EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REM Shelby County Schools School Year. Current Federal/State Law No Child Left Behind (NCLB) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Reauthorization of.
Advertisements

WELLIGENT SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT plan TRAINING
Notification to Participate in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education.
EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
Presented By: Marsha Holleman Jenny Kurzer Nancy Simmons Lauren Whitson.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
10 Things to Expect Regarding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
State of Connecticut Department of Education Department of Developmental Services PPT 101: Understanding the Basics of the Planning and Placement Team.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
T IPS FOR IEP M EETINGS Presented By: Marsha Holleman Jenny Kurzer Nancy Simmons Lauren Whitson.
October 14,  BUT you still need to participate in IEP meetings in a well-documented, meaningful manner.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Prior Written Notice Documenting Decisions EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN DIVISION.
Procedures for Three-Year Reevaluations Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons.
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
September/October Prerequisite Skills Policies Governing the Services for Students with Disabilities NC IEP Team….  (4) A representative.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
Transition Assess Interests, Preferences, Strengths and Needs by age 14*** Add Post Secondary Goals and Transition Activities by age 16 At age 16 advise.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
Orientation to Special Education From Referral to Eligibility.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Special Education Timelines
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Individual Education Plans 101 DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLIANT AND INSTRUCTIONALLY RELEVANT IEP COURTNEY WARD NOVEMBER 2010.
Timely and Effective Transition at Age 3 David P. Lindeman, Peggy Miksch & Phoebe Rinkel Kansas Division for Early Childhood Conference Wichita, Kansas.
What is Special Education Hamilton Special Education Program Improvement Team.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
The New IDEA in Special Education
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Special Education Meeting November 5, 2013 ASC 3:30 TENNESSEE ROOM.
Prior Written Notice of Action & Notice of Conference March 2014 ADE-SEU.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
PSRC EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Compliance issues and suggestions that will help with case management.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
…program and placement decisions are based on students strengths, potential, and needs?
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PARENT REQUESTS
Suffolk Public Schools Special Education Department Federal Monitoring Follow-up Revised 2/22/2013.
Week 3 The IEP Process.
Special Education Process
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

EC Compliance Kristin Haigler and Kris Earl November 2009

Invitation to Conference/Prior Notice At least 7 days notice is required on the Invitation to Conference from the date sent to the date the meeting is scheduled. At least 7 days notice is required on the Invitation to Conference from the date sent to the date the meeting is scheduled. Making arrangements by phone does not count as Prior Notice. Prior Notice starts when the written Invitation to Conference is sent. Making arrangements by phone does not count as Prior Notice. Prior Notice starts when the written Invitation to Conference is sent. If team agrees to meet before the 7 days, that can be handwritten on the form, but there should still be 7 days between date sent and scheduled meeting date on the Invitation to Conference If team agrees to meet before the 7 days, that can be handwritten on the form, but there should still be 7 days between date sent and scheduled meeting date on the Invitation to Conference

Invitation to Conference/Prior Notice If parent indicates they plan to attend and signs Invitation to Conference, a second notice is not required If parent indicates they plan to attend and signs Invitation to Conference, a second notice is not required If parent does not attend the meeting, team can meet without the parent, only addressing purposes on Invitation to Conference. If parent does not attend the meeting, team can meet without the parent, only addressing purposes on Invitation to Conference. If the team wants to discuss/meet for additional purposes, a second meeting must be scheduled. If the team wants to discuss/meet for additional purposes, a second meeting must be scheduled.

Invitation to Conference/Prior Notice If an IEP meeting needs to be rescheduled: If an IEP meeting needs to be rescheduled: Document on the original invitation, a second invitation is not required Document on the original invitation, a second invitation is not required Do not let the IEP lapse due to rescheduling Do not let the IEP lapse due to rescheduling With adequate notice and two documented contacts, the team should meet With adequate notice and two documented contacts, the team should meet Work with the parent to possibly attend by alternate means, such as by phone conference Work with the parent to possibly attend by alternate means, such as by phone conference

Initial Referral Initial Referral The date of Referral, the 90 day timeline, begins when the EC Teacher receives the referral The date of Referral, the 90 day timeline, begins when the EC Teacher receives the referral Through written parent request Through written parent request Through A-Team Through A-Team The EC Teacher receiving the referral should ensure that all required components of A-Team are complete before accepting referral The EC Teacher receiving the referral should ensure that all required components of A-Team are complete before accepting referral

Initial Referral All out of state transfers are initial referrals. All out of state transfers are initial referrals. Information received should be used as part of the referral Information received should be used as part of the referral Interventions can be obtained from IEP received Interventions can be obtained from IEP received Current testing can be used Current testing can be used Even though it is an initial referral, a student may not need to be tested in every area if there is current testing Even though it is an initial referral, a student may not need to be tested in every area if there is current testing

Initial Referral When completing Discussion of Student’s Strengths (pg. 1) and Review of Existing Data (pg. 3), When completing Discussion of Student’s Strengths (pg. 1) and Review of Existing Data (pg. 3), The information should provide a comprehensive description of the student The information should provide a comprehensive description of the student Should be more than a single phrase or sentence. Should be more than a single phrase or sentence.

