AWAST final meeting - Brussels - 1-3 december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Climate Change Committee WG1 /EEA Waste Expert Meeting Introduction in default data and available statistics Anke Herold, ETC-ACC 8 March 2006, Copenhagen.
Advertisements

Austrian experience in waste management © iStockphoto.com/sodafish.
2013 workshop on Waste Policy Implementation May 2013 Copenhagen.
UNSD/UNEP data collection on waste DI Milla Neubauer, Qatar 19 June
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN GAZA STRIP
Biodegradable Municipal Waste Management in Europe Gerry Carty The Parliamentary Sustainable Waste Group and Environmental Services Association 28th January.
Management of municipal solid waste towards a recycling-based society in Japan Dr. Jiro ETOH Institute of Environmental Systems, Kyushu University, Japan.
Chapter 24 Solid and Hazardous Wastes
Household waste management in Flanders
Eurostat UNECE/Eurostat/EEA Workshop on Waste Statistics 4 November 2013 Geneva Karin Blumenthal, European Commission, Eurostat.
Waste management in the Hannover-Region
INTEGRATED PLANNING: THE LINKS BETWEEN URBAN WASTE MANAGEMENT, SANITATION AND ENERGY.
„Business opportunities in waste treatment” Conference -Tel Aviv
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
Dr. Michael Oberdörfer Chania 1 st – 3 rd October 2008 International Conference on Hazardous Waste Management ELEMENTS OF INTERNET BASED DATA PROCESSING.
Annual Conference 2008 Future Challenges for the Waste Management Industry Waste Framework Directive - Impact on the European Waste Management Industry.
Material Flow Analysis MFA Paul H. Brunner Vienna University of Technology Institute for Water Quality and Waste Management
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
Striclty for educational purposes Final project in M.Sc. Course for teachers, in the framework of the Caesarea –Rothschild program of the Feinberg Grad.
Life Cycle Analysis and Resource Management Dr. Forbes McDougall Procter & Gamble UK.
Waste The U.S. produces 11 billion tons of waste per year. Industrial waste –about 400 million metric tons per year in the U.S. Municipal Waste- A combination.
ISWA Statistics on Energy Supply from Waste in the EU & A brief overview of the SYSAV site Håkan Rylander Chairman - ISWA WGTT CEO SYSAV.
Solid Waste Management Lilian Giertz. Overview  What is solid waste?  How does this affect us?  Current management practices  Future management possibilities.
Miami Dade Resources Recovery Facility Operated By: Montenay Power Corporation.
1 © Hermann Koller Sustainable and efficient Packaging Waste Management - Experiences from Austria Budapest, 24 February 2009.
Waste Management Planning in Two Areas of Middle and South of Italy, based on Material and Substance Flow Analysis Umberto ARENA a,b and Fabrizio Di Gregorio.
Nirmala Menikpura Institute of Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and other impacts from recycling activities:
Anaerobic Digestion and the Path Towards Zero Waste Paul Relis Senior Vice President CR&R Incorporated July 14,2009.
Waste Chapter 19.
AWAST final meeting - Brussels December 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
Sustainable waste management by an integrated solid waste treatment plant in Friesland, the Netherlands.
WP4 AWAST Trondheim, June 2002 – ISWA / Cemagref WORKPACKAGE 4 Collection & Transport O. Tabasaran, D. Steinbach, A. Schultheis.
Environmental Evaluation of MSW Treatment in the Czech Republic (LCA Methodology) Authors: Bohumil Černík - Free Lance Consultant
16/10/20031st Padova - Fukuoka Seminar1 Current status on municipal solid waste amount and composition in Japan ○ Shinya Suzuki Department of Civil Engineering,
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
>> Focus on environment Waste management in the Netherlands Vibrant India Day Round Table meeting 22th October 2012 Nijenrode University
Renewable & Nonrenewable Resources Lesson 2.4: “Solid Waste Management”
PWMI1 Sorting, collecting, treating model study of discharged plastics from office buildings in Tokyo and environmental evaluation of scenarios in this.
LESSON 2: CHARACTERISTICS AND QUANTITY OF MSW. Goals  Determine why quantification is important  Understand the methodology used to quantify MSW  Become.
AWAST PROGRESS MEETING RENNES 28–30 NOV 2001 WP 5 BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT LQARS CEMAGREF TRATOLIXO.
TRATOLIXO Tratamento de Resíduos Sólidos, S.A..  51% Public (4 municipalities)  49% Private  Created in 1991  104 employees.
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY DENİZLİ, TURKEY National Technical Waste Management Report from Turkey
ERT 319 Industrial Waste Treatment Semester /2013 Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Workshop Trondheim, June 20th-21st 2002 WP 1 Waste Matter Aspects: Characterisation and Data Processing Roland Fehringer Vienna University of Technology.
Carbon Footprint of residual Municipal Solid Waste (rMSW) Management -
Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the U.S. for 2006 U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste November 2007.
AWAST final meeting Brussels 1-3 december 2003 UR GERE - B. MORVAN AWAST PROGRESS MEETING BRUSSELS 1-3 DECEMBER 2003 WP5 BIOLOGIC TREATMENT Cemagref of.
Multi-criteria analysis and ranking of alternative waste management schemes in Morocco Friday 19 June 2009 Prof. M. Loizidou and D. Malamis s:
12 – 13 février 2001 – Cemagref / ISWA WORKPACKAGE 3 Economic aspects AWASTWP 3.
Progress Meeting - Vienna - June 2001 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global and sustainable.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Session 6: Statistics on Waste Workshop on Environment Statistics and Accounts.
1 Sustainable Waste Management Planning through Life Cycle Approach LCA-IWM Project within EU 5th Action Programme Key-action “The City of Tomorrow and.
Assessment of separate collection in 28 capitals of the EU
Organic Resources and Biological Treatment Henrik Lystad Chair of European Compost Network ECN e.V. 29 January 2016, Brussels MWE/ EUROCITIES/ European.
Municipal waste WASTE MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY Martin Kubal
Chapter 16 Waste Generation and Waste Disposal. Paper or Plastic? Polystyrene – plastic polymer with high insulation value Aka – styrofoam Is harmful.
AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global.
The EU waste Policy – Latest News Michel SPONAR - European Commission, DG Environment.
Recycling in the IVAR - region Sibiu, november 2009 Tron Ree, Chief engineer IVAR IKS.
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF WASTE COLLECTION & MANAGEMENT DATA IN AN AREA ARISING FROM WASTE EMERGENCY Maria Laura Mastellone, Ester Romeo Second University.
Conceptual Landfill Design and Energy Recovery Potential for Greater Dammam Area AbdulRahman Al-Blooshi Umar I. Ahmed Wasi Ul.
Municipal waste in the Lahti region (Päijät-Hämeen Jätehuolto Ltd)
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
Brussels Circular Economy Transition ( )
Secondary Wastes Methods of data compilation and the effects on the comparability of results THE CONTRACTOR IS ACTING UNDER A FRAMEWORK CONTRACT CONCLUDED.
Waste Management in Sweden
Effects of the point of measurement on the comparability of the data on waste treatment Methods of data compilation and the effects on the comparability.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
Presentation transcript:

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Aid in the management and European comparison of Municipal Solid WASte Treatment methods for a global and sustainable approach Orleans Case Study Fifth Framework Program

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Steps 1 & 2: basic experimental data Data collection  From municipalities  From private companies manager of treatment plant Data treatment  Identification of inconsistencies (definition of streams, definition of waste, dates,…)  Identification of uncoherence (in - out  0)  Collection of missing data  Awast default values  Statistical bases Results: flowsheet and streams data = 8 meetings

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Orleans flowsheet inhabitants 22 municipalities Meziere 20 km Incineration MBT Landfill Composting Sorting Chaingy 10 km St Peravy 45 km Chevilly 15 km Lorris 55 km Change 220 km 10 km

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Data collected used for simulator build-up Treatment plants Collection:  Flowrate of waste collected  Calibration of collection process based on first months Sorting: products sold & total input Landfill: operator annual report 2002 Transport: kms Incineration: AGGLO annual report 2002 Mechanical and biological treatment plant: most data extracted from Tratolixo simulator (database) and models adjusted with annual report 2002 data Other composting plants  Database biowaste plants

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Steps 3 & 4: simulator build-up Results: the data available allows to make a complete simulator of the actual situation in 2002

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Global Orléans 2002 Compost 9456 t/y Scrap 45 t/y Bottom ash t/y Scrap 2689 t/y Composting Plants t/y Incineration Plant t/y Landfill t/y Direct Recycling t/y Composite pack 143 t/y Metals 2149 t/y Paper-cardboard t/y Plastics 1166 t/y 1791 t/y Residues 2914 t/y Org waste 3908 Biowaste Mixed waste 945 Biol Fraction 4181 Heavy 3429 t/y Bulky waste 4268 t/y Sorting Plants t/y Wood 4889 t/y Bulky waste Hazardous 281 Oil-fat 107 Ferrous Metal 3172 Glass 6458 Mixed waste Therm. Fract Oil-fat 163 Bulky waste 1520 Mixed second Recycl. fract Paper 748 COLLECTION Compost residues 6446 t/y Ash - Filter cake 1695 t/y Road waste 9589 Bulky waste Mixed waste Org. waste 2987

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Step 5: simulation of scenarios Scenarios  Scenario 0: Assessment of the waste management system in 2003  Scenario 1: New collection of biowaste and composting

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - approach Calculation of waste generated in 2003 Modelling of the new collection system implemented in 2003 Calculation of collected flows, collection performance, energy and costs Simulation of waste management system in 2003

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - Waste generation in 2003 Available 2003 data:  Data for the first half of the year (January-June 2003) for some waste streams  Source: Municipality The need:  Data for the entire year! Study of the waste generation in 2002 Determination of the first six months ratio compared to the entire year for 2002 Estimation of the waste generation for the whole year 2003 based on:  The 2002 ratio applied on the 2003 January-June data  Assumptions for unknown streams

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - Waste generated Waste generated per inhabitants: 346 Kg per inhab. per year Others waste generated:

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - Waste collected

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - Simulation of collection in 2003 Collection of mixed waste Separate waste collection - Curbside 5 areas for curbside collection

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - Simulation of collection in 2003 Social aspect:  216 employees for collection  24 others Energy aspect: MJ = liters of diesel Environment: kms driven with Cost aspect: 44 euros per inhabitants

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Global Orléans 2003 without biowaste collection 11% Compost 9724 t/y Scrap 45 t/y Bottom ash t/y Scrap 2825 t/y Composting Plants t/y Incineration Plant t/y Landfill t/y Direct Recycling t/y Composite pack 159 t/y Metals 2121 t/y Paper-cardboard t/y Plastics 832 t/y 1781 t/y Residues 3737 t/y Org waste 3909 Biowaste Mixed waste 930 Biol Fraction 4130 Heavy 3384 t/y Bulky waste 4208 t/y Sorting Plants t/y Wood 4889 t/y Bulky waste Hazardous 296 Oil-fat 113 Ferr. Metal 3339 Glass 7325 Mixed waste Therm. Fract Oil-fat 125 Bulky waste 1450 Mixed second Recycl. fract Paper 735 COLLECTION Compost residues 6663 t/y Ash - Filter cake 1819 t/y Road waste 9590 Bulky waste Mixed waste Org. waste % 38% 10% 30% 100%

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Global Orléans 2003 without biowaste collection - Cost Compost Scrap Bottom ash Scrap Composting Plants 744,880 € Incineration Plant 3,096,445 € Landfill 6,231,765 € Direct Recycling Composite pack Metals Paper-cardboard Plastics Residues 322,797 € Heavy Bulky waste Sorting Plants 3,757,391 € Wood € 3, 823,979 € 2,542,473 € COLLECTION 12,024,716 € Compost residues Ash - Filter cake 169,963 € Additional cost 4,176,670 € 100% 8% 21% 32% 3% 1% 47% 15% 12% 3% 24% 35%

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Global Orléans 2003 without biowaste collection - Energy Compost Scrap Bottom ash Scrap Composting Plants Incineration Plant - 182,341,152 MJ + 31,977,300 MJ Landfill - 28,980,880 MJ Direct Recycling Composite pack Metals Paper-cardboard Plastics Residues Collection 1,521,906 MJ Transport 77,629 MJ Heavy Bulky waste Sorting Plants Wood Collection 2,737,423 MJ Collection 6,257,852 MJ Transport 240,966 MJ Collection 4,899,864 MJ Transport 216,979 MJ COLLECTION TRANSPORT 15,880,325 MJ 1,166,339 MJ Compost residues Ash - Filter cake Collection 463,226 MJ Transport 625,165 MJ Transport 2,874,772 MJ Transport 1,328,191 MJ Transport 109,585 MJ

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - simulation results Multi-criteria assessment:  Matter balance  Cost balance  Energy balance  Emissions to environment

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 0 - simulation results Matter balance: tons  Imported waste: 32%  Total waste from Orleans:  634 kg/inhab.year Cost balance:  € = 101 €/ton Energy balance:  Consumption = MJ  209 MJ/ton  Production = MJ  827 MJ/ton % Matter recovery: 25.2%  Compost: 3.8%  + 7.8% bottom ashes % Waste in landfill: 33.7%

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Compost 82 t/y Scrap 0 t/y Bottom ash 208 t/y Scrap 0 t/y Composting Plants 1636 t/y Incineration Plant t/y Landfill t/y Direct Recycling 35 t/y Composite pack 0 t/y Metals 0 t/y Paper-cardboard t/y Plastics 0 t/y 213 t/y Residues 1455 t/y Org waste 53 Biowaste 318 Mixed waste 233 Biol Fraction 1032 Heavy 699 t/y Bulky waste 0 t/y Sorting Plants t/y Wood 0 t/y Bulky waste 0 Hazardous 0 Oil-fat 0 Ferrous Metal 33.5 Glass 1.5 Mixed waste 5123 Therm. Fract Oil-fat 0 Bulky waste 0 Mixed second 2130 Recycl. fract Paper 665 COLLECTION Compost residues 133 t/y Ash - Filter cake 0 t/y Road waste 3356 Bulky waste 0 Mixed waste 7792 Org. waste 0 Global Orléans 2003 without biowaste collection - Paper 0.1% 25.9% 49.3% 3.1% 21.6%

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Compost 2.1 t/y Scrap t/y Bottom ash 29.4 t/y Scrap 1 t/y Composting Plants 4.2 t/y Incineration Plant 33.9 t/y Disposal 36.4 t/y Direct Recycling 11.4 t/y Composite pack 0.1 t/y Metals 3.5 t/y Paper-cardboard 0.9 t/y Plastics 0.3 t/y 0.6 t/y Residues 1.4 t/y Org waste 0.9 Biowaste 1.7 Mixed waste 0.3 Biol Fraction 1.3 Heavy 1.2 t/y Bulky waste 2.8 t/y Sorting Plants 9.8 t/y Wood 0.2 t/y Bulky waste 7.5 Hazardous 0.3 Oil-fat 0 Ferrous Metal 0.7 Glass 2.9 Mixed waste 8 Therm. Fract 23.3 Oil-fat 0 Bulky waste 0.6 Mixed second 6.6 Recycl. fract 2.5 Paper 0.1 COLLECTION Compost residues 0.8 t/y Ash - Filter cake 3.5 t/y Road waste 2.8 Bulky waste 7.6 Mixed waste 21.8 Org. waste % 10.3% 35.4% 4.4% 38.0% Global Orléans 2003 without biowaste collection - Pb 100%

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 1 New collection of biowaste Closing of MBT plant (composting of mixed waste) Redirecting mixed waste to incineration Composting of biowaste in Meziere plant

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 1 - collection New collection of biowaste Hypothesis  60 kg/inhab.year  Frequency: once per week  One crew per day Results  For biowaste collection  11 vehicles  48 employees for collection  6 employees: manager and secretary  Performance: 0,8 tons per loader per working hour  21€ per ton for containers purchasing  110 € per tons (vehicles and labour) 7.6 € per inhabitants for the biowaste collection Additive cost (scenario 1/scenario 0) = 11.2€ per inhabitants

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Global Orléans 2003 with biowaste collection Compost t/y Scrap 0 t/y Bottom ash t/y Scrap 2758 t/y Composting Plants t/y Incineration Plant t/y Landfill t/y Direct Recycling t/y Composite pack 159 t/y Metals 2121 t/y Paper-cardboard t/y Plastics 832 t/y 1781 t/y Residues 3737 t/y Org waste 3909 Biowaste Mixed waste 0 Biol Fraction 1 Heavy 0.5 t/y Bulky waste 4208 t/y Sorting Plants t/y Wood 4889 t/y Bulky waste Hazardous 296 Oil-fat 113 Ferrous Metal 3339 Glass 7325 Mixed waste Therm. Fract Oil-fat 125 Bulky waste 1450 Mixed second Recycl. fract Paper 736 COLLECTION Compost residues t/y Ash - Filter cake 1619 t/y Road waste 9590 Bulky waste Mixed waste Org. waste % 12% 14% 30% 34% 11%

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Compost Scrap Bottom ash Scrap Global Orléans 2003 with biowaste collection - Cost Composting Plants 1,043,671 € Incineration Plant 2,919,685 € Landfill 6,231,765 € Direct Recycling Composite pack Metals Paper-cardboard Plastics Residues 2,267,186 € Heavy Bulky waste Sorting Plants 3,757,391 € Wood 988,835 € 4, 027,781 € 2,534,756 € COLLECTION 15,081,289 € Compost residues Ash - Filter cake 169,963 € Additional cost 5,092,768 €

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Compost Scrap Bottom ash Scrap Global Orléans 2003 with biowaste collection - Energy Composting Plants Incineration Plant - 170,813,170 MJ + 27,463,170 MJ Disposal - 28,980,880 MJ Direct Recycling Composite pack Metals Paper-cardboard Plastics Residues Collection 4,790,556 MJ Transport 62,611 MJ Heavy Bulky waste Sorting Plants Wood Collection 2,737,423 MJ Collection 6,007,914 MJ Transport 250,829 MJ Collection 4,899,864 MJ Transport 216,978 MJ COLLECTION TRANSPORT 18,898,993 MJ 1,155,583 MJ Compost residues Ash - Filter cake Collection 463,226 MJ Transport 625,165 MJ Transport 2,874,772 MJ Transport 1,252,906 MJ Transport 217,756 MJ

AWAST final meeting - Brussels december 2003 Scenario 1 compared to Scenario 0 Waste treatment:  Thermal treatment: -4.4% of waste input  -12% of waste thermally treated  Biological treatment: +4.4% of waste input  +46% of waste biologically treated Matter balance:  % Matter recovery: 29.1% (+3.8%)  % Residues: 35.9% (-2.2%) Cost balance: €  +12%  € per inhabitants Energy balance:  MJ consummed (-3%)  MJ produced (-5%) Social aspect: +54 employees for the new collection