermountain Slurry Seal, Inc 1.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
ITS Device Standards & Procurement Project PURPOSE  Develop a series of Standards & Strategies designed to guide and provide consistency across the development.
Pavement Preservation Program Emily McGraw, PE February 23 and 24, 2015 – NCDOT & CAPA Workshop.
60A-1, Fla. Admin. Code and Chapter 287, Florida Statutes Recurring Issues.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March Keric Ashley,
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
Road Maintenance in Estonia
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
QUALITY ASSURANCE MODULE 3. Definitions Quality Assurance - A process/effort that ensures that processes are followed, that the processes of doing right.
Update from FHWA Emulsion Task Force
Acceptance Process for Manufactured Products by Certification:
Pavement Working Group
Construction Management
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Surface Treatments #2.
Pavement Type Selection – Updated Guidance on Use of Alternate Bidding
Document Development for Metro Project: Performance-based Procurement Asphalt Overlay for Programmed Maintenance 17/01/2019.
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Surface Treatments #1.
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Eric M. Reimschiissel Contractors working with Agencies
Txdot field inspection
ETF Research Committee
Presentation transcript:

Fog Seals and Rejuvenating Seal Subtask Group Progress Report CO-Chairs John Fox - Caltrans Bob McCrea-Industry A PPTG Partnering Accomplishment April 19, 2005

HistoryHistory  Memorandum Signed By: Bob Coleman Deputy Director Project Development, November 3, 1998  Stop all fog seals and rejuvenating seals by contract item in the traveled way.  Sights the need for guidance to be Developed.

Steps completed for fog seals and rejuvenating seals  The approval of the maintenance technical advisory Guide (MTAG)  Published Chapter 6 independently of the MTAG - Fog Seal and Rejuvenating Seal guidelines  PPTG task group worked with PST to develop Clear SSP language to insure user safety via quality control  Generated Pilot Project with NSSP for Rejuvenating Seals, D-4 Route 29 - December 2004-Being Advertised Now.

SSP Highlights ( Fog Seals)  Fog seal coat shall conform to the provisions in Section 37 ‑ 1, "Seal Coats," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions.  Asphaltic emulsion shall be either SS1h or CSS1h or CQS1h grade.  The application rate of the fog seal coat (asphaltic emulsion and 40% to 50% added water ) shall be spread at a rate of L/m2.  The exact dilution ratio and rate of application will be determined by the Contractor. Final surface shall produce a surface having a coefficient of friction not less than 0.30 as determined by California Test 342. Tests to determine coefficient of friction will be made before pavement is open to public traffic.  The Contractor shall submit a contingency plan for the approval of the Engineer, which will include corrective action if the coefficient of friction is less then 0.30

SSP Highlights ( Rej.Seals)  5 alternatives Type A,B,C,D and E  The final application rate determined by vendor. SSP provides ranges by type  Final surface shall produce a surface having a coefficient of friction not less than 0.30 as determined by California Test 342.  The Contractor shall submit a contingency plan for the approval of the Engineer, which will include corrective action if the coefficient of friction is less then 0.30

Next Steps  Notify districts regarding guidance. Place SSP’s on OE server.  Develop correlation between other available skid test methods and CT 342. Use CT 342 based on available resources until correlation is complete.  Districts select a limited number of projects and submit to HQ for approval. Based on availability CT 342  Monitor projects

GuidanceGuidance  MTAG & SSP’s has been provided.  Rejuvenating Seal Specification is on the OE server  Fog Seal SSP will go to OE for posting on server.

Correlation with CT 342 needed  Since CT 342 satisfies Caltrans comfort zone, develop a correlation curve with a portable alternate device.

Select Projects  Find Districts that will sponsor a project  Set criteria  Minimum Existing Pavement Skid Number  Initially, Insure that the number of projects match the available testing resources.  Include industry input for prescription.  Follow manufacturer recommendations

Performance Monitoring What?  Skid numbers-Yes  Effect of different fog & rejuvenating seals on various surface textures (e.g. OG, DG, GG, chip seals, slurry seals) & different aged pavements. Yes  Life cycle cost analysis with control sections. Yes  Agency log and documentation. Yes  Pre-existing condition & skid number  Ambient & pavement temperature  Environment - fog, rain, sun  Monitor Agency Table “C” wet accidents  Agency Table C Wet Accidents. Yes

Who Monitors?  Subtask Group will monitor projects  Frequency - semi-annually  Time frame - 3-year minimum  Select specific projects for monitoring  Various geographic areas  Various surfaces  Responsibility for data base. HQ Roadway Maintenance.

Summary Statement: Fog Seals and Rejuvenating Seals are one of the best maintenance tools available for pavement preservation provided they are at done at the right time. These tools provide a huge benefit and now is the time to invest in the future of our highways. Fog Seals and Rejuvenating Seals are one of the best maintenance tools available for pavement preservation provided they are at done at the right time. These tools provide a huge benefit and now is the time to invest in the future of our highways.

Thanks ! John Fox - Caltrans Bob McCrea-Industry