RANGELAND INVENTORY & MONITORING. Rangeland Management is: The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans. You cannot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
MIM and Adaptive Management. PURPOSE of ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT: To achieve long- term desired conditions Emphasis should be placed on long-term monitoring.
Key Messages National Riparian Lands Research & Development Program Assessing Community Capacity for Riparian Restoration.
Guidelines for Setting “Proper” Stocking Rate
Foraging Into the Future. What this talk is about…. Introduction – who/what are we? What do we do? – our mission Range/pasture EKG Monitoring methods.
The Wildfire Climate Relationship in the Selway- Bitterroot Wilderness: Using Management Strategies to Return Wildfire to Wilderness Landscapes.
Thanks for joining us. We’ll be starting soon. To join the teleconference, dial , passcode # To download handouts : Click the Handouts.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Collecting and Analyzing Data.
Rangeland Inventory & Monitoring. Rangeland Management is:  The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans.  You.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Guidelines for Setting “Proper” Stocking Rate K. Launchbaugh UDSA-ARS.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
 Necessary materials: PowerPoint Guide Teacher Information!
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
Organization Objectives & Stakeholders
Learning Goals …develop your knowledge & understanding of what a goal is … learn how goals can be used to improve learning …practice setting SMART goals.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Presented by MOBIL DATA COLLECTIONS ON GRAZING LAND.
Chapter 7: Rangeland Inventory and Monitoring 1. What is rangeland inventory? 2. What is rangeland monitoring? 3. What vegetational attributes are commonly.
Prepared for the 3rd SBB telecon 20 Mar 2012 Michele Walters, BI-01 task coordinator.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Project Activity: Riparian Zone Restoration Scott Compton, Watershed Program Manager Valles Caldera National Preserve.
Applying Social Science to Outdoor Recreation Management Diane Kuehn SUNY ESF.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
EHR Goal Setting and Impact on Quality of Care
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
INYO NATIONAL FOREST - TRAVEL ANALYSIS PROCESS Public Meeting – April 21, 2015.
Homes on the Range An Introduction to California Rangelands Photo Credit: Bureau of Land Management.
Creeks & Communities: A Continuing Strategy for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management.
The Riparian Area Management Plan Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ. of Montana.
Schools Property Planning Competition 2013 “Waitara”
International Natural Resource Management (INRM) (III) Changxiao Li, Ph.D.
March 11, 2010 Planning for Priority Species and Vegetation: Monitoring Framework A Systematic Framework to Plan for Biological Resources In the BLM’s.
Transitions in Rangeland Evaluations David A. Pyke & Jeffrey E. Herrick Jornada Experimental Range Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center.
1 Objectives 1. Why quantitative data? 2. Relationship to attributes and indicators 3. Accuracy and precision of qualitative and quantitative indicators.
ASSESSING PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION for LENTIC AREAS Introduction
FOREST PLAN REVISION Release of Draft Topic Papers INYO NATIONAL FOREST MAY - JUNE 2013.
Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
SUMMARY. Summary Instructions After the checklist is filled out and rationale documented, the ID Team discusses the responses, reads the category definitions.
CREEKS & COMMUNITIES Laura Van Riper – Social Scientist National Riparian Service Team.
What’s the Reference?. Applying the Technique: 6 Steps 1. Identify the Evaluation Area 2. Obtain or develop Reference Worksheet 3. Obtain or develop Evaluation.
Measures Measures Matter!. Key Points to Introduce This Step Measures Matter! –Often seen as last step or too challenging, so neglected –Provide transparency.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
PERFORMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT IN GEOSCIENCES Mara Chen & Dan Harris Dept. of Geography and Geosciences Salisbury University ECLIPSE August 11 th, 2012.
Rangeland Inventory & Monitoring. Rangeland Management is:  The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans.  You.
Central Sierra Interagency Resource Advisor Training Wildland Fire Implementation Plan Mike Beasley Fire Use Manager Yosemite National Park
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
FOR MANAGING BIODIVERSITY AND SPECIAL PLACES
UGIP Technical Committee Key Principles of Grazing Management Improves productivity Improves land health Shows responsibility to natural resources Ensures.
What is Rangeland Management?. Rangeland Management is:  The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans.  A Planning.
POLICY, PLANNING, & MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor Goals Objectives Monitoring.
USING STEWARDSHIP AUTHORITY TO ADVANCE RESTORATION Mae Lee Hafer Regional Stewardship Coordinator Collaborative Restoration.
Project Update SageCon, September 30, 2016
BLM Standards & Guidelines
An Introduction to California Rangelands
Moving Ahead in Rangeland Education
Accounting 9706.
Irvine Ranch Conservancy Monitoring on the IRNL
Modeling the Risk (Consequences & Benefits) of Wildland Fire
Ungrazed deep grassland
Uses and Guidance BLM Evaluate status of Standards for Rangeland Health Guidance provided in Washington Office Instruction Memorandum No In BLM.
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
Measures Measures Matter!.
Grazing Systems REM Integrated Rangeland Management
Tracking Range Change - Forty Years of Change in a Shadscale Stand
Grazing Systems REM Integrated Rangeland Management
Presentation transcript:

