Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Nottoway River Area October 28, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Advertisements

The World Water Quality Assessment Large-scale water quality modeling Hot spots and causes of water pollution.
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Fecal Coliform “Hot Spots” Monitoring Stacie Greco Senior Environmental Specialist Alachua County Environmental Protection Department.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
Leona River Potential Loads and Sources for Bacteria and Nitrates Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas June 4, 2013.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Urban Rivers and Upper Bay Presented by: Jennifer Cragan Environmental Scientist.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Jeanette A. Thurston-Enriquez
RESULTS With increasing amounts of Novobiocin there was an obvious decrease in survival of colony forming units of bacteria (Fig. 8). Triclosan was more.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Chowan River TMDL Development Raccoon/Sappony Area 09/8/04.
Catoctin Creek: A Stream in Distress Catoctin Watershed Project A Partnership of County and Citizen Organizations.
TMDL – Fecal coliform Frank Henning UGA Watershed Extension Agent.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Hillsborough River Fecal Coliform BMAP Process Oct. 22, 2008.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Blackwater River Area October 25, 2004.
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
By Youssef El-Gharabli & Annna Steinberg. Coliform Bacteria It is the commonly-used bacterial indicator of sanitary quality of foods and water. They are.
Chowan River TMDL Development Tidewater Area 08/26/04.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Catoctin Creek TMDL Implementation Plan Development June 24, 2004.
Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
CACHE CREEK WATERSHED Watershed Overview –Physical Description –Land Uses Present –Flow Characteristics –Beneficial Uses Point and Non-Point Source Pollutants.
Beach Contamination Source Identification Techniques: Physical Characteristics of the Beach and Surrounding Watershed Door County Soil and Water Conservation.
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
The Schematic Processor Presented by Dr. Tim Whiteaker The University of Texas at Austin 18 October, 2011.
Critique of North Branch of Sunrise River TMDL Nate Topie and Taylor Hoffman.
Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Tidewater Area October 20, 2004.
Adem.alabama.gov Tombigbee Basin Up-date July 29, 2015 Mark Sport.
Skokomish River Fecal Coliform TMDL Attainment Monitoring in Washington State George Onwumere, Ph.D National Monitoring Conference, San Jose, California.
Chowan River TMDL Development Blackwater Area 09/07/04.
Leona River SELECT Modeling and Potential Bacteria Sources Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research Stephenville, Texas January 24,
Microbial Source Tracking Data Michael Powell 1, Martin Chandler 2, Charles Hagedorn 3 16 November EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.,
Chowan River TMDL Development Nottoway Area 08/31/04.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Bacterial TMDL Model for Copano Bay Research performed by Carrie Gibson at Center for Research in Water Resources Schematic processor tool developed by.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Integrated Watershed Management
Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDL for Four Mile Run
Sources, Transport, Fate Treatment Methodologies BMP Case Studies
Mulberry River Watershed
Modeling Support for Attoyac Bayou Watershed– SELECT
Hydrosphere Notes Parts 4- Watersheds.
Division of Aquaculture
Elm Creek Watershed TMDL E. coli TMDL – Review of Preliminary Findings
Water Pollution.
Total Maximum Daily Loads Development for Holdens Creek and Tributaries, and Pettit Branch Public Meeting March 26, 2008.
Water Quality Improvement Through Implementation of a Watershed Protection Plan in the Leon River Watershed Lower Rio Grande Valley Stormwater Conference.
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model:
Water Pollution & Treatment
Mulberry River Watershed Management Plan
An Overview of Bacterial Source Tracking - Methods and Applications
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Spatterdock and Lake Allen Patuxent Research Refuge
Presentation transcript:

Chowan River TMDL Development and Source Assessment Nottoway River Area October 28, 2004

Nottoway River Watershed

TMDL Steps – Nottoway Monitoring/Listing - Identification of Water Quality Problem. Source Assessment – Locating potential contributors of pollutant in watershed. Modeling – Examining the movement of sources from the land to the water. Allocation/TMDL – Use the model to determine the load reductions necessary to achieve water quality goals.

