HTI: Instructional Theories. Why instructional theories? Getting back to the basics Examine the function of parts – Need to optimize When do I have enough?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing and Developing Online Courses. Course Life Cycle Design Develop Implement Evaluate Revise.
Advertisements

MERLOT New Horizons Conference 2003 Building Effective Online Learning Assignments with MERLOT Cathy Simpson Laura Franklin Northern Virginia Community.
THE PROCESSES OF INSTRUCTION. Back in 1965, Robert Gagne detailed a nine-step instructional process that many teachers, trainers, and instructional designers.
Motivating Instruction James Marshall December 2, 1999.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Robert Gagne Nine Events of Instruction Robyn Taylor And Jessica DeJong.
Instructional Design Models for School Health Education Task Analysis Model (Teacher directed) PowerPoint created by: Erika Russell Sandra L. Owen Professional.
Instructional Strategies for E- Learning C. Candace Chou, Ph.D. University of St. Thomas.
King Saud University College of nursing Master program.
An Assessment of Freshman Composition Online NMHEAR 2004 Albuquerque Susan Wood.
Teaching and Learning If you don’t know anything about learning… You don’t know anything about teaching! Telling is not TEACHING Listening is not LEARNING.
Barry Williams1 Developing an Instructional Strategy Dick & Carey 8.
John Keller’s ARCS MODEL APPROACH A presentation by Sandra Leiterman Kansas State University March
1 Robert Gagne Instructional Design Theories Disediakan Oleh: Nor Salasiah Binti Mat Rashid S-QM0020/10 Pensyarah: Dr Balakrishnan Muniandy QIM 501 Instructional.
1 Robert Gagné’s Nine Events of Instruction “Organization is the hallmark of effective instructional materials” Robert Gagné Art Wolfskill, ALEC.
Systems Approaches Instructional Design Models Brent Schubert April Scott.
Erica Ellsworth, MA School of Criminal Justice, Composition.
Principles of Instructional Design. Instructional Design is... the systematic process of translating principles of learning and instruction into specifications.
Behaviorism-Cognitivism
Instructional Design Presentation Instructional Design & Course Review by Christine Leake.
ROBERT GAGNE: COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THEORY
Click to edit Master title style  Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level  Click to edit Master text.
Conduct Instructional Analysis Identify Instructional Goal(s) Analyze Learners & Contexts Write Performance Objectives Develop Assessment Instruments Develop.
Instructional Technology Brian Newberry. Instructional Technology The Application of Technology To Teaching and Learning What is Instruction? What is.
Instructional Design Workshop V Anand. December 11, 2003STC Pre-Conference Workshop2 Session Plan Introduction to Instructional Design Writing Instructional.
1 Instructional Design EDT 540 ~ Theory Presentation The Conditions of Learning Robert Gagne 29 Sept Betsy Bass For Jim Chiavacci.
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
ELearning Design After your analysis, prepare for delivery.
Instructional software. Models for integrating technology in teaching Direct instructional approach Indirect instructional approach.
How to Improve Our Math Teaching Alan Shurling. Two perspectives on Effective Instruction  Directed instruction  Inquiry-based learning.
Motivating Students in Distance Education Association for Educational Communication & Technology National Convention November 14, 2002.
Multinational Coffee New Franchisee Training Proposal.
Hummm…  How do I create an engaging online course that facilitates learning?
Aptitude by Treatment Interactions and Gagné’s Nine Events of Instruction Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
Design Reports Due date: October 24th, Monday. Motivation & the Design of Instruction.
Application of ARCS to 4 Different IU’s EDTC 6321:Team 2 Rebecca Ramirez Matt Rizvi Charlotte Smith Olga Terrazas November 1, 2009.
Human Learning Asma Marghalani.
LEARNING FRAMEWORK Engage Learning What? Why? How? Knowing what to do brings Awareness / Readiness Knowing why you are doing it gives Motivation / Willingness.
Robert Gagné (August 21, 1916 – April 28, 2002) Father of Instructional Design.
Designing a Digital Imaging System: An On-Line Course Dr. Chi Thai and John Martin Edit 6170 e-Poster.
STORYBOARD Patricia Martinez Instructional Designer 11/23/2013 DETT607 Storyboard Patricia Martinez.
Instructional Design the approach of Robert Gagne ( Conditions of Learning, 1985)
Don’t Forget the Instructional Design Applying Instructional Design Principles in Moodle.
ARCS Model of Instructional Design The ARCS Model of motivational Design is comprised of four steps for promoting and sustaining motivation in the learning.
Back to Back to Web ARCS Motivation Theory by: Josefa Silman EDTC 560 Multimedia and Web Page Design Instructor: Janet Wright.
Instructional Design JMA503. Objectives 1. Assignments Assignments 2. Project guide Project guide 3. Instructional strategy - Events of instruction. Instructional.
Lesson Plan Essentials
HR Storyboard Reducing Heat Loss Through Root Cause Analysis CHRIS KAPLAN - INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER.
Formats that Enhance Retention of Learning and Evidence on Utility and Efficacy of Apps Marie A. Rocchi, B.Sc.Phm, M.D.Ed. Instructional Designer, CRTI-180.
Learning Theories Instructional vs. Learning. Instructional Theories Instructional theory is best described by the presentation of information to promote.
Multinational Coffee New Franchisee Training Proposal.
Lesson design objectives:
Gagne’s Nine Events of Instruction Denise Gautreau Leslie Claire Jen Gross 619 Design of Online Course Fall 2012.
By: Crystal and Jessica.  Allan Paivio ◦ Dual coding theory  It assumes that people process information in two different ways: images and language 
JOT2 – Learning & Design Theories
Learner Strategies Gagne and Driscoll Chp. 7. Self-learners/Independent Thinkers: A priority goal  Seek self-generated strategies l that activate internal.
The relationship between hypermedia producers’ preferred learning styles and the motivational aspects of their productions Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor:
Learning Theories and Theorists Danielle. M Walsh.
MOTIVATIONAL THEORY According to John Keller Compiled from the website:
CEIT 225 Instructional Design Prof. Dr. Kürşat Çağıltay
CEIT 225 Instructional Design Prof. Dr. Kürşat Çağıltay
Learning theories Application continued. Learning by problem solving (situated learning) Learning by Information assimilation Constructivist approach.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Many definitions exist for instructional design 1. Instructional Design as a Process: 2. Instructional Design as a Discipline: 3.
指導教授:Chen, Ming-puu 報 告 者:Chen, Wan-Yi 報告日期:
Developing an Instructional Strategy
It’s about the Audience: Tips for Engaging Presentations
Motive; Motivation An inner drive, impulse, etc. that causes one to act; incentive (Webster, 1996)
Designing and Planning Technology-Enhanced Instruction
Gagne and Driscoll Chapter 6
Presentation transcript:

