Paul Kerswill FRIAS, 27 November 2009 Workshop III: Language, Space and Geography.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experiences of Discrimination: The Impact of Metropolitan and Non- Metropolitan Location Brian Ray, University of Ottawa Valerie Preston, York University.
Advertisements

People Groups Concept and Terminology An Ethnolinguistic Reference Point Orville Boyd Jenkins August 2005 Copyright © 2005 Orville Boyd Jenkins.
Dialect Subordinate variety of a language English language has many dialects These dialects may be of different kinds Regional dialecSocial dialect Where.
Unravelling variation and change in the short vowel system of RP Anne Fabricius SCALPS Research Group Roskilde University Sociolinguistics Symposium 16.
The perception of dialect Julia Fischer-Weppler HS Speaker Characteristics Venice International University
Building Rapport Interpersonal skills of care workers were as important as practical skills and knowing how to do the job. Having a positive attitude could.
May 7, 2015S. Mathews1 Human Geography By James Rubenstein Chapter 5 Key Issue 1 Where Are English-Language Speakers Distributed?
1 Estuary English: A new standard accent? Changes in Received Pronunciation: conservative RP to General RP Suggestions that RP is changing again to include.
Languages Dialect and Accents
Language and regional variation
Introduction to Linguistics for lawyers
Language, Society, and Culture
Varieties of English Sociolinguistics.
3. Defining the Enclave Dialect Community. What are the traits that characterize an isolated speech community? (Linguists have not previously defined.
Unit 6: The Culture of Communication
Language and Social Culture Lecture 7. Language Varieties  Variety is a generic term for a particular coherent form of language in which specific extralinguistic.
What is race?. Race as a social construction (read page 162) The thought among academics is that race is best thought of as a social construction A social.
GREENBAUM, S & QUIRK, R. (1990) A
Department of English Introduction To Linguistics Level Four Dr. Mohamed Younis.
LANE 422 SOCIOLINGUISTICS
Language Variation: Social Class
THE IMPACT OF LINGUISTIC AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY ON SPEECH SOUND PRODUCTION.
LINGUISTICS II Undergraduate Course Asst.Prof.Dr.Azamat Akbarov.
ENG 528: Language Change Research Seminar Sociophonetics: An Introduction Chapter 8: Combinations of Different Types of Variables.
LANGUAGE, CULTURE AND COMMUNICATIO N  Anthropology  Culture  Cultural Holism  Norms  Cultural Model  Enculturation  Cultural relativism  Ethnocentrism.
1 Language and Social Variation. 2 1.Introduction: In the previous lecture, we focused on the variation in language use in different geographical areas.
Speech Provides clues Regional accent Dialect Contains features which are unrelated to regional variations Two people growing up in the same geographical.
Gender and Language Variation Wolfram & Schilling-Estes Chapter 8.
Myths about African American English AAE is bad or broken English AAE is just slang All African Americans speak AAE Only African Americans speak AAE AAE.
Ethnicity as a source of changes in the London vowel system Eivind Torgersen and Paul Kerswill Lancaster University.
Match the phrase to the presenter
FAMILY LEARNING WORKS Susannah Chambers, Head of Family & Intergenerational Learning 23 rd October 2015.
Dialects and Isogloss Chapter 5 section 5. Terms/Concepts Dialect Isogloss.
Language and Social Class
Making it Meaningful  Dialects of American English as YOU see them Dialects of American English  Does everyone speak using a dialect? Information about.
Australian English Setting the scene. Terminology: Languages, dialects and accents  What is a dialect?  refers to a variety of a language that is a.
Investigating language and ethnicity in London: Production and perception data Eivind Torgersen 1, Paul Kerswill 1, Sue Fox 2 and Arfaan Khan 2 Lancaster.
LANGUAGE, DIALECT, AND VARIETIES
LECTURE 3 1 APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY.
Language, Dialect and Accent. Nature of a language The linguist makes no value judgment. S/he recognizes and accepts the existence of language varieties.
Attitudes towards varieties of English among Polish immigrants in the UK Miriam Meyerhoff* Erik Schleef† Lynn Clark* University of Edinburgh,* University.
Paul Kerswill, Jenny Cheshire, Sue Fox and Eivind Torgersen Lancaster University/Queen Mary, University of London University of Cape Town, 27 th August.
Chapter 8. Language: a systematic means of communicating ideas or feelings by the use of conventionalized signs, gestures, marks or especially articulate.
Variations in accents.  In this tutorial we look at accents in English and variation in accents.  The difference between accent and dialect: accents.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 جامعة الملك فيصل عمادة.
Aleksandra Najdeska.  Stereotype: -generalization about a group’s characteristics that does not consider variation between individuals - Not necessarily.
The Reality of Dialects Wolfram, W. (1991) Dialects and American English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Chapter one. The reality of dialects (pp.1.
We stop at: L4 when do we switch from L to H(formal)? (P:40) Now: Practice 2:(L5: Language Maintenance and shift P(52- 73)
Social Class & Style Dr Emma Moore
Lecture 1: The Demographics of the United Kingdom Jason Downs British and American Culture.
LI 2023 NATHALIE F. MARTIN L ANGUAGE V ARIATION. Outline of Today’s Class Today’s : Linguistic Community Linguistic Variation Geography Through time Social.
Match the phrase to the presenter Controlled Assessment 3: Spoken Language Analysing how speakers adapt for different purposes Using Spoken Language Features.
Language – What Should I Say? ___________ – set of mutually intelligible sounds and symbols that are used for communication. Many languages also have literary.
Lecture 7 Gender & Age.
Perceptions of Chesterfield and Chesterfield English
Paul Kerswill, Eivind Torgersen,
Chapter 4: The Sounds of American English
Match the theories to the THEORISTS!
To Linguistics Introduction Department of English Level Four
Universidad del Sagrado Corazón Professor Harry Martinez M.Ed.
Lesson 6: Long-Term Factors Affecting Voting Behaviour
Paul Kerswill ICLaVE, 27 June 2009
Data workshop on ethnolectal varieties FRIAS, 17 March 2010
Linguistic Predictors of Cultural Identification in Bilinguals
Regional and Social Dialects
Language and Social Variation
You must be able to explain the definition of this word to the class!!
APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY
You must be able to explain the definition of this word to the class!!
Regional dialects.
Presentation transcript:

Paul Kerswill FRIAS, 27 November 2009 Workshop III: Language, Space and Geography

2

 Expectation: speech community type has a perceptual correlate  Perceptual linguistic parameters: what is the envelope of variability?  Perceived social parameters: which parameters? Which values (ethnicity, class)?  Link to focusing  What is effect of listener characteristics? 3

 More consideration of the ‘big picture’:  Expansion in ethnographic and cognitive approaches  More concern with geographical context  But perceptual dialectology has not (yet) made a big impact ▪ Garrett et al.’s study of recognition of Welsh English varieties (1990s) ▪ Montgomery’s perceptual maps (200os) 4

The context: a model of dialect change 1. Speech community type  Community structure (Henning Andersen’s open/closed, exocentric/endocentric dichotomies), stratification, group formation, intergroup relations, in-migration/immigration, outward contact, orientation  The mirroring of these factors in observable sociolinguistic variation patterns, including change  The embedding of the speech community in wider geographical dynamics of levelling and divergence 2. Community-external factors, related to wider (both local and national) ideologies about social groups and language 5

 Dedialectalisation  Regional dialect levelling (= supralocalisation)  Geographical diffusion  Innovation (divergence) 6

7

8

9

 Endocentric closed (Type 1): Metropolitan inner city. Language contact- based innovation. Examples: London and Birmingham inner cities  Endocentric open (Type 2): General urban, with strong external contacts favouring outward diffusion. Examples: Glasgow, Liverpool, Manchester  Exocentric closed (Type 3): A low-contact community whose orientation to outside linguistic norms is positive. Change by ideology, not contact. Example: Glasgow inner-city communities, taking up off-the- shelf features (discussed in Lecture 1).  Exocentric open (Type 4): Often rural communities, and unlike Type 1 not especially protective of local norms. Strongly affected by incoming features, diffusing from local urban centres. Example: Huntly. Also high-mobility, high-contact urbanised regions around a metropolis: the south-east of England 10

