Urban Middle Grades Mathematics Curriculum Implementation Karen D. King Monica Mitchell Candace Barriteau Phaire Jessica Tybursky.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
PK & PCK Discussion Session Facilitated by Dr Zahari Hamidon.
LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices March 27, April 23, April 30, May 7 Session One: Modules 1 & 2 Session Two:
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
UTILIZING FORMATIVE EVALUATION IN A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Tiah Alphonso Louisiana State University Department of Educational Theory, Policy,
Chapter 10 Teaching and Learning Strategies
Powerful Pedagogical Practices Jamila Riser, Delaware Mathematics Coalition Jon Manon, University of Delaware.
Teachers’ Use of Standards-Based Instructional Materials Karen D. King New York University Abstract The purpose of the study is: To explore the ways teachers.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Structuring Retreats to Share Findings and Discuss Recommendations Paul Cobb and the MIST Team.
Collaborating for Student Success Teacher Collaboration: Strategies & Outcomes ARCHES Seminar UC Irvine ~ 3/15/10 Ivan Cheng
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
Evaluation Process/Requirements for CAPP Algebra Project.
Curriculum Overview Brent Hartsell CIT 0609.
1 Studying Teacher Professional Development: Challenges and Possible Solutions Nicole Kersting Research Scientist LessonLab Research Institute, Santa Monica,
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
DO STUDENTS THAT HAVE COMPUTERS AT HOME GET BETTER GRADES IN SCIENCE AND MATH CLASS AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL? By Kelly Laura.
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Striving to Link Teacher and Student Outcomes: Results from an Analysis of Whole-school Interventions Kelly Feighan, Elena Kirtcheva, and Eric Kucharik.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Welcome to FACT #2 About Teacher Inquiry Article Quick SCAN Read
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Standards-based Curriculum. What is curriculum? All experiences conducted under the jurisdiction of the school (broad view) A plan or set of outcomes.
The Role of the Institutional Setting in Teachers’ Development of Ambitious Instructional Practices in Middle-Grades Mathematics Paul Cobb Kara Jackson.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Goals for Webinar: Applications of SEC Alignment Analysis
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Context Evaluation knowing the setting Context Evaluation knowing the setting.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Mentoring Moments: Powerful Designs for Mentoring Teaching Policy and Standards Branch Issue 12 / Nov 2012.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement.
Content and Curriculum ….. Information from Chapters 3 and 9 and from the North Carolina Standard Course of Study.
© 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR International Comparative.
Alignment as a Systemic Tool Classroom Instruction.
Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Curriculum Specialist Introduction to Pearson Forward.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
By: Brittany Cochran, Lindsey King, and Justin Blanton.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
ISLN April Welcome Introductions Norms: A - Appreciate one another’s expertise. E - Engage fully in all learning experiences. I - Invest.
Preparing to Facilitate Mathematics Professional Development: Aiming for Alignment Between the Program and the Facilitator Nanette Seago Karen Koellner.
Research and Evaluation
Chapter Six What Makes a Teacher Effective?
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
The curriculum The curricullum tells «What and how the learners should learn» at specific levels of the education system. It includes the objectives and.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
GA Association of School Personnel Administrators
If educators do _____, then _____ will happen in classrooms.
Presentation transcript:

Urban Middle Grades Mathematics Curriculum Implementation Karen D. King Monica Mitchell Candace Barriteau Phaire Jessica Tybursky

Overview of the Study The purpose of the study is: – to explore the ways teachers use Standards-based instructional materials when they are mandated as the materials to use, –The reasons teachers give for their choices in ways to use the materials, and –the relationship between the ways teachers use the materials and students’ achievement

Significance of the Study Framed not as “fidelity of implementation” as a measure in evaluating the curriculum Instead framed as “teachers as decision-makers in their classrooms” and trying to better understand –The decisions teachers make –The reasons for these decisions –The impact on student achievement In particular, trying to understand these issues in the context of urban classrooms where teachers perceive unique constraints on teaching

Mathematics task as represented in instructional materials Task features Hypothesized cognitive demand Hypothesized mathematical practices to be engaged Mathematics task as represented in teachers’ intended curriculum Task features Hypothesized cognitive demand Hypothesized mathematical practices to be engaged Mathematics task as set up by teacher in the classroom Task features Hypothesized cognitive demand Hypothesized mathematical practices to be engaged Mathematics task as implemented with students in the classroom Enactment of task features Cognitive processing Participation in mathematical practices Student Learning Factors influencing task choice Teacher goals Teacher subject matter knowledge Teacher knowledge of curriculum Teacher knowledge of students Teacher knowledge of and access to alternate tasks Factors influencing task setup Teacher goals Teacher subject matter knowledge Teacher knowledge of students Teacher knowledge of student learning Structural instructional realities Factors influencing task implementation Classroom norms Task conditions Teacher instructional habits and dispositions Students learning habits and dispositions Classroom instructional realities

Mathematics task as represented in instructional materials Task features Hypothesized cognitive demand Hypothesized mathematical practices to be engaged Mathematics task as represented in teachers’ intended curriculum Task features Hypothesized cognitive demand Hypothesized mathematical practices to be engaged Mathematics task as set up by teacher in the classroom Task features Hypothesized cognitive demand Hypothesized mathematical practices to be engaged Mathematics task as implemented with students in the classroom Enactment of task features Cognitive processing Participation in mathematical practices Student Learning Factors influencing task choice Teacher goals Teacher subject matter knowledge Teacher knowledge of curriculum Teacher knowledge of students Teacher knowledge of and access to alternate tasks Factors influencing task setup Teacher goals Teacher subject matter knowledge Teacher knowledge of students Teacher knowledge of student learning Structural instructional realities Factors influencing task implementation Classroom norms Task conditions Teacher instructional habits and dispositions Students learning habits and dispositions Classroom instructional realities

Research Design Mixed methods design Population study of teachers’ use based on survey data and student achievement data Case studies of two schools –Interviews and observations of teachers about their planning and execution of lessons –Assessments of student achievement –Interviews with school administrators District Policy Analysis –Review of documents and interviews with district personnel and consultants

Session Schedule 1:10 – 1:25 Mediation of District Pacing Guide – Monica Mitchell 1:25 – 1:35 Validity Study –Candace Barriteau Phaire 1:35 - 1:50 Variations in Teachers’ Use – Jessica Tybursky and Karen King 1:50 – 2:30 Discussion