DWR’s Second Alternative Proposal for Method 4 Peter Brostrom Department of Water Resources Water Use and Efficiency Branch August 25, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Alderwood Water & Wastewater District Draft Water Conservation Goal Kelly ORourke HDR December 17, 2007.
Advertisements

California American Water Monterey Supply Project - Scenarios December 11-13, 2012.
Summary of BMP Savings Calculator Sample Results SB X7 7 Urban Stakeholder Committee 22 October 2010 Richard A. Mills California State Water Resources.
Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on Budget-based Water Rate Structures 1 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern.
Standardized Reporting Form (B1) September 13, 2011 B1 (On Line Data Submittal Listening Session) Shem Stygar & Kent Frame 1.
Water Conservation: Current & Future Trends And A (small) Success Story By Richard M. Silberman Co-President, Managing Director Healthy Buildings.
1 Summary of City of Austin Population and Water Demand Revision Requests for Region K Water Planning Austin Water Utility Water Resources Management Program.
Spain’s Emission Projection Project: Agriculture Julio Lumbreras Rafael Borge Authors: Ministry of Environment Technical University of Madrid.
Unit 5 PERCENTS. 2  Indicates number of hundredths in a whole  Decimal fraction can be expressed as a percent by moving decimal point two places to.
Addition & Subtraction Add Plus More than Subtract Difference Take away Altogether Minus Less than +-
California Milk Pricing California has its own state milk pricing order.
Pathways to Lasting Solutions “The Longest Yard” Water Budget Rate Structures & The City of Boulder, Colorado January 25, 2007 © 2006 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
Urban Water Conservation Under 2009 Legislation Ryan S. Bezerra February 8, 2013.
Percent Problems Solving Simple Percent Problems.
Water Conservation PARKVILLE HIGH SCHOOL. Residential  Low-flush toilets- Low flush only uses 1.6 gallons of water compared to a normal flush of 3.5.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
CENTURY 21 ACCOUNTING © 2009 South-Western, Cengage Learning LESSON 18-2 Calculating Depreciation Expense.
Energy Conservation. What is energy conservation?  Energy conservation is the practice of decreasing the quantity of energy used while achieving a similar.
Challenges for district heating methodologies Worldbank Workshop on CDM Methodologies 5 December 2005 Lambert Schneider.
Senate Bill X7-7 Implementation CII Task Force March 1, 2011 Manucher Alemi, Ph. D., P.E. Water Use and Efficiency Program Manager.
Framework for Phase 2 Modeling Function of the Model: A platform for discussing alternative growth scenarios in Metro Boston and the associated tradeoffs.
Systematic Municipal Water Use Accounting and GPCD Calculations John W. Longworth, P.E. -- Chief Water Use and Conservation Bureau NM Office of the State.
Agricultural Stakeholder Committee August 3, 2011 DWR’s Discussion Paper on Proposed Methodology for Quantifying the Efficiency of Agricultural Water Use.
Water Use Efficiency Implementation: Lessons Learned in California Tom Peters Mary Lou Cotton.
CENTURY 21 ACCOUNTING © Thomson/South-Western LESSON 18-2 Calculating Depreciation Expense.
Potential Target Method #4 Using Density and ETo Factors Tom Hawkins DWR U4 Technical Subcommittee Meeting August 25, 2010.
Learning about Using Inverse Operations for finding the original price after a percentage increase or decrease.
Energizing Utilities to Embrace Demand Energizing Utilities to Embrace Demand Management South Florida Water Management District Water Summit December.
Understanding SB 1016 Solid Waste Per Capita Disposal Measurement Act 1.
Numbers Percentage of a number.
Water Conservation Investigation. Determine the average household water usage per month What does 20% reduction in water use represent? What does 35 %
BMP-Based Target Setting Presented by DWR at U4 Technical Subcommittee Meeting on August 25,
Calculating Effect Sizes for Single Subject Designs 10.1.
Peter Brostrom California Department of Water Resources Office of Water Use and Efficiency Branch October 15, 2010.
Time Frame. Opportunities To Comment Today October 15 th - Urban Stakeholders Committee November 9 th – California Water Commission Formal Rulemaking.
Department of Water Resources Sacramento, CA October 11, 2010.
Regional Conservation Progress Review of Regional Savings from September 21, 2010.
6-3 Finding Percents NS1.3 Convert fractions to decimals and percents and use these representations in estimations, computations, and applications. California.
Innovations in Water-Efficient Landscaping and Indoor Water-Use Jacob Atalla, KB Home 1) Efficiency as a resource – quantifying the savings that new homes.
Impacts of Municipal Conservation and Reuse Strategies in Region C Dan Hardin Director, Water Resource Planning Texas Water Development Board.
Making Conservation Work for You Chris Brown Chris Brown Consulting for Office of Rural Community Affairs December 2, 2003.
Topic 2 Proportional Reasoning with Percents Percent of a Number To find the percent of a number, you can: write the percent as a fraction and.
SBx7-7 The New Terrain Chris Brown Greening Our Water Infrastructure Petaluma April 9, 2010.
Eugene Water & Electric Board Jill Hoyenga, Water Management Services Supervisor.
Peter Brostrom Water Use and Efficiency Branch California Department of Water Resources.
January 25, 2106 Update Background 2015 – Fourth Year of Extreme Drought April 1, 2015 Snowpack was lowest ever recorded Risks.
Temperature.
I’m Thinking of a Number
CONEWAGO CREEK GROUND WATER STUDY Base Flow and Impervious Cover November 7, 2007 Watershed Alliance of Adams County Joe McNally, P.G. GeoServices, Ltd.
Meeting Utah’s Future Water Needs January 21, 2016 By Todd Adams and Candice Hasenyager.
Vicki Lake, Unit SupervisorContra Costa Climate Leaders Workshop Division of Statewide Water Management May 9, 2016
Simplify MultiplyDivide Add & Subtract Proportion.
PRESENTED TO: ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER POLLUTION ABATEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 5, 2013 Regional Wastewater.
OBJECTIVES 1. DEFINE and GIVE EXAMPLES of: proper fractions
Calculating Effect Sizes for Single Subject Designs
Elizabeth Lovsted, P.E. February 15, 2017
Investment Appraisal A set of tools which allow a company to make an informed decision on whether or not to proceed with a given investment. These tools.
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis
Drought Planning Through Integrated Rate Design
Urban Water Use Efficiency Policy-2016 and Beyond
Director Jerry Werner March 26, 2010
Divide the number in C by 10.
California’s Water Conservation Amidst A Record Drought
Paul D. Jones II, P.E., General Manager August 25, 2016
2 Equations, Inequalities, and Applications.
3. Fractions.
NARUC Winter Policy Summit
Public Utilities Department
WRIA 49 Planning Unit Buildout Analysis
Presentation transcript:

