Physics of sin 2 2θ 13 ★ What is θ 13 ? ★ What does sin 2 2θ 13 mean? sin 2 2θ 13 measures the oscillation amplitude of reactor neutrinos, e.g., at Daya.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Probing CP violation in neutrino oscillations with neutrino telescopes Kfir Blum, Yosef Nir, Eli Waxman arXiv: [hep-ph]
Advertisements

Kiwoon Choi PQ-invariant multi-singlet NMSSM
Can we experimentally test seesaw and leptogenesis? Hitoshi Murayama (IPMU Tokyo & Berkeley) Melbourne Neutrino WS, Jun 4, 2008 With Matt Buckley.
Flavor Violation in SUSY SEESAW models 8th International Workshop on Tau-Lepton Physics Tau04 Junji Hisano (ICRR, U of Tokyo)
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Neutrino Masses, Leptogenesis and Beyond The Incredible Foresight of ETTORE MAJORANA Haim Harari Erice, August 31, 2006.
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for → e and −e Conversion Ren Bo Coauther : Koji Tsumura, Xiao - Gang He arXiv:
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Probing Majorana Neutrinos in Rare Meson Decays Claudio Dib UTFSM I.S. & B.K. Fest, UTFSM, May 2010 G. Cvetic, C.D., S.K. Kang, C.S. Kim, PRD 82, ,
Particle Physics and Cosmology
Measuring CP violating phase from long baseline neutrino experiments Naotoshi Okamura (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) ICFP2005 Oct. 07, NCU.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 1 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
March 2005 Theme Group 2 Perspectives on Grand Unification in View of Neutrino Mass R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland.
Pasquale Di Bari (Max Planck, Munich) COSMO 06, Tahoe Lake, September 25-29, 2006 Flavor effects in leptogenesis Reference paper: S. Blanchet, PDB hep/ph.
A New Theory of Neutrino Oscillations Netta Engelhardt
Fermion Masses G.G.Ross, Corfu, September 2005 The Standard Model.
Current Status of Neutrino Physics 2012 NRF workshop on Flavor and Collider Physics Yonsei University June 8~9, 2012 Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul-Tech )
Minimal SO(10)×A4 SUSY GUT ABDELHAMID ALBAID In Collaboration with K. S. BABU Oklahoma State University.
Model building: “The simplest neutrino mass matrix” see Harrison and Scott: Phys. Lett. B594, 324 (2004), hep-ph/ , Phys. Lett. B557, 76 (2003).
Probing Majorana Neutrinos (in Rare Decays of Mesons) 11/17/ DBD11 C. S. Kim arXiv: (PRD82,053010,2010) G. Cvetic, C. Dib, S.K. Kang, C.S.
Leptonic CP Violation & Wolfenstein Parametrization For Lepton Mixing in Gauge Family Model Yue-Liang Wu Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics China.
0 Physics of Neutrinos From Boris Kayser, Fermilab.
Shaving Type-I Seesaw Mechanism with Occam's Razor
Test Z’ Model in Annihilation Type Radiative B Decays Ying Li Yonsei University, Korea Yantai University, China Based on J. Hua, C.S Kim, Y. Li, arxiv:
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
Anarchy, Neutrinoless double beta decay and Leptogenesis Xiaochuan Lu and Hitoshi Murayama NuFact 2013, Aug 22nd UC Berkeley.
1 Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser Scottish Summer School August 11,
From Cosmological Constant to Sin Distribution ICRR neutrino workshop Nov. 02, 2007 Taizan Watari (U. Tokyo) (hep-ph) (hep-ph) with.
A. Yu. Smirnov International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy Institute for Nuclear Research, RAS, Moscow, Russia NO-VE 2006: ``Ultimate.
March 2005 Theme Group 2 What can N-N-bar Oscillation teach us about physics Beyond the standard model ? R. N. Mohapatra University of Maryland NANO workshop,
QFD, Weak Interactions Some Weak Interaction basics
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Impact of Neutrino Oscillation Measurements on Theory Hitoshi Murayama NuFact 03 June 10, 2003.
21 Sept The MSM -- Neutrino Masses and Dark matter -- Takehiko Asaka (Tohoku University) TA, S.Blanchet, M.Shaposhnikov [hep-ph/ ] TA, M.Shaposhnikov.
Geometric -Mass Hierarchy & Leptogenesis Zhi-zhong Xing (IHEP, Beijing)  A Conjecture + An Ansatz  Seesaw + Leptogenesis  -Mixing + Baryogenesis Z.Z.X.,
H. Quarks – “the building blocks of the Universe” The number of quarks increased with discoveries of new particles and have reached 6 For unknown reasons.
The CKM matrix & its parametrizations
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
Standard Model - Standard Model prediction (postulated that neutrinos are massless, consistent with observation that individual lepton flavors seemed to.
Quark-Lepton Complementarity in light of recent T2K & MINOS experiments November 18, 2011 Yonsei University Sin Kyu Kang ( 서울과학기술대학교 )
SUSY GUT Predictions for Neutrino Oscillation Mu-Chun Chen Brookhaven National Laboratory DUSEL Workshop, January 4-7, 2005 University of Colorado at Boulder.
Family Gauge Bosons with an Inverted Mass Hierarchy Yoshio Koide (Osaka University) in collaboration with Toshifumi Yamashita (Maskawa Insititute, KSU)
Probing Majorana Neutrinos in the LHC Era YongPyong2010 Seoul National University of Tech. Sin Kyu Kang.
Cosmological matter-antimatter asymmetry & possible CP violation in neutrino oscillations Zhi-zhong Xing (IHEP) International UHE Tau Neutrino Workshop.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS AND LEPTOGENESIS Alicia Broncano Berrocal MPI.
Neutrino physics: The future Gabriela Barenboim TAU04.
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis International workshop on double beta decay searches Oct SNU Sin Kyu Kang (Seoul National University of.
A model for large non-standard interactions of neutrinos leading to the LMA-dark solution Yasaman Farzan IPM, Tehran.
and what we unsuccessfully tried to explain (so far)
Neutrino Masses and Flavor Mixing H. Fritzsch.
Neutrino Masses and Flavor Mixing H. Fritzsch LMU Munich.
Leptogenesis beyond the limit of hierarchical heavy neutrino masses
Modeles Theoriques Andrea Romanino CERN.
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
Lepton Flavour Violation
Non-unitary deviation from the tri-bimaximal mixing and neutrino oscillations Shu Luo The Summer Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics.
Flavor Mixing of quarks.
Neutrinos and the Evolution
SU(3) Gauge Family Model for Neutrino Mixing and Masses
高能物理所 张贺 高能物理学会第七届年会 2006年10月29日
Precision Probes for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Exploring SUSY breaking mechanism with B decays
What’s the matter with antimatter?
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis
Neutrino Oscillations
TeV Leptogenesis in the Minimal Seesaw Model
High Energy Physics On the Fukugita-Tanimoto-Yanagida Ansatz with Partially Non-degenerate Right-handed Majorana Neutrinos 29 October,
Presentation transcript:

