2004 2006 J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEMPLATE DESIGN © John B. Cole 1,*, Kristen L. Parker Gaddis 2, Francesco Tiezzi 2, John S. Clay 3, and Christian Maltecca.
Advertisements

Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
2006 J.B. Cole,* G.R. Wiggans, and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2006 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
J. B. Cole 1, P. D. Miller 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2 Department.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2003 Paul VanRaden, Melvin Tooker,* Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
G. R. Wiggans*, L. L. M. Thornton*,1, R. R. Neitzel †, and N. Gengler ‡ * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD †
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Fertility Trait.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Breed Composition Codes for Crossbred Dairy Cattle in the United States John B. Cole,* Melvin E. Tooker, Paul M. VanRaden, and Joel H. Megonigal, Jr. Animal.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
2006 Paul VanRaden, John Cole, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Genetic correlations between first and later parity calving ease in a sire-maternal grandsire model G. R. Wiggans*, C. P. Van Tassell, J. B. Cole, and.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
2003 Melvin Tooker, Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
Adjustment of breeding values for past and future inbreeding Paul VanRaden*, Lori Smith Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H.D. Norman* and J.L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
2002 George R. Wiggans and Curt P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2005 Paul VanRaden and Mel Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic.
2003 P.M. VanRaden* and M.E. Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Definition.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2006 GEORGE R. WIGGANS Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, Maryland ,
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
C.P. Van Tassell 1, * G.R. Wiggans 1, J.C. Philpot 1, and I. Misztal Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.
2005 P.M. VanRaden and M.E. Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Effect.
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Percent of total breedings
Measures of Fertility: Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Presentation transcript:

J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Estimation of Stillbirth (Co)variance Components and Development of a Calving Ability Index

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (2)Cole et al Introduction  A national evaluation for stillbirth (SB) for Holstein will be implemented in August  (C o)variance components were required.  A calving ability index (CA$) which includes SB and calving ease (CE) was developed.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (3)Cole et al Stillbirth  Reported on a three-point scale:  Scores of 2 and 3 are combined. 1 = calf born alive, 2 = calf born dead, 3 = calf died within 48 h of parturition.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (4)Cole et al Data  7 million SB records were available for Holstein cows calving since  Calvings with unknown MGS were eliminated for VCE.  Records with sire and MGS among the 2,600 most-frequently appearing bulls were selected.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (5)Cole et al Data (cont’d)  Herds needed ≥10 calving records with SB scores of 2 or 3 in the database to be included.  Herd-years were required to include ≥20 records and only single births were used.  Inclusion of all records for a cow was not guaranteed.  The final dataset included 2,083,979 calving records from 5,765 herds and 33,304 herd- years.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (6)Cole et al Sampling  Six datasets of ~250,000 records each were created by randomly sampling herd codes without replacement.  Datasets ranged from 239,192 to 286,794 observations, and all averaged 7% stillbirths.  A common pedigree file was used to facilitate comparisons between sire and MGS solutions.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (7)Cole et al Modeling and Estimation  A S-MGS threshold model was used.  Fixed: year-season, parity-sex, sire and MGS birth year;  Random: herd-year, sire, MGS.  Estimation was by quasi-REML and Gibbs sampling.  CBLUP90REML and THRGIBBS1.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (8)Cole et al (Co)variance Components Estimated by Quasi-REML SampleVar(Sire)Var(MGS)Cov(S-MGS) Mean

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (9)Cole et al (Co)variance components estimated by Gibbs sampling Var(Sire)Var(MGS)Cov(S-MGS) SampleMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD Mean

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (10)Cole et al Heritabilities and Correlations Heritability (%)Correlation MethodStatisticDirectMaternalMGSr D,M r D,MGS GSMin − Max Mean − REMLMin − Max Mean

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (11)Cole et al (Co)variance Components Summary  Heritability estimates were slightly lower than literature estimates.  Direct-maternal genetic correlations were much smaller than previous reports.  Mean Gibbs sampling estimates were used in the national evaluation.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (12)Cole et al Economic Assumptions  Newborn calf value  Expenses per difficult birth (CE ≥4) $450 for females $150 for males $75 labor and veterinary $100 reduced milk yield $75 reduced fertility and longevity 1.5% chance of cow death ($1800)

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (13)Cole et al Genetic Correlations Among Traits in Calving Ability Index Trait Calving EaseStillbirth SireDauSireDau Calving Ease Sire Dau Stillbirth Sire Dau1.00

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (14)Cole et al Properties of the Calving Ability Index Calving EaseStillbirth PaternalMaternalPaternalMaternal Mean8888 SD Heritability, % Economic value, $4348

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (15)Cole et al National Calving Trait Indices CntryPat CEMat CEPat SBMat SBModelMerit % DEU AM7 NLD S-MGS7 NOR03433 S-MGS3 SWE S-MGS12 CHE12 38 AM0 USA554500S-MGS4(2003) USA S-MGS6(2006)

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (16)Cole et al Calving Ability Index  CA$ has a genetic correlation of 0.85 with the combined SCE and DCE values in 2003 NM$ and 0.77 with DCE in TPI.  Calving traits will receive 6% of the total emphasis in the August 2006 revision of NM$.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (17)Cole et al Breeds Other Than Holstein  Brown Swiss economic values are −6 for SCE and −8 for DCE.  Separate SB evaluations are not available.  CE values include the correlated response in SB.  Other breeds will be assigned CA$ of 0.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (18)Cole et al Conclusions  SB evaluations can provide additional value beyond that of CE.  Mating programs should assign bulls selected for high NM$ with low and high PTA for service sire effects to heifers and to cows, respectively.

ADSA 2006: Stillbirth (co)variance components (19)Cole et al Acknowledgments  Ignacy Misztal and Shogo Tsuruta, University of Georgia  Participants in Multi-State Project S-1008  John Clay, Dairy Records Management Systems