Historical Water Quality Data Analysis ImpairmentStationSampled Dates Count (#) MinimumMaximumMeanMedian Violation (%) 1,000 Violation (%) 400 Big Hounds Creek5ABHC /90-6/ , Big Hounds Creek5ABHC /74-3/ , Beaver Pond Creek5ABPC /94-4/ ,0002, Little Nottoway R.5ALNT /90-6/ ,0001, Little Nottoway R5ALNT /68-9/ ,0006, Lazaretto Creek5ALZT /74-6/ , Nottoway River5ANTW /02-6/ Nottoway River5ANTW /68-9/74 & 8/90-6/ , Nottoway River5ANTW /74-6/ , Nottoway River5ANTW /16/ Nottoway River5ANTW /94-4/97 & 4/03-3/ ,0001, Fecal Coliform Concentrations *Fecal coliform concentrations (cfu/100 ml)

Water Quality Data Analysis E. coli ImpairmentStation Sampled Dates Count (#) Minimum (cfu/100ml) Maximum (cfu/100ml) Mean (cfu/100ml) Median (cfu/100ml) Violation (%) 235 Big Hounds Creek5ABHC /03-4/ Beaver Pond Creek5ABPC /00-7/ , Dry Creek5ADRY /03-3/ Little Nottoway R.5ALNT /03-4/ Little Nottoway R.5ALNT /03-6/ Lazaretto Creek5ALZT /03-10/ Modest Creek5AMDT /03-3/ Nottoway River5ANTW /03-6/ Nottoway River5ANTW /03-6/ Nottoway River5ANTW /03-9/042361,

Source Assessment Livestock Wildlife Pets Permitted discharges Wastewater treatment facilities Human Biosolids

Permitted Discharges Facility NamePermit ID Design Flow (MGD) Permitted for Fecal Control Data Availability Victoria East Sewage Treatment Plant VA Yes2/99-4/04 Victoria WTPVA Yes5/99-4/04 Crewe WTPVA Yes2/99-4/04 DOC – Nottoway Correctional Center VA Yes5/99-4/04 Hood, WallaceVPG270010PoultryNoND Ingram, CharlesVPG270058PoultryNoND Ingram, William TVPG270074PoultryNoND Jeffery W. DunnVPG270062*PoultryNoND *Indicates poultry facility with some animals outside watershed boundary ND – no data, facility not required to submit monitoring data

Permitted Discharges *Indicates poultry facility with some animals outside watershed boundary ND – no data, facility not required to submit monitoring data Facility NamePermit ID Design Flow (MGD) Permitted for Fecal Control Data Availablity Nottoway County School (Nottoway High) VA Yes5/99-4/04 Oakmotte FarmVPG270081*PoultryNoND Randy ReynoldsVPG270087PoultryNoND Rolling Acres FarmVPG270049*PoultryNoND Triple R FarmVPG270018*PoultryNoND Big Oak FarmVPG170043CAFONoND Super Chic Ltd.VPG270024PoultryNoND Walter Berryman Glascock VPG270068PoultryNoND

Human Source Population, housing units, and onsite treatment system based on U.S. Census Septic Systems Failure to soil surface throughout year Lateral movement continuously to stream Straight Pipes Direct continuous input into stream Biosolids Land-applied

Human Source (2004) ImpairmentPopulation Housing Units (HU) HU with Sewer HU with Septic HU with Other Beaverpond Creek Big Hounds Creek 2, Little Nottoway River 4,8581, ,14570 Nottoway River 2,

Pet Source Population/household based on literature values, veterinarians, and animal control Translated to housing units based on U.S. Census Land-applied

Pet Source (2004) ImpairmentDogsCats Beaverpond Creek 6573 Big Hounds Creek Little Nottoway River Nottoway River

Livestock Source Distribution of waste Pastured Confined, waste collected, spread Direct deposition to the stream Seasonal varying applications Population Virginia Agricultural Statistics Consultation with SWCD, NRCS, VADCR, and VCE Watershed visits

Livestock Population Impairment All Cattle BeefDairyHogHorseSheepPoultry*Goats Beaverpond Creek Big Hounds Creek Little Nottoway River 4,603 1, ,6800 Nottoway River 1, , * Poultry as reported in this table includes broilers and layers as a single population, however, broilers and layers are modeled as individual sources.

