Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | www.nist.gov/baldrige.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 EXAMINER TRAINING Examples of NERD Comment Formatting
Advertisements

Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Polishing Feedback Comments Sample 3: Results Strength.
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
June 2002QPRC 2002, Tempe, Arizona A Workshop on Assessing to the Baldrige Criteria Cheryl L. Jennings, Motorola Lynn Kelley, Textron.
ASSESSING HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ALIGNMENT
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Long Beach School District Stakeholder Survey Results Results from and Parent, Student, and Staff Surveys.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Self-Assessing Your Organization with the Baldrige Criteria.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Transforming lives through learning Learner Dialogue & Profiling.
Looking into the relationship between teacher and principal evaluation
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Parent School Climate Survey Results and Analysis November 2010.
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
External Review Exit Report Midvale School District #433> December 3-4, 2014.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Self-Assessing Your Organization with.
EFFECTIVE TEAMING, AND INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING Academy of Pacesetting States July 19-24, 2009 Princeton, New Jersey 1.
Student Perception Survey Toolkit Colorado’s Student Perception Survey Planning Webinar for Districts.
PARCC Assessment Math Shifts Becky Justus Math Teacher Greene County Tech Junior High PARCC Educator Leader Cadre Member.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Polishing Feedback Comments Sample 1: Process Strength.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Developing Human Capital Management Strategies Herb Heneman University of Wisconsin-Madison Tony Milanowski Westat.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing a High-Quality Scorebook 2015 Presentation for Senior and Alumni Examiners.
2015 Pre-Examiner Training and Preparation Course
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
School Governance for Parents: SSC Fundamentals An Introduction to the School Site Council (SSC) and Your Role in Developing the Balanced Scorecard.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Example of Maryland Performance Management Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Fall 2008.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Application Workshop – Session One April 26, 2011.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
LEARNING & COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES Curriculum Night 2015 Ms. Neely Jarrell Pine Lake Middle School.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Polishing Feedback Comments Sample 2: Process OFI.
Oak Park Education Foundation’s Update to District 97 Board Angie Dodd, Board President Deb Abrahamson, Executive Director Oak Park Education Foundation.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
2013 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Comment Writing for High-Quality Feedback Reports.
Overview What do we mean by a Learning Organisation? Why did we develop a People Development Framework? What was the process involved in building the.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Facilitate Group Learning
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
FLIPPED LEARNING. HOMEWORK EXPECTATIONS ➤ Students are expected to watch video examples (found on the SFE 6 th Grade Math Page) while following along.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ADMN 6130 Class 3 If you don’t organize the chaos, the chaos will organize you.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Writing High-Quality Feedback for 2016 Baldrige Award Applicants.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
SBCUSD Common Core Technology Initiative Assessment, Accountability and Instructional Technology and Information Technology.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | New Examiner Orientation and Examiner Training Experience Welcome to … BALDRIGE.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Examiner Preparation
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing “Straight A” Feedback for Baldrige Applicants 2016 Presentation for Senior.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
New Hanover County Schools
Mission Motto Learning for Life
February 24, 2011 Board of Education Workshop
Release of PARCC Student Results
Introduction to Agribusiness Management
Workforce Planning Project support overview Presenter's Name
Presentation transcript:

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |

Examiner Preparation Learning Objectives l Gain a deeper understanding of the Criteria l Enhance your evaluation skills: - applying current Criteria requirements to the case study l - applying the six-step evaluation process to the review of a Baldrige Award application

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Agenda for Day 1—Wednesday  Opening Plenary  Introductions, Course Overview  Practice #1 – Review of Pre Work Assignment Items 2.1, 4.1, 4.2, 6.1, 6.2  Includes Additional Hour Criteria Discussion (new)  Includes Additional Hour Key Factor Discussion (new)  Wrap-Up/Departure

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Agenda for Day 2—Thursday  Practice #2 — Review of NON Pre Work Assignment Items 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2  Includes Additional Hr. Criteria Discussion (new)  Includes Additional Hr. Key Factor Discussion (new)  Practice #3 — Results Items Pre Work Review and Discussion Item 7.4 (Begin)

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Agenda for Day 3—Friday  Practice #3 (continued) NON Pre Work Items 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.5  Wrap-Up and Departure  Closing Session

