Kathy Hebbeler SRI International February 17, 2010 Characteristics of Children Served in Part C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Large databases vs. individual analysis: Two complimentary approaches in the study of education and learning Esther Adi-Japha School of Education, Bar-Ilan.
Advertisements

Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
MA Department of Public Health Bureau of Family Health and Nuttrion DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SPECIALTY SERVICES FOR VERY YOUNG CHILDREN WITH ASD Ron.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
The Achievement Gap: Lessons from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) Tamara Halle, Nicole Forry, Elizabeth Hair & Kate Perper.
Collaborating for Families and Young Children: Part C and CAPTA in South Carolina OSEP National Early Childhood Meeting February 9, 2005 Kristie Musick.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
2005 NORTH DAKOTA Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
2006 NORTH CAROLINA Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Welcome to the 1 st Annual Summer Early Childhood Public Policy Institute!
1 The Changing Face of Washington’s Families Annabel R. Kirschner, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus, Washington State University Olympia, WA
NEEDS IDENTIFICATION LAP FY 2016 Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Our learning objectives for this section of the training are to: 1.Provide.
1 Preschoolers Identified as Having Autism: Characteristics, Services, and Achievement Elaine Carlson and Amy Shimshak, Westat OSEP National Early Childhood.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
DEMOGRAPHYY VITAL STATISTICS EPIDEMIOLOGY. Essential Questions b What is it? b Why is it important to public health practice? b What essential information.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Infant Hearing Screening in the US, 2001: Results from the ECLS-B Study May S. Chiu, B.S. Magdaliz Gorritz, B.S. Howard J. Hoffman, M.A. National Institute.
Trends in the Postschool Experiences of Youth With Disabilities Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Mary Wagner, Ph.D. SRI.
A Longitudinal Look at the Post-High School Experiences of Youth With Disabilities Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Renee.
1 Pre-Elementary Education Longitudinal Study (PEELS) Elaine Carlson, Westat 2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference Washington, DC February 8, 2005.
Birth Cohort Jennifer Park National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education Sciences IES Research Conference June 2006.
Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation AGAIN in 2012 Kindergarten Entry Assessment as the Fulcrum of the Birth-Grade 3 Continuum NGA – Policy Institute.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
The Link Between Thriving Children and Economic Security: Creating Equity in Early Childhood for Our Common Good.
Young Children in Tulsa County: Selected Highlights Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from the Metropolitan Human Services Commission.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Data Workshop Getting the Tools You Need for Data-Informed Program Improvement Presented at the OSEP National Early Childhood.
GEORGE L. ASKEW, MD, FAAP OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AMERICAN.
WHERE ARE THEY NOW: Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Identified by Newborn Hearing Screening in Hawai`i 2005 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Early Intervention Graduates Go to Kindergarten: Findings from the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) Kathleen Hebbeler Donna Spiker.
Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services.
Social Context in Education By: Cheryl Cox & Dawn Longville.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Data in Early Childhood: The Case of Early Intervention and Early.
2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:
Susan K. Urahn Director of Education The Pew Charitable Trusts Governors Forum on Quality Preschool December 15, 2003 Orlando, Florida TheRole of State.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Sharing is Good for Kids Kathy Hebbeler NERCC Part C Coordinators Meeting April 24, 2013.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
Expanding the National Toolbox for Measuring Part C Participation Rates: Feasibility and Utility of Birth Cohort Methodology Donna Noyes, Ph.D., New York.
ARIZONA EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAM.  States must report annually to OSEP on the primary early intervention service setting for all children reported.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat July 30,
Continuity and Change in Early Childhood Education Chapter 1.
Postsecondary School Enrollment and Experiences of Youth With Disabilities: A National Perspective Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
Expanding the National Toolbox for Measuring Part C Participation Rates: Feasibility and Utility of Birth Cohort Methodology Donna Noyes, Ph.D., New York.
09/13/2007 Child Find Networking Meeting Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
How to Examine Your State's Family Outcomes Data: Asking and Answering Critical Questions Melissa Raspa (ECTA) Gary Harmon (NC) Alice Ridgway (CT) Lisa.
Embedding Child and Family Outcomes into Practice - Part 5 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Early Childhood Outcomes Center Webinar for the Massachusetts.
Making Progress on Measuring Progress Barbara Jackson, NE Beppie Shapiro, HI Lynne Kahn and Kathy Hebbeler, ECO.
Infant Feeding Practices Study II Methods American Public Health Association November 5, 2007 Sara B. Fein, Judith Labiner-Wolfe, Katherine Shealy, Ruowei.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
As Is Future, Alaska & Providers ITOTS Working Group August 18, 2008.
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Aug , 2016
Of Note A HEALTHY START Birth Weight
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Questions, Data, and Reports: Connecting the Data Dots Using the DaSy Framework System Design and Development Subcomponent Taletha Derrington and Kathleen.
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
Child Find: Project SEEK
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Diagnosis or Identification
The Annual Report to Congress on IDEA
Presentation transcript:

