Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 5th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISU Atmospheric Component Update – Part I Justin Glisan Iowa State University.
Advertisements

CanSIPS development plans CanSISE Workshop - 30 Oct 2013 Bill Merryfield CCCma.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 6th.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 7th.
Coupled versus uncoupled radiation and microphysicsMicrophysics droplet concentration 5. Conclusions The sea ice state simulated in RASM is sensitive to.
Atmospheric Reanalyses Update Mike Bosilovich. ReanalysisHoriz.ResDatesVintageStatus NCEP/NCAR R1T present1995ongoing NCEP-DOE R2T present2001ongoing.
John J. Cassano, Matthew Higgins, Alice DuVivier University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski, William Gutowski, Dennis Lettenmaier, Andrew Roberts.
Outline Further Reading: Detailed Notes Posted on Class Web Sites Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GE 101 – Spring 2007 Boston University Myneni L29:
S4D WorkshopParis, France Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio A High-Resolution David H. Bromwich.
Regional Arctic Climate System Model (RACM) – Project Overview Participants: Wieslaw Maslowski(PI)- Naval Postgraduate School John Cassano (co-PI)- University.
THORPEX-Pacific Workshop Kauai, Hawaii Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
The role of spatial and temporal variability of Pan-arctic river discharge and surface hydrologic processes on climate Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department.
Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea Weather Research and Forecasting WRF Mesoscale Meteorology Model Mid-Term Project Meeting Funded by Bureau of Ocean Energy.
The Effects of Grid Nudging on Polar WRF Forecasts in Antarctica Daniel F. Steinhoff 1 and David H. Bromwich 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research.
Larry D. Hinzman University of Alaska Fairbanks Amanda Lynch University of Colorado Kenji Yoshikawa University of Alaska Fairbanks William Gutowski Iowa.
Modeling framework for estimation of regional CO2 fluxes using concentration measurements from a ring of towers Modeling framework for estimation of regional.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
Towards Advanced Understanding and Predictive Capability of Climate Change in the Arctic using a High-Resolution Regional Arctic Climate System Model (RAMC)
WRF-VIC: The Flux Coupling Approach L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory BioEarth Project Kickoff Meeting April 11-12, 2011 Pullman, WA.
WRF SLP Bias Issues Update from Santa Cruz meeting Matt Higgins John Cassano May 18,
Climate 2010 Gary Strand High Performance Network Planning Workshop.
The Large-Scale Energy Budget of the Arctic Mark C. Serreze National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
6-month Plan: May-Oct 2013 RASM 5 th Workshop Seattle 04/13 red == high priority tasks.
ISU Atmospheric Component Update – Part I 3 rd RASM Workshop 2012 Fall Justin Glisan Iowa State University.
Tropical Domain Results Downscaling Ability of the NCEP Regional Spectral Model v.97: The Big Brother Experiment Conclusions: Motivation: The Big Brother.
Operational sub-regional Long-Range Forecasting Unit at RA VI Regional Climate Center – South-East European Virtual Climate Change Center Vladimir Djurdjevic.
Collaborative Research: Towards Advanced Understanding and Predictive Capability of Climate Change in the Arctic using a High- Resolution Regional Arctic.
Regional Arctic Climate System Model (RACM) – Project Overview Participants: Wieslaw Maslowski (PI)- Naval Postgraduate School John Cassano (co-PI)- University.
1.Introduction Prediction of sea-ice is not only important for shipping but also for weather as it can have a significant climatic impact. Sea-ice predictions.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 3rd.
Validation of US Navy Polar Ice Prediction (PIPS) Model using Cryosat Data Kim Partington 1, Towanda Street 2, Mike Van Woert 2, Ruth Preller 3 and Pam.
Synthesis of Modes of Ocean-Ice-Atmosphere Covariability in the Arctic System from Multivariate Century-Scale Observations Martin Miles Environmental Systems.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
CLIMARES WP 110 Climate model scenarios for the Arctic region for the next decades Current state: Klaus Dethloff, AWI WP Leader: Erich Roeckner, MPI Planing.
A Portable Regional Weather and Climate Downscaling System Using GEOS-5, LIS-6, WRF, and the NASA Workflow Tool Eric M. Kemp 1,2 and W. M. Putman 1, J.
Towards development of a Regional Arctic Climate System Model --- Coupling WRF with the Variable Infiltration Capacity land model via a flux coupler Chunmei.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The Hadley Centre The forcing of sea ice characteristics by the NAO in HadGEM1 UK Sea Ice Workshop, 9 September 2005 Chris.
Coordinated CESM/CanESM Large Ensembles for the CanSISE Community
Soil Moisture datasets for seasonal and decadal forecast Stefano Materia, Andrea Borrelli
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 4th.
Advances in Lake-Effect Process Prediction within NOAA’s Climate Forecast System for North America: A Project Progress Report Jiming Jin and Shaobo Zhang.
(Coupled) Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project (C)ARCMIP K. Dethloff, A. Rinke, W. Dorn Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine.
Perspectives in Computational Earth System Science an oceanographer’s view Aike Beckmann Division of Geophysics, Department of Physical Sciences
Intercomparison of Polar Cloud Climatology: APP-x, ERA-40, Ground-based Observations Xuanji Wang Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5 Yi-Chih Huang.
Institut für Küstenforschung I f K Numerical experimentation with regional atmospheric models Hans von Storch and Ralf Weisse 8IMSC, Lüneburg, 15. March.
Collaborative Research: Towards Advanced Understanding and Predictive Capability of Climate Change in the Arctic using a High- Resolution Regional Arctic.
Publications An intro RASM paper (BAMS/EGU/J. Clim) – Model description (components, coupler, challenges resolved/outstanding, community effort) – Best/typical.
Breakout sessions 13:15-14:45Five Breakout sessions 1.Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2.Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3.Terrestrial/Permafrost –
Arctic climate simulations by coupled models - an overview - Annette Rinke and Klaus Dethloff Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research.
Bias score versus precipitation threshold [mm/d] Model - observed precipitation [mm/d] Bias score at selected thresholds Pan-Arctic WRF Background Introduction.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONFERENCE, Borki Molo, Poland, 7-10 February 2007 Extreme Climatic and atmospheric.
IASC Workshop Potsdamr, Germany Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA The Arctic System Reanalysis.
Towards development of a Regional Arctic Climate System Model ---
LONG RANGE FORECAST SW MONSOON
Weather Forecast Verification Using
High-resolution air-sea modeling of the Philippines winter monsoon
Regional and Global Ramifications of Boundary Current Upwelling
ASM Project Update: Atmospheric Modeling
seasonal prediction for Myanmar
Sub-seasonal prediction at ECMWF
Post Processing.
Hydrology and Water Management Applications of GCIP Research
Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences
Polar WRF (Ohio State Modifications)
Surface-Atmosphere Interactions
MINUTES five past ten past quarter past 11 1 twenty past
Vladimir S. Platonov, Mikhail I. Varentsov
Ca2+ infusion rates during all three protocol versions.
Presentation transcript:

Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 5th DOE/RACM Meeting: Santa Cruz, CA 1Justin Glisan, Iowa State University

Outline Update since San Diego Extended SHEBA Year run – Full and embedded domains – Time series/Plots Production runs – Experimental Design – Replication (spatial and temporal) – Ensembles Future Work/PhD Research 2Justin Glisan, Iowa State University

Update since San Diego Production WRF runs by WRF 3.1 – Incorporates various parameterizations designed for the Arctic (Mark Seefeldt’s SD presentation) – Extended SHEBA year run (five years) Full domain analysis Sub-domain analysis for large watersheds and central Arctic Ocean Elements of experimental design dealing with statistical significance and replication

Pan-Arctic WRF Setup Using physics parameterizations tested at the University of Colorado 4Justin Glisan, Iowa State University

PAW WRF (ARW dynamic core) version 3.1 Pan-Arctic Domain Colorado Physics Parameterizations Forcing data sets: – NCEP/DOE R2 – NSIDC Bootstrap Fractional Sea Ice Justin Glisan, Iowa State University5

6

PAW Model Runs Extended SHEBA Run th DOE/RACM Meeting: San Diego, CA 7Justin Glisan, Iowa State University

Present Day Climatology In an effort to study the past 30 years, three distinct five-year periods selected Literature and statistical review shows an ensemble containing from four to six members reasonable – Seven year spin-up (two years for soil, etc.) – Final five years used – Members created 24 hours apart Experimental design…

Extended SHEBA Year Test Case September 1997 – September 2001 (+) – Initial run extended into February 1999 – Will have ensembles Results compared against: – NCEP/DOE R2 – ECMWF ERA40 – SHEBA Observations* 4th DOE/RACM Meeting: San Diego, CA Justin Glisan, Iowa State University9