Goal: Use multiple sources of data to make instructional decisions based on students’ learning gap.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Advertisements

Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
How can we collect relevant evidence of student understanding?
Implementing Common Core Mathematics in Long Beach Unified School District Successes & Challenges Anne Oberjuerge K-5 Math Curriculum Leader Becky Afghani.
FAME: Formative Assessment for Michigan Educators A speed dating version!
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
Summer Institutes 2013 Change Teacher Practice Change Student Outcomes.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Assessment Literacy Module
Formative Assessments
Goal Understand the impact on student achievement from effective use of formative assessment, and the role of principals, teachers, and students in that.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
October 2009 Pamela Kaufman, Deerfield, Il DPS 109.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 3.
PUTTING OUR FOOT DOWN TO ACCELERATE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT FROM WITHIN.
Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Hawaii Department of Education Bridging the Gap: Professional Development Protocols “Tools for Schools”
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Pacifika – workshop four Cultivating success. The Learning Progressions Know the DemandsKnow the Learner Know What to Do.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Educators have collaborative and deep conversations about students, standards, essential learnings, student work, primary and secondary resources, rigor,
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
The Value in Formative Assessment Prepared By: Jen Ramos.
Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011.
Balanced Assessment in the Classroom. Review the Balanced Assessment Survey Packet page 26.
Learning Technologies Across Curriculum Mr. Michael Holmes Means, B. (2010). Technology and education change: Focus on student learning. *Journal of Research.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Mathematical Literacy Roland O’Daniel, Jo Ann Mosier KCTM October 2007.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Implementing Formative Assessment Processes: What's Working in Schools and Why it is Working Sophie Snell & Mary Jenatscheck.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
May 8, Let’s Do Some Math 6 cats catch 6 rats in 6 minutes. How many cats will it take to catch 100 rats in 50 minutes?
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
What’s the connection to Ohio’s other initiatives?
Presentation transcript:

Goal: Use multiple sources of data to make instructional decisions based on students’ learning gap

Turn and Talk to your Neighbor ; and share out Definition of Formative Assessment

Formative Assessment/Instructional Process  Formative assessment is a planned process in which assessment elicits evidence of students status, is used by teachers to adjust their on going instructional procedures, or by students to adjust their current learning tactics.  We have also included a data analysis component at Becker Elementary

What does the research say about improving learning outcomes?

Formative Assessment: Why Dawdling Is Dumb Because compelling evidence now exists that formative assessment, when appropriately implemented, has a profound positive impact on students’ learning, to delay in expanding the use of formative assessment short-changes our students educationally and, thereby, demeans our profession. (Popham, 2009)

Desegregated Data Growth and Areas of Support

Assessment for Learning

Keys Strategies of Formative Assessment (across 3 key process and 3 individuals) Where is the learner going? Where the learner is right now? How to get there? Teacher Clarifying and sharing learning intentions Understanding and sharing learning intentions and criteria for success Understanding learning intentions and criteria for success Engineering effective classroom discussions, activities, and task that elicit evidence of learning Providing feedback that moves learning forward Peer Activating learners as instructional resources for one another Learner Activating learners as the owners of their own learning

Concerns Based Adoption Model ( A model to monitor implementation) Stages of Concern Survey IC Maps Level of Use Interview

Process we came up with Set the purpose of our BASE team meeting, what evidence do we have 2. What needs to be accomplished 3. Look at the Core: 1. what is the expectations according to the Iowa CCSS 2. Look at the DOK: what is the level of rigor 4. Clear learning targets and success criteria 5. Plan for pre/post assessment, instruction, intervention

PLC/BASE Team Meeting Data TeamPurpose  Building Awareness for Strategic Excellence  Grade level teachers, specialists, interventionist, lead teacher, literacy coach and principal meet twice a week for 45 minutes for collaborative planning  Alignment of CIA directly to the Iowa Core  Collaboration  Analyze data  Identify relative strengths and weakness  Strategic focus back to the core  Intervention meetings

o Formative Assessment/Instructional Process o Iowa Common Core booklets Iowa Common Core booklets o DOK Guides DOK Guides o Curriculum Guides, Rubrics, Assessments... o Student Work Samples o Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium Practice Items (3 rd – 5 th ) Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium Practice Items (3 rd – 5 th ) Tools used in BASE Team

Data Process  Convergent Data:  SI, DRA2, IA, End of Unit  Grade Level –  Skills Iowa Mastery/Relative strength and weaknesses Skills Iowa Mastery/Relative strength and weaknesses  Individual Class –  Skills Iowa Mastery/Relative strength and weaknesses  Individual Student –  Relative Strength and weaknesses/compare CFA’s to Skills Iowa  Student Conferencing –  Goal setting, skills tutor, and adjusted small group instruction  Student self-assessment  Intervention Meetings –  6 -8 weeks, with CIM and CLM

Convergent Data  Monitoring student growth rate Monitoring student growth rate  Progress Monitoring  Planning for Interventions

Individual Student Data Core + Key Words Individual strength and Needs  Compare personal score to class average  Compare results to convergent data  Compare Across Data Point  Goal setting

Individual Student Conferencing  Writing  Small group  Skills, Strategies, Skills Tutor  Goal setting  Teacher adjusts small group instruction  Progress Monitoring

Student Self-Assessment Student WorkSuccess Criteria

Student Ownership & Transfer How has instruction changed? What evidence is there that students are adjusting their thinking about learning?

Comments, Questions, Thoughts