1 Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? 報 告 人:張純瑋 Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Direct Instruction Also called explicit instruction Widely applicable strategy that can be used to teach both concepts and skills Uses teacher explanation.
Advertisements

Focus on Instructional Support
 Plan, develop, and distribute course calendars, rules, and materials  Document enrollment, participation, and communications  Inform learners of progress.
Chapter 4 Key Concepts.
CRAMLAP Reflective Practice Steve Walsh. Learning Outcomes To provide participants with an overview of the main principles of RP; To consider the advantages.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Teachstone.com © 2013 Teachstone Training, LLC. All rights reserved. CLASS-Based Professional Development Strategies: Working with Teachers of Toddlers.
Planning Math Lessons That Reach All Learners. Facilitated by: Cynthia Santosuosso.
1 Language Learners Strategies: Issues in Classification Andrew D. Cohen University of Minnesota.
Setting the Stage for Learning. First step is shaping the environment in which learning of movement skills is optimized First step is shaping the environment.
Emotional Intelligence and Agents – Survey and Possible Applications Mirjana Ivanovic, Milos Radovanovic, Zoran Budimac, Dejan Mitrovic, Vladimir Kurbalija,
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Welcome Module 9 Working With Adults. Description Working effectively as a member of an adult team This means: Communicating effectively Helping others.
Drama Methods & Education Douglas Gosse, Drama in Education At the University of Winnipeg  The University of Winnipeg has an excellent Education.
Last time, we asked you to... Bring an ‘live’ issue or concern for which you would like some coaching! Could also be an issue sensitively presented in.
Thinking about assessment…
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission partner logo INCOM – VET WP 3 – Examples of learning materials… FIRST PROPOSAL OF.
Exploring the Normal Distribution Rick Luttrell James Price South Iredell High School.
Lecture 3 DESIGN AND PROCEDURE Prepared by: Ms. Mahaya Ahmad.
1 How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor : Ming-Puu Chen Date : 11/10/2008.
Guidelines for Developing Lesson Plans EX
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
© 2014 Texas Education Agency / The University of Texas System Explicit Instruction for Diverse Learners Foundations Adapted with permission from Anita.
QUALITATIVE MODELING IN EDUCATION Bert Bredweg and Ken Forbus Yeşim İmamoğlu.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
ELearning Design After your analysis, prepare for delivery.
COMPUTER ASSISTED / AIDED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL) By: Sugeili Liliana Chan Santos.
© 2007 Tom Beckman Features:  Are autonomous software entities that act as a user’s assistant to perform discrete tasks, simplifying or completely automating.
Five Design Principles For Experiments On The Effects Of Animated Pedagogical Agents 報 告 人:張純瑋 Choi, S., & Clark, R. E. (2005). Five design principles.
Defining general and subject specific language competences for mainstream education The Norwegian Framework for Basic Skills Jorunn Berntzen, Strasbourg,
Multimedia Learning in an Interactive Self-Explaining Environment: What Works in the Design of Agent-Based Microworlds? 報 告 人:張純瑋 Mayer, R. E., Dow, G.
1 Politeness Effect: Pedagogical Agents and Learning Gains 報 告 人:張純瑋 Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Mayer, R.E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., and Collins, H. (2005).
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities. Year One Professional Development – Day Two Welcome, introduction and review of Day
A computer environment for beginners’ learning of sorting algorithms: Design and pilot evaluation Kordaki, M., Miatidis, M. & Kapsampelis, G. (2008). A.
Effects of an Animated Pedagogical Agent with Instructional Strategies in Mutlimedia Learning Yung, H. I. (2009). Effects of an animated pedagogical agent.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Supporting learners with math anxiety: The impact of pedagogical agent emotional and motivational support 報 告 人:張純瑋 Baylor, A. L., Shen, E., & Warren,
Cognitive Science Overview Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory.
1 Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Agent 報 告 人:張純瑋 Kim, M. & Ryu, J. (2003). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of pedagogical agent.
Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments Feng, Chia-Yen Rickel, J., and Johnson, W. L.
Compare & Contrast Gov Online Learning Center vs. Soar Training Expert for Virtual Environments (STEVE) Crissy Clegg & Greta Ballard.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Key Competencies.
A tour of my progress this year. Personal Introduction "Development is the responsibility of every citizen.". - Late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan.
What is IT? IT represents the technical perspective and includes telecommunications, computers and automatic technologies. More formally, it is the enabling.
All or Nothing: Levels of Sociability of a Pedagogical Software Agent and its Impact on Student Perceptions and Learning. 報 告 人:張純瑋 Dirkin, K., Mishra,
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
Engaging junior college students in computer-mediated lessons using scaffolding strategies 指導教授: Chen, Ming-Puu 報 告 者: Juan, Hui-Lan 報告時間: Lim,
1 Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition – Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds Instructor: Chen, Ming-Puu Presenter:
Instructional Strategies Cindy Cregar EDD/544. What should I consider when choosing an instructional strategy?
Unit 5 Seminar Cognitive Development Developmental Theories (Piaget and Vygotsky)
Universal Design For Learning Success for All Students Ronda J Layman NCDPI Educational Consultant.
CHAPTER 5 Transfer of Training.
Nan Ding Adaptive Instructional System.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Chapter 13 Instructing Students.
Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: 12/18/2007
Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? 指導教授:陳明溥 學 生 :王麗君.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Oleh: Beni Setiawan, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan
Scaffolding Children’s Learning Differentiate Levels of Support
Module 6: Planning Rich Instruction with OER
APPROVED CLINICAL INSTRUCTOR WORKSHOP
Let’s Talk About ICT LIteracy
56: Smart Toy Based Learning
Effective communication
New technologies have made it possible to:
Presentation transcript:

1 Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? 報 告 人:張純瑋 Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents: an opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11 (3),

2 Introduction Open learning environments with a high level of learner control have been argued to foster the acquisition of complex problem solving skills (Jonassen, 1997). students do not optimally use these support tools (e.g., Clarebout, et al., 2000; Land, 2000). Pedagogical agents are animated characters designed to operate in educational settings for supporting learning. provide non-verbal feedback through means of facial expressions and gestures (Johnson, et al., 2000). In this article possibilities of animated pedagogical to enhance the use of support tools are explored.

3 Support typology for pedagogical agents (1) Object of support support can be directed to different aspects involved in solving complex problems (see also Hill & Hannafin, 2001) : content of the task, problem solving steps, metacognitive strategies and handling the technology. Learner control with respect to support Pedagogical agents can control the support and take the initiative to provide it or students themselves may take this decision and request support. Adaptability of support Not only the amount or quantity of support can be adapted to the needs of the learner, but also the object of support. (Depending on specific needs of students)

4 Support typology for pedagogical agents (2) Delivery modalities This pedagogical agent can entail different delivery modalities, which might affect the effect of pedagogical agents on learning (Moreno, Mayer, & Lester, 2000). Reeves and Nass (1996) indicated that students view the interaction with a computer (pedagogical agent) as a social interaction, in which three features are essential namely, (a) image, (b) voice, and (c) personalized language. verbal language (text or speech) to communicate with the learner ; nonverbal language (head nods and gestures) to provide feedback.

5 Support typology for pedagogical agents (4) Timing of support A pedagogical agent can deliver support either up front, or just-in-time during the execution of the task, or delayed support by giving for example information about the process after task completion. Support style supplanting: agent take over the tasks and perform them for the learners. scaffolding: agent perform those parts of the task that the learners are not yet able to perform independently. demonstrating: agent show how a task if performed after which they observe how the learner performs the task.

6 Support typology for pedagogical agents (4) modeling: agent show how a task is performed while revealing and explaining their reasoning process. coaching: agent provide hints and feedback, activate learners when they perform the task; observe the learners and provide guidance when they experience difficulties testing: agent tests the learners’ knowledge about certain aspects of the task in order to guide the learning process. These roles can be characterized by (a combination of) four analytical modalities executing, showing, explaining and questioning.

7

8 Description of the different pedagogical agents (1) Most agents are designed to act as a coach. The agents provide hints and feedback to the learners, while learners are solving the problem. Sometimes demonstration of parts of the task. Explaining is most frequently used as a modality, complemented by showing. Pedagogical agents provide support on the level of the content and solving the problem. Two agents also provide support on the level of working in the environment. None of the agents provides meta-cognitive support or support learners in their monitoring and reflection processes.

9 Description of the different pedagogical agents (2) Except for two agents, all agents can adapt the amount of support they provide. Adele, Steve, Herman, and Cosmo can also adapt the object of support. All agents are technologically able to communicate both verbally and non-verbally. Most agents use speech. Some use both speech and text. Dialogue as communication is mostly used. Looking at who has control over providing support, it can be seen that in most case this is the agent, although some agents allow this control to be taken over by the learners. Just-in-time support is used frequently.

10 Discussion and conclusion This typology provides a common framework to describe and discuss pedagogical agents. most pedagogical agents act as coaches and provide support on the level of the content and problem solving. most of the pedagogical agents are capable of adapting quantity and object of support to learners’ action. Pedagogical agents operating in open learning environments and delivering support on a metacognitive level research on pedagogical agent should focus on the influence of these agents on the learning process, considering research findings with respect to agent characteristics (Lester et al., 1997; Moreno et al., 2000) and learner variables (Shaw et al., 1999).

11 End Thank you