1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RELATED RIGHTS What Goes Out the Door When a Researcher Does? Presented by Gail Norris University of Rochester Office of Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financial Conflict of Interest July 2012 rev
Advertisements

IP MANAGEMENT IN UNIVERSITIES
Invention Disclosures Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual.
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
1 Fiscal Compliance Requirements for Sponsored Programs University of Missouri – St. Louis College of Education March 6, 2009.
Policies and Issues Regarding Intellectual Property Developed at Iowa State University Presentation to Energy Center Grantees/ BECON Users 12/12/03 Kenneth.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Intellectual Property and CRDs February 19, 2015.
History 2002 – Director of research and sponsored program develops IP policy Fall 2002 – Referral to review the policy February 2003 – Faculty affairs.
What we ask in a ROI What it is? Is it related to another invention? Who contributed to making the invention? Who paid for the research? When invention.
1 Project Close-out SPS Round Table January 17, 2006.
Policy On Intellectual Property. Differences With Senate Approved Version Format and structure Definition page is added Consolidates copyright and patent.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Report Submitted by the 2014 Intellectual Property Task Force INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICIES.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Introduction to confidentiality Diana Galpin Research and Innovation Services (R&IS)
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Policy? Guidance? Standard Operating Procedure? Tips on how to achieve compliance with minimum red tape Carolyn Bargoot, Associate Director Post-Award.
Harry Danforth or Sherry A. Cohen Bldg. 003, Rm. 208, BARC-W FAX
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
Technology Transfer at Rice
The proper protocol for grant approval at LCSC GRANT-WRITING 101: INTERNAL PROCEDURES.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
WHO IS WATCHING? WHAT ARE THEY WATCHING? WHY SHOULD I CARE? WHAT SHOULD I DO?
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 3rd October 2013 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2013.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Tips on Routing and Contracts: An Intro for the Campus Research Coordinator Michelle Artmeier Director of Award Services Ron.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
03/10/2008 Terese Rakow, PhD. Postdoctoral Career Development Course March 10, 2008.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
The Basics of the Effort Certification and Reporting Technology (ECRT) System.
Intellectual Property Dr Laura Rush Business Development Manager Research Enterprise Services copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Post-Award basics MATTHEW MOORE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, POST-AWARD OPERATIONS.
1 28 June 2006 © ip21 Limited 2006 Intellectual Property Issues for the Consultant Matthew Dixon, Chartered Patent Attorney, ip21 Limited
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
Lifecycle of an Award Reporting, Close-outs and Audits Michelle Vazin, Vanderbilt University Michele Codd, George Washington University.
CLASP Module Administrative Considerations for PI Movements to or from Peer Institutions.
The Ins and Outs of PI Transfers A departmental administration perspective on faculty moves between institutions Jennifer Cory & Tim Reuter.
Let’s Talk about Intellectual Property Copyright Plagiarism Fair Use.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Technology Transfer Office
So you’ve invented something?
Technology Transfer Office
The Basics of Intellectual Property Reporting
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
Protecting and exploiting research results at Newcastle University Geraint Lewis – Business Development Manager, Research and Enterprise Services
Technology Commercialization Office
OTT, Beltsville Area Harry Danforth or Sherry A. Cohen Bldg. 003, Rm. 208, BARC-W FAX
Partnering with Business and Industry
Managing Property What Principal Investigators and Business Officers need to know Business Services - Rates and Review Team Established February 25, 2015.
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Technology Commercialization, UI, and You
Managing Property What Principal Investigators and Business Officers need to know Business Services - Rates and Review Team Established February 25, 2015.
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND RELATED RIGHTS What Goes Out the Door When a Researcher Does? Presented by Gail Norris University of Rochester Office of Technology Transfer

2 What We Need to Think About – IP and Related Rights  Patents  Research Materials (MTAs)  Copyrights  Grants and other external research awards  Research Data  Research Animals or Equipment  Personnel

3 Questions We’ll Answer  When a researcher leaves, what can he or she take?  What needs to stay at the University?  Once we know the answers to these questions, what do we need to do to ensure that the right property/assets reside in the right place?  We’ll end with a checklist you can use to help you through these issues when the situation arises

