Agenda Round Table Project Goals/Priorities Management documents & structure Agreement Document Responsibilities Time-Line Deliverables (also in technical.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Business Analyst and the SDLC

Advertisements

Work meeting Interreg SYSIASS project 21 st April 2011 University of Essex 1 Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund.

Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration (at the final LRR) -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice.

Final Report Document. Format Title Page Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction Mission Statement Main PDS items Brief justification of the.

Tina design review Main design decisions. Top level modules. Responsibilities. Phases A & B. Test plan. Time table.

WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.

Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2007 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.

CELeSTA CERN LATCHUP STUDENT SATELLITE TEST BOARD DEVELOPMENT AND CHARM PRELIMINARY RESULTS Raffaello Secondo ESA/ESTEC CERN Visit - DECEMBER 9 th 2014.

LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.

LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.

LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.

The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.

S/W Project Management

CHAPTER 5 Infrastructure Components PART I. 2 ESGD5125 SEM II 2009/2010 Dr. Samy Abu Naser 2 Learning Objectives: To discuss: The need for SQA procedures.

→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.

Natal Workshop October 30th, Project Status.

Mantychore Oct 2010 WP 7 Andrew Mackarel. Agenda 1. Scope of the WP 2. Mm distribution 3. The WP plan 4. Objectives 5. Deliverables 6. Deadlines 7. Partners.

Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.

ET-SAT-8 / ET-SUP-7 briefing 1 programme update Briefing to the joint meeting of the Expert Team on Satellite Systems (ET-SAT-8) and the Expert Team on.

CS 360 Lecture 3.  The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software system.  Fundamental Assumption:  Good software.

Budget Setting Process For 2015 Budget Draft 0.1 Member Forum Date of Meeting: 27th May 2014.

Executive Steering Committee Presentation

COROTWEEK n°8 Toulouse May the 24th, 2005 Program Status (Th. Lam-Trong) 1 COROT.

T Project Review X-tremeIT I1 Iteration

Jump to first page (c) 1999, A. Lakhotia 1 Software engineering? Arun Lakhotia University of Louisiana at Lafayette Po Box Lafayette, LA 70504, USA.

Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.

© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.

Requirements validation Csaba Veres. What is it? Validation is the process of checking the requirements document for –completeness –consistency –accuracy.

WGISS /09/2015 DATA PRESERVATION – CNES APPROACH B. Chausserie-Laprée.

Request for Proposal (RFP)

THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.

Action Plans for Test Development and Administration STANAG 6001 BILC Conference, Mons, SHAPE, Belgium, September 2013 Ludmila Ianovici-Pascal Head, Language.

ASPERA-3 Mar. 25, 01 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 3_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 3/25/01 Schedule statused.

Critical Design Review (CDR)

Project Human Resource Management. Presentation Team 1)Mrs. Mardia Ibrahim Osman(Mechanical Engineer) 2)Mr. Elsaeed Osman Elsheikh(Medical Doctor) 3)Mr.

Haripriya Head, Integration Team Pratham, IIT Bombay 19 th June, 2010.

CIWQS Review Phase II: Evaluation and Final Recommendations March 14, 2008.

The Copernicus Sentinel-3 Mission: Update on status Susanne Mecklenburg – ESA Sentinel-3 Mission Manager Sentinel-3 ESA development & operations teams.

NASCE: Programme requirements Paul Ridgway. Need for NASCE? Cost of Skills training Pressures for training outside service hours Pressures for training.

Chapter 12 The Network Development Life Cycle

Unit 17: SDLC. Systems Development Life Cycle Five Major Phases Plus Documentation throughout Plus Evaluation…

CS 501: Software Engineering Fall 1999 Lecture 4 (a) Documentation (b) Requirements Analysis.

K. Mercier, Shanghai meeting, 19th-22 May 2014 CNES, 5 th June 2014 Karine MERCIER EUSO Balloon Key Point Flight Acceptance Organisation.

Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.

T Project Review RoadMappers I2 Iteration

T Project Review Muuntaja I1 Iteration

Unit 4 ● Week 5 decisions Key Words. Unit 4 ● Week 5 communicate Key Words.