Physics of sin 2 2θ 13 ★ What is θ 13 ? ★ What does sin 2 2θ 13 mean? sin 2 2θ 13 measures the oscillation amplitude of reactor neutrinos, e.g., at Daya Bay ( 大亚湾). θ 13 is the yet unknown (smallest) lepton mixing angle.

Physics of sin 2 2θ 13 Zhi-zhong Xing/IHEP ( 邢志忠 / 高能所 ) OUTLINE ★ High Impact of θ 13 on Particle Physics ★ θ 13 = 0 : Prerequisite and Consequences ★ θ 13 ≠ 0 : How Big or How Small? ☆ Expectations from Global Analyses ☆ Expectations from Specific Models ★ Comments and Concluding Remarks

High Impact of θ 13 on Particle Physics Strong experimental evidence in favor of neutrino oscillations ( SK, SNO, KamLAND, K2K, … ) implies that ★ neutrinos are massive ★ lepton flavors are mixed A major breakthrough in today’s particle physics In SM, lepton number is conserving & neutrinos are massless Weyl particles. But many people did not believe that, because ☆ m ν = 0 is not guaranteed by fundamental law or symmetry ☆ m ν ≠ 0 is naturally expected in grand unified theories Today we are convinced that m ν ≠ 0 is actually true. Then, ☆ SM incomplete—an experimental reason to go beyond SM ☆ lepton mixing at the front of experimental particle physics

Quark flavor mixing (CKM matrix): Experimental steps: θ 12 → θ 23 → θ 13 → δ ~ 13° ~ 2° ~ 0.2° ~ 65° Lepton flavor mixing (MNS matrix): Experimental steps: θ 23 → θ 12 → θ 13 → δ/ρ/σ ~ 45° ~ 33° <13° ~ ? ? ?

Lessons of quark mixing for lepton mixing: ★ The smallest mixing angle θ 13 is a crucial turning-point in doing precision measurements and detecting CP violation ★ Neutrino masses might have a relatively weak hierarchy (or near degeneracy) relevant to the bi-large mixing pattern Why is the measurement of θ 13 extremely important? ★ θ 13 is a fundamental parameter of flavor physics ★ θ 13 controls the observable effects of CP violation ★ θ 13 is a sensitive model / theory discriminator ★ θ 13 is a key to search for new and newer physics Possible impact of θ 13 on astrophysics and cosmology: Dark matter, Matter-Antimatter asymmetry, Supernovae, …

θ 13 = 0 : Prerequisite and Consequences Experimentally,θ 13 < 13°( CHOOZ ),θ 13 = 0 is not impossible Theoretically, there is no good reason (symmetry) for θ 13 = 0 Note thatθ 13 = 0 would hold, if there existed mass degeneracy of charged leptons or neutrinos (with Majorana phases Ψ i ): ☆ m 1 = m 3 with Ψ 1 = Ψ 3 or m 2 = m 3 with Ψ 2 = Ψ 3 ☆ m e = m μ or m e = m τ ( J.W. Mei, Z.Z.X., 2003 ) But all these conceptually interesting limits are unrealistic! Consequences of θ 13 = 0: ▲ One CP-violating phase would vanish; ▲ Leptonic unitarity triangles would collapse — CP violation would not appear in neutrino oscillations; ▲ There would be no matter effects on m 3 and θ 23 ; etc.

