Bryce Glaser Dan Rawding (WDFW)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist.
Advertisements

Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
ESCAPEMENT GOALS? WE DON’T NEED NO STINKING ‘SCAPEMENT GOALS! Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
Covariation in Productivity of Mid-Columbia Steelhead Populations S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 600 N.W. Fariss Road Gresham, OR
Dan Rawding, Thomas Buehrens, and Charlie Cochran.
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Reduced Recruitment Performance in Natural Populations of Anadromous Salmonids Associated with Hatchery- reared Fish Pacific Coast Steelhead Meeting –
Precision of Redd Based Escapement Estimates for Steelhead
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
Coho Reintroduction in the Upper Columbia: Using Adaptive Management to Achieve Success Fisheries Resource Management Yakama Nation.
Development of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan: A Brief History Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Administrator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
A Climate Angle on Uncertainty in Salmon Recovery Scenarios Nate Mantua Ph D Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans University of.
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH OF KALAMA RIVER STEELHEAD WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE KALAMA RESEARCH TEAM PAT HULETT CAMERON SHARPE CHRIS WAGEMANN.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)
Directed Acyclic Graphs: A tool to incorporate uncertainty in steelhead redd-based escapement estimates Danny Warren Dan Rawding March 14 th, 2012.
Review of relative fitness (RF) of hatchery- and natural-origin salmon and steelhead Barry Berejikian NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
Adult Entry to Summer Juvenile Rearing of Klamath River Coho Randolph Ericksen Steven Cramer Ian Courter Kathryn Arendt Funded by.
Life History of Western Washington Winter Steelhead, a 30 Year Perspective Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Lewis River Fish Passage Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (draft)
Photo by John McMillan Spawning habitat Winter rearing Summer rearing Smolt Carrying Capacity.
Scott M. Blankenship Contributing Authors Gabriel M. Temple and Cherril Bowman Yakima Basin Science and Management Conference 2009.
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
Management & Recovery Implications Of Wild/Hatchery Steelhead Interactions Within A Large, Complex Watershed Research Partners: WDFW Skagit River System.
Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
February 5, 2003 Integrating Fisheries Management Into Comprehensive Recovery Planning Jeff Koenings, Randy Kinley Mike Grayum, Curt Kraemer, Kit Rawson.
Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
Linking freshwater habitat to salmonid productivity Watershed Program 1 1. NW Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Blvd. East, Seattle, WA
Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning Program Update Presented by: Bill Bosch, Yakama Fisheries Acknowledgements: D. Fast, M. Johnston, T. Newsome Prosser Hatchery.
Oregon Steelhead Status, Recovery Planning and Monitoring Kevin Goodson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting.
Genetic impacts of hatchery stocks on Steelhead in Lower Cowlitz tributaries Anne Marshall, Maureen Small, and Julie Henning Washington Department of Fish.
Washington State Steelhead Stock Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING AMILEE WILSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 2004.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
A Bayesian Approach to Combine Multiple Sources of Escapement Data to Estimate Wind River Steelhead Abundance Dan Rawding and Charlie Cochran.
The influence of variable marine survival on fishery management objectives for wild steelhead Dan Rawding & Charlie Cochran.
Comparison of Winter Steelhead Trap Estimates in Small Basins to Other Escapement Methods and the Representativeness of ODFW Life-Cycle Monitoring Sites.
Supplementation using steelhead fry: performance, interactions with natural steelhead, & effect of enriched hatchery environments Christopher P. Tatara.
1 Independent Scientific Advisory Board June 12, 2003 A Review of Salmon and Steelhead Supplementation.
Recruitment in Wild Smolt and Adult Steelhead Trout: the 30-year Experience at the Keogh River. Bruce R. Ward B.C. Ministry of Environment, U.B.C. And.
Joe Bumgarner Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Wild Winter Steelhead Run Timing How It Has Been Reshaped by Fisheries Management in Washington.
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Background Historic data sets are really only available for Sandy and Clackamas. Current harvest management uses these populations as drivers, but we know.
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Potential Effects of Mark-Selective Fisheries on Central Valley Salmon Brian Pyper and Steve Cramer Cramer Fish Sciences.
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
Timing and distribution of naturally produced coho salmon in the lower Columbia River Good morning, Today I’m going to give you an overview of the joint.
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
The Reintroduction of Late-Run Winter Steelhead into the Upper North Fork Lewis River, Washington, using F1 Wild Broodstock Hatchery Adults.
Status of Washington Steelhead 2006
Steelhead Viability: Where are we now and where are we going?
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 1 November 2018
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 2 November 2018
On Recruitment of Steelhead in Mid Columbia Subbasins
Presentation transcript:

Bryce Glaser Dan Rawding (WDFW) An Approach for Developing Biological Reference Points for Steelhead Populations in the Lower Columbia Region Bryce Glaser Dan Rawding (WDFW)

Biological Reference Points (BRP) ≠ Escapement Goals BRP are quantitative Spawners at Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) Spawners needed to seed habitat Based on current data not on future expectations Escapement goals are from policy-technical interaction and ideally are based on fish management philosophy should include quantitative analysis risk to persistence fishery stability or maximization of catch uncertainty

Overview Background/Available Data Approach & Analysis Initial Results/ Model Performance Development of BRP Escapement Goals for LCR Steelhead Summary/Implications Questions

Lower Columbia Region (LCR) Four summer and fourteen winter steelhead populations in Washington Iteroparous with repeat spawner rate of 5% to 15% Hatchery releases beginning in 1950’s with Mitchell Act program Different populations have different levels of hatchery influence and broodstock types

