 Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documentation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient Accounting System 6. Budget Controls.
Advertisements

 Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
NIH Grants Management Policies DOM Weekly Fund Management Training.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Introduction to Uniform Guidance Presented to Engineering Research Network – Nov 19, 2014 by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
Grant Guidance Changes
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Preparing and Submitting Reports Della Brown White, Ph.D. Program Officer, Office of Health Equity Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health.
Common Compliance Pitfalls and Strategies for Success
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Post Award MUHAS, Dartmouth, UCSF Financial Reporting & Closeouts Tuesday October 21, 2014.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Uniform Guidance Update RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS TEAM MEETING FEBRUARY 2015.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
 Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional.
1 All About Costs A Post-Award Primer NIH Regional Seminar Portland, OR June 2010.
Fiscal Compliance Why it matters… University of Delaware.
 Presented By: NameTitleOffice PresentationTitle NCURA Region V Annual Conference April 21, 2015 Michelle G. Bulls, Director Samuel Ashe, Grants Policy.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
All About Costs A Post-Award Primer  NIH Regional Seminar  Research Triangle Park, NC  April, 2007.
Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
UCLA Department of Medicine Office of Research Administration.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
Grant Award Management Bryan S. Clark, M.B.A. Chief Grants Management Officer Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Got the Grant What’s next??????????? Joy R. Knipple Team Leader, National Institute of Mental Health July 26, 2006.
POST-AWARD GRANT MANAGEMENT June 23, 2014 Presented by Arina V. Kramer Grants Management Specialist Office of Grants Administration, NCI.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Costing and Cost Transfers John Caruso Campus Relations Manager, Sponsored Projects Administration.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
1 All About Costs A Post-Award Primer NIH Regional Seminar Philadelphia, PA April 2010.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
Award Transfers Office of Research Services ORS Brown Bag November 20, 2006.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Uniform Guidance Overview Samuel Ashe, Grants Policy Analyst Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER, NIH 1 NIH Regional Seminar -
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
BUDGET BASICS FOR ADMINISTRATORS TIJUANNA DECOSTER, PH.D., MPA CHIEF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 204 Jean Cody Assistant Director, Post-Award Office of Sponsored Programs.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
All About Costs A Post-Award Primer
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Post-Award Grant Administration
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
COS RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS MEETING
Presentation transcript:

 Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional Seminar – San Diego, CA – October Diane Dean, Director Kathy Hancock, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer Joel Snyderman, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer

Cost Principles Administrative Standards Audit Requirements Grant Award Basics Award Restrictions Responsibilities Accounting Basics Monitoring Basics Subrecipient Monitoring Other Cost Considerations NIH Financial Reporting Basics Closeout 2

As part of a larger Federal effort to increase efficiency and reduce waste, on December 26, 2013, the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) published a series of significant reforms to the Government’s policies relating to grants and cooperative agreements. 2 CFR Part 200 This Final Uniform Regulation (a.k.a. Guidance) (2 CFR Part 200) consolidates and supersedes the eight OMB circulars (A-21, A- 50, A-87, A-89, A-102, A-110, A-122, and A-133). These new federal regulations became effective for new federal awards and new funding for existing awards on or after Dec 26, For more information on 2 CFR Part 200 see: pdf pdf 4

On December 19, 2014, HHS published in the Federal Register, an Interim Final Rule (45 CFR Part 75) adopting OMB’s final regulation (a.k.a. guidance) in 2 CFR Part 200 with certain amendments, based on existing HHS regulations, to supplement the guidance as needed for the Department. HHS made this interim final rule effective on December 26,

Cost Principles: o 45 CFR Part 75, Subpart E (§ § ) Institutions of Higher Education (IHE), State, Local Governments and Indian Tribes, and Non-profit Organizations o 45 CFR Part 75, Appendix IX Hospitals o 48 CFR Subpart 31.2 (Federal Acquisition Regulation): For-Profit Institutions 6

