Prince William County Potomac River Commuter Ferry Study & Route Proving Exercise A Summary of Project Purpose and Results Presented by: Charles “Cody”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
Interim Review of the MBTA Late-night Service Pilot Program February 5, 2015.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Capital Bikeshare National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Jim Sebastian District Department of Transportation.
Think. Learn. Succeed. Getting College Students on Board George Mason University Office of Parking & Transportation VTA 2008 Annual Conference May 20,
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Dulles Metro Extension Phase I: Tyson’s Corner Martene Bryan Luis Serna Matt Zarit.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Miao(Mia) Gao, Travel Demand Modeler, HDR Engineering Santanu Roy, Transportation Planning Manager, HDR Engineering Ridership Forecasting for Central Corridor.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
1 Regional Priority Bus Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County December 17, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the Transportation Planning.
Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
WeGoMil - Real-Time Rideshare August 8, 2012 WeGoMil Real-Time Ridesharing Funded by FHWA & VDOT grants 6 month pilot Exclusively for military personnel.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Structure of Presentation Federal Requirement Methodology WMATA Expenditures and Core Capacity Constraint Draft Revenues and Expenditures for 2015 – 2040.
1 Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee January 8, 2009 CLRP Aspirations Scenario Preliminary.
Developing A Short Range Transit Plan AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2014 John Andoh, Transit Director, Yuma County Intergovernmental Public Transportation.
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
1 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REVIEW Balancing Transit Service with Travel Demand and Available Resources.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 19:Cost Models for Public Transportation.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
JOSHUA CRAIN CE 458: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JUNE 4, 2009 Costs in Small Public Transit Systems in Oregon.
Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.
Metropolitan Washington Region 2002 Vanpool Survey TPB Technical Committee Meeting April 4, 2002 Technical Committee Item # 8.
PRTC Challenges, Opportunities, and Experience with a Regional Fare Collection System.
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document 2010 Arran - 12 July 2010 Graham Laidlaw.
IPART’s review of CityRail’s regulatory framework – stakeholder roundtable 31 July 2008.
1 Palm Tran Transit Survey Coordination Meeting November 18 th, 2008.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Transportation Michal Hyrc, Eric Tidquist, William Koury & Ryan Henderson.
Vanpool Incentive Program National Transit Database Reporting GWRideConnect September 21, 2009.
Walk Statistics.  The question has been asked: “Is Lomas a better BRT corridor than Central?”  The purpose of this analysis is to compare the two corridors.
Prince William County – Specialized Logistics & Supply Chain Briefing Presented By: Prince William County Department of Economic Development
Commuter Rail Studies Summary of MAG High Capacity Transit Study June 2003 Commuter Rail Summary.
Prince William County Federal Agencies & Corporate Facilities Presentation.
Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Guaranteed ride home 3.Parking.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger Rail Alliance February 24, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SNAPSHOT
FCommerce A Perspective on Water Transportation For the NCR
National Defense University Fort Lesley J McNair, Washington D.C.
GMT NEXT GEN TRANSIT PLAN FARE ANALYSIS FINDINGS
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Office of Research and Analysis
April 23, 2018.
Charles “Cody” Smith, PE
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS
Purpose: Develop Tool to Estimate Demand for Rural Intercity Bus Services
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Prince William County Potomac River Commuter Ferry Study & Route Proving Exercise A Summary of Project Purpose and Results Presented by: Charles “Cody” Smith, PE Greenhorne & O’Mara September 23, 2010

1.Obtain actual run times between ferry stops in VA, MD & DC 2.Obtain vessel wake measurements during runs 3.Obtain noise measurements at various points along the Potomac River 4.Observe operations to determine feasibility of docking locations 5.Determine likely capital and operating costs for service 6.Determine likely fares and ridership using VDOT 2000 feasibility study model 7.Apply data to previous 2000 ferry study and provide conclusions & recommendations Study and Route Proving Exercise Goals

General Particulars: Length Overall.…………98 feet Beam……………………31 feet Draft…………………….5.5 feet Speed……………………30 knots Passenger Capacity…… people RPE Vessel

Anticipated Run Times and Distances Time and Distance from potential docking locations Quantico Harbor Station Prince William Marina Occoquan Harbour Marina Belmont Bay Indian Head Fort Belvoir Marshall Hall National Harbor Old Town Alexandria Reagan National Airport Washington D.C. (Southwest Waterfront) Washington D.C. (Anacostia Waterfront) Time (Minutes) Quantico Harbor Station Prince William Marina Occoquan Harbour Marina Belmont Bay Indian Head Fort Belvoir Marshall Hall National Harbor Old Town Alexandria Reagan National Airport Washington D.C. (SW Waterfront) Washington D.C. (Anacostia Waterfront) Distance (Miles) Anticipated Travel Times are Result of: Use of more suitable vessel Waiver of no-wake zones

Capital Cost Woodbridge to Washington D.C. (Anacostia Waterfront) Marshall Hall, MD to Fort Belvoir, VA / Marshall Hall, MD to Washington D.C. (Anacostia Waterfront) Transportation Capital Cost Estimate $19,300,000$12,300,000 Service Point Capital Cost Estimate $2,500,000 to $10,500,000$3,400,000 to $8,600,000 Total$21,800,000 to $29,800,000$15,700,000 to $20,900,000 Estimated Capital Improvement Costs

Based on other system fare box recoveries, study team assumed a fare box recovery of 40% would be necessary to consider a ferry service viable Based on estimated operational costs of $3,885,500/year, minimum annual fare collection would be $1,554,200 Average round-trip ferry service fare was set by study team to roughly equal average round-trip VRE service fare. Average round-trip fare for ferry service was set at $11.00/passenger In order to meet minimum annual fare collection requirements, ferry service would be required to provide 280,000 person-trips annually Fare Box Recoveries and Required Ridership

Statistic****PRTC Commuter Bus Service VRE Commuter Train Service Proposed Ferry Service Annual Operating Cost$12,408,491**$46,192,429*$3,885,000 Annual Fare Revenue$5,641,332*$19,685,561*$1,905,750 Fare Box Recovery Percentage45.5%**42.6%49.1% Annual Operating Subsidy$6,767,159**$26,506,860$1,979,250 Unlinked Annual Passenger Trips1,738,556**3,386,974*337,838*** Operating Subsidy/Passenger Trip$3.89**$7.83$5.86 *As published in the National Transit Database ** As provided by PRTC *** 95% of ferry riders assumed to take ferry both to and from work. Remaining 5% assumed to travel only one way on ferry and take alternate transportation home ****Annual Operating Costs, Annual Fare Revenue and Unlinked Annual Passenger Trips for PRTC and VRE are system-wide and not specifically for the Woodbridge to S.E. Washington D.C. trip pairing Comparison of Ferry Service to PRTC & VRE

1)The commuter ferry service described in this report will require public financial support and be operated in a manner similar to that of PRTC or VRE. 2)Based on the data and analysis contained herein, a public commuter ferry operation has the potential to offer a commuting option to the public that in terms of travel time and service between the area of Occoquan, VA and SE Washington D.C. would be competitive with those commuter services offered by PRTC and VRE. 3)Public commuter ferry service between points in Maryland and Virginia appears to also have real promise given the significant amount of travel time saved as a result of ferry usage 4)No significant noise or wave impacts associated with ferry service are anticipated given the operating parameters specified herein. Study and Route Proving Exercise Conclusions

1)The process of obtaining speed restriction waivers along the Potomac River should be initiated. 2)A more rigorous market analysis should be undertaken to analyze prospective demand by market in order to account for all the significant variables bearing on usage and estimated ridership diversions by mode. 3)Continued coordination with local governments and military installations that front the Potomac River should be pursued. While commuter ferry service from Prince William County to Washington D.C. appears viable, there is great potential for a ferry operation to serve cross-river commuters between Southern MD and VA. 4)Initial investigations into an authority to oversee ferry operations should also be discussed with those counties and cities that might have an interest in commuter ferry service. Study and RPE Recommendations