Conduct & Expectations of IRB Members June CE 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASTM OFFICERS CONFERENCE SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMENS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advertisements

Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
The HRPP FYI Process and the UPIRSO/SAE Review Sheet An IRB Infoshort February 2014.
VISN 20 Multi-Site IRB. VISN 20 Institutional Review Board Who we are: VISN 20 includes the states of Alaska, Washington, Oregon, most of the state of.
Policy Advisory Group (PAG) & Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Leader Primer Presented by: Devin A. Jopp, Ed.D. President & CEO.
Setting up Your Codes Advocacy Program 280 Plaza, Columbus, Ohio CBRE.
SAC Meeting Process and Robert’s Rules of Order A Brief Explanation SAC Chair: David Levy SAC Vice Chair: Steven Schuelka.
So You're Having A Meeting
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Submission to Approval What happens to my protocol once I submit it to the HIC office.
School Site Council Guidelines Roles and Responsibilities Adapted from: Administrator’s Guide to School Site Councils Prepared by California.
NAMES COUNCIL MEETINGS PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL RULES.
FAA Managers Association (FAAMA) New Leader Training – FAAMA V Chapter Leadership In accordance with FAAMA National and Chapter By-Laws: Chapter by-Laws.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Building a Compliance Risk Monitoring Program HCCA Compliance Institute New OrleansApril 19, 2005 Lois Dehls Cornell, Esq. Assistant Vice President, Deputy.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Before you begin. For additional assistance, contact your club’s Information Technology Chairperson or Electronic Learning at:
VA Central IRB Annette R. Anderson, MS, RHIA, CIP VA Central IRB Administrator HRPP 101, September 2010.
Office of Faculty Administrative Services (OFAS) Monthly Information Session October 17, 2014.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Introduces ePIRATE electronic Portal for Institutional Research at ECU East Carolina University Office for Human Research Integrity.
North Carolina Planned Community Act Types of Meetings and Meeting Minutes Ed Bedford, J.D.
Secretary’s Workshop Standard Duties. Usually, the secretary position is the training ground for a future leadership position The standard duties of a.
American Evaluation Association October 16, :20-7:10pm Environmental Program Evaluation TIG: Business Meeting Welcome!!!
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
Doc.: IEEE /0684r2 Submission July 18-22, 2005 TK Tan (Philips) Slide 1 WNG SC Committee Report IEEE , San Francisco, California, July 18.
Omniran ecsg 1 OmniRAN EC SG Agenda March 2013, Orlando, FL Max Riegel (OmniRAN SG Chair)
VA HRPP Accreditation October 18, 2011 Accreditation Conference Call PRIDE/Soundia Duche, MA, MS.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Part II, Conflict of Interest and IRB Noncompliance J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures for COPS & PRS May 17, 2005.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures May 5, Revision of TAC Procedures Project began in October 2004 to incorporate the Commercial Operations Subcommittee.
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Safety Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development Electronic.
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
Jeopardy PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE. VOTES MOTIONS TERMS PROCEDURES PROTOCOL
Doc.: IEEE /0661r0 Submission November 2004 Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
RESPONSIBILITIES & PROCEDURES
NMHIMSS Meet the Board & Committees May 26th, 2016
PowerPoint presentation
MEETINGS & ELECTIONS Saturday, July 22, 2017
Program Compliance Review Committee
School Site Council Training Roles and Responsibilities
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
Senator Training Student Government Association
Click Training Conflict of Interest (COI) Module
Welcome New IRB Members!
Research Integrity Office (RIO)
New TRACKS COI System: Committee Member Training Guide
IEEE P Motions at the July Plenary EC Meeting
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc
Representative Council Conference Committee Orientation
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc
IEEE r: Fast BSS Transition TG Agenda
Welcome Back to the District Assessment Selection Committee (DASC)!
New TRACKS COI System: Committee Member Training Guide
Governance Training “Anatomy of a Meeting”
Agenda for Discussion on Green Field in TGn
NPSTC 10th Anniversary Activities
Author’s Name Company Address Phone Oliver Holland
Agenda and minutes TGn PSMP ad hoc
Agenda and minutes TGn PSMP ad hoc
Union Council Rep Training
Position descriptions
Presentation transcript:

Conduct & Expectations of IRB Members June CE 2013

Objectives Review IRB Member Guidelines: Conduct & Expectation of IRB Members Review motions and voting options for submissions being reviewed during the meeting. Review eBridge RSVP locations, Meeting Agendas and Meeting Minutes

Conduct & Expectation of IRB Members IRB Member Service is voluntary and important to the success of the IRB Committees here at MCW/FH. Complete and maintain IRB CITI Training (group 3) and complete annual COI IRB Member disclosure. IRB Members are expected to attend 75% of convened meetings – Each Committee has approx members which place quorum around 7-9 to conduct the business of the meeting. IRB Members need to arrive on-time – IRB Meetings frequently start with Continuing Education and cover topics identified by IRB Committees, HRPP Office to further provide guidance or refresher of expectation & practice.

Conduct & Expectation of IRB Members IRB Members who are assigned to review a submission must complete & upload their checklist at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. – By uploading a completed checklist, this allows the IRB C2 to address or communicate with the study team any issue as identified by the IRB reviewers. – If reviewers have questions, please contact either the C2 or the Study team

Conduct & Expectation of IRB Members - Motions Primary Reviewers when presenting their review should end with a proposed motion. This will allow discussion to move forward in the meeting. – Ex. for CPR: I recommend this CPR & project be approved > for 1 year > – Ex. for AME: I recommend this amendment be approved > – Ex. for new Protocol: (after hearing secondary reviewer’s report): I recommend this project be > for >. – Ex for RE: I recommend this RE is > In addition I believe this event > > the criteria for >

Conduct & Expectations for IRB Members – Voting Options Voting Options for motions – Yea/In favor: This means you are in favor of the motion as presented – Nay/Opposed: This means you are against the motion as presented – Abstain: You do not have enough information to vote on the motion such as an unanswered question. This should be rare as those questions should be brought up during the discussion of the motion. If you are arriving late – see Not Participating – Recuse: Those members who have a COI or are absent during a significant portion of the meeting and do not enough information to weigh-in on the vote. – Not Participating: This is an administrative action when you arrive late or are absent during a significant portion of the meeting and do not enough information to weigh-in on the vote.

Conduct & Expectations for IRB Members – Voting Options What if I don’t agree with the motion being made? – If you have voiced your concerns, and questions and still you do not agree with the proposed motion, Vote “Nay” or “all those opposed”. It is ok to have split votes on the Committees. – It is not appropriate to vote as “Abstain”, if you do not agree with a motion as it has been made. Only if you do not have enough information in either support or against the motion would abstaining be OK

Conduct & Expectations for IRB Members – Annual Evaluations IRB Members will be evaluated on an annual basis (Jan-Dec) Evaluations will solicit comments from the IRB C2 along with the IRB Chair The comments along with information from the Research Compliance Audits will be tallied together for review by the HRPP Director and recommendations made. IRB members will receive their evaluations back as feedback once reviewed by both the IRB Chair & HRPP Director

Key eBridge Locations How to RSVP Review of Meeting Agenda – If not assigned as a reviewer, IRB members should review checklists and familiarize themselves with the agenda items. Review of Meeting Minutes

Questions?