UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HFT Technical Overview September 26, HFT 2013 TPC FGT 2011 STAR Detectors Fast and Full azimuthal particle identification EMC+EEMC+FMS (-1 ≤ 
Advertisements

LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting ATLAS Detector Upgrade Opportunities M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”
DCal Meeting
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
WP2: Detector development Summary G. Pugliese INFN - Politecnico of Bari.
Electrical Integration WBS Eric J. Mannel Columbia University Electronics Project Engineer VTX and FVTX.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Assembly and Robotics August 3, 2007 LBNL.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
The ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector Gianfranco Segato Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Padova and INFN for the ALICE Collaboration A barrel of two layers.
WP2: Detector development Summary G. Pugliese INFN - Politecnico of Bari.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
Concluding Summary WBS1.1.2 SCT Subsystem A. Seiden BNL March 2001.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
1 US Pixel Mechanics Role Global support structureIntermediate support structureLocal support structure Stave SectorDisk Barrel x (9-11) x5 x (22,40,56)
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
M. Gilchriese Overview of Production Plan for Pixel Global Support and Disk Support Rings M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory February.
Muon trigger upgrades, missing since not aimed towards DOE funding PHENIX upgrades: view presented to DOE R&D $3.5M Construction $16.6M Au-Au p-p 200 Si-Si.
ATLAS SCT End-Cap C Integration 1.Introduction: to the SCT within ATLAS 2.End-Cap C Reception at CERN 3.Final Assembly 4.Integration with the TRT 5.Combined.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
2 Silicon pixel part Done and to be written Written! Under way To be done Introduction 1.Hybrid Pixel Assembly Concept 2.Silicon sensor 1.First thinned.
ATLAS PIXEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW M. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 11, 1999.
1 Pixel Detector General –July Evidence of galvanic corrosion in EU barrel cooling tubes. Recovery plan implemented, this problem now solved but…..
EventsDuration of event (days) Dates (months after start) DeliverablesExternal participation (researcher-days, rd), total = 450 rd Kick-off meeting1m1-m2Protocol0.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
J. Strait Fermilab 16 October 2006 Consideration on LHC upgrade from A US perspective.
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Pixel Upgrade Thoughts on US Role.
Brenna Flaugher Sept. 24 th Lehman Review1 Run IIB Silicon Upgrade: Cost and Schedule Lehman Review Sept. 24, 2002 Brenna Flaugher Run IIB Silicon Project.
Peter Sharp CERN CMS Tracker Summary of the Tracking Trigger Working Group Peter Sharp 21 November 2008.
Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs Cost Schedule.
Local Supports to IDR Discussion ATLAS Upgrade Week November 2014.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
SiD Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D (May Apply to Other Concepts) Bill Cooper Fermilab.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
PS Module Ron Lipton, Feb A bit of History During much of the conceptual design phase of the outer tracker we had focused on the “long barrel”
Jan 24, 2005Tracking Upgrades Welcome and Agenda Carl Haber 1 US ATLAS: Meeting on SLHC Tracking Upgrades Jan 2005 Lawrence Berkeley Lab Welcome.
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
Assembly scenario of ILD Si trackers 2015/4/21 Yasuhiro 1.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Argonne’s Rôle in ZEUS José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DOE Visit, Germantown, March 11 th, 2004.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch September 11, AGENDA Global Design Concept – Updated Global Assembly Concept – Updated Inner HCal Installation concept.
F Fermilab Vertex Effort From a Fermilab Detector R&D Perspective Marcel Demarteau For the Fermilab ILC Detector & Physics R&D Group ALCPG Vertex Detector.
Steinar Stapnes, LHCC June The ATLAS inner detector TRT endcap A+B TRT endcap C TRT barrel SCT barrel SCT endcap Pixels uWhole ID sits inside bore.
Time to resolve Design Issues 1. Disclamer Due to the engineering meeting last week I have not had time to coordinate this material with Tim or the L3.
VELO Replacement Girish Patel University of Liverpool.
SPHENIX Mechanical Don Lynch & Rich Ruggiero April 10, 2014.
RIKEN/CERN pixel electronics/bus R&D plans Johann M. Heuser RIKEN - Radiation Laboratory PHENIX Silicon Upgrades Meeting 10 April 2003.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
TDAQ Phase-II kick-off CERN background information
P. Morettini Towards Pixel TDR PM - ITk Italia - Introduction 8/2/2017.
Mechanics: (Tim).
WP microelectronics and interconnections
TK Upgrade report.
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
Work packages status in Torino and perspectives
Status of CO2 Cooling tests at CERN for Pixel phase 1
L H C A T L A S International Collaboration on the LHC Project
Upgrade Phase 2 Mechanics meeting, 21 March 2013 Introduction
Presentation transcript:

UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden

UCSC August 12, 2008 Goals for Meeting  Evaluate and discuss progress on all aspects of the strip upgrade project.  Make sure that we are properly focused on the work that is required. In particular need to make significant progress prior to meeting in Nikhef first week in November. Are all key areas covered?  Begin discussion on how we will actually do a construction project and its schedule.

UCSC August 12, 2008 Projected U.S. Activities on New Inner Detector Pixels  Lead role in the design of the front-end integrated circuit, contribution to the fabrication costs and production testing. The U.S. is currently leading the R&D effort in this area.  Common design of powering and data transmission with the silicon strip detector, fabrication and test of unique elements of these systems for pixels, and integration of these elements in sub-assemblies in the U.S. The U.S. had the co-lead role for optical readout for the current pixel detector and has, in addition, substantial experience in this general area, for both new powering schemes and data transmission.  Development of 3D and planar silicon sensors, contribution to the fabrication costs and production testing. The concept for 3D sensors originated in the U.S. The U.S. has a strong role in the development of planar sensors (for the outer pixel layers) and there is substantial commonality with similar activities for silicon strip detectors.  Module design, fabrication and testing. The U.S. currently co-leads the R&D effort in this area, has a very strong track record and this is an area in which many U.S. university and laboratory groups have expertise.  Design and fabrication of local mechanical/cooling structures and overall support structures. The U.S. had the lead role in this for the current detector and co-leads the current R&D in this area. We anticipate greater contributions from non – U.S. groups in this area for the SLHC, particularly assuming the lead role for services and related supports that were done solely in the U.S. for the present detector.  Mounting and testing modules on local supports and fabrication and test of sub-assemblies e.g. barrels and/or disks. Fabrication and test of significant sub-assemblies outside CERN is essential to meet schedule and practical requirements.  Contributions to integration and installation at CERN.

UCSC August 12, 2008 Projected U.S. Activities on New Inner Detector Silicon Strips  Leading role in the definition and implementation of the overall electronics architecture, including design contributions to specific elements. The definition of the overall SLHC electronics architecture (for strips and pixels) is currently being co-led by the U.S.  Contribution to the procurement of front-end integrated circuits and local control integrated circuits. Testing of integrated circuits. This follows naturally from the role in defining the overall electronics architecture.  Common design of powering and data transmission with the pixel detector, fabrication and test of unique elements of these systems.  Development of planar sensors (in common in part with pixels), contribution to procurement costs and testing as part of a module assembly program in the U.S.  Assembly and test of silicon strip modules. This would occur in a well coordinated manner at multiple U.S. institutions.  Fabrication of local supports for silicon strip modules. The U.S. is currently leading the conceptual design of the preferred technique for holding, locating and cooling strip modules and fabrication of a fraction of these local supports in the U.S. would naturally follow.  Design and contribution to the global support structures, primarily in the barrel region. Again the U.S. is currently leading this effort and it is also closely tied to the design of the local supports.  Mounting and testing modules on local supports. It is essential that integrated structures be assembled world-wide and shipped to a central point (likely CERN) for final rapid integration into support structures to meet the SLHC schedule constraints.  Contributions to integration and installation at CERN.

UCSC August 12, 2008 Possible Schedule: Construction Project CD0 Review Scheduled for September 11 in Washington. Present following schedule. Activity Start Date End Date Engineering 6/1/10 5/31/11 Pre-production 6/1/11 5/30/12 Parts Production 5/2/12 9/30/14 Build-up Modules 10/1/13 9/30/15 Assemble/Test Structures 10/1/15 9/30/16 Installation 10/3/16 3/30/18