Establishes principles for determining costs applicable to grants, contracts, and other agreements Direct costs F&A/indirect costs Selected items of cost o allowable/unallowable costs o Compensation for personal services 7

45 CFR Part 75, Subpart C – Preaward Federal Award Requirements and Contents of Federal Awards (§ § ) 45 CFR Part 75, Subpart D – Post Federal Award Requirements (§ § ) 8

Prescribes: Preaward requirements Postaward requirements Also includes requirements for: o Payment o Matching or Cost sharing o Accounting for program income o Revision of budget and program plans o Non-Federal audits o Allowable costs Financial management systems standards Property standards Procurement standards Reports and records 9

10 o 45 CFR : Institutions of Higher Education, States and Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, including Non- Profit Hospitals o 45 CFR (h) through (k): For-Profits Organizations, including For-Profit Hospitals o NIH Grants Policy Statement: Foreign Organizations must follow the same requirements as For-Profit Organizations

All NIH grant recipients that expend $750,000 or more within a year in Federal awards are subject to an audit requirement. o Applicable to Non-Federal Entity Fiscal Years Beginning on or after 12/26/2014. o For-Profit and Foreign Organization audit requirement: Expend $750,000 under one or more HHS awards (as a direct recipient and/or consortium participant) At least one award is an HHS grant Audits are due within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) or 9 months after the end of the recipient’s audit period. Recipients delinquent in submitting audits risk the imposition of sanctions and potential loss of Federal funds. 11

Summary of Audit Requirements Recipient Type Source of Audit Requirement (Non- Federal Entity Fiscal Years Beginning Prior to 12/26/2014) Source of Audit Requirement (Non- Federal Entity Fiscal Years Beginning On/After 12/26/2014) Where to Submit Audit Reports State & Local Governments OMB Circular A CFR Federal Audit Clearinghouse Federal Audit Clearinghouse (See contact information in NIH GPS Part III) Institutions of Higher Education OMB Circular A CFR Federal Audit Clearinghouse Federal Audit Clearinghouse (See contact information in NIH GPS Part III) Non-Profits, including non-profit hospitals OMB Circular A CFR Federal Audit Clearinghouse Federal Audit Clearinghouse (See contact information in NIH GPS Part III) For-Profits, including for-profit hospitals 45 CFR 74.26(d)45 CFR (h) through (k) and 45 CFR National External Audit Review Center National External Audit Review Center (See contact information in NIH GPS Part III) Foreign Organizations NIH Grants Policy Statement (same as For-Profits) National External Audit Review Center (same as For-Profits, see contact information in NIH GPS Part III).

Summary of Federal Requirement References Recipient TypeAdministrative Requirements Cost PrinciplesAudit Requirements State & Local Governments and Indian Tribes 45 CFR Part 75, Subpart C – Pre- Federal Award Requirements and Contents of Federal Awards § § AND 45 CFR Part 75, Subpart D – Post Federal Award Requirements § § CFR Part 75, Subpart E See also § and § CFR Part 75, Subpart F at § Also applicable to non- profit Hospitals Institutions of Higher Education 45 CFR Part 75, Subpart E See also § and § Non-Profits45 CFR Part 75, Subpart E Hospitals45 CFR Part 75, Appendix IX45 CFR Part 75, Subpart F at § (h)-(k) and § Also applicable to for- profit Hospitals For-ProfitsFAR 31.2 (48 CFR Subpart 31.2) Foreign OrganizationsSame as above depending on type of institution Per NIH GPS use 45 CFR Part (h)-(k)

**************** NOTICE OF AWARD******************* CENTER GRANT Issue Date:06/01/2015 Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes Of Health **************** NOTICE OF AWARD******************* CENTER GRANT Issue Date:06/01/2015 Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes Of Health 14