DWR’s Second Alternative Proposal for Method 4 Peter Brostrom Department of Water Resources Water Use and Efficiency Branch August 25, 2010

Proposal based on segregating 3 water use factors Indoor Residential (IR) CII Landscape and unaccounted (LU) for water And 20x2020 Plan estimate of 38 GPCD to reach 20% savings.

Indoor Residential Assumes a 2005 state average indoor residential use of 75 GPCD Adopts Method 2 efficiency standard of 55 GPCD Difference is calculated as a statewide average savings of 20 GPCD 75 GPCD-55 GPCD= 20 GPCD savings

CII Savings Uses 20x2020 Plan estimate of the state’s 2005 CII on a per capita basis = 37 GPCD Use Method 2 savings goal of a 10% reduction in CII (37GPCD) x 10%= 3.7 or 4 GPCD

Outdoor/unaccounted statewide savings goal is calculated by taking the 20x2020 Plan statewide per capita savings estimate of 38 GPCD and subtracting the Indoor Residential goal and the CII goal 38 GPCD- 20 GPCD -4 GPCD= 14 GPCD

The Landscape/unaccounted savings goal can be converted to a percentage by dividing the 14 GPCD by the state’s average landscape/unaccounted use. State’s average landscape/unaccounted equals state average baseline GPCD minus average IR GPCD minus average CII GPCD = 80 GPCD Divide LU savings goal by total LU water 14 GPCD/80 GPCD= 18 percent

State’s 20 percent savings target will be met if the following conditions are met: Average indoor residential reaches 55 GPCD Baseline CII reduced by 10% Outdoor and Unaccounted for water is reduced by 18%

Individual Supplier Target Calculation Steps Estimate baseline indoor residential use on a per capita basis Subtract 55 GPCD standard from baseline residential 65 GPCD-55 GPCD=10 GPCD Calculate baseline CII, divide by population and multiply by 10% (baseline CII)/population x 10 percent = 5 GPCD Calculate gallons of indoor residential use by multiply step 1 by population (10 GPCD)x population=total indoor residential

Target steps continued Calculate LU use by subtracting total indoor residential (gals)and total CII (gals) from total use Supplier’s total use-indoor residential- total CII= total LU Multiply LU use by 18% and divide by population for the LU savings goal Total LU x18%/population= 15 GPCD Add the three savings goals to get a total savings = 30 GPCD Calculate target by subtracting total savings from base daily per capita =140 GPCD

SBx7-7 Criteria

Considerations of Climatic Differences in State Landscape water savings requirements are proportional to use. Areas with large amounts of landscape water use have to save more, areas with low amounts of landscape water use have to save less.

Consideration of Population Density Differences Within the State As with climatic differences considers population differences on a proportional basis

Methods to Provide Flexibility to Communities and Regions Allows suppliers flexibility to segregate 3 components of water use to set target

Consideration of Different Levels of Per Capita Water Use - Regional Plant Water Needs Savings required increase proportionally with increase in Landscape and unaccounted for water use

Consideration of Different Levels of CII Water Use in Different Regions of the State As with landscape, CII has a proportional requirement for all users. Users with a high baseline will have to save more, users with a low baseline will have to save less.

Consideration of Undue Hardship on Communities The method accounts for suppliers who have implemented indoor residential water conservation. Suppliers who have implemented CII, Landscape or leak detection will start with lower baselines and have less required savings in these sectors

Difference from Legislatively Defined Methods Similar yet different- a hybrid of methods 1 and 2?

Cost and Expense to Collect Data Required to Implement the Method Relatively inexpensive

Ease of Implementation by the Water Supplier Relatively Simple and easy

Statewide 20% Savings Based on 20 x2020 estimates of savings Better estimates needed for state 2005 average indoor residential use