Reitz Lake TMDL. Goal Setting for Reitz Lake Reasonable Expectations 1 Phase II Adaptive Management MPCA Water Quality Standards 40 µg/L Natural Background.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Amanda Sullivan Environmental Specialist West Virginia Department of Agriculture Carla Hardy Watershed Program Specialist West Virginia Conservation Agency.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
O&G Activities and the Charlie Lake Watershed Presentation by Allan Blair OGC SCEK Fund Workshop June 10, 2004.
Burandt Lake TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Water quality in an urban lake 2/7/2008.
Nutrients and Ecosystems. Fertilizer Application Rates Lawns: kg N/ha/yr Athletic Fields: kg N/ha/yr Pastures (Dairy): kg N/ha/yr.
Agricultural and Biological Engineering SWFREC, UF/IFAS Immokalee.
Togus Pond Development Surveys Lauren Wolpin. Development Overview Shoreland Zoning Regulations Wastewater Disposal Development Survey Buffer Strip Survey.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District in 2013 Claire Bleser September 20, 2012.
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
ESM 202 Eutrophication. US East Coast Source: Issues in Ecology #2 (1998)
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Water Quality as a function of Land Management Practices on Four Kansas Farms William W. Spotts Dr. Donald Huggins.
Mitchell Lake Association 2011 Mark Enochs September 22, 2011.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Golden Lake TMDL Critique Mayank Gupta & Karla Bussen.
Grand Haven Pond Study: An Investigation to Reduce Nutrient Loads and Evaluate Alternative Management Practices in Stormwater Ponds Mark Clark Wetlands.
The Watershed Connection. Stormwater Management: LID Practices |
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Ten Year Plan Update Mitchell Lake Association Annual Meeting September 23, 2010.
Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.
Ed Dunne, Ph.D, Division of Environmental Sciences, SJRWMD P.O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32178; ph:
Nutrient Criteria for the plains regions of Missouri.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 1 – Water Quality Assessment.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Welcome! Medicine Lake Excess Nutrients TMDL Project Steering Committee Meeting #5 May 14, 2009 Photo by: Terrie Christian—President,
STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.
Basics River continuum – transition from headwaters to large river Main variables on life: temperature, bottom type and water chemistry Temperature is.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Water Quality Short Course April 11, 2007 Lake and Reservoir Dynamics Dan Obrecht – UMC
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting
Presentation compiled with unvalidated data.. Began in 1991 as a non-profit organization. Purpose: increasing Albertans’ awareness and understanding of.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Status and Effect of Impervious Area Estimates in the TMDL Presented to the Potomac Watershed Roundtable by Michael S. Rolband P.E., P.W.S., P.W.D., LEED.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
TMDL Critique: MCWD Lakes TMDL – Lake Nokomis, Parley Lake, Lake Virginia, Wassermann Lake Blake Wageman and Lu Zhang BBE 4535.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
Need for Advanced Stormwater Treatment at Lake Tahoe John E. Reuter & Dave Roberts Tahoe TMDL Research Program.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.
An overview and critique of methods
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
Nutrient Criteria Development for Lakes: Minnesota’s Approach & Timeline Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Environmental.
Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed The City of Tallahassee’s Efforts to Reduce Stormwater Pollution Hydrogeology Workshop May 12-13,
Phosphorus Stressor in Lake Champlain Basin Alison Nord, Anna Speed, Ashley Murphy.
Minnesota BMP CHALLENGE SM Workshop WELCOME!. THE MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED All or portions of 38 MN counties 13 major watershed management units ~90%
Phosphorus and Nitrogen in Three Lakes A study of the nutrient status in Lake Erken, Lake Limmaren and Lake Largen.
WATERSHEDS Concepts and Curriculum Review LAKE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Tony Thorpe and Dan Obrecht Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program – Univ. of Missouri.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
2010 Water Quality Monitoring Activities -Medicine Lake -Twin Lake Keith Pilgrim Barr Engineering March 17, 2011 brain huser is great.
TMDL Implementation: Now What?
Yahara River Watershed RCPP
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Lake Clear Victor Castro Eastern Region
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Fishery Census 2005 Carter Lake, Iowa Chris J. Larson
What do we call swimming organisms?
Presentation transcript:

Reitz Lake TMDL

Goal Setting for Reitz Lake Reasonable Expectations 1 Phase II Adaptive Management MPCA Water Quality Standards 40 µg/L Natural Background (Pre-settlement) 26 µg/L Current Conditions 102 µg/L Shallow Lakes = Clear, macrophyte dominated Deep Lakes = Clear, algae dominated; macrophytes in small littoral areas 1 Based on BMPs and current conditions (internal load; macrophytes) 1988 Conditions Nondegradation 109 µg/L CONCENTRATION and/or LOAD 65 µg/L ?

Goal Setting for Reitz Lake Reasonable Expectations 1 Phase II Adaptive Management MPCA Water Quality Standards 60 µg/L Natural Background (Pre-settlement) 47 µg/L Current Conditions 102 µg/L Shallow Lakes = Clear, macrophyte dominated Deep Lakes = Clear, algae dominated; macrophytes in small littoral areas 1 Based on BMPs and current conditions (internal load; macrophytes) 1988 Conditions Nondegradation 109 µg/L CONCENTRATION and/or LOAD 90 µg/L ?

Past Data

Year Total Phosphorus Concentration (  g/L) Chlorophyll-a Concentration (  g/L) Secchi disk transparency (meters) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (mg/L) NA NA NA

Area’s of Concern 4 Internal Loading –Carp –Curly Leaf Pondweed 4 External Loading –Run 0ff –Failing ISTS’s

Internal Loading Sources 4 Problem –Carp –Curley Leaf Pondweed –Shallow “bay” Sediments 4 Possible Solution –Removal Program –Harvesting / Herbicides –Minimize bottom disturbing activity (no wake, dedicated channels, etc.)

Fishery Information

Curley Leaf Example

External Loading Sources 4 Problem –Run off Rural Residential –ISTS 4 Possible Solution –BMP’s (buffer strips, rock inlets, control structures, etc.) –Lake Buffers, Lakescaping –Upgrade failing systems (loan program) and maintaining current systems.

Prioritizing the Culprits: 4 Highest Impacts –Agricultural run off (external) –Internal loading caused by Curley Leaf pondweed and Carp. –ISTS’s 4 Lower Impacts –Wetlands, Developed Area’s, Forest, Atmosphere

Next Steps 4 Complete TMDL –PCA Process 4 Acceptance by EPA 4 Seek Funding

Possible Funding Sources 4 Grants/Loans from MPCA (EPA) 4 County Watershed Dollars 4 Landowners 4 Others?

CONCLUSIONS 4 Internal loading is an important source to Reitz Lake and must be part of any management or implementation plan. 4 Carp and curly leaf pondweed likely play a large role in internal recycling of nutrients. Carp do not reproduce naturally in Reitz Lake due to egg predation by the large panfish population and likely migrate in during high water. 4 The TMDL requires an overall load reduction of approximately 65 to 68% to meet the current State Water Quality Standard. 4 The likely external or watershed sources are agricultural runoff and septic systems.

Questions?