Terms of Award – Section III o 45 CFR Part 75 – HHS rules and requirements that govern the administration of grants o NIH Grants Policy Statement (GPS) – policy requirements that serve as the terms and conditions of NIH awards Special Terms and Conditions – Section IV 15

Only applied to a particular grant for cause Shown on the Notice of Award (NoA) after Section III – Institute and/or Center specific terms of award Funds usually are not restricted in the Payment Management System Restricted funds must be tracked by grantee to ensure compliance o EXAMPLE of Award Restriction: Funds may not be used to purchase equipment without the written prior approval of the NIH awarding component. 16

A. The Principal Investigator B. The Departmental Administrator C. The Department Chair D. The Institution 17

18

Requires that: o Separate account is established for each project o Program Income is identified and accounted for by project o Program Income is used in accordance with the appropriate alternative, i.e.,  Additive  Deductive  Combination  Matching 19

Requires that: o Expenses are charged in accordance with:  NoA Terms and Conditions  NIH Grants Policy Statement  Including addenda in effect as of the beginning date of the budget period  Salary Cap / Rate Limitation  Cost Accounting Standards  Federal regulations o ALL expenses are appropriately documented 20

21

Requires that: o Actual expenses are periodically compared with budget o Actual expenses are accurate, i.e., reasonable, allocable, allowable and consistently charged o Mischarges are corrected in a timely manner (cost transfers) o Prior approvals are obtained when required o Subrecipient expenses are monitored – (Recipient’s responsibility to monitor expenses) 22

Actual expenses should be compared to the budget to ensure: o Total funds on the grant have not been exceeded o Total funds are used appropriately o Total funds for any cost category have not been exceeded if restricted on the NoA 23

Actual expenses should be reviewed to ensure they are accurate and allowable o Reasonable (including necessary) o Allocable o Consistently applied o Conforms to any limitations or exclusions 24

A cost may be considered reasonable if the nature of the goods or services acquired or applied reflect the action that a prudent person would have taken under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision to incur the cost was made. 25

Dr. Grant needed a specialized microscope for his research supported by an NIH grant from the National Cancer Institute. When deciding on the model that would best suit his needs, he received several price quotes on various models that were all within the same general price range. However, one microscope in particular appealed to him – it met all of the necessary specifications plus many additional features. Although it was about $10,000 more than the others, he ordered it. 26

A cost is allocable to a specific grant if it is incurred solely in order to advance work under the grant and is deemed assignable, at least in part, to the grant. 27

When Dr. Grant’s microscope finally arrived, he found that equipment funds for his National Cancer Institute grant were fully expended. Since the microscope was for use on an NIH grant, he decided to charge the cost to another one of his NIH grants that was funded by the National Eye Institute. 28

Recipients must be consistent in assigning costs to cost objectives. Costs may be charged as either direct costs or F&A costs, depending on their identifiable benefit to a particular project or program. All costs must be treated consistently for all work of the organization under like circumstances, regardless of the source of funding. 29

Dr. Grant’s lab was running low on office supplies and postage stamps. Since he couldn’t wait any longer for his institution to provide the supplies, he purchased them and charged them to his NIH grant account. 30

A cost is allowable if it is reasonable, allocable and conforms to the cost principles and the sponsored agreement AND is not prohibited by law, regulation or term of award. Conformance varies by type of activity, type of recipient, and other characteristics of individual awards. 31

Dr. Grant decided to host a very important Departmental meeting at his home and serve beer and pizza hoping that everyone would attend. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss changes in NIH grants policy, which affected the work of the entire Department. Therefore, he decided to charge the cost of the beer and pizza to his grant, especially since he was providing the use of his home. 32

Used to correct: o Erroneous charges o Unreasonable charges o Unallocable charges o Inconsistently applied charges o Unallowable charges Must be well documented Must be made within 90 days from the time error was discovered 33

