1.  Principle that all living things come from other living things.  Before the 17 th century (1600s), another idea was widely accepted.  Spontaneous.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flowchart Designing an Experiment State the Problem Analyze Results
Advertisements

Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis Honors Biology
Spontaneous generation vs. biogenesis
Chapter 14.2 Origin of Life.
The Birth of Experimental Biology
Spontaneous Generation Unit 3. What is Spontaneous Generation?
Mystery Worms A teacher collected some beetles from a rotting log and placed them in a container of dry oatmeal in her classroom. She kept the box covered.
History of Life Chapter 14. Biogenesis Biogenesis is the principle that all living things come from other living things Spontaneous generation is the.
The Story of Spontaneous Generation
Early Scientists. ARISTOTLE Greek philosopher Made observations of the natural world through reasoning. Special “vital” forces brought some living things.
What is Biogenesis? Biogenesis is the principle which sates that all living things come from other living things. Before Biogenesis people believed that.
Spontaneous Generation Unit 3. What is Spontaneous Generation?
Evolution. The First Cells & Their Environment Environment during time of first cells: No oxygen Filled with organic molecules Therefore, the first cells.
The Birth of Experimental Biology
Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis
Spontaneous Generation Before the 17 th century, people believed that living things could come from nonliving things. – The Cell Theory has not been written.
Where do living organisms come from? Biology. Spontaneous Generation Life can come from non-living things Idea persisted up to the 1800s Many ideas were.
Microbiology Brief Review Spontaneous Generation and Biogenesis.
1-2 How Scientists Work Slide 1 of 32 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Designing an Experiment Forming a Hypothesis One early hypothesis was spontaneous.
Slide 1 of 32 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall Biology.
1-2 How Scientists Work.
Slide 1 of 32 Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall 1-2 How Scientists Work Mystery Worms A teacher collected some beetles from a rotting log and placed them.
How Scientists Work and the Development of the Cell Theory
Chapter 14: History of Life Modern Biology © Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, pp
1 Origin of Life. 2 Aristotle (384 –322 BC) Proposed the theory of spontaneous generation Also called abiogenesis Idea that living things can arise from.
The Origin of Life.
CELL THEORY NOTES The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the most discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny..."
Spontaneous Generation Before the 17 th century, people believed that living things could come from nonliving things. – The Cell Theory has not been written.
The Science of Biology Biology 392. Observing the World If you are a thinker, you question things you observe and may not understand and you try to find.
And how we try to figure it out
Chapter 14 The History of Life
Chapter 14: History of Life
Emergence of the Cell Theory Objectives: 1. Critique the experiments done to challenge Abiogenesis 2. Describe the “Cell Theory”
Chapter 14: History of Life Modern Biology © Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, pp
How Scientists Work. Key Concepts How do scientists test hypothesis? Why is it important to be able to repeat investigations?
Chapter 1 Section 1-2: How Scientists Work. Objectives Describe how scientists test hypotheses. Describe how scientists test hypotheses. Explain how a.
INTRO TO EVOLUTION. FIRST IDEAS In early times, people believed in spontaneous generation. Spontaneous generation is the belief that something living.
The Slow Death of Spontaneous Generation. Spontaneous Generation What do you think this means?
Observation vs. Inference Variables Spontaneous Generation
Cell Theory: Discovery of the Cells and its Theory Chapter 7.1.
Chapter 14: History of Life (on Earth)
How Spontaneous Generation was disproven
Scientific Method The scientific method is a series of steps taken during an experiment in order to solve a problem.
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
What is Science? Learning about the natural world.
Theories on the Origin of Life
History of life.
The History of Science Unit 2 continued….
History of Cell Discovery
Spontaneous Generation
MIAMI BEACH SENIOR HIGH MRS DIAZ
Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis
The Story of Spontaneous Generation
How do you think evolution shapes our understanding of biology?
Ch. 14 Origin of Life Biogenesis
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Spontaneous Generation vs. Biogenesis Research Biology
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
RHP 5: Controlled Experiment
Chapter 14 – where did it all begin?
Biology 2201 The overview.
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Where does life come from?
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
What is Critical Thinking?
What is the goal of science? P. 3
The Story of Spontaneous Generation
Write what you think these words mean:
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Presentation transcript:

