Supreme Court Cases Criminal Rights 1960’s. Gideon vs. Wainwright 1963 state courts are required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Case Review The Rights of the Accused
Advertisements

Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
CH 14 Citizenship and Equal Justice
EOC PRACTICE JUDICIAL 3. EOC JUDICIAL 1.The Supreme Court ruled that an indigent defendant in a criminal trial has a fundamental right to the assistance.
 Amendment VI  In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district.
The Civil Rights Movement
AP Government 2001 Glenn deMarrais. Question A. Brown vs. Board of Education Provision: Equal protection Clause Significance: required each state to.
Trial Procedures. Pleadings – papers filed with the beginning of a trial – establish the issues the court is being asked to decided Spell out allegations.
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Do you know your civil rights?
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
The Warren Court 1953 – – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren Chief Justice Earl Warren Liberal decisions Liberal decisions Supported the rights of.
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
Supreme Court Decisions
Miranda v. Arizona.
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.
■Essential Question ■Essential Question: –How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? ■Warm-Up Question: –?
2/11/11 B- Day Do Now: 1.Write down your homework Chapter 7 quiz review due on Tuesday Chapter 7Quiz on Wednesday Bring headphones to class on Monday 2.
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
BY: ANDREW N., AGON A., GRACE S. Civil Liberties.
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
Gideon Vs Wainwright Louis Jenkins And Jackson Joy.
Civil Liberties. In the Bill of Rights, find the following: The right to join the communist party The right to make fun of the president The right to.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) A United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
Defendant’s Rights and the Right to Privacy AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
The Warren Court ( ) Appointed by Eisenhower Liberal period in court’s history Protected Civil Liberties & First Amendment Rights Malapportionment.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
 Dates: Debated: Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided: June 13, 1966  Ruling: The prosecution could not use Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal.
In the criminal justice system, the Supreme Court has the final say. In the 1960s, the dedicated Justices who heard these cases were members of an elite.
Rights of the Accused (Due Process Rights)
Miranda v. Arizona.
The Warren Court 1953 – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren
Supreme Court Activity: You Decide
Supreme Court briefs.
John F. Kennedy
Judicial Branch Famous Trials.
Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Rights of Criminal Suspects
The Warren Court 1953 – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
Supreme Court Cases Civics.
Liberalism vs. Conservatism
Miranda v. Arizona 1966.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Looking into the Important Cases in the Past
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Turbulent Times (The 1960s and 1970s
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s?
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
Miranda vs. Arizona.
Essential Question: How did the decisions of the Supreme Court impact civil liberties in the 1960s & 1970s? Warm-Up Question: ?
Do Now: a) Finish up Rights Movement Packet b) Earl Warren Background
Presentation transcript:

Supreme Court Cases Criminal Rights 1960’s

Gideon vs. Wainwright 1963 state courts are required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases to represent defendants who are unable to afford to pay their own attorneys. Clarence Earl Gideon convicted of unarmed burglary in FL (Wainwright = State Prosecutor)

Reynolds vs. Sims 1964 Sims was a voter who sued Alabama requires that the legislative districts across states be equal in population; redistricting Chief Justice Earl Warren: –the United States is a democracy based on equal representation of the people in government, an apportionment scheme that gives more weight to some votes than others violates the Equal Protection Clause, which forbids a state from denying "to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Because the right to vote is so fundamental to securing protection from the laws, the clause inevitably guarantees "the opportunity for equal participation by all voters in the election of state legislatures."

NY Times Co. vs. Sullivan 1964 requires that the plaintiff in a defamation or libel case prove that the publisher of the statement in question knew that the statement was false or acted in reckless disregard of its truth or falsity NY Times reported Civil Rights information incorrectly; defamed Alabama (Montgomery Public Safety Commissioner, L.B. Sullivan)

Miranda vs. Arizona 1966 statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self- incrimination prior to questioning by police, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them. Miranda Rights must be read to you during arrest Ernesto Miranda was convicted of kidnapping, rape, & armed robbery