Wildlife Source Population Animal densities from VDGIF biologists Habitat from literature values Distribution of waste based on habitat Land-applied Direct deposition to the stream Seasonal variations based on migration patterns and food sources

Wildlife Population ImpairmentDeerTurkeyGooseDuckMuskratRaccoonBeaver Beaverpond Creek Big Hounds Creek , Little Nottoway River 1, ,2621,03162 Nottoway River ,

Bacterial Source Tracking Antibiotic Resistance Analysis (ARA) Differentiates the sources of bacteria based on bacterial resistance to antibiotics

Bacterial Source Tracking Results StationDate Fecal Coliform (cfu/100 ml) E. Coli (cfu/100 ml) Percent Isolates classified as: WildlifeHumanLivestockPet 5ABPC /31/ % 100%0% 8/20/20035,6002,00017%71%4%8% 9/11/ %0%58%38% 10/14/20034,0003,00050%21%4%25% 11/13/ %12%0%59% 12/8/ %17%8%75% 2/4/ %0%21%8% 2/25/ %4%17%8% 3/24/ %21%8%12% 4/19/ %21%12%21% 5/10/ %33%43%25% 6/23/20042,0001,80038%8%33%21% BOLD type indicates a statistically significant value.

Bacterial Source Tracking Results StationDate Fecal Coliform (cfu/100 ml) E. Coli (cfu/100 ml) Percent Isolates classified as: WildlifeHumanLivestockPet 5ABHC /31/ %8%71%4% 8/20/20033, % 8%26% 9/11/ %0%8%38% 10/14/ % 88%12% 11/13/ %0%25%71% 12/8/ %12%8%55% 2/4/ %0%50%21% 2/25/ % 100% 3/24/ %5%0%57% 4/19/ %0%33%17% 5/10/ %40%0%40% 6/23/ %13% 0% BOLD type indicates a statistically significant value.

Bacterial Source Tracking Results StationDate Fecal Coliform (cfu/100 ml) E. Coli (cfu/100 ml) Percent Isolates classified as: WildlifeHumanLivestockPet 5ALNT /31/20033, %17%12%33% 8/20/20032, %8%46%21% 9/11/ %0%21%46% 10/14/ %0%17%58% 11/13/ %0%12%76% 12/8/ %21%8%25% 2/4/ %12%33%22% 2/25/ %0%59%8% 3/24/ %20%0%30% 4/19/ %17%8%12% 5/10/ %38%33%0% 6/23/ %57%12%0% BOLD type indicates a statistically significant value.

Bacterial Source Tracking Results StationDate Fecal Coliform (cfu/100 ml) E. Coli (cfu/100 ml) Percent Isolates classified as: WildlifeHumanLivestockPet 5ANTW /31/20032, % 79%21% 8/20/ %0%29%25% 9/11/ %0%19%75% 10/14/ % 100% 11/13/ % 33%67% 12/8/ %0% 17% 2/4/ %12%42%4% 2/25/ %0%20%0% 3/24/ %0% 75% 4/19/ %0%12%25% 5/10/ %0% 75% 6/23/ %5% 0% BOLD type indicates a statistically significant value.

Modeling Rainfall-Runoff-Water Quality Hydrologic Simulation Program – Fortran (HSPF)  Watershed-based  Continuous time interval  Land-applied, direct loads

VPDES Permit Conceptual Model Mathematical Representation Withdrawal Direct discharges Overland Wildlife on the Land Pastured Livestock Straight Pipes Lateral Flow from Septic Systems Parking Lots Wildlife in Stream Livestock in Stream Septic Failures Sewer Overflows Biosolids Application Pets

Hydrologic Modeling Components Climatic data Land use Topography Soils Stream channel characteristics Point source discharge/withdrawal Flow data

Land use ImpairmentAcres Forest (%) Barren (%) Agricultural (%) Urban (%) Water/ Wetlands (%) Nottoway River42, Little Nottoway River49, Big Hounds Creek 11, Beaverpond Creek 6, Based on Aerial Photos/Land Use maps/On site surveys Project For Growth/land use change Model forest, wetland, agricultural and urban areas

Water Quality Modeling Components Sources Fecal production FC densities FC distribution Delivery Mechanisms Direct Land-applied Temporal Variation

Public Meeting 2 (Date?) Public Review Submit to EPA State Approval Implementation Plan Development Implementation