HTI: Instructional Theories

Why instructional theories? Getting back to the basics Examine the function of parts – Need to optimize When do I have enough?

Disclaimer

Pick and Choose

Robert Gagne Godfather of Instructional Technology Nine events of instruction

1.Gaining attention 2.Informing the learner of the lesson objectives 3.Stimulating recall of prior learning 4.Presenting the stimulus material with distinctive features (multimedia and variation) 5.Providing learning guidance 6.Eliciting the performance 7.Providing informative feedback 8.Assessing performance 9.Enhancing retention and transfer

Critique of nine events A little too behaviorist? A little too absolutist?

What does that mean in a hybrid?

9 Events Version 1 (Flipped) F2F Learner Guidance Providing feedback Enhance retention Assessing (class or testing center) Online Gaining attention Lesson objectives Presenting stimulus Prior recall Enhance retention (other assignments)

9 Events (mixed) F2F Gaining Attention Prior recall Learning guidance Presenting stimulus Eliciting performance Providing feedback Assessing (class or testing center) Enhance retention Online Gaining Attention Lesson objectives Presenting stimulus Learning guidance Eliciting performance Providing feedback Assessing (Quizzes)

9 events (Hands-on) F2F Gaining Attention Prior recall Learning guidance Presenting stimulus Eliciting performance Providing feedback Enhance retention Online Lesson objectives Prior recall Providing informative feedback Assessing

ARCS model – John Keller More a motivation model rather than instructional – Attention – Relevance – Confidence – Satisfaction

Attention Curiosity Perceptual arousal: surprising, incongruous, novel Inquiry arousal: mystery Variability Oft-abused multimedia

Relevance Familiarity: using learner experience and concrete language Goal orientation: examples that show utility Motive matching: teaching strategies to match motives

Confidence Expectancy for success: awareness of criteria Challenge setting: multiple achievement levels Attribution molding: provide feedback that supports student ability

Satisfaction Natural consequences: use skills in real or simulated setting Positive consequences: provide feedback and reinforcements Equity: consistent standards and consequences

Critique of ARCS Motivation != achievement Requires constant checking with students – Bug or feature?

What does that mean in a hybrid?

ARCS in hybrid Doesn’t yield a specific formula

Attention Need to consider what elements are grabbing student attention (F2F or online) Do you need something to grab their attention in both?

Relevance Are components a good fit? Big student complaint is a mismatch between F2F and online

Confidence Where are the criteria located? When and where are you giving feedback? How does a person excel in your course? Confidence is important with respect to online

Satisfaction Have the students had a chance to demonstrate their new knowledge, skills and abilities? – Wolverine Adamantium standards Showcasing good work

4C/ID Four Component Instructional Design Van Merriënboer

Four Components 1.Learning tasks 2.Supportive information 3.JIT Information 4.Part-task practice

Learning Tasks Concrete, authentic whole-task experiences that are provided to learners Simple to more complex Goal is to build mental models that allow for rules and strategies to be generated

Supportive Information Bridge between learners’ prior knowledge and learning tasks Fades as task become more complex Learners determining relationships

JIT Information Information that is prerequisite to the learning and performance of recurrent aspects of learning task Help systems, checklists and manuals

Part-task practice Practice items to promote rule automation Recurrent aspects of whole complex skill

…And much more Keeping it simple for today Less focused on media delivery strategies

Critique of 4C/ID Difference between a complex and simple task? – As determined by faculty Requires extensive preparation Limited to mechanistic concepts and methods?

What does that mean in a hybrid?

4C/ID (Flipped) F2F JIT information Online Learning tasks Supportive information Part-task practice

4C/ID (Mixed) F2F JIT information Part-task practice Online Learning tasks Supportive information

4C/ID (Hands-on) F2F Learning tasks Part-task practice JIT information Online Supportive information

Questions?