Division of Air Quality Ambient Monitoring Donnie Redmond Section Chief May 7, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Council of Governments Donnie Redmond July 13, 2005.
Advertisements

Division of Air Quality Program Overview EMC Member Continuing Education Session Mike Abraczinskas Deputy Director November 2011.
AIR QUALITY – NOTIFYING THE PUBLIC. OKLAHOMA AIR MONITORING SITES.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter; Proposed Rule & 40 CFR Parts 53 and 58 Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations;
1 Shale Gas Development/Production Activities and Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas, Deputy Director North Carolina Division of Air Quality Shale Gas Development/Production.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
PM-2.5 FEM Requirements for Met One BAM Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
UK Air Quality Indicators Janet Dixon Air and Environment Quality Division, Department of Environment, food and Rural Affairs, UK.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Division of Air Quality -- Ambient Monitoring -- EMC Member Continuing Education Session Donnie Redmond Section Chief March 7, 2012.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
State Energy Components of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Seth Effron, State Energy Office July 29, 2009.
Ozone Monitoring Issues & Opportunities - II Ozone Transport Commission MANE-VU Fall Meeting November 19, 2014 Crystal City, VA Will Ollison 1220 L Street,
1 Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing Administrative Burden North Carolina Division of Air Quality Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
What Does a Tribal Air Program Look Like? James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians Environmental Department.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Emergency Air Monitoring During Wildfires Jim Homolya USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Stormwater Management for Colleges and Universities Phase II for Colleges and Universities State Stormwater Programs Industrial Facilities.
Next Generation Air Monitoring: An Overview of US EPA Activities National Air Quality Conference RTP, NC February 12, 2014 Tim Watkins US EPA/Office of.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
Ambient Air Monitoring Networks 2010 CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC October 13, 2010 Rich Scheffe, Sharon Phillips, Wyatt Appel, Lew Weinstock, Tim Hanley,
Development of 24-Hour 2006 PM 2.5 Designations Guidance NTAA National Tribal Air Quality Forum Barbara Driscoll EPA, OAQPS April 17, 2007.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Air Dispersion Modeling City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Air Quality Program Director: Mary Lou Leonard.
EPA’s Revisions to Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (PM NAAQS) Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013 Sushma Masemore,
Ondrea Barber GRIC DEQ Executive Director
What’s on the Horizon? Allabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
1 Shale Gas Development/Production Activities and Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas, Deputy Director North Carolina Division of Air Quality Shale Gas Development/Production.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
Ozone Transport that Impacts on Tribal Land: Case Study Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
Carrie Paige – EPA Region 6, Dallas David Cole – EPA OAQPS, RTP, NC Introduction to Air Permits Introduction to Air Permits.
EPA’s New National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Sunil Kumar MWAQC July 28,
By Taylor Dellinger, GISP Western Piedmont Council of Governments Prepared For: “Hickory Metro Economic Perspective” Foothills APICS Chapter May 9, 2013.
Emission source sampling and monitoring Topic 6 Ms Sherina Kamal May
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Joe Foutz March 27, 2012 – Hickory, NC Division of Air Quality March 29, 2012 – Raleigh, NC Mooresville Regional Office.
Characterization of a Year of Near-Road NO 2 Measurements in Las Vegas, Nevada Prepared by Paul T. Roberts, Jennifer L. DeWinter, and Steven G. Brown Sonoma.
Introduction to Modeling – Part I Sarah Kelly ITEP Sarah Kelly ITEP.
Fire impacts – Natural event data exclusions/ozone monitoring Colleen Delaney, Utah Division of Air Quality March 11, 2004.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Overview of the Division of Air Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
What’s in the future for RONs?
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
Brief Synopsis of Air Quality and Local/Regional Meteorology
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Air Quality Committee Meeting July 11, 2012 Donnie Redmond
Presentation transcript:

Division of Air Quality Ambient Monitoring Donnie Redmond Section Chief May 7, 2014

Topics to be Covered Ambient Monitoring Why do we do it? Who determines how many to operate? How do we decide where to put them? What do monitors look like? (Pictures!) Issues on the Horizon 2

Ambient Monitoring: Why? EPA requirements Highest concentrations Population exposure Background Research Public health effects re pollutant levels To better understand control strategies Public interest 3

Ambient Monitoring: What? EPA regulations lay out minimum requirements Number of monitors Where to locate them How long to operate them Different rules for each pollutant Same standards apply across the nation 4

Example: Ozone requirements Any metro area (MSA) with 350,000 people Must have at least one ozone monitor If >85% of the standard, must have two Any MSA with at least 50,000 people Must have a monitor if >85% of standard At least one monitor in each area must be for maximum concentration 5

Ozone monitoring req’ts (cont.) Eight NC metro areas have >350,000 people Charlotte, Raleigh, Durham, Greensboro, Winston- Salem, Asheville, Hickory, Fayetteville Each must have at least one monitor Second monitor required if near ozone standard Seven other MSAs with 50, ,000 people Wilmington, Greenville, Rocky Mount, Jacksonville, Goldsboro, Burlington, New Bern One monitor required if >85% of standard 85% of the standard (75ppb) is ~64 ppb 6

Ozone monitoring req’ts (cont.) Other considerations Additional monitors may help reduce the size of a nonattainment area Rural monitors may help determine transport of pollution Number of required ozone monitors can add up quickly! 7

Other pollutants PM2.5 Population and pollutant concentration NO2 Population and traffic volume SO2 Population and emissions weighted index Lead Emissions-based CO No population-based requirements Additional background monitors in support of PSD permitting 8

Ambient Monitoring: Who? Statewide network Regional office staff operates the monitors Electronics calibration/repair shop in Raleigh Two labs in Raleigh Central office does QA, SOPs, and reporting Local programs Mecklenburg, Forsyth, Western NC Cherokee tribe Federal agencies also operate monitors in NC 9

Site Characteristics Must meet EPA requirements, including Distance from trees, buildings, roads Nearby emissions sources Prevailing wind direction Height of sample probe above ground Other considerations Safety of technicians (traffic, terrain) Access to power and phone Cost to use site (free is good!) Co-located with other instruments 10

Quality Assurance requirements Chemists/statisticians review, validate, and report all the data Calibrations Power failures “Exceptional events”, i.e., fires Monitor performance issues Temperature, humidity, leaks Insects, varmints Completeness 11

Issues on the Horizon New ozone standard (2015) Could require monitors in smaller metro areas Could extend the ozone monitoring season SO2 source-oriented monitoring (2016) Major concerns regarding resources and logistics Introduction of new high tech sensing devices Citizens can take real-time local measurements 12

Particulate at Goldsboro 13

Ozone at Mocksville 14

Near road monitor in Raleigh 15

Questions? Donnie Redmond Ambient Monitoring Section Chief References 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D DAQ website 16