 Hypothesis 1: Recognising voices from one’s own community (‘own-community recognition’) will be better if one has strong local ties. Thus, working-class judges in established towns will be more successful than middle class groups in the same towns, but working-class judges in a New Town will not have the same advantage.  Hypothesis 2: Own-community recognition will be better in towns with relatively little mobility than in towns with high mobility.  Hypothesis 3: Own-community recognition of an accent with strongly localised phonetic features will be better than that of accents without such distinctive features 11

12 Tape presented to judges in: Voices H ULL 1 Hull F83 2 Milton Keynes F13 3 Durham M55 4 Middles- brough F17 5 Reading F50 6 Hull M9 7 Public school M14 8 Yorks. East Riding M80 9 London M13 10 Hull M15 R EADING 1 Reading M82 2 Hull M15 3 London F35 4 Reading M15 5 Durham M55 6 London M13 7 Public school M14 8 Reading F50 9 Milton Keynes F13 10 Reading F18 M ILTON K EYNES 1 Milton Keynes F82 2 Hull M15 3 London F35 4 Reading M15 5 Durham M55 6 London M13 7 Public school M14 8 Reading F50 9 Milton Keynes F13 10 Milton Keynes M9 Voices presented to judges in Hull, Reading and Milton Keynes

13 (From P. Kerswill and A. Williams 2002)

14 (From P. Kerswill and A. Williams 2002)

15 (From P. Kerswill and A. Williams 2002)

16

17

18

19

20

21

 Perceptual disjunction between older voices and younger voices  Older voices perceived as ‘further west than here’  But judgement of young voices not uniform: voice with levelled accent was problematic, though notably not judged as ‘London’  Difference in WC and MC perceptions  Ascribable to differences in familiarity 22

Investigators: Paul Kerswill (Lancaster University) Jenny Cheshire (Queen Mary, University of London) Research Associates: Sue Fox (Queen Mary, University of London) Eivind Torgersen (Lancaster University) Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council E· S· R· C ECONOMIC & S O C I A L RESEARCH C O U N C I L 23

Investigators: Paul Kerswill (Lancaster University) Jenny Cheshire (Queen Mary, University of London) Research Associates: Sue Fox, Arfaan Khan, (Queen Mary, University of London) Eivind Torgersen (Lancaster University) E· S· R· C ECONOMIC & S O C I A L RESEARCH C O U N C I L Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council Multicultural London English: the emergence, acquisition and diffusion of a new variety (2007–10) 24

Are these the innovators? Roll Deep Crew (East London Hip-Hop crew) 25

Havering Hackney 26

FACE MOUTH TRAP STRUT START PRICE CHOICE GOAT 27

Laura, AngloIssah, Kuwait Grace, Nigeria Jack, Anglo Issah & Grace: shorter trajectories than Laura & Jack. In GOAT, they go their own way – divergence from south-eastern fronting change 28

 There is awareness in the press and radio of a ‘new’ way of talking in London: people claim that more and more white kids ‘talk black’ or ‘sound like they’re black’  The media have coined this ‘Jafaican’. We’ve called it Multicultural London English  Is there evidence that it is ethnically relatively neutral?  If so, we have evidence of a new, multiethnic variety (a “multiethnolect”) 29

 Task: ethnic and geographical classification of real speech from 2005 interviews  10 second sound clip per speaker  All listeners from inner London  Listeners aged 12 or 17 (N=68) 30

MeganHackneyAnglo AndrewHackneyAnglo LauraHackneyAnglo RyanHackneyAnglo SulemaHackneyNon-Anglo (Bangladeshi) KirstyHackneyNon-Anglo (Chinese) GraceHackneyNon-Anglo (Nigerian) DomHackneyNon-Anglo (Columbian) AmjadHackneyNon-Anglo (Pakistani) ChrisHackneyNon-Anglo (Afro-Caribbean) KellyHaveringAnglo DaleHaveringAnglo 31 Plus four Birmingham voices: 2 female, 2 male, one Afro-Caribbean, one Anglo for each sex

