Insun Song 1, Chandong Chang 2, and Hikweon Lee 1 (1) Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (2) Chungnam National University, Korea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Normal Distribution
Advertisements

SINTEF Petroleum Research The strength of fractured rock Erling Fjær SINTEF Petroleum Research 1.
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Infinite Slope Analysis
Taiwan Chelungpu Drilling Project Taiwan Chelungpu-Fault Drilling Project Meeting Mark Zoback Stanford University October 21, 2003 In Situ Stress Measurements,
Selective Survival of Crust Paul Morgan Department of Geology Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona, USA Penrose Conference Lander, WY;
3-D Finite Element Modeling of the Rise and Fall of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau Mian Liu and Youqing Yang Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of.
Toward the next generation of earthquake source models by accounting for model prediction error Acknowledgements: Piyush Agram, Mark Simons, Sarah Minson,
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments David Kohlstedt Brian Evans Stephen Mackwell.
Sensitivities in rock mass properties A DEM insight Cédric Lambert (*) & John Read (**) (*) University of Canterbury, New Zealand (**) CSIRO - Earth Science.
Michael Butzek, Jörg Wolters, Bernhard Laatsch Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Proton beam window for High Power Target Application 4th.
Chapter 3 Rock Mechanics Stress
Structural control of igneous complexes and kimberlites: a new statistical method Dazheng Zhang and Lutz, T.,
The stresses that cause deformation
Samples vs. Distributions Distributions: Discrete Random Variable Distributions: Continuous Random Variable Another Situation: Sample of Data.
Announcements Next week lab: 1-3 PM Mon. and Tues. with Andrew McCarthy. Please start on lab before class and come prepared with specific questions Cottonwood.
CEE 437 Fall 2006 Geologic Maps and Stereonet Slope Analysis.
P.B. Flemings (1), I. Song (2,3) and D.M. Saffer (3) (1) Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, USA (2) Korea Institute of Geoscience.
- D TR ADPE / A © FORCE shale seminar 18 &19 Sept Stavanger Stress determination and pore pressure measurements performed at the Meuse/Haute-Marne.
Bit Error Probability Evaluation of RO PUFs Qinglong Zhang, Zongbin Liu, Cunqing Ma and Jiwu Jing Institute of Information Engineering, CAS, Beijing, China.
Bill Ellsworth U.S. Geological Survey Near-Source Observations of Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Rupture and Fault Mechanics JAMSTEC International.
Faults and Folds Normal Fault In normal faulting, the hanging wall block moves down relative to the footwall block. The fault plane.
 Assuming only absorbing trace gas abundance and AOD are retrieved, using CO 2 absorption band alone provides a DOF ~ 1.1, which is not enough to determine.
Expedition 314 Summary Expedition 314: Sept - Nov, 2007 Logging-While-Drilling dedicated holes at 5 sites Philippine Sea plate megasplay top of subducting.
Structural Analysis and Design of
GOCE OBSERVATIONS FOR DETECTING UNKNOWN TECTONIC FEATURES BRAITENBERG C. (1), MARIANI P. (1), REGUZZONI M. (2), USSAMI N. (3) (1)Department of Geosciences,
Project II Team 9 Philippe Delelis Florian Brouet 이성혁.
Casing Integrity in Hydrate Bearing Sediments Reem Freij-Ayoub, Principal Research Engineer CESRE Wealth from Oceans.
Spatial Variations in Microseismic Focal Mechanisms, Yibal Field, Oman A. AL-Anboori 1, M. Kendall 2, D. Raymer 3, R. Jones 3 and Q. Fisher 1 1 University.
The role of water on lithospheric strength Chester et al., 1995, A rheologic model for wet crust applied to strike-slip faults Hirth et al., An evaluation.
Integrating geologic maps with fault mechanics John Singleton, George Mason University NSF Cutting Edge Workshop 2012.
Estimation Chapter 8. Estimating µ When σ Is Known.
How Faulting Keeps Crust Strong? J. Townend & M.D. Zoback, 2000 Geology.
Quick and Simple Statistics Peter Kasper. Basic Concepts Variables & Distributions Variables & Distributions Mean & Standard Deviation Mean & Standard.
Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults Norman H. Sleep & Michael L. Blanpied Ge 277 – February 19, 2010.
Coulomb Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 15 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 22 Oct: T&S Last Time: RHEOLOGY Dislocation creep is sensitive to: Temperature.
High Resolution Finite Fault Inversions for M>4.8 Earthquakes in the 2012 Brawley Swarm Shengji Wei Acknowledgement Don Helmberger (Caltech) Rob Graves.
-Kazem Oraee (Prof) - Arash Goodarzi (Eng) - Nikzad Oraee-Mirzamani (Phd) -Parham Khajehpour (Eng) 34th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Counting Statistics and Error Prediction Poisson Distribution ( p.
Modeling of Subaqueous Melting of Greenland Tidewater glaciers
Measurements in Fluid Mechanics 058:180 (ME:5180) Time & Location: 2:30P - 3:20P MWF 3315 SC Office Hours: 4:00P – 5:00P MWF 223B-5 HL Instructor: Lichuan.
A multiline LTE inversion using PCA Marian Martínez González.
The influence of the geometry of the San Andreas fault system on earthquakes in California Qingsong Li and Mian Liu Geological Sciences, 101 Geol. Bldg.,
Seismic and Aseismic Slip During Hydraulic Fracturing Stephen Perry.
Project Site Description Area – 2,30,327 m 2 Global Position – Between N ’20” to N ’71” and E ’50” to E ’80” Elevation – +14.5m.
The Ground Response Curve, Pillar Loading and Pillar Failure G.S. (Essie) Esterhuizen Chris Mark Michael Murphy The findings and conclusions in this presentation.
Today: Back to stress stress in the earth Strain Measuring Strain Strain Examples Today: Back to stress stress in the earth Strain Measuring Strain Strain.
Anomalous Vp/Vs ratios in the focal zone of West/Bohemia earthquake swarms T. Fischer1,2, T. Dahm3 (1) Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences.
Introduction to Reliability in Mechanical Engineering Project 2 Group 5 Tsung Heng Tsai 03/12/
Geology 5670/6670 Inverse Theory 20 Feb 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Read for Mon 23 Feb: Menke Ch 9 ( ) Last time: Nonlinear Inversion Solution appraisal.
Maximum likelihood estimators Example: Random data X i drawn from a Poisson distribution with unknown  We want to determine  For any assumed value of.
1 1 Slide Continuous Probability Distributions n The Uniform Distribution  a b   n The Normal Distribution n The Exponential Distribution.
Deflection of PDMS ENMA 490 October 16, 2003 Shawna Dean.
Hydraulic Fracturing in Bowland Shale Lancashire, UK July. 2 nd,2013 ISC Quarterly Meeting.
STRESS SUMMARY Stress= amount of force per unit area (units Pa) Force= mass * acceleration (units N)
Breakout analysis using Fullbore Formation MicroImager images
Geological map of the massifs of Lake Chudzjavr
Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague
A.Teodorczyk, P.Drobniak, A.Dabkowski
Interplate earthquake: 1994 Sanriku (Ms 7.6) Nakayama & Takeo (1997)
Heat Flow Across The San Andreas Fault
by J. D. O. Williams, S. Holloway, and G. A. Williams
by Agus M. Ramdhan, and Neil R. Goulty
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Department of Civil Engineering
Frictional Heating During an Earthquake
Characterization of Sound Speed Profiles
by John D. O. Williams, Mark W. Fellgett, and Martyn F. Quinn
This document is a supplement to the article ‘Large near-surface block rotations at normal faults of the Iceland rift: evolution of tectonic caves and.
Example 3.E - Graf Assume a channel with uniform flow at a depth of 5.03 m. Channel is rectangular with a width of 9 m and average velocity of 12 m/s.
Presentation transcript:

Insun Song 1, Chandong Chang 2, and Hikweon Lee 1 (1) Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (2) Chungnam National University, Korea

Location of study area and tectonic setting

Geologic profile

Breakouts and in situ stress  hmin  hmax IODP EXP 314 NanTroSEIZE report    (MPa)  º  HH rock strength bb bb

Strength vs. sonic velocity Depth (mbsf) V P (m/s) UCS (MPa) Counts V P (m/s) C0002A mbsf Ave.=1784.4m/s (Chang et al., 2009)

   (MPa)  º  HH bb BB Height (m) BB C0002A ( mbsf) Counts UCS (MPa) C0002A mbsf Determination of far-field stress magnitudes bb  hmax breakout BB

Average strength vs. average breakout width Stress (MPa)  ( o ) Average strength Average width

Strength distribution vs. breakout width distribution Stress (MPa)  ( o )

In situ stress determination algorithm Counts UCS (MPa) For S h = 26 MPa  S H = 0.05 MPa Integration of all misfits S H = 28.5 MPa BB For S h = 26 MPa  S H = 0.05 MPa Cumulated density in height (m) Cumulated probability Assume Gaussian distribution of UCS(P) and  i = 0.6 (Song et al., 2010) Using the M-C failure criterion with probability, calculate the probability function of breakout width for given far-field stresses (S hmax and S hmin ) Compare the probability with breakout density in height Select the far-field stress with the minimum misfit

Examples of grid searching method 335 mbsf 484 mbsf 1295 mbsf 1172 mbsf 845 mbsf S hmin from LOT 875 mbsf

Stress profiles  s =0.6 hydrostatic Lithostatic (Chang et al., 2009) unconformity LOP

Stress polygon C0002A LOP

Conclusions Using the distributions of rock strength and breakout width instead of their averages, we were able to determine both S hmin and S Hmax simultaneously. In normal faulting stress regime, S hmin is insensitive to error and becomes more sensitive as it goes to the strike-slip faulting stress regime. In Kumano forearc basin in situ stress is very close to the limit equilibrium condition for normal faulting. Underneath the unconformity the stress condition becomes stable and goes to the strike-slip fault stress regime with increasing depth.

THANK YOU