Project Introduction Spring InSPIRESS Challenge 2 Design an autonomous science payload for the Titan Environmental and Atmospheric Measurement (TEAM)

RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.

ESA/ESTEC CERN Visit December 9/10 th 2014 CELESTA a CERN cubeSat Project.

Request for Proposal (RFP) In response to the RFP – the first step is to prepare a proposal 1. Review Customer Requirements and come up with candidate.

28 May 2010 HMA-FO Task 2: Feasibility Analysis Service HMA Follow On Activities Task 2: Feasibility Analysis Service (Sensor Planning Service) Monthly.

TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.

MGT 437 OUTLET Become Exceptional/mgt437outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT

Mission Definition Review November 27th 2015

Session II: System authority for ERTMS 4RP Trackside approval

Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>

Request for Proposal (RFP)

Engineering Processes

Presented to the CEOS WGISS October 22, 2018

ESA95 Data Delivery Program

Project Introduction Spring 2017.

DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Education and Training Statistics Working Group, May 2011

<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here

Project Management Unit #2

Executive Project Kickoff

Recent Developments in Regional Accounts

Presentation transcript:

Agenda Round Table Project Goals/Priorities Management documents & structure Agreement Document Responsibilities Time-Line Deliverables (also in technical context) Budget and required formalities Technical Details (mostly on Thursday) Tasks for the next few months

CELESTA Team Anne-Sophie: payload engineer, mission operation Raffaello: RM hardware and payload integration Paul: Payload technical responsible Ruben: component/effect specialist Adam: Monte-Carlo calculations / radiation environment Julien: CHARM responsible Mathieu: CSU cubeSat platform responsible Muriel: CSU project management & RHA Laurent: Head of Montpellier Space Centre Enrico: CERN KT fund responsible Markus: CERN R2E responsible

CELESTA Targets/Objectives Mission: demonstrate the equivalence between CHARM and LEO environment Objectives: Technology demonstration: Radmon cube-sat module Validation of new cubeSat platform cubeSat communication station at CHARM Scientific: SEE energy dependency and relevance for LEO mssions Criteria of success: Full success: statistically meaningful results for SEE measurements and full coverage of RadMon dosimetry Partial successful: Radmon functionality proven but limited statistics

Paul: Technical Requirements Bus and interface payload/control/power Connectors Integration Available space Possibility of mezzanine card Integration test and assembly

Enrico: Comments Satellite hardware Ground station Deliverable table for addendum document Other documents “Satellite User Manual” “Launcher interface document” Scientific publications – IP questions Previous mission results/expertise/feedback

Raffaello: Comments ADC dies at 200 Gy, possibility to insert a mezzanine board? Communication between Payload and OBDH. The board power management is still the same? Reduction of the payload the power consumption. SEL candidates. The Brilliance is still the best candidate. The Board size will be readjusted Discussion on Data transmission rate Temperature compensation of the RadFet

Urgent Actions Decision on review requirements/follow-ups of platform [Enrico, Muriel] -> ok, -> to be defined as review members Iteration of missing items of addendum document [Muriel, Markus] Final iteration prior transmission to legal service [Enrico] CERN accounts for Muriel, Matthieu and Laurent [Raffaello]

General Actions Quantification and details concerning success criteria Data of flight platform (incl. criteria) [Matthieu, Muriel] Radmon operation and data taking, RadFet temperature compensation, etc [Raffaello] Statistical requirements for SEE measurements [Anne-Sophie, Ruben] Alignment of requirements with respect to project phases as required for space missions (Phase 0, A-F) Definition of review committee: Montpellier, CERN, ESA, Swiss-Space Common workspace for documents Documentation requirements: CSU templates to be assigned List of documents and naming to be updated to be conform between CERN/CSU Deliverable matrix to be completed including responsibilities logo & communication plan

Technical Actions CERN Ground Station requirement [Enrico, Raffaello, Matthieu] Data volume and format requirement: to be detailed [Anne- Sophie] Check if the AMS ground station can be used for CELESTA [Enrico]