Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?

Objectives Become familiar with the current work of NCDPI regarding Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Know the key differences between the four and three tier RtI model Understand the critical components of RtI as a framework for school improvement

RtI State Leadership Team Angela Quick, Deputy Chief Academic Officer Maria Pitre-Martin, Director, K-12 Curriculum and Technology –Ivanna Mann Thrower, ESL/ Title III Consultant –Amy Scrinzi, Math Consultant –Dan Tetreault, English/ Language Arts Consultant Mary Watson, Director, Exceptional Children –Sherry Thomas, Section Chief, Exceptional Children –Lynne Loeser, SLD/ ADHD Consultant, Exceptional Children Allison Whitaker, Consultant, Federal Program Monitoring and Support

Rick Powers- Statewide RtI Building Administrator Consultant

History of RtI in NC 5

North Carolina Problem-Solving Model 2000 Study began 2004 Five pilot sites 2006 State wide training 2008 Regional training & trainers 2010 General education partnership 2011 Implementation Science 2012 Transition to RtI three tier model

NC DPI Definition of RtI NC Responsiveness to Instruction (NCRtI) is a multi-tiered framework which promotes school improvement through engaging, high quality instruction. NCRtI employs a team approach to guide educational practices, using a problem-solving model based on data, to address student needs and maximize growth for all. 7

Critical Components of RtI Leadership and Shared Responsibility Curriculum and Instruction Assessment Problem-Solving/Data-Based Decision Making Family and Community Partnerships Sustainability and Integration 8

Current State Work Scaling Up Work Group –Focused work with State Implementation and Scaling up of Evidence-based Practices (SISEP) –Collaboration across DPI Agency and Institutions of Higher Education, and LEA representation Collaboration with RtI and PBIS –Developing one Multi-tiered System of Support Secondary RtI Pilots- Oak Foundation Grant

Currently Implementing 80% of LEAs implementing in at least one school 53% of all K-8 schools are implementing 23% of all High Schools are implementing 45% of all schools (K-12) are implementing 10

Transitioning from Four to Three Tier Model

Adjusting Mindsets Process for some students Framework for total school improvement

Why Shift? Place focus on problem-solving foundational core for total school improvement Increase focus on general education Movement away from viewing RtI as a process to a framework for all students Integrate with Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)

Title I ESL AIG Special Education Educating in silos 14 Slide created by Dale Cusumano, Ph.D.

Title I ESL AIG Special Education Educating Collaboratively 15 Slide adapted from Dale Cusumano, Ph.D.

Problem-Solving Model Evidence-Based Practices Data-Based Decision Making Four Tier RtI Model System of Support for Student Success Three Tier RtI Model

Perceived focus on individual students Individual paperwork at all Tiers 7 Step Problem- Solving Individual student data only Education in silos Perceived as route to Special Ed Focus on Core instruction at all tiers TIPS Monitor all students’ response All students in Tier I Shared Education Core Paperwork at Tier I Four TiersThree Tiers

What Happened? 18

Defining, Analyzing and Monitoring Tiers I, II and III

Layering of Support Differentiated Core Supplemental Support Intensive Support 20

Foundational Core: Tier 1 21 Who: All students are in Tier 1 (Foundational Core) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to produce good outcomes for the majority of students Effectiveness: If at least 80% of all students are meeting benchmarks in Foundational Core alone. What about subgroups?

Tier I – Three Tier Focus on Foundational Core Includes all students Focus on all students across a grade and response to foundational core Document on one grade level problem-solving form Monitor response (of all students) to instructional changes

Tier I – Focus on Foundational Core Enhanced core Increased academic engaged time Less paperwork Less progress monitoring

Analyzing Foundational Core

Are at least 80% of your students proficient in each subgroup with foundational core alone? What is working? Why? How do you know? What’s not working? Why? How do you know? Do teachers have needed skills & content knowledge?

Supplemental Instruction: Tier II Slide adapted from G. Batsche Who: Students needing supplemental support in addition to Foundational Core instruction (approx. 20% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improve performance in Foundational Core Effectiveness: If at least 70-80% of students improve performance toward Foundational Core standards

Tier II – Supplemental + Foundational Core Instruction is connected to core content Supplemental instruction does not supplant core Documentation is on same form for individual student Analysis of effectiveness of Tier II instruction for all students toward Foundational Core standards

Intensive Instruction: Tier III 28 Who: Students needing Intensive support in addition to Supplemental and Foundational Core instruction (approx. 5% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improve performance Effectiveness: If there is progress toward performance in Foundational Core standards Slide adapted from G. Batsche

Tier III – Intensive + Supplemental + Foundational Core Instruction is most intensive in the building Increase intensity and frequency (time, duration, or digging deeper in specific skill) Documentation is on same form for individual student Analysis of effectiveness of Tier III instruction for all students toward Foundational Core Standards

Training, Support and Information State Training –Transition Training (Four Tiers to Three Tiers) Conducted June, July and August 2012 Future dates will be sent out via listserv –New Implementer Training (3 days) Haywood County- Sept 5, 6, 7 Edgecombe County- Oct 3, 4, 5 Winston-Salem/Forsyth County- Oct 10, 11, 12

Training, Support and Information Ongoing Technical Assistance to District Teams through RtI Field Consultants Regional Networking Meetings- –Conducted every other month in each region Listserv – your regional field consultant

NCDPI Responsiveness to Instruction

Contact Information for Training and Support Anne Nixon- Regions 1, 2, 3 Amy Miller- Regions 3, 4, 5 Amy Jablonski- Regions 6, 7, 8 Rick Powers- Statewide Consultant

Questions