Hatcheries Hatchery program Chambers Cr winters (Puget Sound origin) Skamania summers (Washougal origin) Local broodstocks (Cowlitz, Kalama, Abernathy) Relative Reproductive Success (RRS) to smolt stage Chambers (6%) measured in Forks Creek, Skamania (30-35%)Kalama & Clackamas River, Wild Broodstock (>80% -adult stage Hood & Kalama)

Harvest Mainstem Columbia River - Mixed Stock Fisheries commercial fisheries- managed for < 2% incidental catch Stock composition of steelhead catch in both commercial and Treaty fisheries (above BON) is unknown Sport fisheries have been operated under wild steelhead release since 1984

Mark/Re-sight via Snorkeling Adult Trapping Redd Surveys Juvenile Trapping

Smolt Trapping with concurrent Adult Escapement data

LCR Steelhead Challenges Short data series and high measurement error for redd counts (coefficient of variation ~ 30%) Standard salmon spawner to adult recruit relationships do not account for iteroparity Ocean survival has varied over 10-fold in the LCR introducing much variation in adult recruits Different proportions of hatchery spawners with limited measurements of RRS

Approach Standardized spawners into wild equivalents using appropriate RRS estimates to discount hatchery spawners to the smolt stage Standardized SR data into fish density (fish per square kilometer of drainage area) Developed spawner to smolt relationships to reduce environmental variation caused by 10-fold changes in marine survival and lack of mainstem Columbia River catch estimates by stock Autocorrelation is not an issue using spawner and smolts Hierarchical modeling (meta-analysis) using different spawner-smolt-relationships (SRR)

Hierarchical Modeling Borrow strength from other curves - from those with more data Estimates shrink towards the mean, which yields improved precision of individual BRP Compromise between individual and fully pooled estimates Reduces overfitting of individual curves Allows individual curves to be fit in cases, where there are few data points, outliers, etc.

Common set of steelhead spawner to smolt relationships Spawner to smolt functions come from a random sample of S/R distributions that can be hierarchically modeled.

Analysis Barrowman, N.J., R.A. Meyers, R. Hilborn, D.G. Kehler, and C.A. Field. The variability among populations of coho salmon in maximum reproductive rate and depensation. Ecological Applications 2003:784-793. (used km available) Smolts and spawners per sq. km of drainage area, with spawners adjusted for RRS data Bayesian hierarchical analysis using WinBUGS with Lognomal error Vague priors similar to Barrowman so the results are data driven not prior driven Checked convergence with Brooks-Gelman-Ruben (BGR) statistics.

Smolts per Square Kilometer Hierarchical BH R HS Wild Equivalent Spawners per Square Kilometer

Results Deviance Information Criteria (DIC) is a Bayesian analog for Akiake Information Criteria (AIC) Using DIC for model selection BH and HS models were preferred over Ricker model. These results are consistent with other analysis for yearling anadromous salmonids, that dome shape models (Ricker) do not fit this life history type well.

Model Performance Yellow Line- drainage area only Fitting a curve with no S/R data Pink Line – Individual estimate

Basin Model w/95%CI Superimposed over PNW Population outside LCR Smol ts per Sq km Wild Equivalent Spawners per Sq. KM

Biological Reference Points B = spawners needed to produce 50% of asymptotic smolt estimate S* = inflection point in curve, spawners needed to seed habitat MSP = spawners needed to produce maximum smolt production K = smolt capacity estimate Productivity = slope of curve at origin; est. of population resiliency.

Smolt Capacity = 43 to 55 smolts per KM^2 Seeding Levels = 0.4 to 1.7 Wild Equiv.Spawners per KM^2 Smolt Capacity = 43 to 55 smolts per KM^2 Productivity = 66 to 137 smolts per KM^2

Historic Escapement Goals Best professional opinion US v. Oregon TAC recommended 1000 steelhead spawners for the Wind River. Application of Boldt Case (Puget Sound & Washington Coast) Potential Parr Production model to LCR Lucas and Nawa (1985) recommended 1400 steelhead spawners for the Wind River Hierarchical Modeling Approach Using BRP - ~500 spawners for the Wind River (using HS model)

Summary & Implications BRP are quantitative useful in developing Escapement Goals. Hierarchical Model Approach can provide estimates of BRP even for populations with little or no SR data. Individual curves are improved when data is available. Basin model sensitive to RRS and HOS estimates, and when spawners use a low fraction of drainage area (Mill-LCR, NF Scappoose) Basin model potentially useful outside LCR except very small tributaries (OR coast) Next Steps – model improvement by incorporating steelhead distribution and/or GIS attributes

Summary & Implications In LCR populations – it appears we have been achieving seeding levels or higher in most years. In LCR - 12/95 (13%) spawner points < S* Reassessment of current Escapement Goals for LCR steelhead populations is likely warranted. If LCR steelhead recovery requires improvement in adult abundance: increase habitat capacity because we are seeding habitat. and increase wild stock productivity by decreasing pHOS

Acknowledgements Data Multiple funding sources NOAA through Mitchell Act, Bonneville Power Administration WDFW Data Asotin – Mark Schuck (WDFW) OR Coast – Eric Suring (ODFW) Snow Ck – Randy Cooper (WDFW) KRT - Coweeman and Kalama WSPE - Mill, Abernathy, Germany, NF Toutle Region 5 Fish Mgt - Grays, Cedar, EF Lewis, Wind, & Trout Many techs and bios who collected 95 spawner and smolt points since 1977.

Questions???