Lisa K. Baxter, Kathie L. Dionisio, Janet Burke, and Halûk Özkaynak National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA Modeling as an exposure estimation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Division Of Early Warning And Assessment MODULE 11: ASSESSING THE FUTURE.
Advertisements

DG-JRC, IES – EEA-EPA Meeting Sept.04 Research Needs for Implementation and Inter-comparisons for Environment & Health Indicators Andreas N. Skouloudis.
Heather Simon, Adam Reff, Benjamin Wells, Neil Frank Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, US EPA Ozone Trends Across the United States over a.
Halûk Özkaynak US EPA, Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC Presented at the CMAS Special Symposium on Air.
Perspectives in Designing and Operating a Regional Ammonia Monitoring Network Gary Lear USEPA Clean Air Markets Division.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
What is a sample? Epidemiology matters: a new introduction to methodological foundations Chapter 4.
Markus Amann The RAINS model: Modelling of health impacts of PM and ozone.
Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Integrated Assessment of Particulate Matter Exposure and Health Impacts Sonia Yeh.
Need for High Quality Environmental Data for Informing Public Health Actions Vickie Boothe Environmental Engineer Environmental Health Tracking Branch.
Monitoring and Pollutant Load Estimation. Load = the mass or weight of pollutant that passes a cross-section of the river in a specific amount of time.
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Halûk Özkaynak US EPA, Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC Presented at the CMAS Special Symposium on Air.
Personal Monitoring for Air Pollution Exposure Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Atmospheric Measurements Manager South Coast Air Quality Management District CAPCOA.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory CMAS Special Session on Human Health October 13, 2010 Combining Models and Observations.
Time series study on air pollution and mortality in Indian cities R Uma, Kaplana Balakrishnan, Rajesh kumar.
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Air Quality Health Risk Assessment – Methodological Issues and Needs Presented to SAMSI September 19, 2007 Research Triangle Park, NC Anne E. Smith, Ph.D.
Task Force on Health Recent results - Particulate matter Michal Krzyzanowski TFH Chair Head, Bonn Office European Centre for Environment and Health WHO.
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH INFORMATION UNDER THE EU E&H ACTION PLAN Work on ambient air APHEIS Network Meeting Ispra 6-7 June 2006 Scott.
Environmental Exposure Surveillance in a Combat Theatre Coleen Baird, MD, MPH US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine I have no disclosures.
U.S. EPA DISCLAIMER EPA strongly cautions that these study results should not be used to draw conclusions about local exposure concentrations or risk.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Long-term exposure to air pollution and asthma hospitalisations in older adults: a cohort study Zorana Jovanovic Andersen ERS Conflict of interest.
1 Environment and health information Content Scott Brackett.
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
CMAS special session Oct 13, 2010 Air pollution exposure estimation: 1.what’s been done? 2.what’s wrong with that? 3.what can be done? 4.how and what to.
PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM TYRE AND BRAKE WEAR OPEN QUESTIONS Sustainable Transport Unit Institute for Energy and Transport Joint Research Centre 8 January.
Modeling as an exposure estimation approach for use in epidemiologic studies Part 2: Example applications KL Dionisio 1, LK Baxter 1, V Isakov 1, SE Sarnat.
ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH INFORMATION E&H Consultative Forum 19 October 2005 Process Content 1: Ambient Air Quality.
PM Media Messages. #1 Should we talk about air quality, or PM and ozone? Use “air quality” rather than specific pollutants as much as possible Public.
Indoor Air Quality Update June 27, Indoor air quality reflects outdoor and indoor air pollution sources Improving outdoor air quality reduces indoor.
OBJECTIVES (i) An update of the national analysis a) to assess the confounding and modifying effect of community and neighbourhood level ecological.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Managing Smoke and Emissions. A new system for managing smoke and emissions in Victoria that will provide for coordinated: Investment Service delivery.
GOING FROM 12-KM TO 250-M RESOLUTION Josephine Bates 1, Audrey Flak 2, Howard Chang 2, Heather Holmes 3, David Lavoue 1, Mitchel Klein 2, Matthew Strickland.
Exposure Assessment for Health Effect Studies: Insights from Air Pollution Epidemiology Lianne Sheppard University of Washington Special thanks to Sun-Young.
IRAS en het ILM Gerard Hoek Health effects of NO 2 : evidence from recent epidemiological studies Gerard Hoek Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences.
Comparison of NAAQS RIA and Risk Assessments - Bryan Hubbell.
Selecting Research Design   The overall plan made by the researcher to get answers to research questions and for testing the hypothesis.   It is the.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Results from the 7 th joint WHO UN- ECE TF on Health meeting Jürgen Schneider Project Manger WHO ECEH, Bonn,
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
1 Part09: Applications of Multi- level Models to Spatial Epidemiology Francesca Dominici & Scott L Zeger.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
Konstantina Dimakopoulou, Evangelia Samoli, Rob Beelen, Massimo Stafoggia, Zorana Jovanovic Andersen,Barbara Hoffmann etc. Air Pollution and Nonmalignant.
Innovative Research for a Sustainable Future (+1) l Overview and Evaluation of Alternative Air.
Modeling as an exposure estimation approach for use in epidemiologic studies Part 2: Example applications KL Dionisio 1, LK Baxter 1, V Isakov 1, SE Sarnat.
JEREMY SARNAT, STEFANIE SARNAT, W. DANA FLANDERS, HOWARD CHANG, JAMES MULHOLLAND, LISA BAXTER, VLAD ISAKOV, HALÛK ÖZKAYNAK Annual Conference of ISES/ISEE/ISIAQ.
Exposure Prediction and Measurement Error in Air Pollution and Health Studies Lianne Sheppard Adam A. Szpiro, Sun-Young Kim University of Washington CMAS.
The Near-road Exposures and Effects of Urban air pollutant Study (NEXUS) investigating whether children with asthma living near major roadways in Detroit,
By Cesar E. Lebron. Bronx County has some of the highest rates of asthma in the United States. Rates of death from asthma in the Bronx are about three.
Background The Near-road EXposures to Urban air pollutants Study (NEXUS) investigated whether children with asthma living in close proximity to major roadways.
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Predicting PM2.5 Concentrations that Result from Compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) James T. Kelly, Adam Reff, and Brett Gantt.
RD Evaluation and Comparison OF Methods to Construct Air Quality Fields for Exposure Assessment haofei yu, jim mulholland, howard chang, ran huang,
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Which method is most appropriate for assessing exposure?
How Can TEMPO Contribute to Air Pollution Health Effects Research
Development of TracMyAir Smartphone App for Predicting Exposures to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone Michael Breen,1 Yadong Xu,1 Catherine Seppanen,2 Sarav Arunachalam,2.
Near-Roadway Health Effects
George Washington University
Epidemiology MPH 531 Analytic Epidemiology Case control studies
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Critical Appraisal วิจารณญาณ
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
- Welcome to CMAS - Air Quality Science: An Essential Ingredient for Air Pollution Health Studies Session Dan Costa, Sc.D. DABT National Program Director.
Presentation transcript:

Lisa K. Baxter, Kathie L. Dionisio, Janet Burke, and Halûk Özkaynak National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA Modeling as an exposure estimation approach for use in epidemiologic studies: Guidance in choosing the appropriate model Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory 10/30/2013

Background Many epidemiological studies use measurements from central-site monitors to estimate exposures. Measurements from central-site monitors may lack sufficient spatial and temporal resolution. More sophisticated methods may provide better estimates of exposure. –Produce less biased and more precise health effect estimates 1

Background Examples: –Employing modeling techniques to increase the spatial resolution of exposure estimates Fill in counties with no measurements to get more statistical power in epidemiological studies Better capture “hot spots” or roadway impacts –Use models to increase temporal resolution by filling in for periods of time when central site measurements are not available PM speciation data only measured 1-in-3 or 1-in-6 days –Exposure models which incorporate exposure factors such as time-location-activity budgets and penetration of ambient pollutants to the indoor environment 2

Tiers of exposure metrics relevant to air pollution epidemiology studies 3

Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Exposure Metric When would exposure estimates generated from more complex methods be an improvement over those generated from central site monitoring data? Answer depends on: –Epidemiological study design –Pollutant(s) –Health outcome 4

Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Exposure Metric: Epidemiological Study Design Time-Series Study 5 Number of deaths at the county level Need to characterize the temporal variability Is this adequately captured by the central-site monitor?

Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Exposure Metric: Epidemiological Study Design Time-Series 6 Measurements not taken daily Characterizing temporal pattern more difficult because of missing days Missing days may make it difficult to perform epidemiological analysis

Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Exposure Metric: Epidemiological Study Design Source: Cohort Study Know more specifics on the study participants Concerned with both temporal and spatial variability Central-site monitor may not be sufficient 7

Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Exposure Metric: Pollutant 8

Factors Influencing the Selection of the Optimal Exposure Metric: Health Outcome CANCER ASTHMA ATTACK Exposure window: years Exposure window: days Some metrics may do a better job of estimating long-term exposures while others may be better estimating short-term exposures 9

Take Home Message Exposure metric – There is not a one-size fits all approach – What is available for the study? – Will a modeling approach potentially improve exposure estimates in turn producing less biased health effects results? Need to look at the combination of epidemiological study design, pollutant, and outcome to understand whether a modeling approach would be worth the additional effort/complexity Modelers should be involved at the beginning to advise and decide on the approach 10