Tracker SSD Ladder Preproduction Review Actions and Changes Since Last Week September 16, 2002 Alessandro Brez Robert Johnson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Advertisements

1 HYDROSTATIC TESTING Approved for Public Release.
MODELING THE TESTING PROCESS Formal Testing (1.0) Requirements Software Design Risk Data Approved, Debugged, Eng. Tested Code Automated Test Tools Tested.
Planning for Certification in Plan your project In this presentation we present the tasks that must be completed in order to achieve certification.
Tracker SSD Ladder Preproduction Review Alessandro Brez Robert Johnson.
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, A Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS A: Tracker Test Plan Overview.
GLAST LAT ProjectF-to-F, March, TrackerR. Johnson 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker, W.B.S Face-To-Face March Meeting Robert Johnson.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Review, September 1, Tracker SubsystemR. Johnson 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker, W.B.S August Status Meeting.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST I&T January T Borden 1 Tracker EM Mechanical Mock-up T Borden I&T Tracker Mock-up.
GLAST LAT ProjectTEM &TEM-PS Manufacturing Readiness Review – September 16, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Pat Lujan TEM.
Chapter 11 Quality Control.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
A Review ISO 9001:2015 Draft What’s Important to Know Now
Introduction to Computer Technology
S/W Project Management
Occupational Health and Safety
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002  AERODROME MANUAL.
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Managing Project Through Information System.  Monitoring is collecting, recording, and reporting information concerning any and all aspects of project.
Important informations
LSST Camera CD-3 Review Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY LSST Safety Council Camera Review Bremerton, WA 2015 LSST Camera Environment,
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
GLAST LAT ProjectApril 27, 2006: LAT Pre-Ship Review Presentation 12 of 12 Quality Assurance 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Pre-Ship Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, C Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS C: Ladder Fabrication A. Brez.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Schedule Summary; Critical.
SOML Large Optics Daily Reporting Guide to using the new ETSEDMS server for Large Optics Daily Reporting.
CMSC 345 Fall 2000 Requirements Overview. Work with customers to elicit requirements by asking questions, demonstrating similar systems, developing prototypes,
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
HND Computing Unit 8 Quality Management Prepared by S Hargrave
Maintaining and Sustaining System Integrity Configuration Management for Transportation Management Systems Configuration management (CM) describes a series.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Tracker Subsystem1 GLAST LAT Project TRAY DELTA MRR, 18 Nov., 2004 GLAST LAT Tracker Delta Manufacturer Readiness Review for Tray Assembly and Test at.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, C Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS C: Electronics Module Testing.
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, E Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS E: MCM Assembly Gamma-ray.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Silicon Strip Detector.
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 LAT QA has hired a full-time on-site representative (Donald Knaepple)
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 Survey & Process Review conducted at Teledyne on Nov. 14, 2003.
Working Hours Utilities. An easy to use tool that helps maintain your company resources (setup working hours for users, update when facilities and equipment.
LAT-PR GLAST LAT ProjectManufacturing Readiness Review, Oct. 12, 2005 LAT Test Stand Manufacturing Readiness Review 1.Introduction Bill Olson.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
Chapter 25 – Configuration Management 1Chapter 25 Configuration management.
Software Project Configuration Management
Maintaining Safety Standards
Software and Systems Integration
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
AERODROME MANUAL.
Maintaining Safety Standards
Systems Analysis and Design
Software Requirements
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
First Article Inspection
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Chapter 11 Quality Control.
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Introduction and Overview
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

Tracker SSD Ladder Preproduction Review Actions and Changes Since Last Week September 16, 2002 Alessandro Brez Robert Johnson

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review2 Disclaimer R. Johnson prepared this presentation over the weekend and is responsible for all possible errors within. A. Brez may need to clarify or correct some of the points during the course of the presentation.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review3 Plan for New Encapsulant G&A has ordered the new materials: –Nusil CV-1142 for dam –Nusil CV-2500 for fill These materials are approved and on the LAT list. We expect that these materials will be sufficiently cured after 12 hours for handling, even though the full cure requires 7 days at room temperature. G&A will build 10 ladders and encapsulate their wire bonds with these materials. INFN will carry out the full suite of electrical tests before and after the encapsulation. USCS will put these materials onto detectors in the long-term testing setup. INFN will carry out environmental tests on a ladder encapsulated with these materials. We will review the results on these 10 ladders before proceeding with flight production.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review4 Clarification of Database and Traveler The ladder database and input masks are being modified according to the new draft of LAT-TD-914. This database will not serve as the “traveler” during production. All items that are redundant with the “in process” traveler being used by G&A are being removed from the database masks. The database serves only as a means to record the information that INFN requires in order to monitor the process, evaluate the quality of each ladder, and archive the condition of each ladder: –Alignment errors –All electrical measurements –Missing wires

