Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Calculator Walkthrough Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. April 8, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Advertisements

Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop March 14-15, 2006.
A Comparison of Measure Avoided Cost Calculations using Utility TOU Load Shapes and DEER Hourly Measure Savings 14 March 2006.
E3 Calculator Revisions 2013 v1c4 Brian Horii June 22, 2012.
1 Illustrative Results Based on E3’s Avoided Cost Model Thursday, April 19, 2012 Marginal Generation Costs.
1 CPUC DEER, Cost-Effectiveness Calculators and Avoided Costs Peter Lai, Energy Division Jeff Hirsch, JJ Hirsch & Associates June 24, 2009.
California Energy Commission Customer-side Distributed Generation Impacts CED 2013 Preliminary Demand Analysis Working Group DG PUP June.
Electrical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran M. Poursistani N. Hajilu G. B. Gharehpetian M. Shafiei CHP Systems.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Energy and Environmental Economics 1 Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Economic Update Brian Horii and Snuller Price Energy & Environmental Economics,
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
Presentation Overview
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Knowledge to Shape Your Future Electric / Gas / Water Information collection, analysis and application EE Potential Summary Study Overview CALMAC Meeting.
1 Quality Control Review of E3 Calculator Inputs Comparison to DEER Database Brian Horii Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. November 16, 2006.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Vermont Electric Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Draft Findings April 10, 2006.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
1 EE Evaluation Report on 2009 Bridge Funding Period California Public Utilities Commission November 22, 2010 Energy Division Energy Efficiency Evaluation.
Impact of 8760 Analysis on Value of Energy Council & RTF use 48 time segments per Year – 12 Months – Four Hourly Time Bins each month Considering move.
Avoided Costs of Generation
A Quick Guide Total Cost of Ownership calculator tool (ver. 1.1)
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
California SONGS\OTC Plants Assumptions TEPPC – Data Work Group Call Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
Nuclear Fissionary, April 2, 2010 Why are prices declining?  Generally, solar panels make up about 50% of the cost of a system (40% for thin film),
Embedded Generation Workshop SALGA Head Office 18 April 2013 THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF EFFICIENCY MEASURES AND DISTRIBUTED GENERATION ON MUNICIPAL ELECTRICITY.
1 CPUC Avoided Cost Workshop Introduction and Overview.
© 2012 Portland General Electric. All rights reserved. PGE Schedules 7 & 32 Portfolio Time-of-Use Portfolio Options Committee Meeting February 18, 2014.
1 Issues summary Pre workshop comments. 2 Scope of the 2006 Update 1. Common definition of peak 2. Avoided cost and E3 Calculator updates for peak and.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 4, 2005.
Bill Savings Public Workshop Costs and Bill Saving in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs for 2003 to 2005 April 21, :00 AM to Noon 77 Beale.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Arthur Rosenfeld, California Energy Commission Gregory Rosenquist, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory C. Keith Rice, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ARI.
ProCost Version 3 Christian Douglass, Ryan Firestone, Charlie Grist
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Northwest Power and Conservation CouncilProCost Version 2.2 RTF July 2007.
RTF Update Kevin Smit Kelly Tarp ProCost Version 3.0 Modifications A registered professional engineering corporation with offices in the Seattle,
NEEA DEI Study Data Analysis Plan October 28, 2005 RLW Analytics, Inc. Roger L. Wright, Chairman, and Principal Consultant.
Distribution Efficiency Initiative: Calculator Review April 29, 2008 Regional Technical Forum.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop March 14-15, 2006.
1 Proposed Input Assumptions to RTF Cost-Effectiveness Determinations February 2, 2010.
Analysis of Demand Response Modeling in GridView Andy Satchwell and Sarah Smith Modeling Work Group December 21, 2015 The work described in this presentation.
The Impact of Retail Rate Structure on the Economics of Commercial Photovoltaic Systems in California Ryan Wiser, Andrew Mills, Galen Barbose & William.
1 Modeling Distributed Generation Adoption using Electric Rate Feedback Loops USAEE Austin, TX – November 2012 Mark Chew, Matt Heling, Colin Kerrigan,
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
1 W-E Calculator 2.0 Workshop Experience Implementing the W-E Calculator Jill Kjellsson Program Manager – Industrial, Ag and Water April 6,
Forecasting Power System Hourly Load and Emissions for Air Quality Modeling ERTAC-EGU Model Development Group – Webinar & Outreach slides Robert.
Local Government Partnerships Impact Evaluation Research Plan Itron Study Manager: John Cavalli CPUC Study Manager: Jeremy Battis July 20,
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Hourly vs TOU Avoided Costs
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Mike Jaske California Energy Commission
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Update Workshop
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation Calculator Walkthrough Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. April 8, 2005

Purpose of the Calculators Provide a tool that allows users to input program information and select from pre-determined end- use shapes to calculate program cost effectiveness.  Preprocess hourly data to a more manageable form Allow easy calculation of measure benefits by climate zone  Recognizes both the shape and cost differences by climate zone.