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Practice #1 Review Pre Work Process Items Assignments: Table 1: 2.1 Table 2: 4.1 Table 3: 4.2 Table 4: 6.1 Table 5: 6.2 Table 6: 2.1 or 6.2 (as needed)

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 1: Read the Criteria. Exercise Page 8

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 2: Determine Most Relevant Key Factors. Exercise Page 11

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 3: Read & Analyze the Application. Exercise Page 19

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 4: Identify Strengths / OFIs. Exercise Page 21

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 5: Write Feedback Ready Comments Exercise Page 25

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Process Strength 2.2a(4) To mitigate the strategic challenge of competitors wishing to hire its engaged workforce, the applicant ensures that workforce plans support any needed changes. For example, through data and budget analysis and surveys, the applicant takes a proactive approach to workforce capacity and allocates instructional staff to areas of greatest need through “vertical teamwork.” RelevanceNugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Process OFI 4.2a(1) It is not clear how the applicant systematically transfers knowledge specific to the needs of parents and volunteers in support of the PhilP that all are accountable for student performance. For example, parents and volunteers do not appear to be included in teachers’ grade-level discussions, and parents do not appear to have access to teachers’ online forums, blogs, and classroom support server (Figure 4.2-1). RelevanceNugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 6: Determine the Scoring Range and Score Exercise Page 29

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Practice #2 Non Pre Work Process Items Apply Learnings - Practice the 6-Step Process Table Assignments: Table 1 – Item 1.1 Table 2 – Item 1.2 Table 3 – Item 2.2 Table 4 – Item 3.1 Table 5 – Item 3.2 Table 6 - Facilitator’s Choice

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 1: Read the Criteria. Exercise Page 32

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 2: Determine Most Relevant Key Factors. Exercise Page 35

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 3: Read & Analyze the Application. Exercise Page 37

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 4: Identify Strengths / OFIs. Exercise Page 39

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 5: Write Feedback Ready Comments Samples Page 43 Exercise Page 47

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Process Strength 2.2a(4) To mitigate the strategic challenge of competitors wishing to hire its engaged workforce, the applicant ensures that workforce plans support any needed changes. For example, through data and budget analysis and surveys, the applicant takes a proactive approach to workforce capacity and allocates instructional staff to areas of greatest need through “vertical teamwork.” RelevanceNugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Process OFI 4.2a(1) It is not clear how the applicant systematically transfers knowledge specific to the needs of parents and volunteers in support of the PhilP that all are accountable for student performance. For example, parents and volunteers do not appear to be included in teachers’ grade-level discussions, and parents do not appear to have access to teachers’ online forums, blogs, and classroom support server (Figure 4.2-1). RelevanceNugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 6: Determine the Scoring Range and Score Exercise Page 49

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Practice #3 Part 1: Review Pre Work Results Item 7.4 (Large Group)

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Practice #3 Part 2: Apply Learnings - Practice Step 1 Table Assignments: Table 1 – Step 1: Item 7.1a, c Table 2 – Step 1: Item 7.1b Table 3 – Item 7.2 Table 4 – Item 7.3 Table 5 – Item 7.5 Table 6 - Facilitator’s Choice Exercise Page 52

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 1: Read the Criteria.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Practice #3 Part 2: Apply Learnings - Practice Steps 2, 3, 4, and 6 Table Assignments: Table 1 – 7.1 Table 2 – 7.1 Table 3 – Item 7.2 Table 4 – Item 7.3 Table 5 – Item 7.5 Table 6 - Facilitator’s Choice Exercise Page 52

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Results Strength 7.3a(1) Strong results for key measures of workforce capability and capacity may help strengthen the engagement factor of having sufficient resources to get the job done. Rates of certification (Figure 7.3-1) and student-teacher ratio (Figure 7.3-2) have improved over the periods shown, reaching 100% or close to 100% for all segments, and the student-teacher ratio in elementary and middle schools compares favorably to that of a Baldrige Award winner. Relevance Nugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Results OFI 7.2a Results related to key student requirements, such as stimulating creative thought, treating students fairly, and maintaining a safe school, are missing. Tracking such results may give the applicant insights into how to retain families and how to attract families to the district. Relevance Nugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 2: Select the Key Factors. Exercise Page 55

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 3: Read and Analyze the Application. Exercise Page 57

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 4: Determine Strengths and OFIs. Exercise Page 59

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 6: Determine Scoring Range and Score. Exercise Page 61