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review5 Clarification of Traveler & Procedure G&A has a detailed “in process” procedure and traveler accessed at a computer terminal at each workstation. The G&A documents are not public and do not belong to the LAT, but they can be reviewed by us on site. LAT-PS-635 lists detailed procedure steps for those processes that INFN developed in collaboration with G&A, such as SSD edge bonding. These and the working-stage definitions are consistent with the in-house G&A document. LAT-PS-635 also details those processes developed and carried out by INFN personnel, such as the electrical testing. LAT docs 635, 914, and 891 apply equally to G&A and Mipot. We are editing LAT-PS-635 and LAT-TD-914 to clarify what they are and reduce the confusion.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review6 Clarification of NCR LAT-PS-891 has been renamed—it is not a NCR procedure but rather a set of criteria to use in acceptance testing of individual ladders. Nonconformance reporting by G&A will be carried out using their internal procedures. We are working to agree upon defining major nonconformances that, upon their occurrence, will require a halt to production and immediate notification of A. Brez and R. Johnson. For example, Johnson proposes (TBR): –Rejection of >4 ladders out of a run of 40. –Accidents resulting in destruction of >2 ladders out of a run of 40.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review7 Plan for Independent Source Inspection As stated already, INFN personnel have worked closely with G&A on the G&A site to develop the procedures. Sandro has reviewed all G&A procedures and their “in- process” documents. INFN personnel will continue to be on site monitoring the production at all times, mainly by way of the electrical testing. Darren March and Nick Virmani visited G&A and Mipot last November to inspect their facilities. Darren Marsh will travel to G&A to perform an inspection when the first 10 ladders are reviewed. An equivalent process will be implemented for the start of production at Mipot.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review8 Clarification of WS-5 Pulling a couple of ladders per day out of the production line at WS-5 for special electrical testing adds too much complexity to the production flow, which is not justified by the results seen so far. Of primary importance is to ensure that a large lot of ladders (such as a week’s production) is not carried out before beginning electrical testing. For example, if G&A wishes to wire bond one week and encapsulate the next, the WS-5 electrical testing would be required. Johnson proposes to specify that no more than 20 ladders (TBR) may be wire bonded before electrical testing begins on the lot.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review9 Response to Nick Virmani’s Comments We reviewed Nick’s written comments and drafted a response to him. Some are being incorporated into the documentation, while others were arguably not necessary. Johnson has not yet been able to discuss the response with Nick. Most of Nick’s concerns should be satisfied by Darren’s review of the in-house G&A (and later, Mipot) documents. Adding much of the detail to LAT-PS-635 that Nick requests is not possible and would anyway not be relevant, since G&A works from their in-house procedures, not directly from LAT-PS-635.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review10 Tooling Drawings The tooling was developed by collaboration between INFN and G&A. G&A machines all of the tooling (even the tools to be used by Mipot). G&A controls the drawings in its internal system. Do we want to enter the drawings into the LAT system for archival purposes?

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review11 Requested Items Production plan and flow diagramLAT-PS-635 Qualification/Environmental Test Plans and Test Flow See LAT-TD-879 and LAT-TD-880 for completed testing of ladders. Production Quality Control PlanLAT-PS-635 Inspection and measurement documentation plan LAT-DS-635 and LAT-DS-914. Plans for handling, shipping containers, environmental control and mode of transportation, identification, and storage LAT-PS-527 and LAT-PS-635. Ladders are never shipped until after mounting on trays.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review12 Requested Items Traceability Plan for all flight hardware Tracker database: LAT-TD-384 and LAT-TD-914. Production ScheduleLAT P3 schedule. Closure of Actions from the Previous Reviews None Complete drawing package approved for production LAT-DS-26 and LAT-DS-594 are the flight articles. The assembly fixture drawings are only in Italy. Subsystem Specification Complete & Under CM Level-3 spect is under CM. Level-4, LAT-SS-134 and LAT- SS-152 release in progress.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review13 Requested Items Complete fabrication, test, and assembly procedures LAT-PS-635 Complete analyses of production tooling and test equipment The tooling and equipment are all at G&A and have been tested. Certification of all flight hardware, production tooling and test equipment Vendor certifications are listed in LAT-PS-635. Marsh and Virmani have visited G&A and Mipot. Marsh will inspect after first 10 ladders are assembled. Control methods for all safety hazards No unusual hazards known. Vendor is responsible for its workforce and has EH&S certification.

September 16, 2002SSD Ladder Preproduction Review14 Requested Items Interface Control requirements Not relevant to ladder assembly MaterialsSee LAT-PS-635 and LAT-SS- 172 Equipment identification and certification Equipment is identified in LAT- PS-635. Personnel identification and certification Vendor responsibility LeadershipAlessandro Brez Contingency PlansNothing is written Risk Assessment, mitigation, and recovery plans Nothing is written