1.Open your school’s CEE English Language Learner Performance Analysis – Section 3 2.Open your Action Planning Handbook: Data Reflection Protocol – State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & CREATING ACTION PLANS September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group Travis.
Advertisements

USING DATA REPORTS AND CONDUCTING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group.
All About State Testing May 24, 2012 Karen Weintraub, Assessment Manager/ District Assessment Coordinator
WASHINGTON STATE TRANSFOMATION INTEGRATING SUPPORTS USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL January 2015 OSPI’s Office of Student and School Success.
Assessment Report January 2013 Department of Teaching & Learning.
Getting to Graduation October 3, Assessment Requirements Assessment Requirements for Certificate of Academic Achievement (CAA) / High School Diploma.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Seattle Public School ELL Data Veronica Maria Gallardo, Director of ELL 1.
MEDIAN STUDENT GROWTH ANALYSIS December 2014 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn.
Paul McCold, Ph.D. Migrant, Bilingual and Native Education OSPI Webinar Friday May 10, :30 – 11:30 am 1.
Development of a Revised Accountability Framework.
Manson School District Elementary: How did we do last year? SMART Goals Reading – 78% of students met the targeted SMART goal Math – 89% of.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Priority and Focus Schools: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT April 2015 OSPI’s Office of Student and School Success Travis Campbell, Director Paul Wieneke,
CRAFTING S.M.A.R.T. GOALS September 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director, K-12 Education Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
NAEP 2013 Inclusion Guidelines for Idaho’s English Language Leaners (ELL) Angela Hemingway Idaho State Department of Education NAEP State Coordinator
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Seattle Public School ELL Data Veronica Maria Gallardo, Director of ELL 1.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
Assessment and ISEE v6 Karlynn Laraway, Coordinator National & International Assessment.
September 11,  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.
ANDREW PARR, WASHINGTON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION GREG LOBDELL, CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT JUNE 24,
CFN 204 Network Math Meeting Monday, December 3, 2012 PS 29 Paul Perskin.
OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Division of Assessment and Student Information Assessment Update Webinar #1 August 27, 2015.
Greg Lobdell, President & Director Research In Collaboration with the State Board of Education: Ben Rarick Andrew Parr, and Linda.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
Deep Data Dive & Action Planning: Increasing Capacity for Improvement May 2015 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and.
Navigating Indistar ® to Develop & Implement Your Student and School Success Action Plan Office of Student and School Success Paul Wieneke, Indistar® Program.
IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.
Getting SMART With Public Appointments Women in Public Policy 12 th November 2009 Shaama Saggar-Malik Telephone: (main office)
Data-Driven Dialogue Predicting, Exploring, and Explaining Data
Manson School District Middle School Strategies Our schoolwide strategies are created within the context of the Manson School Board Ends Policies,
Meeting the Needs of English Language Learners: Using Assessment Results and Data to Inform Decisions Michael Sabados, PhD, CSDE consultant Bureau of Data,
Washington State Science Update Craig Gabler, Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113 November 9, 2010 Science Web-Seminar.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
1.Open your school’s CEE Achievement Index Summary – Section 5 2.Open your Action Planning Handbook: “Data Reflection Protocol – State Assessments” (Appendix.
2013 Legislative Decisions Regarding High School Assessments Accountability will move to Grade 11 Smarter Balanced tests in : English Language Arts.
State Assessments ~Andover~ 2014 and Beyond. Future of Assessments State BOE Decision: Dec. 10, 2013 Did not approve the use of Smarter Balanced Assessments.
MMSD Value-Added Results January 3, Attainment versus Growth Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 2.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
Smarter Balanced Field Test March 3, 2014 Sequim School District.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Focusing on Washington State Assessment for Learning in Science Kara Monroe Science Assessment Specialist OSPI June 26,
Jigsaw Activity. * The room has 3 sections: * Elementary * Middle * High * Please move to the section for your grade level and take your electronic device(s)
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 9, 2014.
District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME DATE 1.
MAY 8, 2015 REGIONAL MATH COORDINATORS MEETING. AGENDA TEA Update New TEKS Implementation Assessment Needs Upcoming Professional Development Collaborative.
Technical Assistance Meeting II. Agenda Introductions Sharing our System Information (T-Chart) Activity – Evaluating the EL Program Balloon Activity Next.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Bridge to College Courses Funded by College Spark Washington Washington Bridge to College Project: Setting a Context for Principals Dr. Kathe Taylor Assistant.
Gearing Up for ELPA21 ORTESOL November 15, 2014.
Scaffolding Lessons to Meet Students Needs
Sheltered Instruction: What, Why, and How
Everett, March 2010 Opening Meeting
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Scaffolding Lessons to Meet Students Needs
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
Office of Student and School Success
How to Interpret Student Growth Plots
Pennsylvania’s ESSA Submitted Plan Review
Teacher SLTs
Jayhawkville Central High School
Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
WELCOME TO ELL Mrs. Park.
Presentation transcript:

1.Open your school’s CEE English Language Learner Performance Analysis – Section 3 2.Open your Action Planning Handbook: Data Reflection Protocol – State Assessments (Appendix B.4) Before We Begin You will use these during this short presentation.

Data Reflection Protocol

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS November 2014 Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn

 Understanding the 3 components of the ELL Analysis  What can the data tell us and questions to consider  Next Steps with Your Teams  Contact Information “Pause and reflect”: When you see these in the PPT, you can pause this video to reflect on what you see in your data! Bill Wagner / The Daily News Monticello “Success Night” Agenda

Before beginning your review of these data, please reflect on your preliminary thoughts about your current and former ELL students’ performance. One or more of the following thought-starters may be helpful. – I assume… – I predict… – I wonder… – My questions/expectations are influenced by… See Appendix B.3 in the Action Planning Handbook, or, National School Reform Website at: Pause and Reflect #1

Action Planning Process

Section 3 of the Student Performance data in the Comprehensive Data Package and Services English Language Learner Performance Analysis

Washington English Language Proficiency Assessment (WELPA) performance – All grades in your school MSP, HSPE, and EOC performance for your ELL students Former-ELL Analysis on MSP, HSPE, and EOC – Performance AFTER students exit the ELL program ELL Performance Analysis

For WELPA, MSP, HSPE, and EOC: – If number of students assessed is < 10 – “Enhanced Suppression”: OSPI implemented in July Can suppress data in certain cases even if count is > 10 students For MSP reading and math in grades 3-8, if your school participated in the Smarter Balanced Assessment pilot testing in spring of 2014 “Missing data” in your charts

Top Chart: Percent of students transitioning. The “Attainment” measure. Bottom Chart: Percent of students by the 4 performance levels of the WELPA Table: Count of ELL students assessed in each year WELPA Performance

For students exiting: – How are we doing relative to our district and the state? – Are we improving? Bottom chart: Percent of students by the 4 performance levels – What do you see by level? Table: – How fast is the population changing and in what ways? What more do you need to know? Pause and Reflect #2

Top Chart: Shows percent of students meeting standard on the MSP, HSPE, and EOC assessments Bottom Chart: Shows the percent of students at each performance level Table: Counts of ELL students ELL Performance on MSP/HSPE/EOC

Top Chart: Are our ELL students performing similar to, or different from the district and state? Bottom Chart: Are we increasing the percent at Levels 3 and 4 and decreasing Level1? Table: How fast is the population changing and in what ways? What more do you need to know? Pause and Reflect #3

In the past, we have only had ELL=Yes or No for each student With the 2014 MSP, HSPE, and EOC data we have 4 attributes – Never-ELL – Current-ELL – Former ELL- transitioned within 2 years – Former ELL- transition outside of two years Former ELL Performance

Charts: Reading (top) and Math (bottom) performance 2014 data only. You will need multiple years to show change Count table shows you the size of these groups in 2014 Former-ELL Performance

What do you notice between your “ALL” group and “Never- ELL” and “Current-ELL”? After students exit ELL program, what do you see in their performance? What do you notice comparing reading and math for each subgroup? Table: – How fast is the population changing and in what ways? What more do you need to know? Pause and Reflect #4

Data around: – School and district strengths – Evidence based programs and services – Barriers See page 10 of Student and School Success Action-Planning Handbook Deepening your understanding

Next Steps

Incorporating Perceptual Data in Data Reflection Protocol

Perceptual Data

Next Steps

Office of Student and School Success: (360) or  Andy Kelly:  Travis Campbell:  Craig Shurick:  Sue Cohn: Center for Educational Effectiveness  Greg Lobdell: Data analysis & data usage:  Jennifer Jones: Operations and Report Delivery: Contact Information