Harvard iGEM 2005: Team BioWire and BioLoserz!!! LOL Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Avin Tamsir, Jeffrey J. Tabor & Christopher A. Voight.
Advertisements

A SYNTHETIC GENE- METABOLIC OSCILLATOR Reviewed by Fei Chen.
VICTORIA HSIAO 1 Bacterial Edge Detector UT AUSTIN / UCSF IGEM Charles Darwin, immortalized.
An Intro To Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits Uri Alon Presented by: Sharon Harel.
Simulation of Prokaryotic Genetic Circuits Jonny Wells and Jimmy Bai.
Davidson College Synth-Aces Tamar Odle (’08), Oscar Hernandez (’06), Kristen DeCelle (’06), Andrew Drysdale (’07), Matt Gemberling (’06), and Nick Cain.
Programmed population control by cell-cell communication and regulated killing Lingchong You, Robert Sidney Cox III, Ron Weiss & Frances H. Arnold Programmed.
Synthetic Biology = design and engineering of biological systems that aren’t found in nature Why would we want to do this? - Want to understand natural.
Flashing Bacteria Morgan Haskell Coby Turner. What We Wanted To Do  University of California in San Diego  Biological synchronized clocks  Flash to.
Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks Guet et. al. Andrew Goodrich Charles Feng.
BioWire Progress Report Week Nine Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
“Engineering modular and orthogonal genetic logic gates for robust digital-like synthetic biology” Baojun Wang, Richard I Kitney, Nicolas Joly & Martin.
Synthetic Biology and iGEM Cambridge iGEM2007 team 27 July 2007.
PROJECT REVIEW BERKELEY 2006: ADDRESSABLE CONJUNCTION IN BACTERIAL NETWORKS Fei Chen.
BioWire Progress Report Week Four Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
Programming Bacteria for Optimization of Genetic Circuits.
First Institute of Higher Education in Modern China Since 1895 A World-class, Progressive, and Multidisciplinary Research University.
Synthetic biology: New engineering rules for emerging discipline Andrianantoandro E; Basu S; Karig D K; Weiss R. Molecular Systems Biology 2006.
Morgan Haskell Coby Turner Dan Karkos. Jeff Hasty and team  University of California in San Diego Biological synchronized clocks ○ Flash to keep time.
Manipulating DNA.
MURI Pattern Detection Circuits
The Programming of a Cell By L Varin and N Kharma Biology and Computer Engineering Departments Concordia University.
IGEM 2006 PRESENTATION The NCBS Team : Adil, Aparna, Ashesh, Dhanya, Krithiga, Ruchi, Sugat and Mukund
Imperial Starting off: Week 1 Week 1 Engineering/Biology Introduction Lectures Journal Club WikiBrainstorming 3 ideas.
1/45. 2/45 1. Tri-Stable Switch 2. Lead Detector 3. iGEM Community.
Genetic Circuit Challenge Workshop Thursday 24 Nov 2011 Bentham seminar room 1.
Why synthetic Biology? Reverse Engineering vs. Forward engineering: »Synthetic replicas of natural genetic circuits.
Imperial College iGEM Jamboree MIT – Nov 4th 2006.
1 Gene Regulation Organisms have lots of genetic information, but they don’t necessarily want to use all of it (or use it fully) at one particular time.
Melbourne Uni What is iGEM? International Genetically Engineered Machine competition Started in 2003 within MIT.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Synthetic Biology = design and engineering of biological systems that aren’t found in nature Why would we want to do this? - Want to understand natural.
Manipulating DNA. Scientists use their knowledge of the structure of DNA and its chemical properties to study and change DNA molecules Different techniques.
Engineering a Molecular Predation Oscillator Thanks to staff from Imperial College for the support over.
The University of Arizona. The A Team Students Patrick Hollinger Brian Heinze Josh Kittleson Tim Spriggs Tyler Brown Dan Reavis Kevin MacDow Carlos Chang.
Harvard iGEM 2005: Team BioWire Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
Last Week Determined that our YFP reporter (used in the receiver) is a defective part Re-ordered a working YFP and began reconstruction using the new YFP.
Programmed population control by cell-cell communication and regulated killing Lingchong You, Robert Sidney Cox III, Ron Weiss & Frances H. Arnold Programmed.
Toward in vivo Digital Circuits Ron Weiss, George Homsy, Tom Knight MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
Harvard iGEM 2006 Cyanobacterial Oscillator From cyanobacteria......to E. coli Photosynthetic Circadian rhythm Evolved over billions of years Model organism.
BioWire Progress Report Week Four Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
Nathan Reyna, Biology Jeff Matocha, Computer Science Ouachita Baptist University Kentuck-E. Derby.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Standardization in Engineering Parts –Categorization –Community agrees on properties –Characterization of function –Quality control Assembly –Creates efficiencies.
Quorum Sensing iGEM2007. Target (eg Nickel) luxI OHHL luxR.
Harvard iGEM 2005: Team BioWire and BioLoserz!!! LOL Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Imperial. Starting off: Week 1 Week 1 Engineering/Biology Introduction Lectures Journal Club WikiBrainstorming 3 ideas.
BioWire Progress Report Week Two Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Paula Nunes, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
Brown iGEM international genetically engineered machines competition August Update 1/55.
IGEM 2005: Team BioWire and BioLoserz!!! LOL Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
Encapsulation for Drug Delivery Encapsulation for Drug Delivery 31 st July iGEM Team 2009 Charles Dave Dineka James Kun Nuri Royah Tianyi.
Cling-E. coli : Bacteria on target Harvard iGEM 2007 Ellenor Brown Stephanie Lo Alex Pickett Sammy Sambu Kevin Shee Perry Tsai Shaunak Vankudre George.
Directed Evolution of a Genetic Circuit 15 February 2008 George McArthur This presentation is primarily based on content taken from the paper “Directed.
BioWire Progress Report Week Six “Halfway There” Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
BioWire Progress Report Week Two Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Paula Nunes, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
BioWire Progress Report Week Six “Halfway There” Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
BioWire Progress Report Week Five Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush.
Fundamentals of Information Sensing, Transmission, and Processing at the Molecular Level in Biological Systems.
2007 Brown iGEM Team 7 undergraduates 7 grad student advisors
Distributed computation: the new wave of synthetic biology devices
Engineering Static and Dynamic Control of Synthetic Pathways
Oscillating Fluorescence in E. coli
A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation
Clever/Descriptive Title
Clever/Descriptive Title
HKUSTers Jean and Winnie
Engineering Biological Systems with Synthetic RNA Molecules
Nicholas S. McCarty, Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro  Trends in Biotechnology 
Presentation transcript:

Harvard iGEM 2005: Team BioWire and BioLoserz!!! LOL Orr Ashenberg, Patrick Bradley, Connie Cheng, Kang-Xing Jin, Danny Popper, Sasha Rush

Project Overview Goal – To engineer a biological “wire” capable of propagating a chemical signal down its length Initial Signal

Project Overview Our Approach – Signal: acyl-homoserine lactones (AHL) used by V. fischeri in quorum sensing – Transmission: pulse is controlled by a genetic incoherent feed-forward loop – Wire: engineered E. coli placed in wire form with agarose stamps

Circuit Design Incoherent feed-forward loop combined with positive feedback – AHL upregulates production of cI, YFP, and LuxI – LuxI produces more AHL molecules – cI represses YFP and LuxI production cI YFP & LuxI AHL Animated line following flow of wire

Circuit Design (This page should include a more macroscopic design of our system, with stuff like sender cells, receiver cells, propagation cells, and how they’re placed in relation to each other, how circuits were cotransformed, etc)

Circuit Construction Constructed with BioBricks using parallel assembly 6 parts assembled in 3 stages (image from parts.mit.edu)

Final Constructs Sender Construct (LVA+): aTc -> AHL J06001 Receiver Test Construct: AHL -> YFP J06000 Receiver Repressor Component: AHL -> cI J06004 Receiver Output+Propagation Component: AHL-> {YFP, AHL}, cI repressible, LVA- J06008

Photolithography Place lines of bacteria down on agar using micropatterned agarose stamps CAD of stamp

Photolithography Stamping process1mm perimeter lines Want picture of agarose stamp, possible master too and PDMS mold CAD design->Master mold using photolithography in cleanroom->Agarose stamp

Key Experiments Senders and Receivers – Testing signal reception in cells laid down with the stamp Propagation Constructs – Testing induction of propagation constructs with AHL

Senders and Receivers AHL producing “sender cells” were combined with “receivers” that fluoresced in response to AHL. Cells were laid down using agarose stamps Senders Receivers

Senders and Receivers Results – Receiver cells fluoresced when laid down with sender cells. – [MOVIE? PICTURE? COOKIE?] Conclusions – Stamping is a viable method of laying down cells in a predetermined pattern for chemical signaling

Propagation Constructs “Propagation cells” included the entire incoherent feed-forward loop/positive feedback system RBS and degradation tags on proteins were varied AHL was added to propagation cells in liquid media to test for induction

Propagation Constructs Results – Issues with noise - cells were either constitutively “on” or “off” regardless of AHL addition – PICTURE Conclusions – Noise and leakiness are inherent in any biological system; synthetic constructs must be able to adjust for this

Challenges Construction – Time consuming nature of circuit construction – Need for rapid and accurate verification of parts with sequencing Organization – Difficulty in keeping track of large numbers of subparts involved in construction – Sasha created a WICKED COOL database to organize the assembly process

Challenges

Achievements Made a helluva lotta parts Learned basic molecular biology techniques Pioneered the up and coming cutting edge field of SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY!!!!!1111one Did some computer modeling… oh wait, we didn’t. Obtained Alain’s credit card number. Heh heh heh.

Future Work Circle Oscillator – Las lactone shares similar pathway with Lux – Lux signal (A): moves both ways – Lux, Las signals (A,B): move unidirectionally BABA ABAB AA BB AA

New Ideas: Toward Oscillators Line Oscillator – “Bounce” a signal back and forth along a line Initial Signal

New Ideas: Toward Oscillators Line Oscillator (design 1) – 1 signaling molecule, 2 types of cells: “End” cells and “Interior” cells – End cells have a longer delay (> 1 interior cell refractory period) between receiving input and generating pulse output END INT

New Ideas: Toward Oscillators Line Oscillator (design 2) – Two signaling molecules A and B Lux with either Las or Rh1 (respond to different variants HSL) – 4 cell types: AB, BA, AA, BB. Cell XY takes input X and pulses Y in response. e.g. AB takes input A and pulses B in response. – Requires 2 signaling molecules but does not require different time scales on end cells. Issues: Crosstalk and BioBricks. ABABBABAAA BB A B