Initial Referral IEP Team Determination (pg. 4) IEP Team Determination (pg. 4) If the IEP team determines to conduct an evaluation, the evaluations listed must match evaluations checked on the DEC 2, Permission to Evaluate If the IEP team determines to conduct an evaluation, the evaluations listed must match evaluations checked on the DEC 2, Permission to Evaluate The names of the evaluations written on the DEC 1 should be written as stated on DEC 2 The names of the evaluations written on the DEC 1 should be written as stated on DEC 2

Reevaluation Any Reevaluation triggers the three year cycle Any Reevaluation triggers the three year cycle A DEC 7 is required for every Reevaluation A DEC 7 is required for every Reevaluation Review of Existing Data Review of Existing Data Each section must be addressed and should provide a comprehensive description Each section must be addressed and should provide a comprehensive description Should be more than a single phrase or sentence Should be more than a single phrase or sentence

Reevaluation The IEP team will Determine the Need for Additional Data The IEP team will Determine the Need for Additional Data If the team determines the need for testing, specific evaluations should be written in If the team determines the need for testing, specific evaluations should be written in DEC 2 Permission to Evaluate must be signed by parent DEC 2 Permission to Evaluate must be signed by parent Tests written in on the DEC 7 must match the evaluations checked on the DEC 2, using the same terms on both forms Tests written in on the DEC 7 must match the evaluations checked on the DEC 2, using the same terms on both forms

Reevaluation For any Reevaluation where no testing is required, the team must complete For any Reevaluation where no testing is required, the team must complete DEC 3 Eligibility Determination DEC 3 Eligibility Determination Even if just adding/deleting transportation or any other related services Even if just adding/deleting transportation or any other related services DEC 5 Prior Written Notice DEC 5 Prior Written Notice

DEC 5 Prior Written Notice The purpose indicated needs to match the section(s) completed The purpose indicated needs to match the section(s) completed Explanations of Actions needs to provide a clear picture of the decision making process Explanations of Actions needs to provide a clear picture of the decision making process Each section should state the decision and a description of why the decision was made Each section should state the decision and a description of why the decision was made Document date of implementation and copy of DEC 5 given to parent Document date of implementation and copy of DEC 5 given to parent

DEC 5 Prior Written Notice Prior Written Notice should be completed whenever there is disagreement between the LEA and the Parent Prior Written Notice should be completed whenever there is disagreement between the LEA and the Parent There must be documentation that the parent was given a copy of the DEC 5 There must be documentation that the parent was given a copy of the DEC 5 A copy of the Parents’ Rights Handbook should be given with the DEC 5 A copy of the Parents’ Rights Handbook should be given with the DEC 5

Initial IEP/Annual Review The beginning date on the IEP is the date of the meeting, with IEP dated for one year The beginning date on the IEP is the date of the meeting, with IEP dated for one year With the exception of PreK, meeting prior to the third birthday With the exception of PreK, meeting prior to the third birthday If there is a delay in getting the DEC 6 signed, the IEP team should reconvene to start the IEP with the date of the DEC 6 If there is a delay in getting the DEC 6 signed, the IEP team should reconvene to start the IEP with the date of the DEC 6

IEP Compliance Issues Summarize Assessment Information should review current assessment data and current IEP progress Summarize Assessment Information should review current assessment data and current IEP progress Assessment data could include formal evaluations if just completed, but should include current classroom assessment data as well as state and district assessment data Assessment data could include formal evaluations if just completed, but should include current classroom assessment data as well as state and district assessment data Functional Performance Functional Performance Must be addressed for every student Must be addressed for every student

IEP Compliance Issues Extend 1 & Extend 2 Extend 1 & Extend 2 Extend 1 – Extended Content Standards Extend 1 – Extended Content Standards Extend 2 – Competency Goals Extend 2 – Competency Goals Test Modifications Test Modifications Must be documented to be used in class Must be documented to be used in class Test Modifications for students in separate settings Test Modifications for students in separate settings Other: list classes and accommodations, with statement student will participate in classes with disabled peers Other: list classes and accommodations, with statement student will participate in classes with disabled peers Least Restrictive Environment Justification Statement Least Restrictive Environment Justification Statement Must explain why services cannot be delivered with nondisabled peers Must explain why services cannot be delivered with nondisabled peers

Meeting Compliance Parents should receive a copy of all forms completed Parents should receive a copy of all forms completed If attending the meeting, they should receive a copy before they leave If attending the meeting, they should receive a copy before they leave If not attending, a copy should be forwarded, with documentation to the method used If not attending, a copy should be forwarded, with documentation to the method used

EC Compliance Questions??? Questions??? Plus/Delta/Issue Bin Plus/Delta/Issue Bin