4 Is this Really Necessary??  Academic institution and researchers are collaborative – are there really disputes that arise in this area?  Madey v. Duke University  Catalona v. Washington University  Researchers leaving on less than friendly terms means a higher risk of an issue in this area

5 Intellectual Property Covered by a Patent Application or Issued Patent  University owns and inventor gets % of royalties – even if he leaves  If an inventor leaves – he (and his new employer) needs to make sure that he has necessary rights to use the patent if still needed in his research  For patents that are in prosecution and not yet issued – we need to ensure that inventor will be available to cooperate in continued prosecution (good incentive with royalty sharing)

6 Inventions that are Partially Developed at Both Institutions  This is common because of fluid, on-going nature of research  To unravel the issues – important to have some idea of status of the researcher’s work at the time of the job change  Bayh Dole requires correct ownership if inventive work was done with federal funds  Inter-institutional Agreements are the solution to joint patent ownership

7 Research Material  RM that was developed here should be moved to the new place under an MTA  If researcher was working here with material received under an MTA we need to make sure the new employer negotiates a new MTA for the material. Can’t use ours (maybe can assign ours but need to pay attention to terms and intended use)  Involve new employer’s MTA staff asap.

8 Copyrighted Material and Works of Authorship  General Rule – Work for Hire  Textbook exception  Creates some ambiguity with advent of new technology tools  Web based software or other computer software  Audio, visual or written works of authorship used in course curriculum  Teaching modules, resource or other training manuals, etc., etc.  Once identified, we can license use to new employer or choose to let it go

9 External Research Awards  Government Grants and Industry Sponsored Research Agreements  University personnel should talk with the PI who is leaving to discuss status of project  Will the work stay or go with the researcher?  Mutual agreement on what is needed to finish and who will do it. Involve research office of new employer asap.  Consultation with Sponsor and review of terms of agreement necessary

10 Research Data  Most researchers hold onto their research data like it was their baby  Data is typically in lab notebook or on PCs  OMB Circular A-110 specifies that financial records, supporting docs, and all other records pertinent to a federally funded award shall be retained by the institution  That means we need to make sure we have access to the research data (probably true with all sponsored research)...

11 Research Data - Access  We can keep a copy of the data – probably necessary for financial records and reports submitted to sponsor  We can allow researcher to take data but make it available to us as needed  Record-retention period specified  Consider whether data is needed to support pending patent applications

12 Research Animals and Equipment  If Animals will move – may need University Committee on Animal Research (UCAR) approval  Some University policies require quarantine of animals before being accepted into their facilities  Transfer of equipment depends on funds used to purchase it and purpose of equipment  If Fed agency funds – check agency regs and docs  If University or Industry sponsor funds – should stay here as general rule

13 Personnel  In some cases, we need to prepare for the possibility that the researcher may take personnel with him (now or in near future) and anticipate the staffing issues that might create for your department

14 Reverse Engineer if a New Researcher is Coming Here  Check IP terms to make sure researcher has right to use any copyrights or patents owned by former employer  Check documentation for any research materials brought to the University  Check documentation and ascertain grants or other research awards that are being transferred to University  Understand status of any transferred grants or awards to make sure $ and work are properly allocated between the two institutions – complicated – stay tuned

15 Best Practices – Exit Interview (Entrance Interview)  Is the Researcher intending to use any patented, patent-pending or copyrighted works after he leaves? If so, contact OTT  Is the Researcher taking any research material (cell lines, mice, cell/tissue cultures, antibodies, etc.). If so, contact ORPA. ORPA will contact new employer  Is the Researcher the PI on any external grants. If so, you need to understand what the status is of the project ($ and work) and who will complete – Contact ORPA. ORPA will contact new employer  Talk through the issue of research data – especially related to the researcher’s federal grants and make sure we have access to it – ORPA can help  If applicable, consider issues of animal research, equipment and potential personnel loss

16  This presentation will be available on the ORPA website so you can access it to get the Exit Interview slide when you need it  QUESTIONS?