RF DEFLECTORS AT CTF3 BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH MINI-WORKSHOP ON CRAB CAVITIES FOR THE LHC Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY Feb 25-26, 2008 Fabio Marcellini.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
Advertisements

5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,
Measurements on phase stability at CTF3 Giulio Morpurgo / CERN IWLC 2010.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
DESIGN OF A 7-CELLS, HOM DAMPED, SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITY FOR THE STRONG RF FOCUSING EXPERIMENT AT DANE David Alesini, Caterina Biscari, Roberto Boni, Alessandro.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
CLIC DR EXTRACTION KICKER DESIGN, MANUFACTURING AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM C. Belver-Aguilar (IFIC) On behalf of: A. Faus-Golfe (IFIC), F. Toral (CIEMAT),
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
Compensation of Transient Beam-Loading in CLIC Main Linac
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
KICKER LNF David Alesini LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
FAST KICKER STATUS Fabio Marcellini On behalf of LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Higher-Order Modes and Beam-Loading Compensation in CLIC Main Linac Oleksiy Kononenko BE/RF, CERN CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting, March 14, 2012.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
Feasibility and R&D Needed For A TeV Class HEP e+e- Collider Based on AWA Technology Chunguang Jing for Accelerator R&D Group, HEP Division, ANL Aug
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
Progress Report on the Ultra-fast Harmonic Kicker Cavity Design and Beam Dynamic Simulation Yulu Huang 1,2 H. Wang 1, R. A. Rimmer 1, S. Wang 1 1.Thomas.
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
How does a klystron work? TE-MPE Section Meeting Karolina Kulesz
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
CLIC Main Linac Cavity BPM Snapshot of the work in progress
TESLA Damping Ring: Injection/Extraction Schemes with RF Deflectors
NC Accelerator Structures
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Developments on Proposed
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
H. Wang1, R. A. Rimmer1, S. Wang1, J. Guo1
Presentation transcript:

RF DEFLECTORS AT CTF3 BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH MINI-WORKSHOP ON CRAB CAVITIES FOR THE LHC Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY Feb 25-26, 2008 Fabio Marcellini

Presentation OUTLINE CTF3 and bunch combination with RF deflectors. RF deflector design for the Delay Loop. Results of operation with DL RFD. RFDs design for the Combiner Ring. Results of operation with CR RFDs. Beam vertical instability induced by RFD. New deflector design (in progress).

Motivation and goals of CTF3 collaboration Build a small-scale version of the CLIC RF power source, in order to demonstrate: full beam-loading accelerator operation electron beam pulse compression and frequency multiplication using RF deflectors Provide the RF power to test the CLIC accelerating structures and components CTF3 – Layout DRIVE BEAM LINAC fully loaded acceleration DELAY LOOP recombination x 2 phase-coding bunch length control COMBINER RING recombination x 4 PETS on-off two-beam acceleration structures 12 GHz structures 30 GHz 4 A – 1.2  s 150 Mev 30 A – 140 ns 150 Mev 10 m CLEX CLIC Experimental Area R. Corsini: CTF3 collaboration meeting, Jan 08

Streak camera images of the beam, showing the bunch combination process in the CTF3 preliminary phase Bunch combination at low charge RF deflectors are special injection kickers essential in the bunch interleaving process to obtain compressed bunch trains with bunch rep rate beyond 10 GHz. Bunch combination has been obtained for the first time during the CTF3 preliminary phase using the TW deflectors designed for the CR. 333 ps t x 83 ps

INFN-Frascati has designed and built RF deflectors for injection and extraction in: DELAY LOOP STANDING WAVE STRUCTURE high efficency (deflection vs. rf power) per unit length. filling time proportional to the quality factor: generally slow. deflecting fields scales as the square root of the number of cells. in pulsed regime a circulator is generally needed but... 2 CAVITIES and HYBRID JUNCTION → NO CIRCULATOR COMBINER RING TRAVELING WAVE STRUCTURE low efficency (deflection vs. rf power) per unit length. filling time proportional to the group velocity and the structure length: generally fast. deflecting fields scales as number of cells. circulator not necessary.

Even and odd trains are deflected by kicks of the same amplitude but opposite sign. Only even trains are injected into the ring. DESIGN PARAMETER Frequency [GHz] angle of deflection [mrad]15 Max. Beam energy [MeV]300 Klystron output Power [MW] 20 Pulse length [s] 5 The required deflection is too large to get with a traveling wave structure of reasonable dimensions. It is necessary to resort to a standing wave resonator. The CTF3 Delay Loop

The major drawback of this choice is the slow filling time of a resonant SW cavity. To keep acceptable the difference (less than 1%) of deflection angle between the head and the tail of the train the cavity Q must be reduced, but not beyond a certain threshold, when the shunt impedance becomes too low. A good compromise is obtained with a loaded Q value between 3000 and Coupling hole 70X38 rectangular beam pipe WR650 wg Pill box shaped cavity CAVITY VOLTAGE vs. TIME t [ns] V/Vmax t' t'' [V(t')-V(t'')] < 0.01 Train length [V(t’)-V(t”)]<0.01 The cavity deflector has been designed starting from a simple pill box shape. The cavity is externally coupled to a rectangular waveguide (WR650, the same standard of the klystron output) through a hole. The hole dimensions set the input coupling coefficient  and they have been chosen to obtain the wanted cavity loaded Q. Delay Loop Deflector

b Sensitivity of the resonant frequency and of the loaded Q to small variations of the main dimensional parameters has been evaluated. coupling hole axis Delay Loop Deflector

 =5.42 tuner Tuning sensitivity and range of tuning Delay Loop Deflector

Resonant frequencies of the most dangerous parasitic modes for the beam dynamics (monopoles and dipoles) are far enough from the lines of the beam power spectrum. Example of HOM (octupole–2.98GHz). Electric field (magnitude) representation. CAVITY PARASITIC MODES The vertical polarization of the TM110 results more than 40 MHz apart from the horizontal one. Distribution of losses on the cavity walls. Average power dissipated in each cavity is 2.5 kW at full power operation (i.e. 20 MW klystron output peak power). Each cavity has been provided with 5 coils for cooling. THERMAL ANALYSIS Delay Loop Deflector

TIME DOMAIN CAVITY RESPONSE The reflected power depends on: the cavity input coupling coefficient the pulse rise time Reflected power for 2 arbitrary slopes of the input pulse Blue – RF input pulse. Red – cavity reflected power. Power coming from klystron is split in equal parts by the hybrid and feeds two cavities, excited in the TM110 deflecting mode. Power reflected at the cavity inputs add in phase at the fourth port of the hybrid, where it is connected a load. In principle no power reaches the klystron. With 2 cavities the total shunt impedance is doubled. Deflecting voltage results increased by a factor √2. Klystron needs to be isolated from the reflected power. This can be done by a circulator......or by a 90 deg hybrid junction similarly to the sled scheme used in the linac technology. Delay Loop Deflector

WHOLE DEFLECTOR STRUCTURE DESIGN Basic components: 1)Two identical cavities (the same described above). 2) One 3dB hybrid coupler. The hybrid is longitudinally aligned at the center of the two cavities. The fields in the two cavities resonates in quadrature. Then the cavities have to be placed an odd multiple integer of /4 of the RF wavelength apart along the beam line to kick the beam with the same amplitude and phase. For reasons of space the distance between the gaps has been chosen 250mm, i.e. 5/4 RF Delay Loop Deflector

Septa magnets port for vacuum pumping directional couplers RF windows SF6/vacuum 3 dB coupler deflector cavities Delay Loop Deflector

