Www.elena-project.org www.prolearn-project.org Improving LOM-Based Interoperability of Learning Repositores Germán M. Rivera Bernd Simon Juan Quemada Joaquín.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation 16 April 2007 Update on work of Joint DCMI/IEEE LTSC Task.
Advertisements

Oyster, Edinburgh, May 2006 AIFB OYSTER - Sharing and Re-using Ontologies in a Peer-to-Peer Community Raul Palma 2, Peter Haase 1 1) Institute AIFB, University.
Optimising metadata workflows in a distributed information environment R. John Robertson & Jane Barton Centre for Digital Library Research University of.
ISWC Doctoral Symposium Monday, 7 November 2005
Reference ontologies for manufacturing Bob Young - R Young, N Hastilow, M Imran, N Chungoora Z Usman and A-F Cutting-Decelle.
End-to-End Efficiency (E 3 ) Integrated Project of the EC 7 th Framework Programme E 3 WP5 Objectives E 3 WP5 Structure and Research Challenges
University of Piraeus Department of Technology Education and Digital Systems Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas(C.E.R.T.H.) Informatics and Telematics.
Thomas D. Wason IMS Project Feb IMS Meta-Data Thomas D. Wason, Ph.D. IMS Project & GEM
IM Lab NCCU 1 Introduction of SCORM: Sharable Content Object Reference Model Hao-Chuan Wang Computer Science Department National Chengchi University 2003.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
CIA 2003 th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents CIA th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents DIA: Data Integration.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Module 2b: Modeling Information Objects and Relationships IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter, 2007 Michael Crandall.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
Tutorial for SC 32/WG 1 e-Business Standards Prepared for: SC Kunming Plenary Meeting Wenfeng Sun, Convenor ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG1 (eBusiness)
José Paulo Leal | Ricardo Queirós CRACS & INESC-Porto LA Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto Rua do Campo Alegre, Porto PORTUGAL.
RDF Data Sources (keyword textbox) Search RDF Data Sources: LOM Binding Schemas (keyword textbox) Search XML Bindings: Dublin Core Application Profiles.
Tutorial for SC 32/WG 1 e-Business Standards Prepared for: SC Gyeongju Plenary Meeting Wenfeng Sun, Convenor ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG1 (eBusiness)
OBAA STANDARD Where are we? Tiago Primo GIA – Grupo de Pesquisa em Inteligência Artificial UFRGS.
UK LOM Core How and why it came about Charles Duncan, Intrallect
Peer-to-Peer Data Integration Using Distributed Bridges Neal Arthorne B. Eng. Computer Systems (2002) Supervisor: Babak Esfandiari April 12, 2005 Candidate.
José Paulo Leal | Ricardo Queirós CRACS & INESC-Porto LA Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto Rua do Campo Alegre, Porto PORTUGAL.
Introduction to MDA (Model Driven Architecture) CYT.
Categories of Vocabulary Compatibility Dmitry Lenkov Oracle.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
UML Profile to Support Requirements Engineering with KAOS Presented by Chin-Yi Tsai.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects (INF 389K) September 18, 2006 The Big Metadata Picture, Web Access, and the W3C Context.
Aligning library-domain metadata with the Europeana Data Model Sally CHAMBERS Valentine CHARLES ELAG 2011, Prague.
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry and IEEE LOM Application Profiles Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG,
© DATAMAT S.p.A. – Giuseppe Avellino, Stefano Beco, Barbara Cantalupo, Andrea Cavallini A Semantic Workflow Authoring Tool for Programming Grids.
ISO/IEC : Framework for a Metadata Registry By Daniel W. Gillman Bureau of Labor Statistics USA.
What and Why? Next steps for oneM2M Semantics Group Name: WG5 Source: Joerg Swetina, Martin Bauer (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 oneM2M-MAS
1 A Historical Perspective on Conceptual Modelling (Based on an article and presentation by Janis Bubenko jr., Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. June.
Telmo Zarraonandia Laboratorio DEI. Dpto. de Informática U. Carlos III de Madrid A Late Modelling Approach for the Definition of Computer-Supported Learning.
10/24/09CK The Open Ontology Repository Initiative: Requirements and Research Challenges Ken Baclawski Todd Schneider.
BEN METADATA SPECIFICATION Isovera Consulting Feb
Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania.
TMF - Terminological Markup Framework Laurent Romary Laboratoire LORIA (CNRS, INRIA, Universités de Nancy) ISO meeting London, 14 August 2000.
CoOL: A Context Ontology Language to Enable Contextual Interoperability Thomas Strang, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien, and Korbinian Frank German Aerospace Centor.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
© The ATHENA Consortium. EM1 - Enterprise Modelling as a way to achieve Interoperability Module 3 - What interoperability problems does Enterprise.
A Mediated Approach towards Web Service Choreography Michael Stollberg, Dumitru Roman, Juan Miguel Gomez DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute
Metadata and Meta tag. What is metadata? What does metadata do? Metadata schemes What is meta tag? Meta tag example Table of Content.
Metadata Made Simple LMS² seminar 1 February 2006 Sarah-Jane Saravani Carolyn Paulsen.
Providing web services to mobile users: The architecture design of an m-service portal Minder Chen - Dongsong Zhang - Lina Zhou Presented by: Juan M. Cubillos.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Creating a Smart Space for Learning The ELENA Consortium Information Society Technologies (ist) PROGRAMME OPEN-INTELLIGENT-EFFECTIVE.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
DCMI Abstract Model Analysis Resource Model Jorge Morato– Information Ingeneering Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
ResearchEHR Use of semantic web technologies and archetypes for the description of EHRs Montserrat Robles, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis, Jose Alberto.
Improvement of Semantic Interoperability based on Metadata Registry(MDR) Doo-Kwon Baik Dept. of CSE Korea University.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: IEMSR, the Information Environment & Metadata Application.
Manolis Mylonakis, Polyxeni Arapi, Nikos Pappas, Nektarios Moumoutzis, Stavros Christodoulakis {manolis, xenia, nikos, nektar, Laboratory.
Thursday, 22 May A Handbook of Guidelines on Metadata Usage Jon Mason Metadata Downunder – Metadata, Semantics and Interoperability in Practice Sydney,
Metadata & Repositories Jackie Knowles RSP Support Officer.
A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services Jane Hunter Sharmin Choudhury DSTC PTY LTD, Brisbane, Australia Slides by Ananta.
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Wolfram Höpken IFITT RMSIG.
WWW: WSMO, WSML, and WSMX in a Nutshell Dumitru Roman 1, Jos de Bruijn 1, Adrian Mocan 1, Holger Lausen 1,2, John Domingue 3, Christoph Bussler 2, and.
Session 3 Metadata & Workflow
Modularization and Semantics of Learning Objects in a Cooperative Knowledge Space Nadine Ludwig Center for Multimedia in eLearning & eResearch, Berlin.
Data Access Service Specification: RDF(S) Ontology Access Draft
Applications of IFLA Namespaces
Accommodating local cataloguing traditions in a global context
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Ontology-Based Approaches to Data Integration
Metadata in Digital Preservation: Setting the Scene
Database System Concepts and Architecture
A programming exercise evaluation service for Mooshak
Presentation transcript:

Improving LOM-Based Interoperability of Learning Repositores Germán M. Rivera Bernd Simon Juan Quemada Joaquín Salvachúa Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Information Society Technologies (IST) PROGRAMME

Outline Introduction LOM Application Profiles The ELENA Smart Space for Learning A LOM Application Profile for a Smart Space for Learning Conclusions

Introduction What do we aim? Overcome present lack of interoperability between learning repositories.

Application profiles and ontologies LOM Well known standard App. Profile Adaptation or combination of schemas LOM+AP Good starting point to interoperate

What makes a LOM application profile? Selects LOM elements Specifies value restrictions Refines LOM semantics Specifies multiplicity constraints Introduces required extensions Refines the learning object notion Possibly aim backwards compatibility

The Need for Interoperability in Smart Spaces for Learning LOMAP initiated by Elena and extended by ProLearn. Elena’s Smart Space for Learning: Network of learning repositories, which supports the personalized mediation of heterogeneous learning objects. Corporate learners are being offered heterogeneous set of learning objects. Shortcomings in decision effectiveness, process administration, IT infrastructure. Need for a global view of integrated internal and external repositories. Search based on an ontology or common data model shared by several systems.

Differentiating Learning Material from Learning Activity LM: Consumed independently of time and location. Physical or digital good. LA: Live events. Synchronous service. IMS LD and SCORM already use this concept. Here an LA is an autonomous entity. The AP is conditioned by the selection criteria and the results description.

Application Profile Design Refinement of the Learning Object Notion Distinguish two types of learning objects and be expressive enough for contractual purposes. Selection of LOM elements Mainly for learning material. Specification of value restrictions For LOM value spaces and vCard elements. Semantics refinement To apply it in the Smart Space for Learning. Specification of multiplicity constraints Also for each vocabulary entry. Introduction of extensions Both in vocabulary and elements.

Overview of Selected Elements and Mappings Categories (LOM, Profile) : Rights General Metametadata Technical Classification Lifecycle Educational Relation and annotation Mappings to Dublin Core and Open- Qcat. Not used Brokerage aspects Identification LM technical aspects Versatility LA concepts LO classification

Conclusion LOM Application Profile for building Smart Spaces of Learning. Generic process for designing LOM Application Profiles. Distinction between Learning Material and Learning Activities. Learning objects described for brokerage purposes.