Report on Session Guidelines Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EuropeAid Political Economy at Work Brussels January 2011 Paolo Ciccarelli Infrastructure Unit (Transport) Directorate for Development and Cooperation.
Advertisements

Regional Routing Model Review: A) Data Fusion Efforts and Issues Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program Review.
2012 Freight in the Southeast Conference America’s Marine Highway Services March 16, 2012 Lauren Brand, Director Office of Marine Highways & Passenger.
The Trade Growth Challenge Liner Shipping Responses to the Growth of Global Freight.
Idaho/Canada Border Issues Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Coeur d’Alene, ID April 22-23, 2008.
Louisiana Ports Deliver… Presented by: Ports Association of Louisiana Presented by: Ports Association of Louisiana.
1 Presentation for the 11th Annual Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Conference By David B. Sanford Director, Navigation Policy & Legislation American Association.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
America’s Marine Highways Program Propeller Club October 4, 2012 Jim Murphy East Gulf Lower Mississippi System Gateway U.S. Department of Transportation.
Regional Perspectives on Freight: A Multimodal Economic Network Ernie Perry, PhD MAFC April 23-25, 2013.
Maritime Administration America’s Marine Highway Program & Port Infrastructure Development Program Chip Jaenichen, Deputy Administrator Maritime Administration,
“Does Moving from A to Z Matter?” Thoughts on Freight Corridors in the Southeast.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
Senate Transportation Committee January 25, 2011 Eric Johnson Executive Director Washington Public Ports Association Larry Paulson Executive Director Port.
Marketing Plan Shipping on the Great Lakes The University of Toledo November 7, 2006 Intermodal Transportation Institute.
The 2011 Rail Conference: Moving Freight and Passengers in the 21 st Century Seaports and Freight Rail Eric D. Johnson Executive Director Washington Public.
Ports and Waterways: A State DOT Perspective Secretary Sherri H. LeBas, P.E. April 29, 2015.
URBAN FREIGHT Getting kicked to the curb?. How will we live?
Building Inter-metropolitan Rail Corridors: A Public Policy Forum, University of Delaware, February Inter-metropolitan Rail Corridors and Regional.
The Port of Pittsburgh is the busiest inland river port in the nation and the 11 th busiest port of any kind* TOTAL PORT RANKING* 1 South Louisiana, LA.
Mike Elliott, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen (BLET), Washington State Legislative Board (WSLB) February 2014.
U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration.
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
Bill Anderson Ontario Research Chair in Cross Border Transportation Policy Director, Cross-Border Institute University of Windsor For Windsor-Essex Chamber.
T HOUGHTS ON THE P ANAMA C ANAL E XPANSION Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies.
Greg Cenac Steve Haik Ross ChapmanRonnie Harris Perry DufreneMarc Mergen Ivan EchegarruaKen Robinson Mike GrayDan Sleker Harold Yeldell TRANSPORT NETWORKS.
California Integrated Logistics Center. A BART TRAIN FOR FREIGHT Moving freight through the Port of Oakland without increasing highway congestion Faster.
Network Appalachia Access to Global Opportunity in the 21 st Century.
Preparing for Post-Panamax Commodity Flows: Restructuring on Kentucky Waterways Tim Brock Research Associate Kentucky Transportation Center Smart Rivers.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
1 City & Port of Baltimore Maritime Industrial Zone Overlay District (MIZOD) “Talking Freight” Web Conference, Nov. 19, 2008 James M. Dwyer Maryland Port.
Regional Integration Cluster Olivier Hartmann - SSATP.
America’s Marine Highway Lauren Brand: US DOT/Maritime Administration Office of Marine Highways & Passenger Services.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
Transportation and Logistics Roundtable Series Locations and Dates September 9, 2015.
Federal & State barriers  "An assessment of statutory, regulatory, technological, institutional, financial, and other barriers to improved freight transportation.
Network Appalachia Access to Opportunity in the Global Economy of the 21 st Century.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
Alabama Water Resources Assoc. * September 5-7, 2007 * CAWA Emerging Opportunities for Our Inland Waterways Alabama Water Resources Association September.
Mary Lamie, Executive Director St. Louis Regional Freight District.
International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus Georgia: Areas in the vicinity of Tbilisi airport Ministry of Economy and Sustainable.
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
Thoughts on Freight Logistics in the Southeast Bruce Lambert 1.
Cultural Resource Planning Summit June 8, 2010 Eric D. Johnson Executive Director Washington Public Ports Association.
Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications of the Republic of Turkey Intermodality leads to Sustainability A workshop for the Working Party.
Think Globally, Act Locally August 19, Introduction Why freight is important to central Ohio Global implications and impacts Highway system challenges.
Meetingthe Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying Ahead The AASHTO-FHWA Freight Transportation Partnership —Meeting the Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying.
Prepared for AASHTO’s Standing Committee on Water Transportation Presented by Alan Meyers, AICP Cambridge Systematics October 13, 2011 Workshop: Finalizing.
Why Intermodal Freight is Necessary Cheryl Ball Waterways and Freight Administrator Missouri Department of Transportation.
Ariel Dayan Zev Steinberg Background Introduction Hong Kong Port (HKP) Development and Global Manufacturing Trends Impacts of emerging.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
Illinois Intrastate Shuttle Sponsor: America’s Central Port, Granite City, Illinois Route: M-55 Marine Highway Route (Illinois River) Project Snapshot:
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
Our nation’s freight transportation system is a vast, complex network of almost seven million miles of highways and local roads, railways, navigable waterways,
1. 2 February Alliance Workshop St. Louis Regonal Freightway Alliance Needs Analysis and Freight Development Committee Terminal Rail Association.
1 Willamette Valley Intermodal Facility: Feasibility Study.
1 Transport and Logistic Platforms Logistic City’s – Intemodal and Sustainable Solutions Lisbon – 07 of July 2010.
Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Transportation Infrastructure Perspective Ross Chittenden Deputy Executive Director, Contra Costa Transportation Authority.
Chapter 12. Moving Freight 1. Describe the role of freight movement in the economy 2. Explain why certain commodity tend to move on specific transport.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
Great Northern Corridor Coalition Update
Strategic Sites Inventory Program Freight Logistics Zone Development
BARGING 101 By Captain John C. Farmer Presented to:
An Inland Port in Salt Lake County
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC EXPANSION
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
Office of Ports and Water Planning
Presentation transcript:

Report on Session Guidelines Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies

General Response  Positive step foreword in process  Seen as good well creation for state if dialogue continues  Business climate is changing-timing is critical  LA is catching up to neighbors but opportunities exist

New pressures  Globalization  Panama Canal will change demands  Firms expanding overseas with limited funds

Economic Development  State needs to collaboratively develop intra regional competition with locals and state  Railroad access is considered too late in development phase  Corridor protection

Maritime Activities  Too many ports –regarding marketing, promotion, projects  Workforce development – deckhands, etc.  Inland navigation expansion – state as advocate for funding  Tax equity between barges and rail  Pilot fees is different associations  Dock and maritime union and labor  Inner Harbor Lock needs State support

Regional and National Development  I-20 as automobile highway  New Orleans Rail Gateway Modernization  Access to Markets is diverse

Railroad Issues  Railroad access into the Port of Lake Charles  Intermodal ramp availability  Interchange agreements along the river  Captive shippers – dual rail  Need rail funds for other modes like for airports  Standardization of railroad car weights on railway bed

Highway  Congestion in Baton Rouge, New Orleans  Rail Grade Crossings  Truck permitting standardization  Complete I-49 and I-69  Improve 371, 171, 28

Institutional Needs  Training logistics and support professional staff  Coalition for Strategic Planning for State  State needs to change perception  Ombudsmen function

Next Steps  List of Topics for Review (internal)  Draft for Internal Review (internal)  Release Strategic Plan (external)  Freight Summit (external)