Calculator Files CEE Tool Res 1g.xls  Tool for residential measures  Inputs, outputs and methods detailed in Tech Memo Res 1g.doc CEE Tool Com 1d.xls  Tool for non-residential measures  Inputs, outputs and methods detailed in Tech Memo Com 1d.doc Climate zones are described in CLIMATE ZONES-T24.Doc Tools are DRAFT  Provided now to aid in implementation planning  Numbers do not fully reflect the MPR gas forecast  Tools are currently set-up for PG&E’s service territory only  Numbers do not necessarily reflect the final PG&E load shapes  Files are large due to PG&E’s requirement for 300 simultaneous measures in one file. Reducing this to 100 would reduce file size by over 50%.

Calculator Tabs Input: All user inputs describing program and measures Output: Program overall impacts, and by sector and quarter Output-Measure: Impacts for each measure Calculations: The calculations CostG: Avoided costs for Gas CostE: Pre-processed data for electric PolicyManual: Inputs for NTG Ratio and measure life. Users will only interact with these three tabs The remaining tabs are used for the calculations, and may be locked or hidden in the final version

Residential Tool Input Tab  User Inputs are in unshaded cells.  Generic user inputs in the top 7 rows. Note that some incentives and rebates are input while others are calculated.  Measure info begins in row 11  Dropdown lists used where possible Climate Zone, Measure EU shape, Measure type, Program type Notes  CZ selection should match EU shape  Selection of “system” climate zone will use the lowest capacity value CZ for that measure.  Installation schedule starts in Row T (for 12 qtrs)

Residential Tool Output Output Tab  Total Program Costs  Total program impacts  TRC and PAC results (lifecycle and levelized) BC Ratios are approximations  Net Impacts by year  Net Impacts by Sector (res non-issue)  Net Impacts by Climate Zone  Net Impacts by measure  Net Impacts by month (out 20 years)

Non-Residential Tool Input Tab  Same as residential tool with a few additions… Target Sector (Col C) is used Because of the form of PG&E’s data, all measure EU shapes are not available for all Target Sectors, so Column F indicates when mismatches occur. Summer Peak kW savings (Col P) will be needed when an TOU costing period based shape is used.

Pre-processing

Calculators Make use of Pre- Processed End Use Shapes Pre-processing allows for the detail from the hourly avoided costs and the hourly end use shapes to be captured, while streamlining program design and evaluation. Pre-processing basically takes a normalized end use load shape and multiples it against the hourly avoided costs. The resulting hourly benefits are then summed into four quarters for each year of the 20 year forecast period. For each year, 8760 hourly values are condensed to four values. Because the load shape information and the cost information are multiplied at the hourly level BEFORE summation into quarters, there is NO loss of precision. The quarterly benefits by end use (and by climate zone) are the building blocks for the cost effectiveness evaluation in the Calculators. For those cases where hourly load shapes do not exist, TOU values were used. TOU will be less precise. Both methods are described in more detail in the following two slides.

Pre-processing – Hourly Loads Hourly Shapes (by sector, measure, CZ)  Multiply against 8760hr x 30yr x 10Climate zones (if shapes applies to all CZs)  Calculate avoided costs by quarter for each shape Generation (Energy and Capacity combined) T&D Capacity  Calculate Average Monthly Peak and Non-coincident peaks for 12 months Average monthly peak is the average load during the five highest system hours for each month. Non-coincident peak is the highest load during the month.

Pre-processing: TOU Factors TOU Costing Period Factors  Average hourly avoided energy costs across TOU periods Separate implied generation capacity from all-in market price for Non-Res  Sum hourly capacity costs across TOU periods.  Calculate avoided costs by quarter for each shape Generation net energy Generation capacity (for non-Residential) T&D Capacity  Calculate Monthly Average and Non-coincident Peaks Residential  Monthly average: Smr Pk or Wtr Ptl demand, based on kWh H-factor  Non-coincident: largest average seasonal demand, based on kWh H- factor Non-Residential  Monthly average: use Smr Pk and Wtr Ptl TOU factors for Smr and Wtr quarters  Non-coincident: Use highest of seasonal TOU Factors