 If a listener claims a voice to be that of a Londoner, then we take this as a claim that the voice belongs to the listener’s speech community 32

33

Actual ethnicity of speakers (1f, 1m for each ethnicity) Judgement of speaker’s ethnicity based on voice sample Actual ethnicity/sex of speaker Is heard as coming from... 34

Is heard as...Is heard as coming from... 35

Is heard as being... Is heard as coming from... 36

Is heard as...Is heard as coming from... 37

 Birmingham Non-Anglo voices are more likely to be heard as ‘London’ than Birmingham Anglos voices  Havering Anglo voices are heard as ‘white’ and as from London or Essex  Hackney Anglo voices are also heard as ‘white’, but much less consistently. One is consistently heard as ‘black’. They are heard as from London with more consistency than the Havering Anglos  Hackney Non-Anglo voices are heard as coming from various backgrounds, with no correspondence with actual race/ethnicity. The exception is Grace. 38

 Non-Anglo voices are heard as coming from London  This effect is extended to Birmingham Non-Anglo voices  Anglo voices are less strongly associated with London  Anglo voices from Hackney are more likely to be heard as being from London than those from Havering Question: can a content analysis of interviews shed light on these associations? 39

 How are ‘own place’ and ‘own language’ constructed?  Likely relevant categories for language: ‘Cockney’, ‘posh’, ‘Multicultural London English’ (need to look for members’ term for this concept, along the lines of Kiezdeutsch),...  Parameters of construction for place and language: Age, behaviour, dress, ethnicity, words, pronunciation... 40

41 Identi- fies as Cock- ney Identi- fies as ‘myself’ Identi- fies as East London Identi- fies as London Identifies as foreign ‘Cockney’ somewhere other than Hackney or local area ‘Cockney’ distinct from current language of own area Anglo n= Non- Anglo n= Columbian

42 ‘Cockney’ spoken by older people Cock- neys are white Cockneys have specific cultural character- istics (tea, beer, pubs, chips; they are chavs, racist) Cockney associated with words (geezer, all right, mate, cock, sweet, governor, rhyming slang) Associates own speech with words (what’s up, blood, bredren, save it, safe, shank, mug, bless) Refers to ‘slang’ as words distinguish- ing their speech from Cockney Refers to own variety as ‘slang’ Anglo n= Non- Anglo n= also ‘ghetto’, ‘rude’ (Non- Anglos), ‘raggo’ (Anglo)

 5/13 Anglos claim to be Cockneys  Citing family background: ‘Mum is a real Cockney’  Also language mentioned  No Non-Anglos claim either the identity or the dialect  Cockneys are defined by a process of othering  Social and linguistic practices (tea, bags of chips; ‘mate’, ‘geezer’...)  White (and sometimes racist)  Older people  ‘Cockney’ spoken somewhere else (other parts of London, Essex)  Or spoken here, but in another time  Own identity defined as local, East London, sometimes by postcode  But never ‘East End’, thus setting themselves apart from the soap Eastenders  No mention of race or ethnicity in this section of interviews 43

 Almost everybody says their speech is different from Cockney  Cockney is defined by words, freely cited  The speakers claim different words for themselves  Own speech and speech of the area rarely given a name  The designation ‘slang’ is often used, but speakers cite vocabulary to define it ( what’s up, blood, bredren, save it, safe, shank, mug, bless)  Accent never mentioned  Match in individual cases between self-ascription and members’ perception  Ryan is heard as black. He says of himself that he hates white people, and is always taken for black in the absence of visual clues  Dom does not claim a British identity. Of the Non-Anglos, he is heard as the least ‘London’ 44

 Dialect recognition and geographical ascription shows local perceptions of speech communities  Correlation with focusing/diffuseness, ongoing levelling  Gives quantifiable, but subtle picture of how individuals perceive local areas, local speech, and who is ‘one of us’  Match with both variation patterns and with ethnographic information 45