The frequency responses of each component of the system have been measured to verify their correspondence with the design specification and with the results obtained from HFSS simulation code. To optimize the isolation of the klystron from the reflected power the impedance sees from the cavity side ports of the HJ must be as equal as possible. Accurate tuning of the resonant frequency of the cavity operating mode is therefore necessary. The two polarizations of TM110 deflecting mode. HFSS simulation (above) Measured (below) Measured transmission between klystron and load ports. Reflection at the klystron port (red). Transmission between klystron and load ports (green). HFSS result. S11 measured at the HJ input port phase difference between the signals taken from the two cavities fed through the HJ Delay Loop Deflector

Beam current: in transfer line before the DL (black), in the DL (red) and in transfer line after recombination (blue) Beam recombination in the Delay Loop (factor 2)

2 nd deflector RF deflector field o injection line septum local inner orbits 1 st deflector o /4 The orbit must have the length C = (n t ± ¼) (it is „-” in our case) so the beam arrives exactly: The CTF3 Combiner Ring – 1 st turn: at zero crossing phase -- 2 nd turn: at the crest – 3 rd turn: at zero crossing again But opposite amplitude than at the injection Adjust the length with the wiggler

MECHANICAL DRAWING FABRICATION STEPS PROTOTYPE Combiner Ring Deflector SCALING LENGELER’S RESULTS FOR 2.855GHz T.W. DEFLECTING STRUCTURES

2.6 A 8.5 A 10.4 A Achieved recombination: Linac current lower than nominal DL bypassed (no holes, missing factor 2) Losses during recombination (instability…) R. Corsini: CTF3 collaboration meeting, Jan A 30 A current !

Vertical Instability: what has been observed. Sum & difference signals, show the instability develops in the vertical plane from turn to turn Stored current Horizontal position Vertical position Analog signals in a CR BPM

Very repetitive pattern several consecutive shots with the scope in persistence mode

Losses depend strongly on the pulse length 230ns 130ns 60ns

Increasing the charge in the bunches the instability becomes stronger. From FFT, the frequency content of the vertical difference signal has a peak at 47 MHz from the fundamental frequency ( GHz). The instability occurs in case of both a single train doing different turns and different recombined trains. Moreover:

VERTICAL MODES IN THE RF DEFLECTORS Metallic rods have been inserted to shift the frequencies of the vertical polarity deflecting modes. Dimensions and position of the rods have been chosen to move the vertical modes out of the klystron bandwidth. Dispersion curve of the vertical modes have been measured before the final assembling.

VERTICAL MODES IN THE RF DEFLECTORS (HFSS) frequency shunt impedance Q Frequency of the highest impedance mode is GHz  46 MHz above the RF frequency! SPECTRUM OF A 200 BUNCHES IN THE COMBINER RING IN 4 TURNS (F REV  3.56 MHZ)

1)Good agreement between analytical model/tracking and observed phenomena; 2)Strong instability driven by only few mm off-axis beam; 3)Reduction of vertical  -function at the deflector, minimization of the vertical residual orbit, proper choice of tune and bunch patterns, can help in the control of the instability; 4)Lowering the Q-factors of the vertical modes by damping can reduce the driving force of such modes. TRACKING CODE RF deflector M CR A dedicated tracking code has been written to study the multi-bunch multi- turn effects. Only 1 RF deflector and 1 mode (dominant) considered. RESULTS (see D. Alesini: CTF3 collaboration meeting, Jan 08)

MODIFY THE PRESENT RF DEFLECTORS >30 mm ADDING TWO WAVEGUIDE WHICH COUPLE THE VERTICAL POLARITY

MAKE NEW RF DEFLECTORS Titanium surface coating Aluminum instead of copper Welded, not brazed P out_2 /P in =6% Damping could be not sufficient in any case! Vertical wgs should be moved on more central cells.

MAKE NEW RF DEFLECTORS Stronger damping could be realized if the vertical polarity is coupled out of every single cell (except the two terminals) through holes or antennas.