Other Cost Considerations 34

NIH Grants Policy Statement defines actions requiring NIH prior approval. Some prior approval actions affecting cost include the following: o Carryover of funds (if required-see Section III of NoA) o Incurrence of pre-award costs greater than 90 days o Deviation from award terms and conditions o Activities disapproved or restricted as a condition of award For a complete listing of NIH prior approval requirements see: o NIH GPS Prior Approval Requirements 35

Requests for carryover of funds should be signed by Authorized Representative. Request must be sent to GMO and include: o Detailed budget by direct cost category with F&A cost information (base and rate). If personnel costs are requested, include  a detailed breakdown of personnel costs  base salary  salary requested  effort to be spent on the project o A scientific justification for the use of funds o The reason for the unobligated balance 36

Progress Reports, financial and final reports should be submitted on time to avoid consequences. Failure to submit timely reports may adversely affect future NIH funding to: o The Grantee Institution o The Principal Investigator NIH may impose sanctions on institutions that do not meet these reporting requirements, including: o Corrective actions o Removal of expanded authorities o Delay or withholding of future awards to the project or program 37

38

Federal Financial Report (FFR)(SF-425) Expenditure Data Timely - Must adhere to submission deadlines: o Annual – (Non-SNAP Awards)  FFR submitted for each budget period no later than 90 days after the end of the calendar quarter (CQ) in which the budget period ended.  Budget period ends 1/31/2016 – FFR due 6/30/16 (90 days after the end of the CQ of 3/31/16) o Final (End of Competitive Segment) – (SNAP and Non-SNAP Awards)  FFR submitted within 120 days following the end of the project period (SNAP – Streamlined Non-competing Award Process) 39

FFRs should be submitted timely and accurately Reported expenses and program income must agree with institutional accounting records Routine Revisions to correct FFRs are not appropriate Information related to Financial Reporting: See FFR (SF425) Instructions for NIH Grantees available at 40

Projects ending on or after October 1, 2014, recipients must submit the following document within 120 calendar days of the end of the period of performance: –Final Federal Financial Report (FFR) SF-425 Expenditure Data (submitted through eRA Commons); –Final Progress Report; –Final Inventions Statement & Certification; Previously the reporting deadline was 90 days from the project period end date. See NOT-OD for more information 41

42 New HHS Closeout Requirements New HHS policy requires NIH to initiate unilateral closeout procedures – i.e., closeout without receipt of acceptable reports -- within 180 days of the period of performance end date if grantee has not submitted an acceptable report for each required final report. o See: NOT-OD

43 Recipients must ensure there are no discrepancies between final FFR expenditure data (in eRA Commons) and the FFR cash transaction data (in Payment Management System [PMS]). o The FFR module in eRA Commons will display a text reminder before submitting the Final FFR (as of late August 2015) Failure to submit an acceptable final FFR in a timely manner may result in disallowed costs or federal debt o If a grantee fails to submit a final FFR expenditure data report:  NIH must use the last recorded quarterly cash disbursement level o If the final FFR expenditure data does not match the amount reported on last FFR cash disbursement report to PMS:  NIH must use the lower amount Unilateral Closeout emphasizes the need for TIMELY and ACCURATE reporting

Centralized office accepts receipt of all non- financial, paper-based closeout documents; o Final Progress Report; o Final Invention Statement and Certification. If not using eRA Commons Closeout Module, mail closeout documents to: NIH Centralized Processing Center 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 5016, MSC 7986 Bethesda, MD (for regular or US Postal Service Express mail) Bethesda, MD (for other courier/express mail only) 44 Recipients are strongly encouraged to submit closeout documents electronically through the eRA Commons; However,

in advance Whenever you are contemplating a significant postaward change, and you are uncertain about the need for prior approval, consult in advance with: The Notice of Award (terms and conditions) Your Office for Sponsored Research/Projects NIH awarding component Grants Management Officer/Specialist 45

Diane Dean, Director, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Kathy Hancock, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer Joel Snyderman, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer