Metadata projects in Sweden and the Nordic countries C-G Hjelm, Statistics Sweden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eurostat T HE E UROPEAN PROCESS OF ENHANCING ACCESS TO E UROSTAT DATA A LEKSANDRA B UJNOWSKA E UROSTAT.
Advertisements

Data without Boundaries project A short overview of outputs & future perspectives Roxane Silberman DwB coordinator ESS workshop, Luxembourg September,
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS FOR ENERGY SECURITY
Implementation of the CoP in SLOVENIA Cooperation with data users Genovefa RUŽIĆ Deputy Director-General.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
Tryggve project developing services for sensitive biomedical data: Call for Nordic use cases NeiC 2015 Conference Workshop on sensitive data Antti Pursula.
Eurostat M ODES OF ACCESS TO EU MICRODATA IN THE NEW LEGAL FRAMEWORK A LEKSANDRA BUJNOWSKA E UROSTAT S TATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE E UROPEAN U NION.
3 rd Data without Boundaries Training Course EU‐SILC longitudinal component Paris, February 2014.
Joint UNECE/Eurostat work session on statistical data confidentiality October 2013 Ottawa, Canada Improvement of access to European microdata Outcome.
Integrated European Census Microdata 5 th DwB Training, Barcelona, January 2015.
Decentralised and Remote Access to Confidential Data in the ESS (ESSnet DARA) Overview and State of the Art Maurice Brandt Destatis FIRST EUROPEAN DATA.
Session 4. Panel session: How useful is the notion of “circle of trust” concept ? A vision for the future. Maurice Brandt Destatis Germany 2ND EUROPEAN.
GSIM Stakeholder Interview Feedback HLG-BAS Secretariat January 2012.
1 1 General preconditions Training workshop on ¨censuses using administrative registers in Geneva 21 May 2012 Harald Utne, Statistics Norway
Audit of Public Procurement
Eurostat European profiling: a crucial tool in the current European developments on statistical units D. FRANCOZ Eurostat J OINT UNECE/OECD/E UROSTAT MEETING.
Laura Kestilä, PhD Senior Researcher The Finnish Youth Research Network (NTV) and National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) Juha Makkonen, MA Senior.
1 1 Development of a competence framework in Statistics Norway HRMT Geneva Jan Byfuglien Beate Johnsen Division for human resources, Statistics.
Feasibility Study.
Development of metadata in the National Statistical Institute of Spain Work Session on Statistical Metadata Genève, 6-8 May-2013 Ana Isabel Sánchez-Luengo.
Accreditation practices at the Hungarian Central Statistical Office Zoltán Vereczkei Methodology Department Hungarian Central Statistical Office
A researcher accreditation model for access to Official micro-data Paul Jackson ONS and DwB Tarragona, 28/10/2011 A DwB Project.
Deliverable 2.6: Selective Editing Hannah Finselbach 1 and Orietta Luzi 2 1 ONS, UK 2 ISTAT, Italy.
Safe Centre Network Need for Safe Centre to enrich European Research Maurice Brandt (Destatis) and David Schiller (IAB) Work session on statistical data.
1 1 Improving interoperability in Statistics Some considerations on the impact of SDMX 59th Plenary of the CES Geneva, 14 June 2011 Rune Gløersen IT Director.
Revising priorities in the statistical programme Management Group on Statistical Cooperation * 24 & 25 March 2011 * Carina Fransen.
Lisbone, March ALBANIAN METADATA AlbMeta Prepared by INSTAT Working Group.
International Initiatives International Household Survey Network and Accelerated Data Program Olivier Dupriez World Bank / IHSN.
26 August 2011 Future of access to EU confidential data for scientific purposes Jean-Marc Museux Eurostat – 58th ISI conference,
J OINT ACCESS TO NORDIC MICRODATA C HARLOTTE N IELSEN & I VAN T HAULOW R ESEARCH S ERVICES S TATISTICS D ENMARK.
© Federal Statistical Office, Research Data Centre, Maurice Brandt Folie 1 ESSnet Projects “Decentralised Access to EU microdata” Maurice Brandt Research.
Metadata management in National Statistical Institutes and researcher access: an example Zoltán Vereczkei Hungarian Central Statistical Office Methodology.
Harvesting Social Knowledge from Folksonomies Harris Wu, Mohammad Zubair, Kurt Maly, Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies, Proceedings of the.
PROJECT OF STATISTICAL COOPERATION II R. Muiños, I. Valdivia, INDEC – Argentina R. Vallejos, M. Soares, S. Albieri, Z. Bianchini, IBGE, Brazil F. Segui,
Nordic platform for sensitive biomedical data The Tryggve project Antti Pursula
Sponsorship on Standardisation Background and overview Daniel Defays Forwardlooking Feedback Workshop, The Hague, 30/31 May 2013.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
1 Statistical business registers as a prerequisite for integrated economic statistics. By Olav Ljones Deputy Director General Statistics Norway
ESS Vision 2020 Strategic Risk Management Risk Mitigation Involvement of the DIME-ITDG DIME-ITDG Steering Group – item 07 Luxembourg,
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
GSIM in practice in Norway Jenny Linnerud – Ørnulf Risnes – Arofan Gregory -
UNSD Recent international developments in Energy Statistics.
Sum-up of common issues from pilots Different types of exercises when joining statutory reporting & INSPIRE implementation: 1-To explain ‘INSPIRE fitting.
Challenges in the implementation of SIMSTAT Introduction Nordic meeting 16 September 2014 Jennie Bergman.
The Competitiveness and Innovation framework Programme (CIP) ICT Policy Support Programme (PSP) Call 6 Grant EUROPEAN LOCATION FRAMEWORK Copyright.
1 1 Improving interoperability in Statistics Some considerations on the impact of SDMX MSIS 2011 Luxembourg 23 – 25 May 2011 Rune Gløersen IT Director.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
14-Sept-11 The EGR version 2: an improved way of sharing information on multinational enterprise groups.
Joint UNECE/Eurostat work session on statistical data confidentiality October 2015 Helsinki, Finland Circle of trust Maurice Brandt DESTATIS.
Are the Standard Documentations really Quality Reports? European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Helsinki, 3-6 May 2010 © STATISTIK AUSTRIA.
44222: Information Systems Development
Framework Regulation Integrating Business Statistics (FRIBS)
Researchers’ Usage of Microdata The example of Statistics Finland Advanced presentation – Some additional details Consultation Mission on Promoting the.
Statistical process model Workshop in Ukraine October 2015 Karin Blix Quality coordinator
1 Recent developments in quality related matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker,
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE TurkStat Streamlining the Statistical Production in TurkStat High Level Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central.
Privacy and ‘Big Data’: the European perspective Human Subjects’ Protections in the Digital Age: IRB, Privacy and Big Data Peter Elias, University of Warwick.
E-Infrastructure for Sensitive biomedical data NeiC 2015 Conference Espoo, Finland Antti Pursula.
Investment Intentions Survey 2016
Investment Intentions Survey 2016
The ePhyto Solution A Guide to implement the ePhyto System
Legal, political and methodological issues in confidentiality in the ESS Maria João Santos, Jean-Marc Museux Eurostat.
ESS Resource Directors Group meeting 27 April 2017 Elwira Navarre
WORKSHOP ON THE DATA COLLECTION OF OCCUPATIONAL DATA Luxembourg, 28 November 2008 Occupation as a core variable in social surveys Sylvain Jouhette
Anja Burghardt, Institute for Employment Research (IAB)
Workshop on Decentralised Access to European Microdata
Åsa Olsson, Head Information and publishing Communication Department
BETTER AND PROPER ACCESS TO PACIFIC MICRODATA
ITDG meeting of of October 2011
Point 6. Eurostat plans for Time Use Survey data processing and dissemination Working Group on Time Use Surveys 10 April 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Metadata projects in Sweden and the Nordic countries C-G Hjelm, Statistics Sweden