RANGELAND INVENTORY & MONITORING

Rangeland Management is: The use and stewardship of rangeland resources to meet goals and desires of humans. You cannot make good management decisions if you do not know the effect of past management actions. CURRENT FUTURE

Information for Management Inventory = record of resources at one point in time: Land area & pasture sizes Roads & trails Water Vegetation types Corrals, buildings, fences ?

Information for Management Maps for management = resources referenced geospatially: Vegetation map Range map Watershed map Land ownership

Information for Management Assessment = evaluation of condition at one point in time: Riparian Proper Functioning Condition Rangeland Health Ecosystem Integrity Usually involve protocols based on “qualitative” attributes (rather than “quantitative” measures).

Monitoring The word "monitor" is rooted in a term meaning "to warn." Enable managers to take appropriate actions and change course if needed.

Monitoring After a wildfire, a land manager of this sagebrush steppe area in Southern Idaho may implement a monitoring program to determine if and when the burned area recovers to a plant community similar to an unburned area.

Monitoring A rancher may implement a monitoring protocol to determine if a new grazing system is affecting establishment of sedges or willows along a stream, improving the stability of stream banks.

Monitoring A leafy spurge patch such as this could be monitored to determine if the weed management plans are effective.

Monitoring: The Main Steps Complete inventory – know resources available Develop objectives Design and implement management Design the monitoring methodology Evaluate management actions

One Example of a Planning Model

Main Steps in Rangeland Management What do you have? How will you get there? What do you want to have? Just do it! Just do it! How is it going? What needs to change? Inventory Set Goals PlanImplement Evaluate Revise

Monitoring: The Main Steps What do I need to know to make good management decisions? What/how can I realistically monitor? Set SMART Objectives

SMART Objectives: S pecific – Objectives should specifically state what you want to achieve on the land you are managing. M easurable – It must be possible to measure whether you are meeting the objectives or not. A chievable - Are the objectives you set achievable in your current setting? Consider environmental constraints, societal expectations, economic parameters, legal requirements, and technological limitations. R ealistic – Set objectives that you can realistically achieve given the natural and management context of your situation. T ime – Set a time horizon for management objectives.

SMART Objectives: To set SMART objectives, you must know:  What you are capable of: Skills Abilities Knowledge  What affects your resources: Ecological site Climate Current condition  What resources you have: Land Human capital Economic

Examine Trend Trend = upward or downward based on conditions measured at least 2 points in time: Used to evaluate management actions Measures change over time Best if done frequently Apparent Trend = attributes measured at one time point in time to infer trend. Often misleading

Trend vs. Current Status Time Ecological Status

Factors influencing trend Weather Grazing/Browsing Insects Recreation Fire Trampling Rodents All of these can be beneficial or detrimental, depending on circumstances.

FORTY YEARS OF CHANGE IN A SHADSCALE STAND IN IDAHO Lee A. Sharp, Ken Sanders & Neil Rimbey Access full text article at. p://rangelands.library.arizona.edu/Volume12/Number6/azu_ra ngelands_v12_n6_313_328_m.pdf p://rangelands.library.arizona.edu/Volume12/Number6/azu_ra ngelands_v12_n6_313_328_m.pdf

The following rangeland photo journal charts the changes that have occurred in a shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia) stand in southern Idaho starting in  Photos of the site have been taken annually since 1955, but the selected photos show the dynamic nature of the site. Background of Photos

L.A. Sharp Experimental Area –Malta Idaho

1951

1955

1958

1959

1960

1961

1963

1964

Scale Insect

Interpretation of data Determine if management objectives have been achieved. if not, why? Determine if management objectives need redefining. are they realistic? have your goals changed? Determine needed management action.

“Pictures are worth a thousand words” But only if you know the true story of what happened over time. Photos are used by critics, but they seldom make the correct interpretation. The permittee is the person most likely to know the true story.