OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educator Effectiveness: Making Connections & Rubric Analysis Presented by the Oregon Department of Education August 2013.
Advertisements

District Determined Measures
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE LocalAssessmentGuidance.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
Student Learning and Growth Goals 101: Requirements and Recommendations Spring 2015 Webinar.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Today’s website:
June  Articulate the impact SLG goals have on improving student learning  Identify the characteristics of assessments that measure growth and.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Student Learning targets
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
KEEP And Student Growth Measures for Building Leaders Lawrence School District, May 14, 2014 Bill Bagshaw, Assistant Director, TLA, KSDE Kayeri Akweks,
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations
Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting VAM Update.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Accountability Updates NCAEE Region 1 May 2, 2014 M. E. (Butch) Hudson, Jr. Regional Accountability Coordinator Accountability Region 4.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
Setting the Context 10/26/2015 page 1. Getting Students READY The central focus of READY is improving student learning... by enabling and ensuring great.
Rhode Island Model Teacher Evaluation & Support System Preparing for your End-of-Year Conference.
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations.
Kansas: a State of Transition Brad Neuenswander Deputy Commissioner, KSDE Fall 2013.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
South Dakota Student Learning Objectives Dianna Tyler.
SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.
Median Student Growth Percentile For Classroom Teachers and Contributing Professionals 1 ONGL-12/15/14.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
DISTRICT NAME HERE Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Last Revised: 10/01/15. Senate Bill 290 has specific goal-setting requirements for all licensed and administrative staff in the State of Oregon. In ,
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
Five Required Elements
Using Student Growth Percentiles in Educator Evaluations
Outcomes Review 8 components of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Understand requirements for scoring SLG goals Recognize the role of SLG goals.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations
Common Core State Standards
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Student Growth Measures
Presentation transcript:

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness

Warm Up The median is the middle number in a sequence of numbers  On your table is a list of Student Growth Percentiles from Mr. Hendrick’s class  Identify the median score from his class list and circle it

Norms  Share your expertise  Equity of voice  Active listening  Respect for all perspectives  Self-monitor use of technology  Safety and confidentiality

Connector On an index card please complete the following sentence stem “One of the most important learnings that I hope to take away today is…”

Give One, Get One!  Turn to a neighbor  Introduce yourself to a colleague (name, position & district)  Share the information on your card  Turn the other direction and start the process over again  Share out

Outcomes for Today ESEA Waiver Update Review SLG Goal process and requirements Clarify the connection between SGPs and SLGs for the SY

ESEA Waiver Requirement Teachers in tested grades and subjects (Grades 4-8 ELA/Math) and principals must use state assessments as one measure of student learning and growth (SLG) in their evaluation Oregon educators set two SLG goals annually; Category 1 goals are measured by state assessment; Category 2 goals are measured by other assessments Teachers in tested grades and subjects & Principals Category 1 SLG goal Category 2 SLG goal Teachers in non- tested grades and subjects Category 2 SLG goal ELA/Math Grades 4-8

ESEA Waiver Update Oregon’s waiver approved for 3 years with conditions removed For evaluation purposes statewide assessments will only be used as a measure of SLG goal attainment for those grades that have baseline data  Tested grades and subjects are now ELA and Math 4-8

Impact of Class Size on SGPs Districts are required to use Median Student Growth Percentiles for educators who have at least 20 students Teachers and principals in grades 4-8 (ELA and math only) who fall below 20 students must use other measures that are valid, reliable, and comparable across the school or district (Category 2 measures)

ODE has requested a modification to the waiver  Districts will determine MSGPs, but not incorporate them in educator summative evaluations for SY  Districts required to provide SGP training to staff ODE recommends that all educators set two goals that use Category 2 measures Request to USED for

What is a Student Growth Percentile? Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) measure growth for individual students by comparing the improvement in his or her achievement on Smarter Balanced to that of his or her “academic peers” (i.e. those who have similar historical assessment results).

What is a Median Student Growth Percentile? Median Student Growth Percentile represents the exact middle of the Student Growth Percentile scores for the educator’s students. In other words, half of the educator’s students performed above or below the median score.

