Donald H. Bliss1 Robert D. Moore2 William G. Kvasnicka3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bovine Nematode Resistance
Advertisements

Internal Parasites Lab
Strategic Parasite Control Back in the news. Backed by sound science.
Medical Reports HOW TO GET ALL OF THAT DATA YOU ENTERED BACK OUT AGAIN.
The Scottish Sheep Scab Initiative Presentation prepared by Brian Hosie SAC Veterinary Services, Edinburgh.
Lessons Learned Feeding Buffalo John Bowron DVM Prairie Heights Bison.
Wisconsin Pressure Ulcer Coalition Data Update Outcomes Congress Nathan Williams Jody Rothe, RN, WCC December 2, 2009.
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
Goat Management.
Administering Medications. Pneumonia Soremouth Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBR) Taken from InfoVets Cattle CD.
HEALTH MANAGEMENT OF SHOW FOOD ANIMALS Floron C. Faries, Jr., DVM, MS Texas Cooperative Extension College of Veterinary Medicine Texas A&M University.
The Application of the Scientific Method: Preclinical Trials Copyright PEER.tamu.edu.
Parasite Control and Rotational Grazing Patty Scharko, DVM, MPH Extension Ruminant Veterinarian Livestock Disease Diagnostic Center.
Novel Approaches to Control of Gastrointestinal Nematodes (GINs) in South American Camelids (SACs) Gillespie, R.M. RVT, BS*, Terrill. T.H., PhD*, Williamson,
Comparative efficacy evaluation of Albendazole and Ivermectin drench formulation against internal parasites of donkeys in Sudan. SAWSAN M. A. IMAM (1,
Efficacy of pour-on dewormers on weight gain and fecal egg count in Hawaiian stocker cattle Jonathon Beckett 1, Tim Richards 2, Craig Reinemeyer 3 1 Animal.
Agrosept. Effective but kind hand hygiene with unique long lasting effect Agrosept.
The incidence of parasitism in Midwest shelter owned companion animals Rachel Berkley, Shoshana Tanenbaum, Claudia J. Baldwin, DVM, MS; Richard B. Evans,
Criminal Justice Referral and Incentives in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Anthony DeFulio 1, Paul Nuzzo 2, & Maxine Stitzer 1 1 – Johns Hopkins.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 4 Gathering Data Section 4.3 Good and Poor Ways to Experiment.
Anthelmintics. Effective deworming program- small ruminants Deworm ewes shortly before, or right at, lambing. –best opportunity to disrupt the parasites'
Monitoring the Progress of Clinical Trials in a Network Setting: Experience from the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network P. VanVeldhuisen.
Raymond F. Anton, MD for The COMBINE Study Research Group
© Mark E. Damon - All Rights Reserved Another Presentation © All rights Reserved
Bioavailability of cobalt and antihelmintic effects of Albendazole fortified with cobalt (Vermitan super) in sheep J.M.Nguta a ; J.M.Mbaria a Department.
ACT - TOPIC O-1 Running Laboratory Tests 1. 2 Laboratory Tests Laboratory testing aids in the diagnosis and treatment of sick animals. There are several.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Implications of The WHI Study Eric Colman, MD Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Division of Metabolic and.
Livestock Parasite Control Getting rid of the creepy crawlies!
High Impact Tools for Health Promotion James O. Prochaska, Ph.D. Director and Professor Cancer Prevention Research Center University of Rhode Island Founder.
Using the new treatment prevalence protocol in Ireland Suzi Lyons.
15 July 2009 INFLUENCE OF PHC SEED AND FOLIAR TREATMENTS ON IRISH POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD Summary of Rhizoctonia Data, Holland Ag Services, Washington.
Anthelmintics Effective deworming program- small ruminants Deworm ewes shortly before, or right at, lambing. –best opportunity to disrupt the parasites'
REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LAB ~ APPALACHIA The Effects of Hybrid Secondary School Courses in Algebra 1 on Teaching Practices, Classroom Quality and Adolescent.
Anthelmintics.
CB-1 Background of Pancreatic Cancer & NCIC CTG PA.3 Study Design Malcolm Moore, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Princess Margaret Hospital Chair,
EVALUATION OF LAMBDA STAR IN THE CONTROL OF APHIDS ON KALE. BY JOSPHINE W. NJOGU REG NO.A138/10309/2007.
CDA exercise guidelines 150 minutes moderate – intensity (60 – 70% of max) aerobic over minimum 3 non consecutive days PLUS resistance exercise 3.
Purpose of Clinical Trials Assess safety and efficacy of Experimental treatments New combinations of drugs New approaches to surgery or radiation therapies.
Background  Substance abusers are at risk for HIV and other STIs.  Anal intercourse (AI) is riskier than vaginal intercourse.  Studies of AI have focused.
1 CLEAN COURT OUTCOME STUDY January, 2005 Charlene Rhyne, PhD.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effects of the DASH Diet Alone and in Combination.
October 24, 2006 Advisory Committee on Research on Women’s Health. 1 Summary Report of NIH Inclusion Data – FY2005 Carlos E. Caban, Ph.D., M.P.H. Office.
Daniel J. Houlihan1, Maria E. Prado 1,2 and Sharon Patton3
Sam Womble County Extension Agent – Ag/NR Bexar County
Extra-genital samples for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in women and MSM Self-taken samples analysed separately compared with self-taken pooled samples Janet.
Landon Marshall, Pharm. D. , Matt Hill, Pharm. D. , Jim Wilson, Pharm
Parasite Control In Beef Cattle
Percent States that expanded Medicaid as of January 1, 2015
Parasites – Ruminants.
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
American Public Health Association Annual Meeting
Feasibility of Shortening the Germination and Fluorescence Test Period
Fecal Egg Counts: A useful tool in parasite management
Burden of Atrial Fibrillation The Percentage of Strokes Attributable to AF Increases With Age.
Clinical Trials.
Summary of the “Fecal Worm Egg Count Reduction” Trials in Merck Animal Health National Data Base 2018 Donald H. Bliss1 Robert D. Moore2 William G. Kvasnicka3.
Surveying the Safety of NOACs in the Real World
Water Treatment Virtual Lab
Farm Size Trend.
Administering Medications
Ammonia Titration Laboratory Activity
Health Status by Income
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
The Role of the Private Vet
WORM TESTS We are measuring eggs – Not worms
Section 4-3 Relations in Categorical Data
Subhead Calibri 14pt, White
A new treatment has been discovered that is believed to be the cure for HIV/AIDS. Brainstorm possible ways to convince the general public that this is,
Figure, Supplemental Digital Content 2: Prevalence by Age Group Annual (Jan-Dec) prevalence rates of Hormone Therapy /Vaginal Hormone Therapy, by age groups;
Presentation transcript:

Summary of “Fecal Worm Egg Count Reduction” Trials in Merck Animal Health National Data Base Donald H. Bliss1 Robert D. Moore2 William G. Kvasnicka3 1MidAmerica Ag Research, Verona, WI 2College of Agriculture, Biotechnology & Natural Resources, University of Nevada 3University of Nevada, Professor Emeritus

Protocol for Fecal Worm Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT) All clinics agreed to use a standard protocol: 20 samples taken at the time of treatment. 20 samples taken 14-days after treatment. Pre-/post-treatment samples sent to same lab: ● Treatment not revealed until test completed. ● Modified WI Sugar Flotation Technique (Eggs/3 g). ● Results sent to participating clinic and entered in Merck Animal Health National Database.

Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test Results 250+ Participating Vet Clinics. 24+ States Represented. 580+ Trials Completed. 19,996 Samples Analyzed. 10,069 Pre-treatment Samples. 9,927 Post-treatment Samples.

Table 1: Efficacy Summary for Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test Conducted with Macocyclic Lactone Endecticide Pour-On Products (2009-2013). _________________________________________________________________ No. of No. of Egg Counts/3g* Percent Products Trials Samples Pre-Rx Post-Rx Efficacy(%) Pour-ons: Ivomec® PO 3 108 59.1 43.2 27.0% Ivermectin PO 26 1,164 71.5 38.7 45.8% Dectomax® PO 10 431 46.8 16.4 65.1% Cydectin® PO 11 477 58.3 16.0 72.5% Eprinex® PO 3 144 49.3 38.0 22.9% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PO Summary 53 2,324 62.1 30.0 51.6% _________________________________________________________________ *All samples taken at Rx and again 14-days post-Rx. **Updated Jan. 3, 2013