Kathy Hebbeler SRI International February 17, 2010 Characteristics of Children Served in Part C

Objectives Share some information on what we know about children and families receiving Part C services Discuss the implications for child find, eligibility criteria and improving systems and services

Data Sources National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) ( Data States report annually to the U.S. Department of Education ( Patterns in the Identification of and Outcomes for Children and Youth With Disabilities (

NEILS Followed 3,338 children and families from entry to early intervention through kindergarten Families entered EI in Nationally representative study with data weighted to represent the nation (but the nation in 1998) Data collected shortly after family enrolled in EI Service providers --Study enrollment form Families – Telephone Interview Followed 3,338 children and families from entry to early intervention through kindergarten Families entered EI in Nationally representative study with data weighted to represent the nation (but the nation in 1998) Data collected shortly after family enrolled in EI Service providers --Study enrollment form Families – Telephone Interview

State Reported Data All states submit data annually to Office of Special Education Programs in the U.S. Department of Education Provides perspective on change over time Not much detail on characteristics of children and families being served.

Number of children has increased Note: This is a one day count. Number served in a year is higher

Percentage of children has increased

8 Percentage of children served nationally, and in by state (1997, 1998– 2005 average, and 2006) (IES Report)

9 Percentage of children ages birth through 2, by OSEP categorization of eligibility criteria (2006 data) (IES Report) National Average

More boys than girls NEILS found 61% boys

Most children are White (not Hispanic )

Proportionately more White and American Indian/Alaskan Native Children are served

Differences in trends by race/ethnicity

Over half of the children are over 2

Increase in % served varies by year of age

16 Percentage of Infants & Toddlers Entering Services by Age at Entry * * Age at development of the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP).

17 Eligibility for Early Intervention Services

18 Eligibility by Age at Entry

19 Reasons for Eligibility for EI: 0 to < 12 months

20 Reasons for Eligibility for EI: 12 to <24 Months Reasons for Eligibility for EI: 12 to < 24 months

21 Reasons for Eligibility for EI: 24 to 36 months

22 Average Age for Events Leading to Beginning Early Intervention

23 Over 1/3 children in EI are low birth weight *Source: Bloom and Tonthat (2002).

EI serving only a fraction of low birth weight babies in US 22% began EI after 12 months; 8% between 24 and 30 months (NEILS) According to CDC, in 2002:  314,077 LBW births occurred (7.8% of all births)  58,544 of these were VLBW (1.46% of all births). 39,000 children younger than age 1 were being served in EI in December

25 Health Status at Entry to EI *Source: Bloom and Tonthat (2002).

26 Household Characteristics 91% live with biological/adoptive mother. 69% live with biological/adoptive father. 7% are in foster care. 16% live in single parent households. 43% have household incomes less than $25, % have another child with special needs in the household.

Issues to Ponder Differences across states in percent served Differences by race/ethnicity Growth over time in the 2 to 3 year olds Timeline to IFSP Services to low birth babies 27