1.Open your school’s CEE English Language Learner Performance Analysis – Section 3 2.Open your Action Planning Handbook: Data Reflection Protocol – State Assessments (Appendix B.4) Before We Begin You will use these during this short presentation.
Data Reflection Protocol
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS November 2014 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn
Understanding the 3 components of the ELL Analysis What can the data tell us and questions to consider Next Steps with Your Teams Contact Information “Pause and reflect”: When you see these in the PPT, you can pause this video to reflect on what you see in your data! Bill Wagner / The Daily News Monticello “Success Night” Agenda
Before beginning your review of these data, please reflect on your preliminary thoughts about your current and former ELL students’ performance. One or more of the following thought-starters may be helpful. – I assume… – I predict… – I wonder… – My questions/expectations are influenced by… See Appendix B.3 in the Action Planning Handbook, or, National School Reform Website at: Pause and Reflect #1
Action Planning Process
Section 3 of the Student Performance data in the Comprehensive Data Package and Services English Language Learner Performance Analysis
Washington English Language Proficiency Assessment (WELPA) performance – All grades in your school MSP, HSPE, and EOC performance for your ELL students Former-ELL Analysis on MSP, HSPE, and EOC – Performance AFTER students exit the ELL program ELL Performance Analysis
For WELPA, MSP, HSPE, and EOC: – If number of students assessed is < 10 – “Enhanced Suppression”: OSPI implemented in July Can suppress data in certain cases even if count is > 10 students For MSP reading and math in grades 3-8, if your school participated in the Smarter Balanced Assessment pilot testing in spring of 2014 “Missing data” in your charts
Top Chart: Percent of students transitioning. The “Attainment” measure. Bottom Chart: Percent of students by the 4 performance levels of the WELPA Table: Count of ELL students assessed in each year WELPA Performance
For students exiting: – How are we doing relative to our district and the state? – Are we improving? Bottom chart: Percent of students by the 4 performance levels – What do you see by level? Table: – How fast is the population changing and in what ways? What more do you need to know? Pause and Reflect #2
Top Chart: Shows percent of students meeting standard on the MSP, HSPE, and EOC assessments Bottom Chart: Shows the percent of students at each performance level Table: Counts of ELL students ELL Performance on MSP/HSPE/EOC
Top Chart: Are our ELL students performing similar to, or different from the district and state? Bottom Chart: Are we increasing the percent at Levels 3 and 4 and decreasing Level1? Table: How fast is the population changing and in what ways? What more do you need to know? Pause and Reflect #3
In the past, we have only had ELL=Yes or No for each student With the 2014 MSP, HSPE, and EOC data we have 4 attributes – Never-ELL – Current-ELL – Former ELL- transitioned within 2 years – Former ELL- transition outside of two years Former ELL Performance
Charts: Reading (top) and Math (bottom) performance 2014 data only. You will need multiple years to show change Count table shows you the size of these groups in 2014 Former-ELL Performance
What do you notice between your “ALL” group and “Never- ELL” and “Current-ELL”? After students exit ELL program, what do you see in their performance? What do you notice comparing reading and math for each subgroup? Table: – How fast is the population changing and in what ways? What more do you need to know? Pause and Reflect #4
Data around: – School and district strengths – Evidence based programs and services – Barriers See page 10 of Student and School Success Action-Planning Handbook Deepening your understanding
Next Steps
Incorporating Perceptual Data in Data Reflection Protocol
Perceptual Data
Next Steps
Office of Student and School Success: (360) or Andy Kelly: Travis Campbell: Craig Shurick: Sue Cohn: Center for Educational Effectiveness Greg Lobdell: Data analysis & data usage: Jennifer Jones: Operations and Report Delivery: Contact Information