No. of No. of Egg Counts/3g* Percent Table 2: Efficacy Summary for Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test Conducted with Injectable Macrocylic Lactone Endecticide Products (2009-2013). __________________________________________________________________________________ No. of No. of Egg Counts/3g* Percent Products Trials Samples Pre-Rx Post-Rx Efficacy Injections: Ivomec® Inj. 15 984 66.5 36.8 44.6% Ivomec® Plus 10 413 97.4 51.7 46.9% Dectomax® Inj. 23 966 63.1 16.0 74.6% Cydectin Inj. 7 311 35.0 6.0 82.8% Ivermectin Inj. 10 506 90.7 55.0 39.4% Generic Ivo Plus 4 149 92.9 46.7 49.8% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Inj. Summary: 69 3,329 71.7 32.1 55.2% _____________________________________________________________ *All samples taken at Rx and again 14-days post-Rx. **Updated Jan. 3, 2013  

Table 3: Efficacy Summary for Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test Conducted with Various Safe-Guard® & Panacur® Formulations. ______________________________________________________________________________________ No of No of Egg Counts/3g* Percent Products Trials Samples Pre-Rx Post-Rx Efficacy Panacur® Drench 32 1,296 59.3 0.7 98.8% SG Drench/Paste 71 2,979 65.0 0.8 98.7% Summary-Drench 103 4,275 63.2 0.8 98.7% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SG Feed/1.96% 28 1,449 45.6 0.2 99.5% SG Mineral 7 265 36.4 1.6 95.5% Liquid Feed 10 388 42.3 1.4 96.6% Cubes/blocks/Paste 10 447 33.7 2.0 94.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Overall Summary** 158 6,824 55.7 0.8 98.5% ________________________________________________________________ * All samples taken at Rx and again 14-days post-Rx – Updated Jan. 3, 2013. ** Note: Coccidia prevalence was reduced by 56.5%.

Table 4: Efficacy Summary for Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test Conducted with Safe-Guard®/ Panacur® in Combination with Various Endecticide Formulations. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Combination No of No of Egg Counts/3g Percent Product Trials Samples Pre-Rx Post-Rx Efficacy -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Safe-Guard® or Panacur ® plus: Ivomec® Inj./plus/PO 19 917 77.2 0.4 99.4% Ivermectin PO/Inj. 28 1,155 76.7 0.4 99.4% Dectomax® Inj./PO 6 223 83.4 0.1 99.8% Cydectin PO 1 41 134.0 0.1 99.9% ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Combination 54 2,366 78.7 0.4 99.4% Summary _______________________________________________________ Note: Coccidia prevalence was reduced by 76.9% *Updated Jan. 3, 2013

Table 5: Efficacy Summary for Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test Conducted for all Products. ______________________________________________________________________________________ Number of Number of Egg Counts/3g** Percent Products Trials Samples Pre-Rx Post-Rx Efficacy(%) Endecticide Injectable: 69 3,329 71.7 32.1 55.2% Pour-On: 53 2,324 62.1 30.0 51.6% Safe-Guard® /Panacur® 158 6,824 55.7 0.8 98.5% Combination Treatment*** 54 2,336 78.7 0.4 99.4% ______________________________________________________________________ *Updated Jan. 3, 2013, **All samples taken at Rx and 14-days post-Rx. *** Safe-Guard® plus an Endecticide.

Table 6: Comparison of FECRT Efficacy for ML Pour-Ons 2008(AABP) vs Table 6: Comparison of FECRT Efficacy for ML Pour-Ons 2008(AABP) vs. 2013(Jan. 3) Products No. of Trials Percent No. of Trials Percent Efficacy 2008 Efficacy 2009-2013 Efficacy Change --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivomec® 8 72.3% 3 27.0% - 45.3% Ivermectin 35 59.7% 26 45.8% - 23.9% Dectomax® 8 78.9% 10 65.1% - 13.8% Cydectin® 9 67.2% 11 72.5% + 5.3% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary 60 66.1% 53 51.2% - 14.9% Updated Jan. 3, 2013

Table 7: Comparison of FECRT Efficacy ML Injectables: 2008(AABP) vs Table 7: Comparison of FECRT Efficacy ML Injectables: 2008(AABP) vs. 2013(Jan. 3) Products No. of Trials Percent No. of Trials Percent Efficacy 2008 Efficacy 2009-2013 Efficacy Change ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ivomec® Inj. 6 76.2% 15 44.6% - 31.6% Ivomec® Plus 6 42.6% 10 46.9% + 4.3% Ivermectin or Ivermectin plus 1 50.0% 14 41.4% - 8.6% Dectomax® 11 90.5% 23 74.6% - 15.9% Cydectin® 2 98.1% 7 82.8% -15.3% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary 26 72.5% 69 55.2% -17.3% Updated January 3, 2013