Time to Data (TTD) can be calculated One national hub in Sweden 1. Information 3. Access (MONA) 2. Metadataportal TIMETIME System solution

Time-line and processes Evaluate and establish standards Modelling of register Demands on user interface Developing Managing and governance >

The need of a standardized framework for modeling of metadata for registers The project needs to work with a established standard that can relate to the models and standards that the register holder have chosen GSIM is chosen in order to modeling the metadata in a standardized way

Nordic Pilot for harmonization of metadata from the bureaus of statistics C-G Hjelm

All Nordic statistical institutions give national researchers access to de-identified microdata Huge potential for cross-border Nordic register research but still rather rare

Similar legal framework in the Nordic countries - Possible to give researchers access to microdata - Allows transfer of de-identified data from one NSI to another under certain conditions Similar authority structure in the Nordic countries: - high security levels - data is de-idenitfied before delivery - amount of data needed is assessed - risk assessment (”harm test”) Remote access systems in DK, SE, FIN, GL* - safe behind fire walls etc - researchers need to sign security agreements to access data - output is logged and controlled * Norway on its way Similarities

Difficulties for the researchers Lack of micro-metadata constitute the major barrier to high quality Nordic register-based research To get an overview of - which data that exists - permissions needed - how to apply for data The data and variables are not systematically and comparably documented in the Nordic countries (quality varies) Data for research has not been prioritised (instead produced for statistics)

- Proposal for new model of cooperation (see report) - Should be tested for 2-3 years Recommendations on data access: 1. Access to Nordic microdata is given through the existing remote access systems 2. Data are extracted and de-identified by each NSI separately. Data will never leave the safe domains of the NSIs. 3. Harmonisation of the application process for data access – a common Nordic application form Outcome of feasibility study

Recommendations on data security: 4. Common Nordic security agreement is signed by all researchers as well as each relevant NSI 5. Development of an security agreement between the relevant NSI on data transfer 6. Structures for communication on security between NSIs in place 7. Data output is logged and controlled by the data hosting country Outcome of feasibility study

Production of information material 8. on how to apply for and get access to microdata Recommendations on financing 9. similar as today Recommendations on Metadata 10. Development of adequate common Nordic metadata describing the precise content of registers and variables including changes over time series Outcome of feasibility study

Nordic pilot for metadata harmonisation Development of Nordic metadata framework to increase access to metadata in cross-Nordic research projects The common framework should consist of: -The same variables/datasets in the different countries -The same language – English -The same common technical terms that have the same meaning in all countries -Presentation of metadata should follow a harmonised, predetermined setup (will increase usability of metadata reports for the researchers) The project

Objective is to ease potential use of cross-Nordic microdata in research by: 1.Mapping of common subject areas 2.Identifying subject areas demand from researchers 3.Describe metadata in a common framework 4.Publish metadata for microdata The project

Developing the framework -establishment of working group -mapping common subject areas -mapping of current practises -assess needs of researcher community -examine other initiatives -Nordic metadata report -development of manual for the metadata framework -pilot project to test two specific datasets (one register- based and one survey-based) Implementation of the framework Registering metadata in accordance with the framework Future work and final report Outline

Pilot project 2 years 1.6 MEUROS Project in collaboration with researchers and metadata experts Outline

Thank you for your attention! C-G Hjelm