Information Dominance Anytime, Anywhere… PEOC4I.NAVY.MIL Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Trade Facilitation APEC BUSINESS TRAVEL CARD SCHEME
Advertisements

1 of 4 Elements of the Treaty Establishes an ITAR-free environment for the US Government, Australian Government and accredited US and Australian companies.
Bulk Petroleum Executive Agent Cynthia F. Smith PETRO May 30, 2012.
Group B: AAAH’s country level activities. Major goals Enable the countries to develop, implement and review periodically a HRH strategy that leads to.
Joint Contingency Contracting
Private Sector Perspectives on Federal Financial Systems Modernization and Shared Services.
UNCLASSIFIED National Guard State Partnership Program (SPP) Overview of the National Guard State Partnership Program.
U.S. EXPORT CONTROL LAWS ANALYSIS FOR THE IT MANAGER Presented by Wendy A. Robinson Assistant Attorney General Oregon Department of Justice Salem, Oregon.
1 The Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Team must INNOVATE AND COLLABORATE to deliver EFFECTIVE, AFFORDABLE tools for the joint warfighter. Understand.
U. S. Fleet Forces Command
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
Chapter 10 Information Systems Management. Agenda Information Systems Department Plan the Use of IT Manage Computing Infrastructure Manage Enterprise.
The UNITAR/ILO Programme for Capacity Building to implement the GHS GHS Stocktaking Workshop For Southeast, East and Central Asia September 2010.
Open Cloud Sunil Kumar Balaganchi Thammaiah Internet and Web Systems 2, Spring 2012 Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts Lowell.
The gun trials of the Brazilian dreadnought Minas Geraes.
United States Foreign Military Fund Execution in Bulgaria Defense Security Cooperation Agency.
C4ISR via OA Mike Danjczek November, 2014 Copyright GTS 2014.
Cloud Computing Zach Ciccone Claudia Rodriguez Annia Aleman Xiaoying Tu Nov 14, 2013.
1 As a public interest company, MITRE works in partnership with the government to address issues of critical national
1.ITAR Rules / Regulations 2.FMS v.s Direct Contract 3.JTLS Site License 4.JTLS Software Maintenance & Support Agreement (SMSA) JTLS Acquisition and Maintenance.
REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA The MILITARY REFORM. The necessity of military reform is determined by: imperfection of presentimperfection of present state security.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Lt Gen Bill Lord, SAF/CIO A6 Chief of Warfighting Integration and.
High Level Architecture Overview and Rules Thanks to: Dr. Judith Dahmann, and others from: Defense Modeling and Simulation Office phone: (703)
Information Sharing Challenges, Trends and Opportunities
1 Institutional Adaptation Panel Association of the United States Army Mr. Dean G. Popps Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Fusion Centres in Selected Countries Borders & Globalization Conference September 25-27, 2014 Elaine Koren, Research & Analysis Division Fusion Centres.
Personnel Requirements for Implementing the New Triad Robert B. Barker December 15, 2005.
1 Guiding Principles for Nationwide Interoperability A Brief Overview of Recent Efforts and Progress.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 World-Wide Joint Training and Scheduling Conference 25 March 2009 USTRANSCOM DPO Change Management Cynthia Robben (TCJ5/4-S)
1 September 18, 2006 Commercial Space Launch Vehicles Lessons Learned Needs Workshop Ken Hodgdon Export Control and Interagency Liaison Division Office.
SSC Pacific – A Strong Community Partner And Economic Engine… Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow CAPT Mark Kohlheim, Commanding Officer 17 NOV 09 SSC Pacific.
1 Asia-Link HIGHER EDUCATION NETWORKING BETWEEN EUROPE AND ASIA 1.
1 Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) Colombia Assistance Plan 9 – 12 June 2009 Mr. José M. Matos Stability Directorate Humanitarian Assistance Division
Department of Defense Budget APEX Strategic Priorities The Quadrennial Defense Review – the first conducted in an era of global terrorism – continues.
Paul A. Strassmann, Copyright Stevens Institute of Technology The Structure of I.T. Spending as Measure of Organizational Disorder Paul A. Strassmann,
1 Olga King Jet Propulsion Laboratory Office Of Export Compliance April 27, 2011.
EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION
Navy International Programs Office Mr. Rino Pivirotto Executive Director 15 April 2005 Presentation to the Homeland Security – Maritime Domain Awareness.
WELCOME TO DSCA STRENGTH THROUGH COOPERATION. DSCA’s mission is to lead, direct and manage security cooperation programs and resources to support national.
Fax: (703) DoD BIOMETRICS PROGRAM DoD Biometrics Management Office Phone: (703)
Corporate Social Responsibility Sourcing Strategies and Trade William Anderson Head of Social & Environmental Affairs Asia Pacific.
US Coast Guard Overview Hampton Roads AFCEA 1. US Coast Guard: Stats Workforce: AD, 7500 Reserves Assets: –Shore locations: 945 –Ships (>65’): 247.
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions Approach and Proposal “Charting Our Course”
AFLCMC… Providing the Warfighter’s Edge SOSA Industry Day: Working Agendas August 4, 2015.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
11 US-China-ASEAN Relations in the South China Sea Dr. Nong Hong, Associate Professor Research Center for Oceans Law and Policy National Institute for.
Acquisition Policy SCM-OC July Lesson Outline  US DOD Acquisition Policy and Authority  Acquisition Framework  USG, Foreign Government and Industry.
Protecting Against Cyber Challenges Pacific Operational Science & Technology Conference 15 March 2011 Rob Wolborsky Chief Technology Officer Space and.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
2011 Senior Leaders Seminar CARAT Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training 30 March 2011 Bangkok, Thailand CDR Troy Amundson COMLOG WESTPAC CTF 73 CARAT.
As of W Jan 15 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Pacific Warfighting Center Training and Exercises Directorate USPACOM J32 23 January 2015.
FITARA Revamping IT in the Federal Government Presentation to DIR Information Security Forum Richard A. Spires April 14, 2016.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force SAF/IA: Building Relationships, Capabilities, and Capacity Hansen Mak.
Defense MOU Attache Group September 28, 2011 DSCA Overview.
’05 ’06 ’07 #1 ’02 ’06 ’04 ’06 ’07 ’09 ’03 ’04 DAU and DISAM Curriculum Review February 22, 2012 Greg Beckham Defense Systems Management College
2 Agenda Command Mission ……………………………… Command Relationships ……………………..…….4 Fleet Assets……………………..……………………. 6 Sailors and Civilians………..……………………….
Sectoral Approach to Skills Development
Maritime Security as an Integral Part of an
Computer Science and Information Technology
FY17 End of Year Goals Summary FY17: Top 40 Goals Assessment
Guiding Principles The Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Team must INNOVATE AND COLLABORATE to deliver EFFECTIVE, AFFORDABLE tools for the joint warfighter.
Architecture Tool Vendor’s Day
U.S. Coast Guard Cyber Education & Training
Strategic Boards Toolkit
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
NSRP Workforce Development Panel – Navy Program Manager Thoughts
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Maritime Strategy Interdependency:
Presentation transcript:

Information Dominance Anytime, Anywhere… PEOC4I.NAVY.MIL Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I) Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited (11 MARCH 2010) 1206 Interoperability and Sustainment Challenges “Building Maritime Security Capacity in Partner Nations” James Churchill Program Manger International C4I Integration (PMW 740) 18 March 2010

2 Agenda Section 1206 description Section 1206 Case Value Issues and Implications Status Attain Interoperability Summary

3 Section 1206 Description Section 1206 of National Defense Authorization Act for FY06 authorized US Government support to build capacity of a foreign country’s national military to conduct counterterrorist operations or to participate in stability operations with US Armed Forces 1206 Projects  COCOM Prioritized  FMS process used to implement  Funded with US Operations & Maintenance (O&M) dollars –Generally two-year programs

4 PMW 740 Section 1206 Case Value 1206 Fiscal YearPACOM C4I AOR Total $PMW Case Total $ 2006$30,000,000$35,500, $45,580,000$46,546, $40,040,307$51,693, $15,365,868$34,083,080 Total$130,986,175$167,822,387

Southeast Asia PEO C4I MDA Programs Indonesia: 18 MDA Ground Stations 2 MDA Command Suites 15 Shipboard Radars CENTRIXS / GPOI Sri Lanka: 8 MDA Ground Stations 10 RHIBS Malaysia: 9 MDA Ground Stations 1 MDA Command Suite 1 Joint Forces Command Center CENTRIXS Philippines: Manpack Radios for Coast Watch South 8 MDA Ground Stations 1 MDA Command Suite 5 India: CENTRIXS Cambodia: S4/GPOI Thailand: S4/GPOI Singapore: CENTRIX

6 MDA Products MDA (Section 1206 Projects)  Maritime/Coastal Surveillance Stations (MSS) –Ground Stations  MDA Regional Command Center Upgrades  Day/Night Cameras, X & S Band Radars, AIS  HF/VHF Radios  CENTRIXS  Broadband Network Upgrades  Concept of Operations (CONOPS)  Training GPOI  Peace Support Operations Collaboration Center (PSOCC)  Computers, servers, projectors  Software  Training

7 NDAA Section 1206 Implications Acquisition Authority  Acquisition Command roles and responsibilities do not include negotiation of international information sharing agreements Legal Authority  Goods and Services are provided with “no strings attached” –No reciprocity requirement –No “quid pro quo” requirement  Provision of goods and services does not obligate USG to further offers –No assurance of out-year sustainment resources –No assurance of out-year training resources

Partner Nation Interoperability Barriers Maturing Information Technology (IT) basis within military forces  Partner Nation military “career development” generally unlike that of US forces  Typically limited IT operations, maintenance or administration experience within enlisted ranks Varied Education and Training basis within military forces  Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSAs) typically centralized within command structure Limited operations and sustainment budgets (Military labor is cheap; equipment is unobtainable) Sites often in austere environments in response to threat axes Few nations, or national militaries, have similar “Concepts of Operation” to the US Military.

9 Sovereignty Implications Technology is delivered to partner nations for their use…as they see fit  May not match with US desires  Regardless of what they “want” to do, may be limited in what they “can” do Recipient nations may be unwilling to “share” anything with nearest neighbors Recipients may expect that US will pay the out-year costs in order to keep the system in operation Nations typically desire to maximize use of “In Country” resources / products / concepts

10 Engagement Continuum “no capability” Organized Workforce Equipped Workforce Trained Professional Military Bilateral Data sharing and Operations Multi-Lateral Data sharing and Operations Recruiting Funding Established command Procurement Sustainment Educated entries Robust training Professionalism National Trust Treaty Negotiations Information controls Trust Treaties The 1206 “Tradespace” Partner Nation Capability Data Sharing Effectiveness

MDA Delivered Over 2 dozen Maritime Surveillance Systems & Command Centers to PACOM AOR COTS systems  Good: commercial standards, wide variety of service providers, low overall cost, minimized ITAR issues  Other: only does what industry needs, not “plug and play” with US DoD proprietary systems, not “hardened” to military spec Sovereign nation systems  Located in partner nation buildings / spaces, manned and operated by partner nation military members  Not “automatically” connected to US networks / systems  Often identified by partner nations as operating at a “classified” level

12 Attaining Interoperability (cont) Data/interoperability agreements needed Equipment delivered to partner nations is NOT the problem  Sensors are capable of “exporting” data in accordance with commercial standards. –i.e., AIS data in NMEA standard message format “could be” forwarded from either individual stations or from regional centers.  Communications equipment operates on “commercial frequencies.” –i.e., individual sites or regional centers “could” come up on a specified HF or VHF frequency to perform comms checks US-side systems MAY be a problem  Unclear how exactly to “import” data from partner nation, uncovered, unencrypted, network environments into US environments

13 Summary Invested over $130M in PACOM AOR MDA via 1206 Improved military to military relationships with recipient nations Sustainment not automatic Information sharing