Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Advertisements

Tier Two at CFMS Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Adapted from Rob Horner, et al.
Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.
An Evidence-based Intervention for Tier II Supports
SCOTT ROSS, PH.D UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY. Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention:
Effective Behavior Management in the Classroom Setting
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Check in Check Out Presentation.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions
SWPBS Tier 2 Meets Tennessee’s RtI2 School-Based Teams
Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
Check-in/ Check-out with PB4L Schools
Wednesday, 9:15-10:30, Salon C. Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Barbara Mitchell, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
TIER TWO INTERVENTIONS Jim Artesani, Ed.D. 304 Shibles Hall Orono, ME 04469
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
Response to Intervention in The Social Domain. Response to Intervention (RTI) Response to evidence-based interventions (Elliott, Witt, Kratchowill, &
Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Deb Childs, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier 2/3 Consultant.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Secondary Behavioral Interventions What do we do if universal supports aren’t enough!
March 15, 2012 APBS, Atlanta, Georgia Megan Cave & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Danielle Piasecki November 16,  Review of Check-In/Check-Out  Consistency  Results from other schools  Common issues and solutions  Questions.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Tier 2 Support The Behavior Education Plan. 2 Objectives Identify the BEP and its place in SWPBS Identify daily, weekly, and quarterly features of the.
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
The Behavior Education Program: A Check-In, Check-Out Intervention Jennifer Wright Cottonwood Elementary June 12, 2008.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
MDE- R ESPONDING TO C HALLENGING B EHAVIORS T HROUGH R ESPONSE TO I NTERVENTION.
PBIS Tier 2 Check-In/Check-Out Program Franklin Flyers
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Supporting Students At- risk by Implementing a SW Targeted Intervention Teri Lewis-Palmer July 10, 2008.
Secondary Interventions Function-based Strategies to Support At-Risk Students.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
PBIS Opening Day Check-in/Check-out Re-designing ISS.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
Assessing the Impact of A Targeted Group Intervention The Middle Part of the Triangle What is BEP? BEP at Indian Head ES.
Tier II Interventions Check-In Check-Out Overview & Review Presented by: Todd Nicholson, MS, NCSP Positive Behavior Intervention Specialist.
CHECK IN-CHECK OUT – A SECONDARY BEHAVIOR PLAN Elizabeth Roberds A PLAN PROPOSED FOR GRISSOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – MUNCIE, IN.
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Check-In / Check-Out (CI/CO): Overview for Staff.
Planning for Tier 2. TIER 1, 2, or 3? Are there ANY schools that aren’t motivated to support the difficult, at-risk kids? Answer = NO So, why don’t we.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An additional intervention to complement school and classroom managment The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Behavior Education Program (BEP): Overview for Staff Leanne S. Hawken, Ph.D. University of Utah.
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
W. M. Anderson Primary: School- Wide Positive Behavior Support Plan James Carraway, Chairperson Macie Davis Debra Fulmore Pam Lee Lerlisa McKnight Gail.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Check In Check Out (CICO) A targeted and intensive approach to consistent behavior monitoring.
Systems and Interventions
Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.
Introduction to Promoting Positive Behavior in Schools:
Presentation transcript:

Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013

Check-In Check-Out Intervention Overview CICO-SWIS Application Data-Based Decision Making Questions & Answers

Primary Prevention: School-wide & Classroom-wide systems for all students and all staff in all settings. Universal, Tier I Secondary Prevention: Systems for targeted or group- based interventions for students needing additional support beyond the Universal or Tier I system. Targeted, Tier II Tertiary Prevention: System for students requiring more intensive & individualized supports for academic, social, or mental health services. Individualized, Tier III

80% 15% 5% Check-In/ Check-Out

Everyone on staff knows about it Easy access and quick implementation Substitute teachers and volunteers included Always readily available for timely implementation No individual changes necessary Home school connection Regular reporting of progress Skills are taught and used Transition into self-management skills

Small group intervention to provide… Daily organization and behavioral support Systematic performance feedback High rates of adult attention Mechanism for making data-based decisions Communication link between school and home

Research supported practice Schools can successfully implement Decreases problem behavior Effective for 60-75% of Tier II, at-risk students Not as effective for students who do not find adult attention reinforcing (Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004, pp. 9-10)

More effective with students with attention- maintained problem behavior (March & Horner, 2002; McIntosh, et. al., 2009; Campbell & Anderson, 2008) Effective across behavioral functions (Hawken, O’Neill, & MacLeod, 2011) Students who do not respond to CICO may benefit from function-based, individualized interventions (Fairbanks, et. al., 2007; March & Horner, 2002; Macleod, Hawken, & O’Neill, 2010)

ALL All specialized interventions are more effective and more durable if they are done with school-wide behavioral expectations as a foundation. SOME FEW

CICO works for 65-70% CICO 15%

Improved structure Prompts are provided throughout the day for correct behavior. System for linking student with at least one positive adult Student chooses to participate. Student is “set up for success” First contact each morning is positive. “Blow-out” days are pre-empted. First contact each class/activity period is positive. Increase in contingent feedback Feedback occurs more often. Feedback is tied to student behavior. Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be ignored or rewarded

Program can be applied in all school locations Classroom, playground, cafeteria Anywhere there is a supervisor Elevated recognition for appropriate behavior Adult attention delivered each target period Adult attention (and tangible) delivered at end of day Links school and home support Provide format for positive student/parent contact Organized to fade into a self-management system Increased options for making choices Increased ability to self-monitor performance/progress

Social Competence & Academic Achievement Systems Administrative leadership, team-based implementation, defined commitment, allocation of FTE & coordinator, budgeted support, development of decision-driven information system Practices Define procedures, teach procedures, use daily progress report for progress monitoring, communicate with home on student progress, acknowledge expected behavior, correct behavioral error (continuum of consequences), use information for decision making Data Data entry, report generation, decision making

School-wide PBIS in Place School-wide expectations defined and taught Reward system operating Clear and consistent consequences for problem behavior Process for Identifying a Student Who may be Appropriate for CICO Student is not responding to SWPBS expectations Request for Assistance Student finds adult attention rewarding Student is NOT in crisis

Daily CICO Progress Report Card Same expectations for all Common schedule All staff are taught rules for accepting, completing, and returning the card Home Report Process Can be same as progress card Can be a unique reporting form

CICO 15% CICO-SWIS is a decision system for targeted or group- based interventions for students needing additional support beyond the Universal or Tier I system.

CICO-SWIS Readiness Requirement 3 The school/facility has a standard Daily Progress Report/CICO point card with the following information: Defined number of check-in periods (up to ten) Defined number of expectations/goals (3-5) A three-point rating scale

More information and examples are available at in the Resources section

How are we doing with implementation? How are the students responding?

How is each student doing in relation to the school- wide goal?

What is one student’s pattern over time?

What does one student’s average day look like?

What is one student’s pattern over time in a single period?