Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP-02-002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASEP -- Proposal for CVT -- GRB informal meeting # January 2009 JASIC GRBIG-ASEP
Advertisements

EU Tire Label. April 2011 Tire Performance Label: A Global TrendTrend 2 EU World wide introduction of a tire label EU-Label for the performance in Rolling.
Some observations on the base of the ASEP dBase Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA.
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, sections 3.2 and 3.3 Determination of engine speeds, calculation of available power.
Principles of Revision of ECE Regulation No. 59 Submitted by CLEPA Informal document No. GRB-42-8 (42nd GRB, 5-7 September 2005, agenda item.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~ JASIC 1 Informal document GRB (57 th GRB, 5-7 February 2013, agenda.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
UN/ECE GRB R41WG DEG conclusions 8 August General - 1 In February 2007, GRB agreed: In February 2007, GRB agreed: That ISO362-2 is practical and.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values JASIC 1 Informal document GRB Rev.1 (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda item 3(b))
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
Anchor points in ASEP the shifting in the various proposals as the chairman has understood it ASEP meeting June 2008 v4.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-44-2 (44th GRB, 4-6 September.
Report of the GRB informal Working Group on ASEP Transmitted by the Chairman of the Informal Group Informal document No. GRB-45-3 (45th GRB, February.
Motorcycle Noise Emissions - The German Position – - ISO response - 4. GRB Informal Group Meeting 25./26. August 2005 Milwaukee.
1 NL ASEP proposal Presentation to GRB version issued by the Netherlands GRB 50; September 2009 Informal document No. GRB (50th GRB, 1 – 3.
GRB – ASEP – 08 Criteria to compare proposals Den Hagg – September 2007.
Additional ASEP data GRB IG ASEP sept 2007 By the Netherlands.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
ASEP, items for clarification
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Off-cycles principles
Noise Emission of Motor Vehicles
ASEP, a way to analyse methods
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
Improvement of Family definitions
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
“Reference Sound Assessment”
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Road Traffic Noise An Industry Opinion Noise in EUROPE – 24 April 2017
IMMA proposal for a test procedure towards real driving conditions
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
CLEPA Input for 3rd IWG ASEP meeting
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
GRB informal group R51.03 Annex 10
Presentation transcript:

Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP

New test method of ECE51 represents the actual behaviour of today's cars in urban traffic But this new procedure does not cover almost all realistic behaviours in urban traffic (higher engine speed) Most of vehicles under normal driving conditions does not differ significantly from a "normal behaviour“ But what is a "normal behaviour“ and how can we identify it ? Background

« Non linear » noise causes can be identify on engine (intake system, switches, exhaust system, controlled valves, adaptive software,...) Tyre/road doesn’t make « non linear » noise  Engine ONLY need to be studying IN CASE OF DOUBT “Normal behaviour"

Tests made on full throttle condition on ISO test track Engine noise is given by : L engine = Lvehicle – Ltyre Limit is given by the homologation point and Engine noise behaviour Experimental approach and ASEP limit curve Homologation point : - Engine noise : L wot rep eng = Lwot rep – L tyre(50 km/h) - Engine speed N L90 = 1,6509×PMR -0,3166 Engine noise behaviour : 5 dB / 1000 rpm Limit : 0,005 × (N – N L90 ) + L wot rep eng + x dB

Off Cycle Emission need to cover high engine speed and urban traffic behaviour : Engine speed from N L90 to N max Speed from 20 to 70 km/h Acceleration under a max Off Cycle Emission shall identify « non linear » noise : Tyre noise must to be significantly lower than Engine noise  Gear ratio is chosen in this range Limit curve of engine speed, speed and acceleration

Practical proposal 2 practical approaches to determine Engine noise : Few Pass by to cover N L90 to N max Few Coast down to qualify Tyre noise One Pass by to adjust Lwot(7.5m) to Lwot(2.5m) One Pass by to cover N L90 to N max Few Coast down to qualify Tyre noise Several pointsContinuous line

Explicit criteria and informations on the method Globally applicable Performance based on realistic behaviours in urban traffic (high engine speed and urban speed and acceleration) In technology neutral : No definitive choose of gear Repeatable / reproducable Fitness for purpose : To identify « non linear » noise Relative limit based on Annexe 3 : L wot rep 1.Gear selection : Variable 2.Entry speed : from 20 to 70 km/h 3.Target acceleration : No target acceleration 4.Maximum engine speed : to be define 5.Exit speed : Variable 6. Wide open throttle 7.Mulitple test conditions : Yes 8.Engine speed range : N L90 to N max 9.Relating to “doubt” ? 10.Work load Only few passes need to be done