θ 13 ≠ 0 : How Big or How Small? Convincing flavor theory has been lacking—it is at present impossible to predict fermion masses, flavor mixing angles and CP phases at a fundamental level—the flavor problem Flavor experiments play the leading role — determine those unknown parameters and shed light on the unknown theory Current experimental data ★ Current experimental data allow us to get useful hints on the size of θ 13 from global analyses of solar, atmospheric, reactor and accelerator neutrino oscillation data (like good lesson from pinning down m t with LEP electroweak data and sin 2 β with non-B factory quark mixing data) — essentially model-independent. Current experimental data ★ Current experimental data help us to build some realistic models from which the size of θ 13 can be calculated.

Expectations from Global Analyses Group A: J. Bahcall, M. Gonzalez-Garcia, C. Pena-Garay (BGP) Group B: M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. Tortola, J. Valle (MSTV) Main approximation: one mass scale dominance for 3 types of experimental data (,δis decoupled) ☆ Solar and KamLAND:, θ 12, θ 13 ; ☆ Atmospheric and K2K:, θ 23, θ 13 ; ☆ CHOOZ:, θ 13.

★ Best fit of BGP: θ 13 = 5.44°or sin 2 2 θ 13 = ★ Best fit of MSTV: θ 13 = 4.44°or sin 2 2 θ 13 = An experiment with sensitivity 1% may measure sin 2 2 θ 13 !

Expectations from Specific Models Low–energy phenomenology of lepton masses and mixing: M l –charged lepton mass matrix ; M ν –effective neutrino mass matrix M l and M ν may stem from GUTs or non–GUT models, but their structures are in general unspecified. Testable relation between lepton masses and flavor mixing parameters can’t be achieved, unless phenomenological hypotheses are made. Results for θ 13 from “predictive” models are of two types: ★ θ 13 is given in terms of mass ratios of leptons or quarks ★ θ 13 is given by other knownν— oscillation parameters Totally 12 parameters, but only 7 of them have been known

“Democratic” neutrino mixing model (H. Fritzsch, Z.Z. X., 1996 ) Bi-large lepton flavor mixing withθ 13 ≠ 0 and CP violation: Prediction Idea: S(3) L × S(3) R symmetry of M l and S(3) symmetry of M ν are explicitly broken by small perturbations Or, sin 2 2 θ 13 = 0.013

SO(10)–inspired neutrino model ( W. Buchmüller, D. Wyler, 2001 ) Comments: leptogenesis can be accommodated; RGE effects are not included; difficult to get a satisfactory flavor picture Idea: Lepton-quark symmetry Seesaw mechanism from data to obtain light neutrinos Mass spectraand It is possible to get bi-large mixing pattern with a prediction i.e. sin 2 2 θ 13 = Too good?

Texture zeros of M ν ( P. Frampton, S. Glashow, D. Marfatia, 2002 ). We get θ 13 ~ 5°or sin 2 2 θ 13 = 0.03

Minimal seesawνmodel ( P. Frampton, S. Glashow, T. Yanagida, 2002 ) Motivation: to simultaneously interpret neutrino oscillations and cosmological baryon number asymmetry In the basis of diagonal M l and M R, FGY ansatz of M D gives Since |Det(M ν )| = m 1 m 2 m 3 = 0, m 1 = 0 or m 3 = 0 must hold. ★ The texture of M ν is stable against radiative corrections; ★ CP-violating phases of M ν can be determined by θ 13 etc. We take the m 1 = 0 case (normal hierarchy) as an example:

Two CP-violating phases ( W.L. Guo / J.W. Mei, Z.Z. X., 2003): Y B  ε 1 ~ 10 –10 can be achieved, if M 1 ≥ GeV ( SM/SUSY ) Remark: a testable model in which θ 13 determines Y B etc. |cosδ|< 1 requires sin θ 13 ~ 0.075, in a very restrictive range Cosmological baryon number asymmetry via leptogenesis:

Comments and Concluding Remarks θ 13 has a role ! ★ Another bonus to be achieved from a measurement of θ 13 is to understand sub-leading effects in neutrino oscillations & to probe or isolate much newer physics (e.g., sterile neutrinos) ★ More theoretical reasons for sin 2 2θ 13 >0.01( M. Lindner 2003 ) ☆ Models with the “anarchy” idea typically predict sin 2 2θ 13 just below its current upper limit; ☆ Quantum corrections allow sin 2 2θ 13 = 0 at the GUT scale to become sin 2 2θ 13 >0.01 at low scales: nothing → something.

Thank You & Happy Chinese New Year