1

 Principle that all living things come from other living things.  Before the 17 th century (1600s), another idea was widely accepted.  Spontaneous generation › The idea that living things could arise (come from) nonliving things.  i.e., maggots appeared on rotting meat;  fish appeared in ponds that had been dry the previous season – people thought the mud gave rise or life to the fish. 2

 Italian scientist who noticed and described the different developmental forms of flies. › Tiny wormlike maggots turned into sturdy oval cases. › From these cases, the flies eventually emerged. › He also observed that these maggots always seemed to appear where adult flies had previously landed.  These observations caused him to question the idea that flies were spontaneously generated from rotting meat. 3

 Figure 14.1, page 261  Redi’s experiment conducted in 1668 to test his hypothesis. › Meat kept away from adult flies would remain free of maggots.  He performed a controlled experiment.  Experimental Group › Netting-covered jars which contained meat  Control Group › Uncovered jars which also contained meat 4

 In the experimental group › The netting allowed air to enter, yet prevented the adult flies from landing on the meat.  After a few days › Maggots swarmed over the meat in the uncovered jars. › The net covered jars remained free of maggots.  Redi’s experiment showed convincingly that flies come only from eggs laid by other flies.  Redi’s hypothesis was confirmed.  Major strike against the hypothesis of spontaneous generation. 5

 A new tool enters the picture about the same time that Redi was performing his experiments.  Microscope  New revelation › World teeming with tiny creatures  Discovered › microorganisms are simple in structure › amazingly numerous and widespread  Microorganisms believed to arise from a “vital force” in the air. 6

 Italian scientist, Lazzaro Spallanzani, designed an experiment to test the hypothesis of spontaneous generation of microorganisms.  He knew that microorganisms grew easily in food.  He tested their growth in meat broth. 7

 Figure 14.2, page 262  Boiled meat broth to kill all microorganisms already present in the broth, on the glass of the flask and in the air within the flask.  Experimental Group › Boiled clear, fresh broth in a straight neck flask until flask filled with steam. › Sealed the flasks by melting their glass necks closed while the broth was hot. 8

 Control Group › Flasks were left open  Results › Broth in the experimental group remained clear, free of microorganisms. › Broth in the control group became cloudy due to contamination with microorganisms.  Spallanzani’s Conclusion › Boiled broth only became contaminated when microorganisms in the air entered the flask. 9

 Opponents objected to his method.  They disagreed with his conclusions.  They claimed that he had heated the flasks too long, which destroyed the “vital force” that was in the air inside them.  Without the “vital force” the air could not give rise to the microorganisms.  Because of this rebuttal, spontaneous generation was kept alive for another century. 10

 Spontaneous generation controversy grew intense by the mid-1800s.  Paris Academy of France › Offered prize to anyone who could solve this dilemma. › The winner was Louis Pasteur.  Figure 14.3, page

 Pasteur expanded on Spallanzani’s experiment.  Instead of using a straight-neck flask, he made a curved-neck flask. › This allowed air inside the flask to mix with the air outside the flask.  The curve in the neck of the flask prevented solid particles, such as microorganisms, from entering the body of the flask. 12

 Experimental Group › Curve-necked flasks › Broth remained clear up to a year › When Pasteur broke off the curved necks, the broth became cloudy and contaminated with microorganisms in a day.  Pasteur’s Conclusion › In comparing his experimental group to Spallanzani’s control group, Pasteur reasoned that the contamination was caused by microorganisms in the air. 13

 Those who believed in spontaneous generation conceded and gave up their fight.  The principle of biogenesis became a cornerstone of biology. 14