Option A: State Assigned SGPs Option A: State Assigned SGPs Option B: Verify SLG Goal Option B: Verify SLG Goal This option does not require educators to set a Category 1 SLG goal Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) are used exclusively to determine the Category 1 SLG rating This option requires educators to set Category 1 SLG goals using Smarter Balanced and rate their goals using the SLG scoring rubric The SLG goal rating is compared with the educator’s median SGP rating to determine the Category 1 SLG rating Two Options; Districts Choose

Timeline and Responsibilities SY ODE RESPONSIBILITIESDISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES Fall 2015 Provide districts state criteria for determining Median Student Growth Percentiles (see Table 3 on page 5 in this guidance). Provide districts with communications and guidance. Select Option A or Option B to be used district-wide. Establish a process for determining the teacher of record. Create class rosters and establish a roster verification process School Year Provide districts with professional development and technical support. Provide training in the district to educators, evaluators, and coordinating staff. February - June 2016 Administer Smarter Balanced Assessment Educators verify class rosters. Summer 2016 Calculate Student Growth Percentiles for all students. Send districts Student Growth Percentiles and Smarter Balanced achievement data in August. Receive Student Growth Percentiles and Smarter Balanced results from ODE. Fall 2016 Provide guidance and support to districts. Determine the Median Student Growth Percentile ratings using the state criteria. Incorporate median Student Growth Percentile ratings into educator summative evaluations.

What do we need to do this year? Goal Setting Goal Scoring Summative Evaluations

SLG Requirements for REQUIRED 8 components including Rationale Minimum of 2 SLG goals each year *Statewide assessments (Category 1) required for teachers and principals in tested grades and subjects Oregon Matrix used for summative evaluation *Pending review of HB 2680 RECOMMENDED Content is focused, not everything you teach Context can help ascertain instructional needs Tier goals/targets where appropriate Include the support YOU need

How do SGPs change the goal setting and scoring processes? Teachers and principals in grades 4- 8 in ELA and math All other educators

Teachers and Principals in Grades 4 – 8 ELA and Math Minimum of 2 SLG goals each year Quality Review Checklist used for goal setting One goal must use Category 1 measure (Smarter)  Method for scoring Category 1 goal depends on whether the district uses Option A or Option B Second goal can use either Category 1 or Category 2 measures  Category 2 goals scored using the statewide SLG Scoring Rubric Oregon Matrix used to identify summative scores

All Other Educators Minimum of 2 SLG goals each year Quality Review Checklist used for goal setting Goals can use either:  Category 1 (statewide assessments) OR  Category 2 (school or district-wide assessments) measures Goals scored using the statewide SLG Scoring Rubric Oregon Matrix used to identify summative scores

Quality Review Checklist Takes place during the goal setting phase of the professional growth cycle for teachers and administrators For an SLG goal to be approved, all criteria must be met Version with guiding questions available in SLG section of toolkit

Scoring SLG Goals Category 2 goals scored using State SLG Scoring Rubric Category 1 goal for tested grades and subjects must use SGPs (compared to Cat. 1 rating from scoring rubric, if district chooses Option B) Regardless of “on cycle” or “off cycle” year, all teachers and administrators set and score two goals every year

Your Turn! Use the data packet provided to:  Calculate Mr. Hendrick’s Y-axis rating  Determine Mr. Hendrick’s median SGP  Use the “State Median Student Growth Percentile Criteria” (p.5 of SGP Guidance, Table 3)  Calculate Mr. Hendrick’s X-axis rating Share Out

Things to Keep in Mind… Districts with contract teachers on a two year cycle MAY select two of the four goals from the cycle Decisions about probationary teachers do not have to be based on SLG goal scores Tested grades and subjects must use one Cat.1 goal rating in summative evaluation (Matrix) Adjusting evaluation cycle  Fall to Fall  Spring to Spring

Resources ODE Webpage for SGPs has been added to the EE Toolkit ODE Webpage for SGPs ESD Regional Workshops  Contact your ESD to find out when a regional training might be available in your area

Remaining questions?

ODE Contacts Educator Effectiveness Team: Tanya Frisendahl Sarah Martin Sarah Phillips Brian Putnam